T1B

Risa wrote:he fucked over denise richards (and his first born) while Denise was carrying their second child. what other proof do you need? :? the dude is a tard.

poptart wrote:Please give us the cliff notes, 88.

I spent 21 minutes on the silly string haired Colorado teacher fruit a while ago, and THAT put me within a few precious minutes of my yearly leftist faggot nutcase time allotment, and Wagon just informed me that we're only at the start of spring.

And well, when I factor in future Dunglsinger, Bace, Dinsdale, and PSU posts, I'm flat skrewed this year.

I'm hoping Al Gore gets laryngitis.

Physics Professor Says Science Points To Conclusive Evidence of WTC Controlled Demolition

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones | November 12 2005

Brigham Young University physics professor Steven E. Jones is the latest credible individual to come forward and assert that the official story of 9/11 differs wildly from the observable facts.

Jones appeared on The Alex Jones Show on friday to discuss a story that refuses to die and one that has again been pushed to the forefront of alternative research.

Jones made numerous compelling points on the collapse of both the twin towers and Building 7. According to Jones, his scientific peers have been very sympathetic to his research and have agreed with his conclusions.

- The three buildings collapsed in their own footprints and did not topple over. This bears the characteristics of controlled demolition. The central columns were pulverized and the buildings fell in on themselves. Why would Muslim fanatics go to the lengths of wiring the largest complex of buildings in the world with explosives when a topple collapse would have caused more damage to lower Manhattan and killed more people?

- Horizontal puffs of smoke or 'squibs' can be seen popping out floors as the collapse engulfs floor by floor of the buildings. Again, this is a phenomenon atypical of controlled demolition.

- Molten metal found in the basement of the WTC suggests that the commonly used explosive thermite may be responsible for the collapse. Jones said that buildings not destroyed by explosives would have insufficient directed energy to produce the large quantities of melted melted that was discovered. The molten steel was found five days after the collapse, on Sept. 16, when the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) used an Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) to locate and measure the site’s hot spots.

- It requires temperatures of at least 5,000 fahrenheit to melt steel. Diesel jet fuel does not reach these temperatures and the fires in the buildings were short lived. Firefighter tape recordings prove that only small pockets of fire were still burning in the buildings seconds before their collapse.

- Building 7 was not hit by a plane and yet it collapsed in 6.6 seconds, which is .6 seconds quicker than it would take an object dropped from the roof of the building to hit the floor. This violates fundamental laws of physics, unless the building was brought down by explosives.

- Buildings that collapse without the aid of explosives produce large piles of in-tact concrete and do not turn to dust as they are falling, as was witnessed on 9/11.

Following a scientific presentation back in September, Jones is now seeking a piece of molten steel from one of the buildings for analysis.

We will continue to track the progress of Jones' investigation and further expand on this story as and when it develops

velocet wrote:Pops, the condensed cliffs notes: the host and Sheen perform the conspiracy theory dance vis-a-vis 9-11-01. Apparently, the WTC collapses had been the result of bombs going off, that the planes crashing into the buildings and exploding wasn't enough to cause what happened.
Cover-ups abound. Lots of "unanswered questions".



velocet

Mister Bushice wrote: Chucky is just jumping onto the 9-11 conspircy bandwagon with this guy among others:

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:

Risa wrote:he fucked over denise richards (and his first born) while Denise was carrying their second child. what other proof do you need? :? the dude is a tard.

No....he's simply addicted to PUSSY. And LOTS of it.

Frankly I ain't mad at him. He tapped DR and has the trophies to prove it.

'BODE to Chuck.

Risa wrote:The Towers fell STRAIGHT down. Both of them.
THAT IS NOT NORMAL (except in a controlled demolition).

Remember, the Towers weren't hit at their bases, they
were hit at the middle and top. So yeah, sure, the structure
was superheated, whatever.

Gunslinger wrote:

Risa wrote:The Towers fell STRAIGHT down. Both of them.
THAT IS NOT NORMAL (except in a controlled demolition).

Remember, the Towers weren't hit at their bases, they
were hit at the middle and top. So yeah, sure, the structure
was superheated, whatever.

Uh, the towers were BIG FUCKING STRUCTURES that registered on the richtor scale when they collapsed! :?

So, your theory is when an elephant is shot, he should be all prime time and shit and fly into the nearest tree. Maybe have his snout rap around his head for good sport.

m2 wrote:

Gunslinger wrote:

Risa wrote:The Towers fell STRAIGHT down. Both of them.
THAT IS NOT NORMAL (except in a controlled demolition).

Remember, the Towers weren't hit at their bases, they
were hit at the middle and top. So yeah, sure, the structure
was superheated, whatever.

Uh, the towers were BIG FUCKING STRUCTURES that registered on the richtor scale when they collapsed! :?

So, your theory is when an elephant is shot, he should be all prime time and shit and fly into the nearest tree. Maybe have his snout rap around his head for good sport.

Yeah, but is it an elephant?


the truth

Gunslinger wrote:

m2 wrote:

Gunslinger wrote: Uh, the towers were BIG FUCKING STRUCTURES that registered on the richtor scale when they collapsed! :?

So, your theory is when an elephant is shot, he should be all prime time and shit and fly into the nearest tree. Maybe have his snout rap around his head for good sport.

Yeah, but is it an elephant?


the truth

I've paintballed a couple of times over the last couple of years. It's crazy shit! When the paintball hits you, you fly about 20 feet into the nearest wall and leave a body imprint.

If there isn't a wall the floor is so slippery, you slide across the floor about 50 yards. Crazy fucking shit!

Moving Sale wrote:A 757 hit this building? yea right. :roll:

Risa wrote:

Mister Bushice wrote: Chucky is just jumping onto the 9-11 conspircy bandwagon with this guy among others:

The Towers fell in reverse order of how they were hit.
That's not normal.

Building 7 was not smacked by any plane, but it
fell to the ground. That's suspect.

No other buildings in the vicinity fell as completely
as the Towers (understandable) or Building 7 (suspect).

The Towers fell STRAIGHT down. Both of them.
THAT IS NOT NORMAL (except in a controlled demolition).

Remember, the Towers weren't hit at their bases, they
were hit at the middle and top. So yeah, sure, the structure
was superheated, whatever.

Why would the superheated portions completely crumble
into themselves -- and so rapidly at that -- as they did
leaving NOTHING instead of like falling over, doing some
weird ass leaning tower of pisa/stature of liberty knocked
on its side in some movie, shit?

And then you add Bldg 7 on top, which, again, wasn't hit
by anything the surrounding buildings except the towers
werent, and it crumbles completely where others stand
comparatively solid.

Besides, trapped people were filmed after the crash in the
burned portioned. How were people able to do that?

OCmike wrote:

Risa wrote:

Mister Bushice wrote: Chucky is just jumping onto the 9-11 conspircy bandwagon with this guy among others:

The Towers fell in reverse order of how they were hit.
That's not normal.

Building 7 was not smacked by any plane, but it
fell to the ground. That's suspect.

No other buildings in the vicinity fell as completely
as the Towers (understandable) or Building 7 (suspect).

The Towers fell STRAIGHT down. Both of them.
THAT IS NOT NORMAL (except in a controlled demolition).

Remember, the Towers weren't hit at their bases, they
were hit at the middle and top. So yeah, sure, the structure
was superheated, whatever.

Why would the superheated portions completely crumble
into themselves -- and so rapidly at that -- as they did
leaving NOTHING instead of like falling over, doing some
weird ass leaning tower of pisa/stature of liberty knocked
on its side in some movie, shit?

And then you add Bldg 7 on top, which, again, wasn't hit
by anything the surrounding buildings except the towers
werent, and it crumbles completely where others stand
comparatively solid.

Besides, trapped people were filmed after the crash in the
burned portioned. How were people able to do that?

I saw an interesting show on the History Channel about how the truss construction of the twin towers lead to their collapse and caused them to fall straight down.

Supposedly the only way they could build towers so tall was to use this format for the building, but it generally isn't used because when one floor collapses due to the excessive heat from a fire, it drops right onto the one below it and they fall like dominoes. Anyway, I saw it on TV, so it must be true.

m2 wrote:

Gunslinger wrote:

m2 wrote: Yeah, but is it an elephant?


the truth

I've paintballed a couple of times over the last couple of years. It's crazy shit! When the paintball hits you, you fly about 20 feet into the nearest wall and leave a body imprint.

If there isn't a wall the floor is so slippery, you slide across the floor about 50 yards. Crazy fucking shit!

You win.

You need that in your life.


the truth

Gunslinger wrote: Good god you are an idiot. 30 minutes after being hit the towers should have flown about 20 blocks opposite of how they were hit.

OCmike wrote:

Gunslinger wrote: Good god you are an idiot. 30 minutes after being hit the towers should have flown about 20 blocks opposite of how they were hit.

I was regurgitating the takes provided by strutural engineers who, yaknow, do that sort of thing for a living... Don't like it? Write a fucking letter to the History Channel, dipshit.

Rack Fu wrote:When Dungslinger is not delivering pizzas, he's a structural engineer who specializes in building skyscrapers. Who knew?

Rack Fu wrote:When Dungslinger is not delivering pizzas, he's a structural engineer who specializes in building skyscrapers. Who knew?

Risa wrote: Anyway, G-Man, what are the conspiracy theories around your way, seeing how members of the FBI tried to warn the administration and
were cock-blocked pre-9/11.

Rack Fu wrote:

Risa wrote: Anyway, G-Man, what are the conspiracy theories around your way, seeing how members of the FBI tried to warn the administration and
were cock-blocked pre-9/11.

Simple! People warned higher-ups about a bunch of Muslims at flight schools, no one listened, 9/11 happened and here we are.

Where exactly is the conspiracy theory?

A bunch of worthless tards at HQ weren't doing their jobs and listening to the field agents who are actually out there putting two and two together. No conspiracy, just ignorance and incompetence.

Risa wrote:

Rack Fu wrote:

Risa wrote: Anyway, G-Man, what are the conspiracy theories around your way, seeing how members of the FBI tried to warn the administration and
were cock-blocked pre-9/11.

Simple! People warned higher-ups about a bunch of Muslims at flight schools, no one listened, 9/11 happened and here we are.

Where exactly is the conspiracy theory?

The unusual stock trade activity in the days prior to 9/11
by government higher ups;

the warnings to the well-connected not to fly on 9/11.


If Clinton had specifically warned the current administration
to make these things a priority... why wasn't Clinton listened to?
Who told the 'higher ups' not to pay attention to such things,
in the first place?


Where was the priorities instead, Rack Fu, within the FBI?

A bunch of worthless tards at HQ weren't doing their jobs and listening to the field agents who are actually out there putting two and two together. No conspiracy, just ignorance and incompetence.

Has the situation improved in that regard?

What's the take on the Libby shit? The Iraq shit?

88 wrote: Anyone who believes that ^^^^ is a nut job.

88 wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:

88 wrote: Anyone who believes that ^^^^ is a nut job.

No a nut job is someone who can look at the pic I posted (I can post a non photoshopped one if you like) on the first page and say a 757 hit that building because the government said so. Now THAT'S a nut job.

I saw a red X too. But I don't need to see whatever it was that you posted in ignorance to know you are a nut job, Moving Sale.

What hit the Pentagon, Moving Sale?

Where did it come from?

Who sent it?

What happened to the people on the missing 757?

Why hasn't the conspiracy unraveled and been published by people like Mary Mapes?

How can the same people who believe that "Dub-chimp" is the dumbest president ever also believe he has the ability to orchestrate the most incredible conspiracy in the history of mankind?

Moving Sale wrote:

88 wrote:

Moving Sale wrote: No a nut job is someone who can look at the pic I posted (I can post a non photoshopped one if you like) on the first page and say a 757 hit that building because the government said so. Now THAT'S a nut job.

I saw a red X too. But I don't need to see whatever it was that you posted in ignorance to know you are a nut job, Moving Sale.

What hit the Pentagon, Moving Sale?

Where did it come from?

Who sent it?

What happened to the people on the missing 757?

Why hasn't the conspiracy unraveled and been published by people like Mary Mapes?

How can the same people who believe that "Dub-chimp" is the dumbest president ever also believe he has the ability to orchestrate the most incredible conspiracy in the history of mankind?

Learn to read you fucking moron. Are any of you Right Wing Wackos capable of that?

I said there is no way a 757 hit that building. The Math is wrong. You want to try and stick to the subject?

You want to show me how that is possible? Can't believe your own lying eyes?

How are the spools intact?

Why is the hole too small?

BTW I never said GW did anything to harm the pentagon. For all I know it was an AQ missile and he is actually UNDER playing the threat from AQ. Not that that is the subject.

mvscal wrote:

m2 wrote:sounds good to me.

But you're a dumbfuck.

mvscal wrote:

Risa wrote:If Clinton had specifically warned the current administration
to make these things a priority...

Because he didn't. Terrorism was never at any point in time a priority in his administration.

Moving Sale wrote: Why is the hole too small?

mvscal wrote:

Gunslinger wrote:Tell us all how you believe Saddam bombed Oklahoma City, you fucking nutjob.

I do?

Shut the fuck up, dumbshit.

mvscal wrote:

Gunslinger wrote:Tell us all how you believe Saddam bombed Oklahoma City, you fucking nutjob.

I do?

Shut the fuck up, dumbshit.

Gunslinger wrote:If you are going to make statements Risa, give links or something.

mvscal wrote:I've posted links about Ramzi Yousef and the first WTC bombing.

You're thinking of someone else and Dungeater isn't capable of thought on any level.

mvscal wrote:

Gunslinger wrote:What are you going to do mvscal after you lose your credibility over the term "dumbfuck"?

Unless you begin sprouting brain cells, that's never...ever going to happen. You're a dumbfuck now and you're going to remain a dumbfuck for the rest of your useless life.

You're a thief, you beat women, you're an anonymous note leaving pussy and you deliver pizzas. The game of life is already over for you. You lost.

mvscal wrote:Gunslinger, you got laid. Gunslinger, you worked 2 jobs when you were younger, while I sit here at a computer hoping not to get caught, Gunslinger, those times you posted as NoCal where hilarious and provided such valuable gems as "Twice". Gunslinger, I post on romper room and you are so much uncooler than him. Gunslinger, you are a loser for not getting up in the face of a bunch of 20yr olds and telling them to turn their stereo down. Gunslinger, I can't believe you stole a JoJo CD that was given to you. etc. etc. etc.

you're an anonymous note leaving pussy...