Page 1 of 1
The Oxford Group On Iran
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 10:33 pm
by Dr_Phibes
Here is an interesting paper on the consequences of bombing Iran from an English Research Group:
Lengthy, but a good read
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 11:29 pm
by Mikey
mvscal wrote: Or do you think insurgencies grow trees?
Nurseries grow trees.
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 11:52 pm
by Cuda
The Oxford Group?
Quote a bunch of drunks much, Phibes?
THE OXFORD GROUP CONNECTION
This article is an effort to put together in sequence the various events that took place in the years from 1908 to 1935 which made possible the meeting in Akron, Ohio between the AA founders, Dr. Bob Smith and Bill Wilson, and which resulted in the subsequent birth of Alcoholics Anonymous. It is an assemblage of facts gleaned from the following publications:
Alcoholics Anonymous
AA Comes of Age
Pass It On
Dr. Bob and the Good Old Timers
Not God (by Ernest Kurtz)
For Sinners Only (by A.J. Russell)
On the Tail of a Comet (by Garth Lean)
Akron Genesis of Alcoholics Anonymous (by Dick B.)
The Oxford Group & Alcoholics Anonymous (by Dick B.)
You could use a 12-step plan to quit smoking dicks, Phibes
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 1:18 am
by Felix
Cuda wrote:The Oxford Group?
Quote a bunch of drunks much, Phibes?
not that it's any of my business cuda, but that's not the group you're looking for
http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/
ywia
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 3:44 am
by Dr_Phibes
mvscal wrote:We are already at war with Iran. Those idiots should have taken that into consideration. Or do you think insurgencies grow on trees?
Wake the fuck up.
Nonsense. This policy was phase-lined before the war even started, so you can stick that. I thought it was a sobor (sorry Cuda, different Oxford Group - best leave getting drunk and sucking dicks to the American version) write up, no mention of flip-flopping swiftboating Islamofascists and blamegamey Zio-kikes.
The point of larger escalation, rather than surgical Balkanisation being likely is spot on. There is no real strategic advantage to be won and Isreal is put in a dangerous position. If the US commits to keeping a lid on the region long term - everyone else sits back and watches while you bleed yourself.
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 9:29 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
mvscal wrote:
But there are plenty of them to be lost if we permit a nuclear armed Iran.
Consider a glowing, glass-like Israel as a tax cut.
You Americans all like tax cuts, don't you?
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 11:37 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
mvscal wrote:I'm not in the least bit concerned with Israel.
Yes you are. America's gag reflex.
mvscal wrote:Why are you constantly obsessing over them? It's beyond neurotic.
I'm trying to save you, my naive, southern cousins.