HighSchool Boys basketball on National TV?
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 1:46 am
(Defering to mods, wether this belongs in CBB forum)
I'm not sure I understand what Good there can be by showing a nationally televised game of 16 and 17 year olds playing basketball.
And the thought that Duke Vitale is rollin around these sites to do these games, scares me a bit. Why would HE need to be doing the broadcast?
Wed. night, (18th)- some kid who's signed with UNC and some other kid who's going the Dook route, were playing a High School game. And ESPN2 was there to bring it ALL to you. All 5 camera angles!
Can anyone seriously build an argument FOR this new trend?
A few years ago. I (and others) contemplated what would happen when they start showing High School games on National TV. ESPN being the obvious leader in this department. I remember saying that since College games were such HUGE $$ makers, the HS game can't be far behind. We've seen it the last year or so, in HS football. ESPN started doing tape delay broadcasts.
Others argued that it'd never happen. They exploit the 18+ year olds in college enough, no way will they allow the corporate greed mongers to go into High Schools. Little Billy barely has any hair on his nads, yet the team is getting pressure to wear Addida's for their big TV game this friday?!
I don't get it. Why must we trash the last real amature sports known to the U.S. public? And, believe me, in due time, the greedy corporations will trash it. They'll use and abuse the players, coaches and teams. Anything to make a buck.
HIGH School!? I'm stumped.
Someone help me out here.
Oh, btw, PLEEEEEEEEASE don't go the "Gymnastics -Figure Skating - Tennis - Golfer" route, ok? I don't want to hear that crap. We're talking BIGTIME TV broadcasts, of bigtime sports. That make bigtime dollars. Not side sports played by individual phenoms.
Thanks.
I'm not sure I understand what Good there can be by showing a nationally televised game of 16 and 17 year olds playing basketball.
And the thought that Duke Vitale is rollin around these sites to do these games, scares me a bit. Why would HE need to be doing the broadcast?
Wed. night, (18th)- some kid who's signed with UNC and some other kid who's going the Dook route, were playing a High School game. And ESPN2 was there to bring it ALL to you. All 5 camera angles!
Can anyone seriously build an argument FOR this new trend?
A few years ago. I (and others) contemplated what would happen when they start showing High School games on National TV. ESPN being the obvious leader in this department. I remember saying that since College games were such HUGE $$ makers, the HS game can't be far behind. We've seen it the last year or so, in HS football. ESPN started doing tape delay broadcasts.
Others argued that it'd never happen. They exploit the 18+ year olds in college enough, no way will they allow the corporate greed mongers to go into High Schools. Little Billy barely has any hair on his nads, yet the team is getting pressure to wear Addida's for their big TV game this friday?!
I don't get it. Why must we trash the last real amature sports known to the U.S. public? And, believe me, in due time, the greedy corporations will trash it. They'll use and abuse the players, coaches and teams. Anything to make a buck.
HIGH School!? I'm stumped.
Someone help me out here.
Oh, btw, PLEEEEEEEEASE don't go the "Gymnastics -Figure Skating - Tennis - Golfer" route, ok? I don't want to hear that crap. We're talking BIGTIME TV broadcasts, of bigtime sports. That make bigtime dollars. Not side sports played by individual phenoms.
Thanks.