Page 1 of 1
Calling my Shot right now!
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2005 10:54 pm
by Zyclone
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2005 11:27 pm
by chowd103
Players wearing the numbers 2 through 45 will sit in section N5,
while the rest will be behind in section O7. They're nice seats,
but you may still need binoculars."
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2005 11:39 pm
by Jack
It will be New England vs. Seattle (Chicago is a possibility).
In the END, you will be hearing....
There is No Doubt About it.... This New England Team is a DYNASTY!!
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 1:10 am
by rozy
Jack wrote:It will be New England vs. Seattle (Chicago is a possibility).
In the END, you will be hearing....
There is No Doubt About it.... This New England Team is a DYNASTY!!
Concur with exception
New England will be there and will fare no better against Seattle than anyone else in the last few months.
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 3:21 am
by Zyclone
rozy wrote:Jack wrote:It will be New England vs. Seattle (Chicago is a possibility).
In the END, you will be hearing....
There is No Doubt About it.... This New England Team is a DYNASTY!!
Concur with exception
New England will be there and will fare no better against Seattle than anyone else in the last few months.
Who beat Seattle this year?
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 3:30 am
by Mississippi Neck
Zyclone wrote:rozy wrote:Jack wrote:It will be New England vs. Seattle (Chicago is a possibility).
In the END, you will be hearing....
There is No Doubt About it.... This New England Team is a DYNASTY!!
Concur with exception
New England will be there and will fare no better against Seattle than anyone else in the last few months.
Who beat Seattle this year?
Skins did. In Washington.
May be a diff story in Seattle and with, perhaps, Ramsey at QB. But then you may not get there...you may play TBay..and using your logic. Who did TBay beat?
That was a while back and the Hawks were the width of an upright from beating the Skins in reg time.
Just sayin..
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 3:55 am
by Zyclone
Mississippi Neck wrote:Zyclone wrote:rozy wrote:
Concur with exception
New England will be there and will fare no better against Seattle than anyone else in the last few months.
Who beat Seattle this year?
Skins did. In Washington.
May be a diff story in Seattle and with, perhaps, Ramsey at QB. But then you may not get there...you may play TBay..and using your logic. Who did TBay beat?
That was a while back and the Hawks were the width of an upright from beating the Skins in reg time.
Just sayin..
Who got fucked 4 times on bad calls in TB?
Hawks actrually should have beat us even though we out played them. We did get lucky but we were also a Green team at the time.
As I said We will win the NFC and hopefully play the Colts (I want no part of the pats right now)
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 5:43 pm
by DallasFanatic
Zyclone wrote:Mississippi Neck wrote:Zyclone wrote:
Who beat Seattle this year?
Skins did. In Washington.
May be a diff story in Seattle and with, perhaps, Ramsey at QB. But then you may not get there...you may play TBay..and using your logic. Who did TBay beat?
That was a while back and the Hawks were the width of an upright from beating the Skins in reg time.
Just sayin..
Who got fucked 4 times on bad calls in TB?
Hawks actrually should have beat us even though we out played them. We did get lucky but we were also a Green team at the time.
As I said We will win the NFC and hopefully play the Colts (I want no part of the pats right now)
Easy Zyclone. You first have to make it to the playoffs before you win it. Now I know its just the Seagulls, but a division game on the road can never be taken for granted. I agree the Skins are playing some good ball right now and if indeed they do make it to the postseason, they'll be a tough team to beat. I just hope they fall on their faces in Philly.
:D
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 6:31 pm
by G.O.
one thing the skins have going for them is that they are playing better both offensively and defensively than they have all year. up til recently, the O would be good, and the D would let down. more often, it would be the D playing well, and the O would slack. then the O would move the ball, but not score.
70 points in the last 2 games vs 2 pretty good division rival teams while allowing 2 offensive TD's- one in garbage time and another was a fluke tipped ball.
doesnt hurt that they already beat the bears and the hawks- both at home, granted, where they have been a better team. but the skins are a better team than they were earlier in the season.
the skins can play with anyone in the NFC. and dont forget that JOE FREAKIN GIBBS is their coach.
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 6:54 pm
by DallasFanatic
G.O. wrote:one thing the skins have going for them is that they are playing better both offensively and defensively than they have all year. up til recently, the O would be good, and the D would let down. more often, it would be the D playing well, and the O would slack. then the O would move the ball, but not score.
70 points in the last 2 games vs 2 pretty good division rival teams while allowing 2 offensive TD's- one in garbage time and another was a fluke tipped ball.
doesnt hurt that they already beat the bears and the hawks- both at home, granted, where they have been a better team. but the skins are a better team than they were earlier in the season.
the skins can play with anyone in the NFC. and dont forget that JOE FREAKIN GIBBS is their coach.
Hey gwego. I don't want Joey in PB to get on my ass so I want to remind you of a bet we had at the beginning of the season. You said the Skins would finish three games better and I disagreed. Well I'm coming correct and giving you props. I believe the bet was a sig for a month so feel free to slap a sig on me or I'll just leave the current AV up for another month. Let me know.
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:27 pm
by G.O.
DallasFanatic wrote:
Hey gwego. I don't want Joey in PB to get on my ass so I want to remind you of a bet we had at the beginning of the season. You said the Skins would finish three games better and I disagreed. Well I'm coming correct and giving you props. I believe the bet was a sig for a month so feel free to slap a sig on me or I'll just leave the current AV up for another month. Let me know.
i was thinking about that recently- i couldnt remember if i said they'd finish 3 games better or what. i do remember i twice predicted 9-6
hey, i'm right as of this week.
well, for doubting ol coach gibbs, you deserve to wear some kind of sig. let me see what i can come up with.
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:33 pm
by Big Daddy
By no means should we be celebrating. But i must say that I am tickled silly that this team once again is fighting back, even coming from behind. No more quitters! It's nice to be clicking on all cylinders right about now. I do think Brunell needs to be healthy enough to start for us to continue to make progress. If need be P-Ram can take over late to finish the job at hand. I’m noticing more announcers starting to compliment the skins by adding phrases like “that’s what they are doing down in DC right now” referring to power I’s and Power Sweeps and such. Gibbs is bringing old skool football back as we know it. And how brilliant is Greg Williams? This dude is the real deal. He is molding LaVar into a fine tuned machine. I still love it when our D takes the field, it gets me all fired up. In order to get a shot at any Superbowl you’ve GOT to have a Solid and Outstanding Defense!! I like what I’m seeing but, not counting my eggs until they hatch. This team can play with the best of them. In Denver…Lost by a couple, and in KC loosing by a late TD run by Holmes. Taking S.D. to overtime and loosing by a TD run. All of these might have had something to do with a little maturity process by the Defense.
Overall, I’m optimistic we can take a couple of games in the Playoffs as long as Philly doesn’t come up with some miraculous game and we don’t shoot ourselves in the foot.
"Grey 40...Grey 40......."
Let’s get it on!