Who had "17 Paki civilians" in the death pool?

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Mon Jan 16, 2006 4:00 am

Way to drum up support for the enemy, Rummy.

I think it is unAmerican and "emboldeding" the enemy to continually support this douchebag that keeps fucking things up.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Mon Jan 16, 2006 11:19 am

Bizzarofelice wrote:Way to drum up support for the enemy, Rummy.

I think it is unAmerican and "emboldeding" the enemy to continually support this douchebag that keeps fucking things up.

Look bud, this "War On Terror" isn't going to fight itself, you know.

Rummy's just making sure that both sides remain competative.
Think along the line of Little League. Everybody gets a turn at bat.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Mon Jan 16, 2006 2:17 pm

but it seems almost like "affirmative action" the way the powerful US balances the playing field by helping the opposition with their recruitment quotas.

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:08 pm

Who had "17 Paki civilians" in the death pool?

A total bungle by our side, but you do realize that "Paki" is essentially calling a Pakistani a mvscal, right?

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:57 pm

OCmike wrote:
Who had "17 Paki civilians" in the death pool?
but you do realize that "Paki" is essentially calling a Pakistani a mvscal, right?

No. I brought hope to the enemy by dropping it in the title of this thread, eh?

The Flaming Lips wrote:Do you realize?

Wolfman · Post by **Wolfman** » Tue Jan 17, 2006 2:53 am

let me think about this---
top dog in Al Qaida is invited to
a "party" to which I'm also invited ???
If I have nothing to do with terrorism---

IF I'M NOT THERE --
START WITHOUT ME !!!!

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Tue Jan 17, 2006 3:22 am

Better 17 swarthy Pakis than 3,000 American Goddam Patriots goddammit.

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Tue Jan 17, 2006 3:42 am

WTF kind of justification is that?

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Tue Jan 17, 2006 3:48 am

Are you with us or against us?

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Tue Jan 17, 2006 6:20 am

Depends on if killing innocent civilians is being with you or not.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Tue Jan 17, 2006 6:48 am

What about 3,000 innocent Americans?
Somebody has got to to pay.

Why do you hate Patriotism?

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:56 am

So you justify killing innocent pakistani infants, women and children as payback for 911?

Doesn't that make you pretty much the same as those who support the terorrists who flew into the towers?

It's one thing to gun down a bombpacking insurgent. continually fucking up intelligence reports and blowing up innocent civilians and writing it off as "part of the war on terror and payback for -11" is just terrorism in a different coat.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Tue Jan 17, 2006 6:48 pm

mvscal wrote:
Mister Bushice wrote:So you justify killing innocent pakistani infants, women and children as payback for 911?

Who says we killed "infants"?

Great point. They were all future terrorists.

All Paki women need to have their uterus' wombs ripped out for harboring the enemy.

Solo · Post by **Solo** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 9:03 pm

Looks like one of the innocent civilians was al qaeda's chemical weapons expert.

http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/Investigation ... id=1517986

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 9:38 pm

Good. I hope the Paki protesters hear this, feel stupid and walk sullenly back home*

*shack.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 10:47 pm

The proper lesson in all this is "See what happens when you harbor these Al-Quaeda fucks in your shit-hole village?"

Instead of regretting the loss of these Pakistani jerkoffs lives, we should be promising more of the same- and delivering

T1B

Who had "17 Paki civilians" in the death pool?

Who had "17 Paki civilians" in the death pool?

Re: Who had "17 Paki civilians" in the death pool?