T1B

Posted: **Tue Mar 21, 2006 9:58 pm**

Bush was on live TV when that old lady asked him why he really went to War and Bush went off on her! Anyone see Bush's MeltDown?

Trust me when you see the evening news you will see Bush's eyebrow hair shoot in all directions, He even picked up his hand and in a Karate Chop fashion he told that poor old lady who has one foot in the grave and the other on a banana peel to hold on a few times. he would not let her retort. Even the old man on CBS said it was the most passion he has seen from any president.

And Bush got it from a few other reporters also.

The old man from CBS said after the press meeting, this was one of the very rare times Bush did not screen the questions. Now I know why he always looked like he had all the answers before.
Bush looked like he wanted to choke the old bat, You could tell he was thinking if only she could go Hunting with Dick Cheny. Bush was like a wannabe comic dying on stage, he was studdering and had a loss for words. I almost got sexualy aroused watching this 107 year old lady lay down the smack bat on his asshat!

I know Michale More must of came in his sock more than once. This will be on his next movie for sure, This press confrence was a disaster for the Republicans.

This man is still in charge of our country. And to be honest? I was Embarassed to be an American for a breif moment and that rarely happens
I wish I could have my Vote back!

Posted: **Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:02 pm**

mouse wrote:The old man from CBS said after the press meeting, this was one of the very rare times Bush did not screen the questions.

I guess full scale delusion must be setting in at the Bush White House. For them to think that Chimpy should ever be allowed to think on his feet smacks of hubris on a gigantic scale. That man shouldn't be allowed to eat pretzels unattended, much less fielding questions from Helen Thomas.

Posted: **Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:20 pm**

I really wish the Bush haters would just shut the fuck up. The man can do nothing right in your eyes. He has a PressConference one day, you all complain that the questions are screened. The next day he goes live and you guys bash him b/c he isnt as polished. He's not that a great a public speaker. Its been beaten into the ground. Damnit, let the man be the President. He's smarter than anyone in here besides Velocet. He got elected for a 2nd term. Judge him when he is done. If the Dems thought the Republicans were ruthless when Bubba was in office wait and see how the rest of us are going to complain and bitch if god forbid a Lib gets elected.

Posted: **Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:29 pm**

Cicero wrote: He's smarter than anyone in here besides Velocet.

He’s smarter than you and Fraudo, and that’s about it.

Posted: **Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:30 pm**

If this is true, good for him. God forbid the president of the United States actually react with his balls for once, and stand up for something with some conviction and passion as opposed to just giving the fake plastic response that we're all accustomed to. Now if he can start reacting with his brain and balls at the same time, he'll get a rack...

Posted: **Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:31 pm**

Cicero wrote:if god forbid a Lib gets elected.

You really really really aren't very smart.

A liberal DID get elected. Hence, some people are invoking their legal right to Free Speech (something that apparently liberals like YOU don't believe in) to complain about it.

Maybe you (and a good percentage of the rest of this board's membership) should learn what the word "liberal" means before you try and bandy it about in an attempt to look intelligent -- it's kinda counterproductive to putting on a false air-of-intelligence when you use words with an opposite meaning from what you're trying to say.

Bush is BY FAR the most liberal president in a long, long time. Budget out front should have told you. Rollbacks on civil rights out front should have told you. Larger government than when Bush took over out front should have told you.

So, instead of trying to use catch-phrases that you heard on talk radio, would you care to try and use English to say what it is you mean, or better yet, just shut up?

Or, at least keep your posts to words that you actually know the correct definition of? Is that too much to ask?

Posted: **Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:35 pm**

Dinsdale wrote:
Cicero wrote:if god forbid a Lib gets elected.
You really really really aren't very smart.

A liberal DID get elected. Hence, some people are invoking their legal right to Free Speech (something that apparently liberals like YOU don't believe in) to complain about it.

Maybe you (and a good percentage of the rest of this board's membership) should learn what the word "liberal" means before you try and bandy it about in an attempt to look intelligent -- it's kinda counterproductive to putting on a false air-of-intelligence when you use words with an opposite meaning from what you're trying to say.

Bush is BY FAR the most liberal president in a long, long time. Budget out front should have told you. Rollbacks on civil rights out front should have told you. Larger government than when Bush took over out front should have told you.

So, instead of trying to use catch-phrases that you heard on talk radio, would you care to try and use English to say what it is you mean, or better yet, just shut up?

Or, at least keep your posts to words that you actually know the correct definition of? Is that too much to ask?

RACK!!!

Posted: **Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:37 pm**

actually this was one of dubya's better outings.....

Posted: **Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:41 pm**

mvscal wrote:
Not disagreeing on the liberal take, but that is simply stupid.

This had been rehashed 14,000,000 times here, but the 4th Amendment says one thing, Bush says another. The two are at odds, regardless how the Spin Machine tries to claim otherwise. Bush supports warrantless searches, the 4th Amendment does not.

But, that's not terribly germaine to this discussion. We're discussing how W Bush is an absolute monument to flaming fucking liberals everywhere (and it boggles my mind how anyone can fail to grasp this concept), and Sissyroo is a fucking idiot who can't even parrot somebody else's political takes without looking like a moron.

Posted: **Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:43 pm**

Cicero wrote: The man can do nothing right in your eyes.

Not true Bush can do many things right, He can Lie like no other President in History and he knows how to fill a C-130 full of Body bags on a daily basis,
I know how to give him credit when he does what he knows best, Ruin a Nation and bring on WW III

Posted: **Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:46 pm**

Goober McTuber wrote:
Cicero wrote: He's smarter than anyone in here besides Velocet.
He’s smarter than you and Fraudo, and that’s about it.

If you seriously believe that, then you're dumber than I thought you were.

Posted: **Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:48 pm**

mvscal wrote:Yes, he is quite the liberal. Progressive foreign policy. Big government spending on social programs. You name it.

Yet, his minions are always quick to label anyone who doesn't agree with him as "liberals."

Amazingly fucking ponderous. I'd say if the people calling the shots don't even know what the fuck they're talking about, it's time for this neocon movement to end. When you've got people with all of the accumen and vocabulary of Sissyroo wanting to run the country, you've got fucking problems.

Most liberal president since FDR-btw.

Posted: **Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:49 pm**

Dins,

I dont listen to Right Wing radio. I dont even watch Fox News. You fuckers on the other side swear that we cant think for oursleves and that we are brainwashed. Actually I watch more CNN and CNBC than anything else and I see the bias. Im grwoing tired of you man. You are in serious need of an ass kicking.

Posted: **Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:52 pm**

Cicero wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:
Cicero wrote: He's smarter than anyone in here besides Velocet.
He’s smarter than you and Fraudo, and that’s about it.

If you seriously believe that, then you're dumber than I thought you were.

So, he's not smarter than a Bag of Shit?

Posted: **Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:55 pm**

mvscal wrote:
mouse wrote:he knows how to fill a C-130 full of Body bags on a daily basis,
Two bags isn't going to fill a C-130. Try again, dumbfuck.

Two bags is all you need when you have the rest of the plane full of Mexicans he wants working in this country

Posted: **Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:00 pm**

Cicero wrote:You fuckers on the other side

And this is reason #5,879,532 why you're a fucking idiot -- would you care to explain to me what "my side" is? I don't think I've expressed loyalty to any particular political party or philosophy in the history of my involvement on these boards, except to maybe say that I'm extremely socially conservative, which I've demonstrated numerous times with my posts, and will continue to do so, even while you sit here and take up for the "liberal side's" hatred for the Bill Of Rights.

You swear that we cant think for oursleves

Link?

I've done no such thing, or at least certainly not recently.

What I WILL swear to, is your inability to think for yourself.

Don't try to drag anyone else who might share some of your liberal political ideology under the bus with you.

You are in serious need of an ass kicking.

And you're just the guy to do it, right?

Nevermind that in the last 5 years, you've yet to kick ANYBODY'S ass on these boards.

But it looks like you might be feeling a little froggy today, little feller.

Here I am. You may commence this "ass kicking" any time now.

You WILL forgive me if I don't run under the bed and cower in fear in the face of a brutal Sissyroo ass kicking though, right?

For myself, I think that Sissyroo's complete inability to even phathom why he's a superlative boardbitch is one of the funniest running jokes around here. It's like everyone else here is in on the joke, except him.

Posted: **Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:01 pm**

Wow I just realized I can relpy to another poster at this board w/o having to toss in any cheesy Insult.
Am I that talented?

Posted: **Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:05 pm**

mvscal wrote:
Dinsdale wrote:Most liberal president since FDR-btw.
Not nearly as bad Johnson.

Shit -- you're better at this American History stuff than I...

I'm still trying to figure out what exactly it was that Johnson even did during his tenure, before I start labelling him one way or another.

Posted: **Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:08 pm**

mvscal wrote:Speekee Engrish?

I'm surprised he even started a thread about a presidential press conference. ET or Extra must've been pre-empted.

Posted: **Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:10 pm**

RadioFan -- sweet avatar, dude.

Posted: **Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:12 pm**

I was just kinda funnin' with ya', mvscal.

Johnson was a spectator, much like W. And any time the People are stupid enough to elect a spectator, evil liberalism will abound, like it has under Bush.

Posted: **Wed Mar 22, 2006 3:08 am**

mouse wrote:Bush was on live TV when that old lady asked him why he really went to War and Bush went off on her! Anyone see Bush's MeltDown?

Video link?

Posted: **Wed Mar 22, 2006 4:31 am**

http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_video ... l=politics

Posted: **Wed Mar 22, 2006 4:40 am**

mouse wrote:http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_video ... l=politics

I see 4 options, all of which are straight stolen from the Ministry of Truth

Posted: **Wed Mar 22, 2006 4:45 am**

Dinsdale wrote: For myself, I think that Sissyroo's complete inability to even phathom why he's a superlative boardbitch is one of the funniest running jokes around here. It's like everyone else here is in on the joke, except him.

Don't bandy around terms like boardbitch. When you get smacked up your lopsided dome you immediately go to the "ignore" card and disappear.

Board Bitch indeed, you should listen to your own words.

Posted: **Wed Mar 22, 2006 5:15 am**

Dinsdale wrote:RadioFan -- sweet avatar, dude.

Who did the one with annie? I did the one with shutyomouth.

I also did one with Jay Paterno:

Posted: **Wed Mar 22, 2006 5:18 am**

PSUFAN wrote:
Dinsdale wrote:RadioFan -- sweet avatar, dude.
Who did the one with annie? I did the one with shutyomouth.

I also did one with Jay Paterno:

You've got my pizza face out there, you could have done me using breadsticks on that bitch.

Posted: **Wed Mar 22, 2006 5:22 am**

Dinsdale wrote:I was just kinda funnin' with ya', mvscal.

Johnson was a spectator, much like W. And any time the People are stupid enough to elect a spectator, evil liberalism will abound, like it has under Bush.

I disagree most heartily about Johnson's presidency. Johnson was the most skilled, dirtiest, most backroom oriented president we've had in decades. He lorded over the Senate for years. He was a snake in the grass.

When he won the presidency outright, he did so with a record-breaking majority of popular votes over Goldwater.

Johnson was a spirited, principled, highly intelligent pol who made his mark lastingly on the American political landscape. In fact, it's funny you mention him as the wallflower, considering who he was veep to.

What exactly brought you to this belief?

Posted: **Wed Mar 22, 2006 5:23 am**

You've got my pizza face out there

I've never knowingly viddied your mug, can't say I care to.

Posted: **Wed Mar 22, 2006 10:56 am**

mvscal wrote:Yes, he is quite the liberal. Progressive foreign policy.

'Progressive foreign policy' = 'Bombing people"

If your IQ was five points lower, you would be poking out of a sandwich.

Posted: **Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:26 pm**

Cicero wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:
Cicero wrote: He's smarter than anyone in here besides Velocet.
He’s smarter than you and Fraudo, and that’s about it.

If you seriously believe that, then you're dumber than I thought you were.

I seriously believe the man is a gibbering fucktard. That puts him right about the level of you and Fraudo. You’re hardly qualified to judge anyone else’s intelligence, you know.

Posted: **Wed Mar 22, 2006 2:10 pm**

Cicero wrote:Dins... You are in serious need of an ass kicking.

And you aren't the one that can do it.

Then again. I really wish the Cicero haters would just shut the fuck up. The man can do nothing right in your eyes. He speaks his mind in a thread one day, you all complain that he's too goddamned dense to wrap his puny brain around the issues. The next day he drops smack and you guys bash him for the effort. He's not that a great a public smacker. Its been beaten into the ground. Damnit, let the man be a Tard. He's smarter than anyone in here besides Wilson. He got elected board Tard for a 2nd term. Judge him when he is done.

Posted: **Wed Mar 22, 2006 2:52 pm**

Thanks Bizz.

Posted: **Wed Mar 22, 2006 3:01 pm**

Bizzarofelice wrote: The next day he drops smack.......

link?

Posted: **Wed Mar 22, 2006 3:03 pm**

PSUFAN wrote:
Dinsdale wrote:I was just kinda funnin' with ya', mvscal.

Johnson was a spectator, much like W. And any time the People are stupid enough to elect a spectator, evil liberalism will abound, like it has under Bush.
I disagree most heartily about Johnson's presidency. Johnson was the most skilled, dirtiest, most backroom oriented president we've had in decades. He lorded over the Senate for years. He was a snake in the grass.

When he won the presidency outright, he did so with a record-breaking majority of popular votes over Goldwater.

Johnson was a spirited, principled, highly intelligent pol who made his mark lastingly on the American political landscape. In fact, it's funny you mention him as the wallflower, considering who he was veep to.

What exactly brought you to this belief?

Rack that.

There's a lot of negative things than can be said about LBJ, but it damn sure cannot be said that he was a spectator. In fact, it could be said that LBJ was THE classic example of the aggressive/aggressive Presidency. He was only in office for 5 years, and he managed to completely reshape the Federal Government's approach to poverty, pushed through civil rights legislation that had languished in Committee for years, pushed through the Gulf of Tonkin resolution, sold the Russians on the Outer Space Treaty...

Posted: **Wed Mar 22, 2006 3:06 pm**

Cicero wrote:Thanks Bizz.

Damned by faint praise much?

Posted: **Wed Mar 22, 2006 3:12 pm**

Its good to be loved.

Posted: **Wed Mar 22, 2006 3:37 pm**

Cicero wrote:I really wish the Bush haters would just shut the fuck up.

If the Dems thought the Republicans were ruthless when Bubba was in office wait and see how the rest of us are going to complain and bitch if god forbid a Lib gets elected.

So Bush bashing is out but bashing an unknown Dem is in?

Gawd you are a retarded fuck.

Posted: **Wed Mar 22, 2006 3:47 pm**

Cicero wrote:Its good to be loved.

Sometimes it's just a good fucking.

Posted: **Wed Mar 22, 2006 3:49 pm**

mouse wrote:Bush was on live TV when that old lady asked him why he really went to War and Bush went off on her! Anyone see Bush's MeltDown?

here's another one for your consideration (all video links at the site):

dig the (real) tagline: 'now there's no link?'

http://www.crooksandliars.com
Bush makes false claim about Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda
Olbermann: "Who does the President think he's F'n kidding?"

I know it's hard to believe Mr. President, but they have these things know that actually record what you say and are able to play back what they record. Even after a long period of time. Keith Olbermann and Countdown supply the evidence.
Video-WMP Video-QT

Today in his speech in Cleveland:

Bush: "First-just if I might correct a misperception, I don't think we ever said, at least I know I didn't say that there was a direct connection between September 11th and Saddam Hussein."

In days gone by-SOTU-three years ago:

Bush: "Saddam Hussein aids and protects terrorists, including members of al-Qaeda."

Now-anyone listening and watching his speech back then would make that connection easily enough since al-Qaeda was responsible for 9/11-don't you think? Keith analyzes it very nicely.

Olbermann: "Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda in the same sentence separated by seven words. Sept. 11th and Saddam Hussein -two sentences later, separated by six words. In a moment Craig Crawford joins me to discuss the fundamental remaining question. Who does the President think he's F'n kidding?

T1B

Anyone see Bush's MeltDown?

Anyone see Bush's MeltDown?

Re: Anyone see Bush's MeltDown?

Re: Anyone see Bush's MeltDown?

Re: Anyone see Bush's MeltDown?