T1B

...and all their announcers as well. Take your freekin East coast bias and shove it! ...how sweet it is you dweebs will be watching from home...muuuhahahahahaha

And a nice GFY to you too.

Major props to the SEC though.

And to the CAA for showing they are every bit the conference that the mid-minor Pac 10 is and to the PAC 10 for backing into a FF spot.

Diogenes wrote:And a nice GFY to you too.

Major props to the SEC though.

And to the CAA for showing they are every bit the conference that the mid-minor Pac 10 is and to the PAC 10 for backing into a FF spot.

...BACKING IN??? are you freeking high? they allowed 45 points to a team who averaged 85 over the season. With that idiotic statement you just proved my point. Not to mention Washington got jobbed with 47 fouls called against them or they would have been in as well.

I give the SEC major props, they came through big time. I'm gloating because the ACC and BE got blanked.

Now put the pipe down and give credit where credit is due....

ChargerMike wrote:...and all their announcers as well. Take your freekin East coast bias and shove it!

Maybe it's just my Big East bias showing, but I don't see a pro-Big East bias among the announcers. OTOH, no argument about a pro-ACC bias.

It is. What you actually have is a who has won in the past and who is ahead in the polls bias.Said bias going the most against good teams in 'mid-major' conferences, and helping out mediocre teams in mediocre mid-minor conferences. Especially when it comes to seeding.

Diogenes wrote:It is. What you actually have is a who has won in the past and who is ahead in the polls bias.Said bias going the most against good teams in 'mid-major' conferences, and helping out mediocre teams in mediocre mid-minor conferences. Especially when it comes to seeding.

RACK you.

No matter how badly and how often you KYOA your tardliness never ceases to amaze. Continue the excellent work.

Terry in Crapchester wrote:

ChargerMike wrote:...and all their announcers as well. Take your freekin East coast bias and shove it!

Maybe it's just my Big East bias showing, but I don't see a pro-Big East bias among the announcers. OTOH, no argument about a pro-ACC bias.

The dynamics of the Big East changed with the addition of Louisville, Marquette and some of the other former Conf. USA schools, no doubt about it. And it was arguably the "best" conference, top to bottom, at least this year during the regular season and on paper, leading up to the tournament.

I think what CM was referring to was CBS' nonstop worshipping of traditional Big East powers, such as Syracuse and UConn.

And I have no doubt that Nance and Packer were pissed when both UConn and 'Nova lost on Sunday, not to mention Duke's absence.

I'll rack any circumstance that forces those idiots to change their tune. Just watch on Saturday though ... Packer will no doubt be talking about how the SEC was such an "underrated conference, this year Jim. Nobody was talking about them ... " Only what the asshole won't say is, "Including me, because I'm never wrong."

Mikey wrote:

Diogenes wrote:It is. What you actually have is a who has won in the past and who is ahead in the polls bias.Said bias going the most against good teams in 'mid-major' conferences, and helping out mediocre teams in mediocre mid-minor conferences. Especially when it comes to seeding.

RACK you.

Continue the excellent work.

Thanks. And don't worry, I will.

The Big East and ACC deserves a bias.

Look at the national champs over the last 5 years. All ACC and Big East.

Suck a cock and win a fucking title for a change, dicks.

^^^Such simple, yet effective logic. Rack the deserved bias!

RadioFan wrote:And I have no doubt that Nance and Packer were pissed when both UConn and 'Nova lost on Sunday, . . .

Don't kid yourself. They were pissed long before that, when both Duke and UNC bowed out early.

Packer hates Duke. I dont undertand why everyone thinks he is up their ass?

Cicero wrote:Packer hates Duke. I dont undertand why everyone thinks he is up their ass?

That's because he absolutely loathes Vitale. He's one of the only ones not stuck up Duke's ass.

MuchoBulls wrote:

Cicero wrote:Packer hates Duke. I dont undertand why everyone thinks he is up their ass?

That's because he absolutely loathes Vitale.

Could someone just lock the two of them in a room together and throw away the key?

-- College Hoops Fan

MuchoBulls wrote:

Cicero wrote:Packer hates Duke. I dont undertand why everyone thinks he is up their ass?

That's because he absolutely loathes Vitale. He's one of the only ones not stuck up Duke's ass.

He may hate Vitale, but that's not why he hates Duke.

Packer wanted badly to play for Duke, but a Duke assistant coach told him that they were waiting to hear from another kid before they offered Billy a scholarship. This pissed him off, and he immediately signed with Wake Forest because he knew he would get a chance to play against Duke 2 or 3 times a year.