Page 1 of 1

Tournament Standings by Conference

Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 1:56 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
In case you were wondering, records of all conferences who received more than one bid in the tourney so far, listed in order of tournament winning percentage . . .

1. ACC: 6-2 record (.750 winning percentage), 5-1 as higher seed, 1-1 as lower seed. Record vs. other conferences: 1-0 vs. A-10; 1-0 vs. Pac-10; 0-1 vs. Big 12, 0-1 vs. CAA.
2. Pac-10: 5-2 record (.714 winning percentage), 4-1 as higher seed, 1-1 as lower seed. Record vs. other conferences: 2-0 vs. Big Ten; 1-0 vs. SEC; 1-0 vs. WAC; 0-1 vs. ACC; 0-1 vs. Big East.
3. Big East: 9-4 record (.692 winning percentage), 8-3 as higher seed, 1-1 as lower seed. Record vs. other conferences: 1-0 vs. Big Ten; 1-0 vs. Pac-10; 2-2 vs. MVC; 1-1 vs. SEC; 0-1 vs. Big 12.
4. MVC: 4-2 record (.667 winning percentage), 1-0 as higher seed, 3-2 as lower seed. Record vs. other conferences: 1-0 vs. Big 12; 1-0 vs. SEC; 2-2 vs. Big East.
5. CAA: 2-1 record (.667 winning percentage), 2-1 as lower seed. Record vs. other conferences: 1-0 vs. ACC; 1-0 vs. Big Ten; 0-1 vs. A-10.
6. C-USA: 2-1 record (.667 winning percentage), 2-0 as higher seed, 0-1 as lower seed. Record vs. other conferences: 0-1 vs. SEC.
7. SEC: 7-4 record (.636 winning percentage), 6-2 as higher seed, 1-2 as lower seed. Record vs. other conferences: 1-0 vs. Big 12; 1-0 vs. C-USA; 1-1 vs. Big East; 0-1 vs. MVC; 0-1 vs. Pac-10.
8. Big 12: 3-3 record (.500 winning percentage), 2-2 as higher seed, 1-1 as lower seed. Record vs. other conferences: 1-0 vs. ACC; 1-0 vs. Big East; 0-1 vs. MVC; 0-1 vs. SEC.
9. Big 10: 3-6 record (.333 winning percentage), out of tournament, 3-4 as higher seed, 0-2 as lower seed. Record vs. other conferences: 2-0 vs. MWC; 0-1 vs. Big East; 0-1 vs. CAA; 0-2 vs. Pac-10.
10. Atlantic 10: 1-2 record (.333 winning percentage), out of tournament, 1-0 as higher seed, 0-2 as lower seed. Record vs. other conferences: 1-0 vs. CAA; 0-1 vs. ACC.
11. MWC: 0-2 record (.000 winning percentage), out of tournament, 0-2 as lower seed. Record vs. other conferences: 0-2 vs. Big Ten.
12: WAC: 0-2 record (.000 winning percentage), out of tournament, 0-1 as higher seed, 0-1 as lower seed. Record vs. other conferences: 0-1 vs. Pac-10.

I'll update this as the tournament progresses, if people are interested.

Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 3:12 pm
by OUMO
It is interesting.

Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 3:34 pm
by Cicero
Pac 10 is surprising a lot of people.

Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:29 pm
by Shoalzie
Cicero wrote:Pac 10 is surprising a lot of people.

Same thing I said about the ACC...quality over quantity. I've been on the UCLA bandwagon for a while...I've got them in the Final Four. I thought they could beat any of the Big Ten teams head-to-head for sure. Washington was even better last year when they had Nate Robinson. Arizona is plenty talented every year and gave 'Nova a tough test. You can't judge a team solely on their conference. The Big Ten had parity in it, it wasn't a conference with a handful of title contenders like the Big East.