Page 1 of 3

Call your shot, maggots! Rose Bowl predictions...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 5:44 pm
by Van
Time to put up or shut up.

USC 52
Texas 34

(Texas scores some cosmetic points well after the outcome is no longer in doubt to make the final score look half way respectable.)

There then ensues scattered reports of Mack Brown effigy hanging parties by Longhorn Nation...

Jim Gray will hardly be able to restrain himself until the final gun goes off. Screaming across the filed in a blur of grey polyester blend, he'll tackle Reggie near USC's band and then he'll pull the long stemmed rose from Reggie's piehole and breathlessly ask him the inevitable stupid question: "Reggie, now that you've conquered Texas, have you decided yet to become a Houston Texan next year?????"

"What the f...Who the fuck are you?? Get outta my face! ~Reggie spots the tv cameras~ Ummm, I just want to enjoy this moment with my fellas right now. All I know is I'm gonna go pull some mouseketeer tail at DISNEYLAND!!!"

Just out of spite, Gene Chizik waits until the interview is over and then he runs up and tackles Reggie from behind. He just had to know that such a thing could be accomplished by someone wearing burnt orange...

Matt Leinart waits for his interview with Jim Gray...

"You guys wanna story about me, involving bitches, and slapping? Here's a real one!"

Slap!!, and a bewildered Jim Gray tumbles to the turf...

Traveler XXXVII insouciantly strides over and mounts Bevo. In response, as befits a true Longhorn on this day, Bevo just snorts and wriggles while gleefully offering up the charade of resistance...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 5:51 pm
by Cicero
usc 34
tejas 31

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 5:52 pm
by PSUFAN
UT: 38
USC: 31

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 5:57 pm
by socal
USC 45
Texas 31

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 5:58 pm
by Laxplayer
$C 52
Tex 14

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 6:16 pm
by RadioFan
What I would like to see:

UT - 35
USC - 21

What I think will be seen:

USC - 45
UT - 17


Van, do we have a sig bet on the game? I seem to recall some talk about it several weeks ago, but can't remember if we actually formalized it. It's up to you.

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 6:17 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
USC - 42
Texas - 24

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 6:27 pm
by WolverineSteve
I've been waffeling on this game of late.

UT-53
SC-51 3OT


edited for Dinsdale...35-35 tie...teams trade fg's in ot 1, teams trade td's in ot 2, Texas Scores and converts the mandated 2-point conversion and SC's 2-point conversion fails giving UT the win.

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 6:27 pm
by TheChief
USC - 45
Texas - 28

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 6:29 pm
by See You Next Wednesday
USC 42
UT 31

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 6:37 pm
by Degenerate
USC - 34
Texas - 20

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 6:38 pm
by DiT
UT 37
USC 34

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 6:45 pm
by Nolesy
Texas 41
USC 35

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:09 pm
by Adelpiero
UT 38
USC 34

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:16 pm
by Dinsdale
WolverineSteve wrote:I've been waffeling on this game of late.

UT-53
SC-51 3OT
Did you spend much time waffling about the scenario that leads to a 2 point OT win? That's one hell of a fumble for a safety. The next time I see the team that has the first possession go for 2, will be the first.

This game looks really close on paper. I'll bet the Longhorns wish that the field of the Sacred Ground of the New Year was covered in green paper for the game, since paper is the only place this one is close.

USC - 63
UT - 31

Texas is about to see what a real OLine looks like.

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:22 pm
by Killian
Dinsdale wrote:Did you spend much time waffling about the scenario that leads to a 2 point OT win? That's one hell of a fumble for a safety. The next time I see the team that has the first possession go for 2, will be the first.
Considering you have to go for two starting with the 3rd OT, it's pretty easy to see how you would win by 2. Brush up on the rules.

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:23 pm
by JayDuck
USC - A lot
Texas - Not quite as much

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:26 pm
by Dinsdale
D'OH!

I missed the "3OT" part...just saw OT. My bad. And since I even quoted the "3OT" part, it's my double-secret bad.

In which case, the 2 point scenario becomes more likely, eh?

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:33 pm
by Shoalzie
Aaaah, a game with some meaning... :wink:

I forgot what my initial prediction was right after the matchup was announced...I know I had USC. I'm thinking 31-24, Trojans...M.O.P.=Bush

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:38 pm
by Jimmy Medalions
42-24.

FO

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 7:49 pm
by UCant Unretires Again
After being down 35-0 at halftime... Texas wins 49-45:

USC blocks a potential game tying field goal on the last play of the game... a Texas player picks up the ball behind the line of scrimmage and runs it in for a TD.

Greatest game ever.

:lol:

I'm taking The Horns and 7 points... that's all I really care about.

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 8:25 pm
by War Stoops
Fiftyfivetonineteeners - 45
Fourtyfivetotwelvers - 30

:x

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 8:30 pm
by Dinsdale
UCant Unretires Again wrote:I'm taking The Horns and 7 points... that's all I really care about.
Was the O/U at 13.5, so you could take that, too?

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 8:31 pm
by buckeye_in_sc
Sorry SC fans:

we played Texas and well I just this smacking of 2002...

Texas 34
Southern Cal 27

I think the Texas defense is too much...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 8:40 pm
by Van
WolverineSteve wrote:I've been waffeling on this game of late.

UT-53
SC-51 3OT


edited for Dinsdale...35-35 tie...teams trade fg's in ot 1, teams trade td's in ot 2, Texas Scores and converts the mandated 2-point conversion and SC's 2-point conversion fails giving UT the win.
If this actually occurs I will take a leave of absence from my job, catch a plane to Wolverine Nation, hunt you down and stab you in the neck with a shard from a rusty stripper's pole.

A triple O.T. loss in the Rose Bowl bookending our last loss 35 games ago (in triple O.T. to Cal) would just be too hard to take.

I'd have to blame you.

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 8:43 pm
by Van
diT wrote:UT 37
USC 34
Dude, you know your heart ain't in that pick...

:lol:

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 8:44 pm
by Van
Degenerate wrote:USC - 34
Texas - 20
Yes, but here's the key thing: Will this loss prove to be a moral victory for Texas??

8)

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 8:51 pm
by Van
buckeye_in_sc wrote:Sorry SC fans:

we played Texas and well I just this smacking of 2002...

Texas 34
Southern Cal 27

I think the Texas defense is too much...
USC isn't comprised of a bunch of overconfident, overbearing thugs. (That'd be us fans, actually.)

Actually, according to VY, it's Texas who has the gangstas. USC? They're the dilligent, forthright pretty boys, remember?

In terms of personalities I see Texas as being Miami and USC as being OSU...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 10:30 pm
by At Large
This game is the typical media/fan mistake. They pump up the greatness of this year's team without bothering to stop and realize that last year's team was better. USC's defense has given up double digits in every single game this year, including 42 to Fresno State. Texas just seems to be the better rounded team this time. Maybe I'm crazy, but I'm calling

Texas 38
USC 28

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 10:31 pm
by Mr T
Another Big XII blowout....

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 11:12 pm
by War Wagon
Texas - 52
USC - 31

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 12:04 am
by Vito Corleone
Vito 45
Van 33

The only analysis that matters is this game

Texas is 64-0 when they out rush their opponent
USC is 1-3 under Carroll when facing duel-threat QBs.
Vince is the greatest duel-threat QB ever.

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 12:49 am
by Van
Vito Corleone wrote:Vito 45
Van 33
LOL!!

We're playing now??

I wonder how that'd go, one on one football between two old never was's...

The Moveable Object vs The Resistible Force!

Fuck it. I'd put money down on Vito and then bet the house on Vito to cover. I'll take the $$, he can have the ruptured groin.
The only analysis that matters is this game
Riveting analysis. Fuggen genius take. Awe......Awe.
Texas is 64-0 when they out rush their opponent
Good thing then that USC is going to outrush Texas.
USC is 1-3 under Carroll when facing duel-threat QBs.
Huh??

They've lost one game in three seasons, and that was three years ago in triple O.T., to Aaron Rodgers and Cal. They lost that one during Leinart's first season at the helm and they lost it on the road, as a result of shitty kicking.

Last I checked, Rodgers wasn't a dual threat QB.

Four years ago they lost two games and both of those were also on the road and the result of placekicking miscues.

Man, you're reaching.
Vince is the greatest duel-threat QB ever.
Great. While we're at let it be known that France boasts the greatest Gallic military of the 21st century.

Whats next? Jewish sports heroes?

Then again, if VY is going to challenge us to a couple duels, hey, he is the "gangsta" so maybe he'll get the drop on us...

Vito, exactly how old are you anyway??

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 1:02 am
by MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan
Well, since I picked 72 for the total score in the pick em, I'll go with

UT 41
SC 31

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 3:16 am
by Dinsdale
Van wrote:
USC is 1-3 under Carroll when facing duel-threat QBs.
Huh??
Kellen Clemens was like #3 in all of D1 in total offense when he got hurt. Plenty'o'rushing yards. That must have been the 1 win, I guess.

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 3:38 am
by PrimeX
My team- 52
The hosers team- 35

Hours of sleep I'll get after the game- Probably cover at 2.5.

Hours of work I will get done the next day- :lol: Like that ever happens.

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 3:43 am
by Adelpiero
it's very hard to pick tejas, just look at the shit Vito posts :meds: :meds:

best dual threat QB ever. get the fuck out of here retard. there are guys who did it over 1 year, remember last year, when Vince got the hook 2 times that season??? or the meltdowns vs OU 2 years, being benched at home vs MU.



he had a very good season, but to claim best ever, man what a tard.

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 4:01 am
by Dinsdale
Dude, this is America. Whatever happened THIS year is ALWAYS the superlative "biggest/best/greatest" ever.

Hell, all of a sudden, Katrina became the "biggest natural disaster in US history!"

The Asian Tsunami of a year ago is the "biggest natural disaster in HUMAN history"...nevermind that China has had many, many, many worse ones...but they didn't happen in the last year, so there's no way they can be the "biggest ever."

And to annoint VY as the all-time best of anything...he didn't even win the best player award for this year...do the math.

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 4:08 am
by Vito Corleone
Adelpiero wrote:it's very hard to pick tejas, just look at the shit Vito posts :meds: :meds:

best dual threat QB ever. get the fuck out of here retard. there are guys who did it over 1 year, remember last year, when Vince got the hook 2 times that season??? or the meltdowns vs OU 2 years, being benched at home vs MU.



he had a very good season, but to claim best ever, man what a tard.
Take a look at what Vince did this year against Mizz!
Since taking over as the starter he has 2 losses, hell brad had that many in his first 6 games as a starter. You can talk all you want about his passing last year but this ain't last year and his improvement to the point that he leads the nation in passing efficiency is as remarkable as anything I have ever seen. At this point in his career there has never been a QB that can both run and pass like him. Not Tommie Frazier, Jamal Holloway, Steve McNair, Donavan McNabb, or anyone. The closest guy is actually Steve Young who is a better passer, but is no where near the runner.

USC will find out soon enough

Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 4:14 am
by Adelpiero
Your comparing Young to S.Young as comparibles? buwahahahahaha!



wow, can USC and Tejas play to a tie??Please?