T1B

As per Diogenes....

PM him, I'm sure he will cover all bets.....

Pac-10


5-1 Thru Saturday.....


dogenies=stupit

The Seer wrote:Pac-10


5-1 Thru Saturday.....


dogenies=stupit

You just figured this out?

Mikey wrote:

The Seer wrote:Pac-10


5-1 Thru Saturday.....


dogenies=stupit

You just figured this out?

No, bettingonAztecstowinafuckinggame=stupit.

Diogenes=inyourdomenomattertheforum

But anyway thanks for the tribute thread, Pac10 boy.


Seriously, as a "Seer" you suck (or maybe I just missed all the bold insightful predictions you made in this forum), and BTW so does the Pac10 (still).And you can't even handle the quote function worth a damn.

Diogenes wrote:The pac 10 still sucks horse cocks.

They'll be history by the end of round 2.

If you're going to have quotes in the title of the thread you might want to make it something I actually said (either statement will do).

Of course I posted this before the seedings were out, I should have added that they would (as usual) get seeded undeservedly high.

Be that as it may, speaking of the best team in your conferance being totally fucking overrated (as if almost getting rolled by a 10 seed wasn't enough)...

The "Seer" wrote:Look for Bruins to dispose of Cal and get a #2 seeding out West and earn a Sweet Sixteen at worst, an Elite Eight more optimistically....

So a 2 seed if they are lucky can make the Elite Eight? Nice confidence there, way to prop your boys. BTW, 1975 is calling, they wanted to let you know John Wooden is retiring at the end of the season.

After which your Teddy Bears will have exactly one championship and two final four appearances in the next 30 years. Your entire conferance 2 championships and six appearances over the same span. The ACC for example(who will have the same number of invites to the tourney when 2006 rolls around for the rest of us), will not be represented in the final four only seven times, four differant teams will win titles and Duke alone will have 3 championships and eight appearances (in both cases, more than your entire fucking conferance)over the same time span.

Did I mention that, here and now, the PAC 10 still sucks?

And for the record they are history. They just don't know it yet. UConn will stomp the Huskies, UCLA will choke to Gonzaga, and the Wildcats are already toast.

Sig Bet on all three occuring?

Either that or STFU, your choice.

Dogenius, you began this "discussion" with your unsolicited, unprovoked, ill-informed, ignorant, foolish comment about " the Pac-10 sucks"..

Facts got in the way. You are dumb. Sorry......

So you're basicly clueless and a pussy?

Fair enough, you're officially dismissed.




For the record, you suck at the whole 'call out thread' concept as well.

Also for the record, the comment was 'the Pac10 still sucks'

Diogenes wrote:

Diogenes wrote:The pac 10

They'll be history by the end of round 2.

If you're going to have quotes in the title of the thread you might want to make it something I actually said (either statement will do).

You'd be hardpressed to display a better example of

KYOA....

Meanwhile...only one Big Ten team left.

Overrated!
clap clap clap clap clap
Overrated!
clap clap clap clap clap
Overrated!
clap clap clap clap clap

Diogenes wrote:
Of course I posted this before the seedings were out, I should have added that they would (as usual) get seeded undeservedly high.

Of course you should have mentioned that you always reserve the right to backpedal whenever it suits your purpose.

Mikey wrote:

Diogenes wrote:
Of course I posted this before the seedings were out, I should have added that they would (as usual) get seeded undeservedly high.

Of course you should have mentioned that you always reserve the right to backpedal whenever it suits your purpose.

Nice game in the NIT... Mikey!


m2

m2 wrote:

Mikey wrote:

Diogenes wrote:
Of course I posted this before the seedings were out, I should have added that they would (as usual) get seeded undeservedly high.

Of course you should have mentioned that you always reserve the right to backpedal whenever it suits your purpose.

Nice game in the NIT... Mikey!


m2

WGARA?

This is about the NCAA Tourney, isn't it?

Nobody could have done any worse than your Bears in this one.

Mikey wrote:

m2 wrote:

Mikey wrote: Of course you should have mentioned that you always reserve the right to backpedal whenever it suits your purpose.

Nice game in the NIT... Mikey!


m2

WGARA?

This is about the NCAA Tourney, isn't it?

Nobody could have done any worse than your Bears in this one.

Yeah the Bears played like crap, and lost to NC state which had a better record and plays in the ACC, but they didn't lose to some correctional school from missouri in the NIT.


m2

Mikey wrote:

Diogenes wrote:
Of course I posted this before the seedings were out, I should have added that they would (as usual) get seeded undeservedly high.

Of course you should have mentioned that you always reserve the right to backpedal whenever it suits your purpose.

Of course you are full of shit as usual. No 'backpedeling', bitch, I made an off the cuff comment before the seedings were even out, and was cvloser to the truth than PAC10 fan is comfortable with. The point is that 1) I never even made the claim that is quoted in the title 2) So far you have the top two teams in the conferance (the only two which actually rated an invite by any criteria aside from TV ratings) barely squeaking by a couple mediocre teams, the third place team eliminated, and the remaining scrub geting stomped later today.

And the two survivors (which is all they are) will be dismissed next round.

And just like you, the Pac 10 still sucks.

Diogenes wrote:

Mikey wrote:

Diogenes wrote:
Of course I posted this before the seedings were out, I should have added that they would (as usual) get seeded undeservedly high.

Of course you should have mentioned that you always reserve the right to backpedal whenever it suits your purpose.

Of course you are full of shit as usual. No 'backpedeling', bitch, I made an off the cuff comment before the seedings were even out, and was cvloser to the truth than PAC10 fan is comfortable with.

The point is that 1) I never even made the claim that is quoted in the title 2) So far you have the top two teams in the conferance (the only two which actually rated an invite by any criteria aside from TV ratings) barely squeaking by a couple mediocre teams, the third place team eliminated, and the remaining scrub geting stomped later today.

And the two survivors (which is all they are) will be dismissed next round.

And just like you, the Pac 10 still sucks.

No, the point is that you made a statement that the Pac 10 will be history by the end of round 2. Now you're saying either that you didn't *really mean it* or that you *would have been right* if not for those evil paid off atheists who made the seedings and that the two teams *only squeaked by*.

Either way you were wrong and you're now backpedaling -- bitch.

You seem to have a deep seated hate for everything on the West Coast, and especially everything in San Diego. Why do you even stay here? You'd probably be a lot happier if you'd just move to, say, Topeka or something.

Mikey wrote:

Diogenes wrote:

Mikey wrote: Of course you should have mentioned that you always reserve the right to backpedal whenever it suits your purpose.

Of course you are full of shit as usual. No 'backpedeling', bitch, I made an off the cuff comment before the seedings were even out, and was cvloser to the truth than PAC10 fan is comfortable with.

The point is that 1) I never even made the claim that is quoted in the title 2) So far you have the top two teams in the conferance (the only two which actually rated an invite by any criteria aside from TV ratings) barely squeaking by a couple mediocre teams, the third place team eliminated, and the remaining scrub geting stomped later today.

And the two survivors (which is all they are) will be dismissed next round.

And just like you, the Pac 10 still sucks.

No, the point is that you made a statement that the Pac 10 will be history by the end of round 2.

Diogenes wrote:And for the record they are history. They just don't know it yet. UConn will stomp the Huskies, UCLA will choke to Gonzaga, and the Wildcats are already toast.

Sig Bet on all three occuring?

Either that or STFU, your choice.

You seem to have a deep seated hate for everything on the West Coast, and especially everything in San Diego. Why do you even stay here? You'd probably be a lot happier if you'd just move to, say, Topeka or somethin

And considering your 'deep seated hate for everything' about America, you'd be more comfortable in Canada.

Have a nice trip and enjoy the Hockey.

Diogenes wrote:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

You are a waste of time and space, and you're breathing air that could be put to much better use.

Why don't you off yourself now while the time is ripe?

[color=violet]Mikey[/color] wrote:

For the record, I will give credit where due.

Arizona at least had the nads to schedule some quality opponents this season, the experiance is undoubtadly why they are still around.

Compared to the Teddy Bears' OOC schedule...

New Mexico St W
Temple W
Delaware St. W
at Memphis L
Drexel W
Albany W
Coppin St. W
Nevada W
at Michigan W
Wagner W
CS Sacramento W
West Virginia L

Still not fucking impressed, there is no fucking way they rate a 2 seed.

Diogenes wrote:

[color=violet]Mikey[/color] wrote:

For the record, I will give credit where due.

Arizona at least had the nads to schedule some quality opponents this season, the experiance is undoubtadly why they are still around.

Compared to the Teddy Bears' OOC schedule...

Temple
at Memphis
Albany
Nevada
at Michigan
West Virginia

Still not fucking impressed, there is no fucking way they rate a 2 seed.

Maybe someone should buy you an asskicking machine. Your legs are probably sore and your ass is callaced....

Canada? WTF!!!!! All Canada is......America's Natural Resource.