Page 1 of 1
Ahem.... Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 1:11 pm
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 6:17 pm
by Cuda
Just in case anybody doesn't think I called my shot...
http://www.theoneboard.com/board/viewto ... ngy#133477
Cuda wrote:Rushville wrote:Hapday wrote:
Manning is a great QB, but he still has a lot to prove.
No argument with that.
Sorry to break this to you, fat boy, but Manning will remain a big-game loser as long as he's playing for a coach who is a big-game loser.
Dungy was a big-game loser at Tampa Bay and he's still a big-game loser at Indy.
Any time any of you fuckos want to be educated about football, feel free to shut the fuck up & listen to me
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 6:26 pm
by BBMarley
Hmmm.. predicting that a coach who has repeatedly chocked in the big game was going to do it again. Yeah- you're a football GOD! Way to step out on a limb and take a chance on a prediction.
If you had said in the preseason that the Bears were a lock for the #2 seed- I might give your argument some credit.
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 6:36 pm
by Cicero
Sorry Cudes. I live in Tampa, and I knew that 3 years ago. Good effort though.
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:59 pm
by PSUFAN
rack cuda
Re: Ahem.... Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 1:11 pm
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 8:57 pm
by Truman
Cuda wrote:Just in case anybody doesn't think I called my shot...
http://www.theoneboard.com/board/viewto ... ngy#133477
Cuda wrote:Rushville wrote:
No argument with that.
Sorry to break this to you, fat boy, but Manning will remain a big-game loser as long as he's playing for a coach who is a big-game loser.
Dungy was a big-game loser at Tampa Bay and he's still a big-game loser at Indy.
Blind squirrels and acorns....
Cuda wrote:Any time any of you fuckos want to be educated about football, feel free to shut the fuck up & listen to me
http://www.theoneboard.com/board/viewto ... highlight=
"The Chefs finish 10-6? BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. That's something only a True Fan would say. Don't confuse my Queef bashing with being any sort of a fan of the Broncos or any other pro team. You look at these things wearing blinders and rose colored glasses. I look at them with cold, hard analysis and a bit of history-based intuition.
I don't see any likely scenario where the Chefs finish 10-6, nor do I see any likely scenario where they don't finish at least a game or two behind the Chargers. The only likely scenario I see for the Chefs is for them to end up no better than 3rd in the division- and even that depends more on how the Raiders second half of the season goes than how the Chefs final 8 games end up."
Bulls-ear, Catnip. :roll:
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 9:30 pm
by Dumbass
Yes, master. I do see a few flaws in my prognosticating.
Damn, are we sick of how damn good I am yet? :wink:
Dumbass wrote:Panthers OVER Steelers
Indy's grasp on home field will be lost come the 2nd half of the season.
The NFC is a pile of garbage but as long as CAR doesn't face Vick, they will cruise into the Super Bowl. If they have to see Vick and the ATL defense, I will be one nervous mofo. Vick has become more controllable as the games have passed so we'll see if they finally get a win over him real soon.
The AFC isn't exactly spectacular (with probably 1 or 2 championship caliber teams more than the NFC) and Indy's schedule (1/6 AFC opponents with a winning record) has been absolutely pathetic with the best teams they have faced being somewhat depleted. They are still good but I am not sold by any means and not riding the undefeated bandwagon. If they lose homefield and have to go to Pittsburgh, they will get shredded and James will be getting stuffed at the line. Indy's rushing defense is not what it needs to be to win a title.
The Steelers have a solid chance of running the table from here on out as long as Roth comes back for the Indy game. I am not sure how long he is out but Batch can't screw it up enough for this team not to win over Cleveland and Baltimore. I mean, he's not Anthony Wright, right? When PIT goes into Indy they'll know what's up and that game will be for homefield in the AFC. The only team I think PIT really needs to be concerned with come playoff time appears to be Denver but they should be hosting them. I think Denver will be able to run on PIT a bit better than most but good old Jake should rise to the occasion and go into choke mode and thow that 4th qtr pick that will get PIT over.
The Broncos have been putting down some solid defenses but I will take the run defense of PIT anyday, especially at home. I don't think the Broncos have enough to hold onto a homefield record with all the potential playoff teams on their schedule.
Come SB, CAR will not go there again only to lose. They will not face a team as good as NWE's championship teams and they can put the kind of pressure on Ben, in the big game that will force him into mistakes. I think both run games wll be strugging for yardage but PIT should get the edge unless Foster really finds his full speed stride and power. When the pressure is on and it really needs to fly, Jake will be connecting to Smith to validate his MVP status in the big one and Proehl will show his value yet again.
Fucking Panthers!
viewtopic.php?t=11160&highlight=
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 10:09 pm
by Cuda
Leave it to RuPaul3.0 & Truvestite to totally miss the point of what they quoted.
And since hints are totally lost on the two of you, I'll just go ahead & tell you the key word in that quote was "likely"... well, the unlikely happened- and the sad fact (for you) is that the Chefs' season record did[/i] depend more on Oakland's final 8 games than their own.
Oh, and, Paula, you are the last fucking person who ought to be making KYOA references- especially toward me. I'm only human, so kicking my own ass is at least a theoretical possibility, but Paula, dear, YOU KYOA virtually every time you click submit.
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 10:51 pm
by Truman
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 11:55 pm
by Cuda
Oh, I point out what the important distinction of what YOU quoted, and I'm the one spinning?
Dumb Fuck + Chef Fan = Redundant
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 12:20 am
by War Wagon
Cuda wrote:
Dumb Fuck + Chef Fan = Redundant
Let's check the replay.
-Coods said that the "law of averages" would catch up to KC.
-Coods said that KC would lose to the Donks at Arrowhead.
-Coods said that KC would lose to the Blots at Arrowhead.
-Coods said that KC would lose 3 of their last 4.
-Coods said that KC wouldn't finish 10-6
-Ergo, Coods is more "likely" the dumbfuck.
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 12:32 am
by BBMarley
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 1:18 am
by Adelpiero
Looks like Cuda is another Kreskin, those picks are nailz
Re: Ahem.... Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 1:11 pm
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 1:38 am
by War Wagon
Yeah, but...
Cuda wrote:
Any time any of you fuckos want to be educated about football, feel free to shut the fuck up & listen to me
Great stuff.
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 1:39 am
by MSUFAN
War Wagon wrote:Cuda wrote:
Dumb Fuck + Chef Fan = Redundant
Let's check the replay.
-Coods said that the "law of averages" would catch up to KC.
-Coods said that KC would lose to the Donks at Arrowhead.
-Coods said that KC would lose to the Blots at Arrowhead.
-Coods said that KC would lose 3 of their last 4.
-Coods said that KC wouldn't finish 10-6
-Ergo, Coods is more "likely" the dumbfuck.
Ya know; yer one a the bigger twats at T1B, but;
I gotta rack that blast. :o
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 2:02 am
by Truman
Momma always said to never argue with anyone dumb enough to eat gourds….
Cuda wrote:
“It depends on what your definition of is, is.”
Parse much, Mule-for-Brains? But to answer your question:
Yes. You’re spinning worse than a
New York Times syndicated columnist.
This is about to end verruh badly for you (again) sCuds. Let’s start by examining your “math”. No stretch here, I reckon, for a ‘tard who claims to speak “reading comprehension”
:
”Dumb Fuck + Chef Fan = Redundant”
Clearly, the irony is beyond your capabilities. Lemme break it down for you:
“Chef Fan” = “Truman”
“Dumb Fuck” = “Cuda”
“Redundant” = The usual butchering you receive every time you open your muzzle.
BTW,
I decide the “important distinctions” here…
"The Chefs finish 10-6? BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. That's something only a True Fan would say. Don't confuse my Queef bashing with being any sort of a fan of the Broncos or any other pro team. You look at these things wearing blinders and rose colored glasses. I look at them with cold, hard analysis and a bit of history-based intuition.
I don't see any likely scenario where the Chefs finish 10-6, nor do I see any likely scenario where they don't finish at least a game or two behind the Chargers. The only likely scenario I see for the Chefs is for them to end up no better than 3rd in the division - and even that depends more on how the Raiders second half of the season goes than how the Chefs final 8 games end up."
"Props" -
I guess - for your Marcus-like take on Dungy, but you tripped all over your clit where the Chiefs were concerned.
Had your li’l prognostication come to fruition, you’da been all over ChiefFan like the smegma on your prepubescent vulva.
It didn’t.
Now have a seat, sCuds...
...And take a deeeeep breath!
War Pittsvilleh
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 2:58 am
by War Wagon
Truman wrote:
This is about to end verruh badly for you (again) sCuds.
Not quite the results Cunta most "likely" envisioned when she started this thread, I'll warrant.
Rack the blasts, Tru.
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 3:28 am
by Truman
War Wagon wrote:Truman wrote:
This is about to end verruh badly for you (again) sCuds.
Not quite the results Cunta most "likely" envisioned when she started this thread, I'll warrant.
Rack the blasts, Tru.
Naw, rack
your Replay, Wags...
Hell, I might've been content to hand ol' sCuds a free pass on this here thread had the only thing missing from his boast been the obligatory "Rack me now, Jim."
But like Hitler's Germany, sCuds falls short of understanding his limitations. 'Specially since we all know that battling ChiefFan with conventional weapons could take years and cost millions of lives.
Then again, you'd probably be looking for validation too from a buncha strangers on a message board if you spent your days tasting choad samples from spent prophylactics like sCuds clearly does....
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 3:41 am
by MuchoBulls
Cicero wrote:Sorry Cudes. I live in Tampa, and I knew that 3 years ago. Good effort though.
Do the Dungy Dance.
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 4:56 pm
by Cicero
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 6:13 pm
by Cuda
OK, so let's just analyze this:
In the AFC I went 50% on the division winners and in the AFC West, I correctly predicted the Chefs finishing behind Denver.
As for the NFC, unforseeable events along with a large measure of disinterest in the NFC fucked everything up.
RuPaul3.0 also went 50% in the AFC & .000 in the NFC however I must point out that the Chefs not only finished behind Denver, they failed to make the playoffs
Marley: Made no pre-season predictions
TardWagon: Also made no pre-season predictions
Truvestite: Made no pre-season predictions either
So the three of you can feel free to shut the fuck up at your earliest convenience. You can pick up your NFL Forum Bitch I.D. Cards at the door on your way out, and please try not to suck any cocks on your way through the parking lot
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 10:01 pm
by War Wagon
Hey Cunt
Just because I didn't waste time predicting the entire NFL's outcome in that thread doesn't mean I didn't make predictions.
I predicted the Chiefs (the only team I care about) would go 11-5 and win the AFC West. So I was wrong. Sue me. Tell ya' what though, if my prediction in August had been correct, I damn sure wouldn't have gone back 5 months trying to find that topic so I could start a new thread pounding my chest about what a football genius I am.
Fucking Loser.
Here's a prediction for next season.
The Chiefs will go 12-4 and win the AFC West, but you'll still be a snivelling cunt.
How you like them apples?
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 10:29 pm
by Cuda
Tard Wagon wrote:Hey Cunt
Just because I didn't waste time predicting the entire NFL's outcome in that thread doesn't mean I didn't make predictions.
Actually, that's exactly what it means you fucking moron.
Tell ya' what though, if my prediction in August had been correct, I damn sure wouldn't have gone back 5 months trying to find that topic so I could start a new thread pounding my chest about what a football genius I am.
Well, no, you wouldn't very well be able to do that- seeing as how every post you've made in the subsequent 5 months not only illustrates an absolute lack of knowledge (and not just about football, but just about everything else too), and puts your pre-season predictions in the same category as the ones made by a dart-throwing monkey.
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 11:20 pm
by Cuda
Dart-Throwing Monkey 3.0 says what?
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 11:45 pm
by War Wagon
Speaking of dart throwing monkeys, I don't recall YOU participating in any of the many pick 'em games we play around here.
Now why is that, do you suppose?
Everybody get's one guess, so here's mine.
Cuda would flame out so badly (and she knows it), she'd puss out and go milk carton half-way thru the season to avoid being listed under xtremeplzr in the standings the rest of the way.
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 11:52 pm
by Cuda
War Wagon wrote:Speaking of dart throwing monkeys, I don't recall YOU participating in any of the many pick 'em games we play around here.
Now why is that, do you suppose?
Most likely is was due to a profound lack of interest on my part.
Everybody get's one guess, so here's mine. etc, etc, etc,...
And opinions are like assholes... etc, etc, etc
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 5:07 pm
by Cuda
I'd have thought you'd be flattered by that, Paula.
It isn't often you get up-compared
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 5:42 am
by Truman
Cuda wrote:OK, so let's just analyze this:
Great idea! Let’s start by seeing if you have a brain in your head!
sCuda wrote:In the AFC I went 50% on the division winners and in the AFC West, I correctly predicted the Chefs finishing behind Denver.
‘Cept you kinda missed the part where the Chiefs finished
second, not fourth. And you predicted the Mules to finish
freaking third! And you want props for this?!
sCuda wrote:…I must point out that the Chefs not only finished behind Denver, they failed to make the playoffs.
Epic take! You da' Man!
Sin,
sCuda wrote:Truvestite: Made no pre-season predictions either
I didn’t post on this Board pre-season. I did, however, post mid-season. Other than opining that a 10-6 Chiefs record would be good enough to make the playoffs, I pretty much nailed my prediction.
How did YOU do mid-season? Care to wow us with more San Diego tie-breakers? :roll:
sCuda wrote:So the three of you can feel free to shut the fuck up at your earliest convenience. You can pick up your NFL Forum Bitch I.D. Cards at the door on your way out, and please try not to suck any cocks on your way through the parking lot
Weak, sCud’s, weak… Hey! Try mixing in some
smack next time! Hell, I’m sure that Scott or C- Mike or Bri or even James might have some extra lying around somewhere that you can borrow!
Can’t speak for Wags, but I’m supremely confident that he could very easily chase you from your own lame-ass thread should he take the notion.
As for Ol’ Tru… Trust me, sCuds, I’m not opposed to setting you straight,
mano o’ tardo (
oh, and you’re the 'tardo in this mix, ‘case you wondered…)
Just so you know: Truman never loses.
Ever.
War Pittstownh
