T1B

Posted: **Sat Feb 11, 2006 10:27 am**

uh-huh

Posted: **Sat Feb 11, 2006 6:03 pm**

OOOOH. THAT Jack Abramoff

Posted: **Sat Feb 11, 2006 9:29 pm**

So what is that supposed to prove, exactly?

That politicians have their pictures taken with thousands of people every year?

Or maybe that Bush was drunk and thought the guy said his name was Jack Ameehoff?

Posted: **Sat Feb 11, 2006 9:34 pm**

Cuda wrote:So what is that supposed to prove, exactly?

That politicians have their pictures taken with thousands of people every year?

Or maybe that Bush was drunk and thought the guy said his name was Jack Ameehoff?

Oh yea, thousands of people just trapse into the Oval Office arm in arm with the President of the United States for a solo photo shoot.

Posted: **Sat Feb 11, 2006 10:23 pm**

BSmack wrote:
Cuda wrote:So what is that supposed to prove, exactly?

That politicians have their pictures taken with thousands of people every year?

Or maybe that Bush was drunk and thought the guy said his name was Jack Ameehoff?
Oh yea, thousands of people just trapse into the Oval Office arm in arm with the President of the United States for a solo photo shoot.

You mean you haven't?

Posted: **Sun Feb 12, 2006 12:37 am**

What's the pic got to do with Harry Reid 's upcoming indictment anyway?

Posted: **Sun Feb 12, 2006 2:11 am**

Diogenes wrote:What's the pic got to do with Harry Reid 's upcoming indictment anyway?

For receiving lawful campaign contributions? Don't hold your breath.

Psst. Duke Cunningham is the exception.

Posted: **Sun Feb 12, 2006 4:08 am**

Degenerate wrote:
Diogenes wrote:What's the pic got to do with Harry Reid 's upcoming indictment anyway?
For receiving lawful campaign contributions? Don't hold your breath.

Psst. Duke Cunningham is the exception.

So then Abrahamoff isn't going to bring the whole GOP conference down with him?

What a relief.

Posted: **Sun Feb 12, 2006 6:23 pm**

BSmack wrote:
Cuda wrote:So what is that supposed to prove, exactly?

That politicians have their pictures taken with thousands of people every year?

Or maybe that Bush was drunk and thought the guy said his name was Jack Ameehoff?
Oh yea, thousands of people just trapse into the Oval Office arm in arm with the President of the United States for a solo photo shoot.

Some day, on some website, somewhere on the internet, maybe something will NOT go right over your head.

Clueless fuckbat.

Posted: **Sun Feb 12, 2006 8:29 pm**

Clinton brings a cunt into the white house to get a hummer.

Bush brings a cunt into the white house to offer him congrats for his clever scheming.

BODE Clinton.

Posted: **Sun Feb 12, 2006 8:39 pm**

PSUFAN wrote:Clinton brings a cunt into the white house to get a hummer.

...and then commits perjury, subornation of perjury and obstruction of justice over said cunt.

But aside from his hobby as a sexual predetor and his attempts to conceal it, isn't recieveing illegal campaign donations from representatives from the PRC (in exchange for missile technology) a little more problematic than from those representing gaming casinos?

Not for a Dem, I guess.

Posted: **Sun Feb 12, 2006 8:52 pm**

I doubt any of that really happened, Dio.

Posted: **Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:09 pm**

Diogenes wrote:...isn't recieveing illegal campaign donations from representatives from the PRC (in exchange for missile technology) a little more problematic than from those representing gaming casinos?

Now, now...remember what we talked about the other week, little chickenhawk?

Posted: **Mon Feb 13, 2006 2:33 am**

PSUFAN wrote:I doubt any of that really happened, Dio.

Then you are either superbly uninformed or pathologicly partisan.

Or both.

Posted: **Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:34 pm**

PSUFAN wrote:I doubt any of that really happened, Dio.

I laughed.

That, to me, is no different than Cheney having the power companies and oil companies set US energy policy.

Same shit, different administration.

T1B

Jack Abramoff? I don't know any "Jack Abramoff"...

Jack Abramoff? I don't know any "Jack Abramoff"...