T1B

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 8:12 pm**

Denver will take it!

m2

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 8:26 pm**

I'm listening at work... can't watch it. Was Parker's knee down?

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 8:29 pm**

BBMarley wrote:I'm listening at work... can't watch it. Was Parker's knee down?

No, but Denver was robbed. His hand hit the ground first with the ball... and it started coming loose before his forearm hit the ground.

It was a fumble... bad call.

m2

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 8:32 pm**

Can't say as I didn't see it... but after that call last week the refs are going to be very careful about overturning a Pitt turnover.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 8:33 pm**

Bad overrule.

Fumble.

Screws put to Dungver early.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 8:40 pm**

Steelers not finding much with their running game so far.

Could spell trouble later.

sayin'

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 8:44 pm**

They didn't want to hear any shit over it this week. LOL.

Ball's bouncing PIT's way.

Now it's in Jake's hands.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:08 pm**

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:WRONG- IT WAS NOT A FUMBLE. Parker had control of the ball when his ENTIRE FOREARM landed on the ground, and the ground cannot cause a fumble.

P.S.- FUCK the Mules.

Concur on both points.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:12 pm**

I thought they said the ground can not cause it if the player is not down by contact and that the elbow did not make him down by contact.

Oh well, I don't care, not my game.
I don't think it is going to matter much anyway. PIT will close this one out by a comfortable margin.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:15 pm**

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:WRONG- IT WAS NOT A FUMBLE. Parker had control of the ball when his ENTIRE FOREARM landed on the ground, and the ground cannot cause a fumble.

P.S.- FUCK the Mules.

I thought if the player is not called down, then the ground can cause it- since his knee wasn't down, he would not have been down by contact and it was a fumble.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:16 pm**

Dumbass wrote:I thought they said the ground can not cause it if the player is not down by contact and that the elbow did not make him down by contact.

Oh well, I don't care, not my game.
I don't think it is going to matter much anyway. PIT will close this one out by a comfortable margin.

Yeah- what he said... :D

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:21 pm**

That's my Jake. This one about to be put away in the first half.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:26 pm**

Alright, I am gonna go get stupid.
See ya on the other end and I expect to be happy.
I am so far.
$

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:27 pm**

Hit the road, Jake.....and take that wack ass beard with you.

Beardo

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:32 pm**

Denver D has yet to stop Pitt. 4 drives, 4 scores.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:36 pm**

Denver had another good season, but their oline and QB are not nearly as good as when they won the Super Bowl.

Oh yeah & NE didn't give last weeks game away.....

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:42 pm**

m2 wrote:Denver will take it!

m2

Take it ........ where??

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:45 pm**

King Crimson wrote:Denver D has yet to stop Pitt. 4 drives, 4 scores.

That's what's most troubling.......

The question is how long will I be able to endure the Nantz/Simms Squeeler suck fest....

not long I'll bet....

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:46 pm**

Jack wrote:
m2 wrote:Denver will take it!

m2
Take it ........ where??

Thanks for the out! :wink:

Still 1 half to go... it's not over yet.

m2

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 10:18 pm**

We've got a ballgame!

24-10

m2

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 10:49 pm**

Red wrote:Mark my words: Denver is going to win the Super Bowl.

The parallels between this year's team and the 1998 Championship team are uncanny, to wit:

The 1998 Broncos and the 2005 Broncos each lost to both the Dolphins and the Giants.

In 1998 the best offensive team in the NFL, the Vikings, had their playoff run end when their kicker (who hadn't missed a FG all season) shanked a FG that would have given them the win. It would have been a great matchup, but I think the Vikings would have beaten the Broncos that year.

In 2005 the best offensive team in the NFL, the Colts, had their playoff run end when their kicker (who hadn't missed a FG at home all season) shanked a FG that would have given them a tie and forced overtime. Indy was the consensus pick to win it all this year.

In 1998 Denver's leading receiver, Rod Smith had 86 catches and scored 6 touchdowns.

In 2005 Denver's leading receiver, Rod Smith had 85 catches and scored 6 touchdowns.

Both the 1998 and 2005 Broncos were the #2 rushing teams in the league.

Unreal. Detroit, here we come.

The 1998 squad had Elway and Davis.

Prime time offensive studs.

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 10:57 pm**

Nice hurry-up offense by Denver...

Game over

m2

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 11:01 pm**

Jerome need to hang onto da Ball, man!

Christ! Jerome!

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 11:02 pm**

TD Big Ben.

34-17

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 11:04 pm**

m2 wrote:
BBMarley wrote:I'm listening at work... can't watch it. Was Parker's knee down?
No, but Denver was robbed. His hand hit the ground first with the ball... and it started coming loose before his forearm hit the ground.

It was a fumble... bad call.

m2

Huh? The ball is NOT coming out. It hits teh ground THEN comes out. Were you working the booth at the Steeler game last week too??

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 11:08 pm**

T REX wrote:
m2 wrote:
BBMarley wrote:I'm listening at work... can't watch it. Was Parker's knee down?
No, but Denver was robbed. His hand hit the ground first with the ball... and it started coming loose before his forearm hit the ground.

It was a fumble... bad call.

m2
Huh? The ball is NOT coming out. It hits teh ground THEN comes out. Were you working the booth at the Steeler game last week too??

If the ball hits the ground and comes loose before the knee or elbow hits... it's a fumble.

m2

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 11:24 pm**

every break that could go their way-did....but no doubt they were the better team

props to the Steelers......

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 11:28 pm**

m2 wrote:
T REX wrote:
m2 wrote: No, but Denver was robbed. His hand hit the ground first with the ball... and it started coming loose before his forearm hit the ground.

It was a fumble... bad call.

m2
Huh? The ball is NOT coming out. It hits teh ground THEN comes out. Were you working the booth at the Steeler game last week too??
If the ball hits the ground and comes loose before the knee or elbow hits... it's a fumble.

m2

The ball didn't come out before the entire lower arm, all the way to the elbow, did hit the ground. Clean your contacts. The wind must have them a little dry.

Kubiak announcement tomorrow. :D

Posted: **Sun Jan 22, 2006 11:38 pm**

The MAIN thing is; that the NFL can NOW breathe a sigh of relief, that nobody even knew what the refs name was. They got all the reviews right. Dudes elbow was down.

Unlike Morelli, that dumbass Colt homer.

Look for Pittsburg to BLAST whoever wins the JV game tonight.

Posted: **Mon Jan 23, 2006 12:22 am**

Normally, I'd tend to root for the NFC team in the SB, unless it's a divisional rival
of the 'Skins, or a team that knocks 'em out of the playoffs.
That being said,
GO STEELERS!!!

Posted: **Mon Jan 23, 2006 12:26 am**

m2 wrote:If the ball hits the ground and comes loose before the knee or elbow hits... it's a fumble.

m2

Ya' missed another part of the body... the forearm.
Idiot.

Rack my home team. Goin' to Detroit.

Posted: **Mon Jan 23, 2006 12:34 am**

Ken wrote:
m2 wrote:If the ball hits the ground and comes loose before the knee or elbow hits... it's a fumble.

m2
Ya' missed another part of the body... the forearm.
Idiot.

Rack my home team. Goin' to Detroit.

Shit for brains...

The forearm doesn't bend from the hand to the elbow... moron!!!

If the forearm hits the turf... so does the elbow!

the truth

Posted: **Mon Jan 23, 2006 12:59 am**

m2 wrote:Shit for brains... The forearm doesn't bend from the hand to the elbow... moron!!!

The next time you're spanking one out in the comfort of your treehouse, look down at your wrist.

Posted: **Mon Jan 23, 2006 1:04 am**

m2 wrote:Shit for brains...

The forearm doesn't bend from the hand to the elbow... moron!!!

If the forearm hits the turf... so does the elbow!

the truth

Just when I thought it couldn't get worse than your first post of the thread, you find a way.

I shouldn't be surprised, to be honest.

Posted: **Mon Jan 23, 2006 1:05 am**

BSmack wrote:
m2 wrote:Shit for brains... The forearm doesn't bend from the hand to the elbow... moron!!!
The next time you're spanking one out in the comfort of your treehouse, look down at your wrist.

Why?

Did the wrist become part of the elbow in western NY... recently?

If your wrist hits the ground... you're not down!

the truth

Posted: **Mon Jan 23, 2006 1:52 am**

m2 wrote:Why?

Did the wrist become part of the elbow in western NY... recently?

If your wrist hits the ground... you're not down!

the truth

You said the forearm doesn't bend from the HAND to the ELBOW. Between the hand and the elbow is the WRIST and the forearm.

Are we clear now? Or do you plan on digging deeper?

Posted: **Mon Jan 23, 2006 2:12 am**

Clean up... aisle 3.

Posted: **Mon Jan 23, 2006 3:05 am**

T1B

Denver v. Pittsburgh... In Game

Denver v. Pittsburgh... In Game

Re: Denver v. Pittsburgh... In Game

Re: Denver v. Pittsburgh... In Game