Hillary tries to appeal to the black masses.

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Tue Jan 17, 2006 2:18 pm

Billary

Easily the most corrupt and self serving person in politics today. Instead of glorifying a great man, she uses the podium to try and help her get the black vote come 2008. The GOP is run like a plantation? Someone needs to take her out.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue Jan 17, 2006 2:23 pm

Her remarks were met with thunderous applause by a mostly black audience at the Canaan Baptist Church of Christ in Harlem.

You were saying?

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Tue Jan 17, 2006 2:51 pm

Easily the most corrupt and self serving person in politics today

Link?
I mean, the GOP is looking many corruption scandals square in the eye right now. Considering that, and that the energy bill was written by energy lobbyists, how can Hillary be the most corrupt and self-serving?

I'd just like you to think about right-wing talking head rhetoric before rehashing it.

Hillary appealing to the black masses wrote: If you make $250,000 a year and don't have children, you should vote Republican. All others get on board.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Tue Jan 17, 2006 3:20 pm

So Hillary has the support of the black community. Does that mean anything for her, politically? The Dems have to still be smarting from the lack of voter turnout in '04.

Wolfman · Post by **Wolfman** » Tue Jan 17, 2006 6:57 pm

Is it time to consider renaming the federal holiday--perhaps instead of Martin Luther King Day, it should just be described as Free-Flowing Democratic Invective Day? After a few more vituperative holidays like this, will the Newts and Kemps be forced to apologize to the conservatives who opposed the holiday? After all, it hasn’t exactly been a boon for American racial unity and brotherhood, with Hillary and Al Sharpton exchanging plantation metaphors.
--thanks to NRO

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:43 am

Schmitt nailed it....

"RNC spokeswoman Tracey Schmitt said: “On a day when Americans are focused on the legacy of Martin Luther King, Hillary Clinton is focused on the legacy of Hillary Clinton.”

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:49 am

ChargerMike wrote:Schmitt nailed it....

"RNC spokeswoman Tracey Schmitt said: “On a day when Americans are focused on the legacy of Martin Luther King, Hillary Clinton is focused on the legacy of Hillary Clinton.”

Bull Schmitt

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Wed Jan 18, 2006 2:25 am

ChargerMike wrote: "RNC spokeswoman Tracey Schmitt said: “On a day when Americans are focused on the legacy of Martin Luther King..."

Oh please...

The RNC is soooo "back-of-the-bus" they're practically skitching.

Gunslinger · Post by **Gunslinger** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 3:40 am

ChargerMike wrote:Schmitt nailed it....

"RNC spokeswoman Tracey Schmitt said: “On a day when Americans are focused on the legacy of Martin Luther King, Hillary Clinton is focused on the legacy of Hillary Clinton.”

Yeh, instead of focusing on MLK Day, this fuck was out looking for others who say stupid fucking shit.

We are all on to your game, go fuck off!

If it was said by a democrat their would be public outrage!

Look you dumbfuck, you are creating the fucking outrage.

Fucking cavemen!

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 2:25 pm

Cicero wrote:Billary

Easily the most corrupt and self serving person in politics today. Instead of glorifying a great man, she uses the podium to try and help her get the black vote come 2008. The GOP is run like a plantation? Someone needs to take her out.

What did you think when Newt said the same kind of thing?

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 4:31 pm

mvscal wrote:
PSUFAN wrote: The Dems have to still be smarting from the lack of voter turnout in '04.
There was no lack of turnout in 04, dumbfuck.

So turnout in traditionaly Democratic voting blocks was the same as that in traditionaly GOP blocks?

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 5:39 pm

mvscal wrote:Shut the fuck up, moron.

Election Turnout in 2004 Was Highest Since 1968

By Brian Faler
Saturday, January 15, 2005; Page A05

The final numbers are in -- and turnout in the 2004 presidential election, it seems, was a bit more impressive than previously believed.

The Committee for the Study of the American Electorate reported yesterday that more than 122 million people voted in the November election, a number that translates into the highest turnout -- 60.7 percent -- since 1968.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar ... Jan14.html

You dodged the question. No surprise.

So turnout in traditionaly Democratic voting blocks was the same as that in traditionaly GOP blocks?

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 7:32 pm

mvscal wrote:Turnout was up across the board.

Sen John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) took 48.3 percent, or 59,028,550 votes. That was about 8 million more than Al Gore won in 2000.
You'll have to find some other lame excuse.

Son of a...that's going to leave a mark. - B_Smack

Terry in Crapchester · Fri Jan 20, 2006 7:37 pm

Martyred wrote:
ChargerMike wrote: "RNC spokeswoman Tracey Schmitt said: “On a day when Americans are focused on the legacy of Martin Luther King..."
Oh please...

The RNC is soooo "back-of-the-bus" they're practically skitching.

The Republican "outrage" at the use of the plantation comparison is so feigned it's pathetic. A look at several prominent Republicans who have made the exact same comparison: http://mediamatters.org/items/200601190008

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:18 pm

Cicero wrote: Someone needs to take her out.

Why don't you? I think you'd make a cute couple.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:48 pm

mvscal wrote:Turnout was up across the board.

Sen John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) took 48.3 percent, or 59,028,550 votes. That was about 8 million more than Al Gore won in 2000.
You'll have to find some other lame excuse.

I guess you're just incapable of answering the fucking question, I did not ask wether turnout was up accross the board, I asked wether turnout in core democratic constituencies was the same as that for core GOP constituencies. Your own data would indicate that it was not.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Fri Jan 20, 2006 11:45 pm

mvscal wrote: In short, you morons don't know what the fuck you're doing and there is no sign of any lightbulbs going on and, come November, you're going be scratching your head and wondering what the fuck went wrong...again.

I don't know about this next November. Traditionally, the party not in the White House makes gains during the mid-terms. I'd expect that to some extent in '06.

But in November 2008, if the Dems are stoopid enough to nominate Billary, there will definitely be much head scratching, hair pulling, and gnashing of teeth going on.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Sat Jan 21, 2006 12:07 am

^^^^^^

Yup.

The wife of the former War Criminal In Chief, and Iraq War Supporter.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Sat Jan 21, 2006 12:18 am

mvscal wrote:
War Wagon wrote: Traditionally, the party not in the White House makes gains during the mid-terms. I'd expect that to some extent in '06.

That's what they said last midterm.

Last midterm, your country's Pampers were still sagging from the assload that was your 9/11
meltdown.

T1B

Hillary tries to appeal to the black masses.

Hillary tries to appeal to the black masses.

Re: Hillary tries to appeal to the black masses.

Re: Hillary tries to appeal to the black masses.