T1B

For insulting me? :)

I was dumpster diving in Fraudos Bathhouse and found this link:


http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyan ... 22491.html


Just another fine example of the B.A. stepping on and crushing the life out of our first amendment rights.

(C) makes a telephone call or utilizes a telecommunications device, whether or not conversation or communication ensues, without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person at the called number or who receives the communications;
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html ... -000-.html

Just to inform the board generally, I do not intend to annoy anyone hare.

Really.

If you become annoyed, it's just a unfortunate side effect of you being dumb as fuck.









Fuck it, I'm calling my lawyer first thing in the morning.

mvscal wrote:

Mister Bushice wrote:Just another fine example of the B.A. stepping on and crushing the life out of our first amendment rights.

Arlen Specter is not a member of the Bush Administration nor is he an ally of the administration.

Bullshit.

mvscal wrote:You must be an exceptionally dense form of tard. Specter has continually been at odds with the BA and rank and file Republicans wouldn't be too distressed to see Specter get hit by a bus.

He is the RINO archetype.

What part of Specter sponsored the bill and Bush signed it are you not getting?

mvscal wrote:I get what happened. You very clearly do not. Not a shock given the fact that you're a total dumbfuck.

To grease the rails for this idea, Sen. Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican, and the section's other sponsors slipped it into an unrelated, must-pass bill to fund the Department of Justice. The plan: to make it politically infeasible for politicians to oppose the measure.

To which Bush's position should have been to veto the entire bill, highlight the offending portions and kick the whole fucker back to Congress to fix. Or did you forget the Contract With America already?

mvscal wrote:It doesn't work that way in the real world, douchebag.

And never has. The only way to stop this shit is with a line item veto.

The reason why it doesn't work is because Bush and Specter AGREE on this issue. Show me just once where Bush has ever come down on the side of personal liberty.

Sorry mvscal, but he had options he did not take. He could have stood up to them and vetoed it like Bsmack said, forcing them to remove it. He could have gone the Clinton route and told the Justice department not to prosecute any cases related to internet pests, like yourself.


You'd better be nice to me. I'm the sensitive type, easily offended. :)

Specter and Bush...those damned liberals.

Feeling stupid yet, self-proclaimed "conservatives?"

I knew you'd slime out of it somehow.

I'll get you next time, Gadget.