T1B

Posted: **Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:45 pm**

I normally detest "urban" rioting and pillaging. But, this is Duke we are talking about.

Burn baby burn. Teach then preppy little faggot white boys a thing or two. :)

Posted: **Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:47 pm**

Maybe Grant Hill can come back and light the ceremonial first car.

Posted: **Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:54 pm**

nahhhh. not black enough. how 'bout elton brand?

Posted: **Mon Apr 03, 2006 2:05 pm**

Sudden Sam wrote:Recruited from Northern prep schools? But, wait...I thought everyone in the north was enlightened...not racist. Must have picked up those tendencies while in the south, huh?

Maybe they figured "when in Rome"?

Posted: **Mon Apr 03, 2006 2:23 pm**

BSmack wrote:Maybe Grant Hill can come back and light the ceremonial first car.

He'd probably brake an ankle before he got there.

Posted: **Mon Apr 03, 2006 2:24 pm**

haterz.

Posted: **Mon Apr 03, 2006 3:24 pm**

question.

is it possible to determine though a medical exam, the difference between getting raped and just fukked real good?

Posted: **Mon Apr 03, 2006 3:25 pm**

BSmack wrote:
Sudden Sam wrote:Recruited from Northern prep schools? But, wait...I thought everyone in the north was enlightened...not racist. Must have picked up those tendencies while in the south, huh?
Maybe they figured "when in Rome"?

I'm thinkin' Nero here...

Posted: **Mon Apr 03, 2006 4:23 pm**

smackaholic wrote:question.

is it possible to determine though a medical exam, the difference between getting raped and just fukked real good?

No.

but it can determine whether someone who says 'i never touched the bitch!' is lying or not.

Posted: **Tue Apr 04, 2006 8:57 pm**

Much as it pains me to say this, in many ways Duke is quite similar to Notre Dame.

Both are very prestigious schools, academically speaking. Both are private, and at least nominally religiously affilated. Both participate in Division I sports despite relatively small enrollments by Division I standards, and each has accomplished enough in one high visibility college sport (football for ND, men's basketball for Duke) to be at least arguably the best known college program in that sport.

There are other similarities between the two schools that, unlike those above, are appropos to the situation at hand. Both schools draw a substantial portion of their student body from outside the immediate geographic area where they are located. And for both schools, the nature of the schools, including the cost of attending either of those schools, and the nature of the community most closely surrounding those schools means that there is a substantial economic disparity between most of the student body, on the one hand, and most of the townies, on the other. And not to the advantage of the townies. Throw in the fact that for both communities (South Bend, IN and Durham, NC), the proximity to that particular campus is said community's preeminent claim to fame, and, well, . . .

I've never attended Duke, so I can't speak for that school with certainty. But I know that at Notre Dame, the students and the townies don't get along, never have. They didn't get along when I was there, they didn't get along before I was there, they don't get along today, and in all likelihood, they won't get along anytime in the foreseeable future. Like I said, I can't speak for Duke for certain, but it would hardly shock me if the situation were similar there.

There's more to this situation than meets the eye, I suspect. But these allegations could be the powder keg to make the situation in Durham really ugly, really fast.

Posted: **Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:02 pm**

Terry in Crapchester wrote: There's more to this situation than meets the eye, I suspect. But these allegations could be the powder keg to make the situation in Durham really ugly, really fast.

but at least at Notre Dame, even the athletes had to prove they 'had what it takes' instead of mummy and Father buying their way in. but i don't know how many trust fund babies who shouldn't be there were at Notre Dame who should have taken their partying down to IU, or PU or Ball State or somewhere?

these assholes did it. pending the results of the rape kit on this working woman's vagina and anus. they did it.

fry them.

Posted: **Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:21 pm**

Risa wrote:
Terry in Crapchester wrote: There's more to this situation than meets the eye, I suspect. But these allegations could be the powder keg to make the situation in Durham really ugly, really fast.
but at least at Notre Dame, even the athletes had to prove they 'had what it takes' instead of mummy and Father buying their way in.

At least at ND, lacrosse was a slightly different animal than was football or basketball.

In Division I, you get 85 scholarships for football and I believe 12 for men's basketball. That means that the majority of each team is on full scholarship, and therefore, one need not be a rich kid if one plays football or basketball at ND (I wasn't a rich kid, either, but neither was I a football or basketball player; instead, I went through on a NROTC scholarship). Lacrosse, IIRC, had only one scholarship available, and the seniors on the team split the scholarship equally. A little bit of help, certainly, but not enough to make the difference by itself. You would have needed another way to finance your education as a lacrosse player.

Not exactly sure how Duke works, but I doubt there's as many scholarships available there for lacrosse as there are for basketball, let alone for football.

but i don't know how many trust fund babies who shouldn't be there were at Notre Dame who should have taken their partying down to IU, or PU or Ball State or somewhere?

Some, but not many. Most commonly, the academic concessions at ND are made for legacies (children of alumni). I'd be lying if I said that no academic concessions were ever made for varsity athletes, but in this regard, for reasons I alluded to above, lacrosse didn't have quite the same pull as did football and basketball.

these assholes did it. pending the results of the rape kit on this working woman's vagina and anus. they did it.

fry them.

First, we don't know that. Not yet, anyway.

Second, even if some did, there were about 40 or so kids at this party. I'd have a very hard time believing that all of them did it. You may find the code of silence appalling, and I can't honestly say you're wrong in that regard, but nobody's under any legal obligation to fess up here, either.

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 1:13 am**

Risa wrote:
these assholes did it. pending the results of the rape kit on this working woman's vagina and anus. they did it.

fry them.

Yeah, lets not worry about proof, or due process or anything. Lets take the word of a stripper with two kids.
She's probably pissed that they didn't tip her enough, or she ran out of meth, or her kids smoked the last of her weed.

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 1:38 am**

How do you stop 20 Dukies from raping a hooker?
Throw them lacrosse sticks

looks like Dukes lacrosse team is more physical than their football team

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 2:13 am**

Risa wrote: these assholes did it.

And you have proof of this? I guess you were absent the day they taught that in law school.

Seriously, you are still the most ignorant human being I have ever read.

No seriously, you are.

Pleasant evening to ya.

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 2:14 am**

Risa wrote:these honkeys did it. pending the results of the rape kit on this working sister's vagina and anus. they did it.

fry them.

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 3:31 am**

"In Duke, the favorite hobbies are disco dancing, archery, rape, and table tennis"

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 3:36 pm**

Risa wrote:
Terry in Crapchester wrote: There's more to this situation than meets the eye, I suspect. But these allegations could be the powder keg to make the situation in Durham really ugly, really fast.
but at least at Notre Dame, even the athletes had to prove they 'had what it takes' instead of mummy and Father buying their way in.

The Duke lacrosse team is a perennial top 5 team - they played in the championship game last year and were considered to be a top contender again this year. It's not a club sport - these guys were all recruited, even if a lot of them are paying their own way. Men's lax is only allotted 12.6 scholarships even though 40 some odd guys are on the roster.

Terry is right about the town-gown relations. Not all that great.

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 3:39 pm**

rozy wrote:
Risa wrote: these assholes did it.
And you have proof of this? I guess you were absent the day they taught that in law school.

They say they didn't touch her.

No one mentions the broken Lee press-ons except her.

Racial obscenities.

She's got vaginal and anal ... issues.

Somebody didn't use condoms?

They did it.

They say they didn't touch her, but 4 of them did.

Fry them. All of them.

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 3:59 pm**

Risa wrote:
rozy wrote:
Risa wrote: these assholes did it.
And you have proof of this? I guess you were absent the day they taught that in law school.
They say they didn't touch her.

No one mentions the broken Lee press-ons except her.

Racial obscenities.

She's got vaginal and anal ... issues.

Somebody didn't use condoms?

They did it.

They say they didn't touch her, but 4 of them did.

Fry them. All of them.

well there's the smoking gun. a couple of N bombs and a broken Lee press on. btw, even if 4 of them did rape her. why should all fry? maybe they did it in a back room where no one knew they were raping her.

you're fucked in the head. seriously.

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 4:02 pm**

Is it possible to rape a hooker? I mean business was conducted here. Offer + acceptance= contract.

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 4:04 pm**

titlover wrote:well there's the smoking gun. a couple of N bombs and a broken Lee press on.

the physical evidence of contact where they claimed there was none.

btw, even if 4 of them did rape her. why should all fry?

if your 'friend' does wrong, you don't back up your friend in that wrong... unless you agree with what your friend did.

they are all accessories.

the kids who stood around and watched the Central Park Jogger get raped got worse. they didn't do it, but they were charged as if they did.

or being an accessory/non-Samaritan does it only count if you're black?

Blacks are supposed to 'snitch'.... oooo terrible a 'stop snitching' culture.

Everybody else is free to claim 'none of my business'.

Fuck you, man.

maybe they did it in a back room where no one knew they were raping her.

The cops were called over the noise that was made.

And if a woman OR man is violated, it's still a violation whether someone is there to witness it or not.

How many of you assholes bought Kate Fabers story hook line and sinker, though?

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 4:06 pm**

WolverineSteve wrote:Is it possible to rape a hooker? I mean business was conducted here. Offer + acceptance= contract.

she's an exotic dancer. that does not mean hooker, automatically.

and hookers can be raped, too.

i hope you all die. Bastard assholes.

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 4:10 pm**

Dancers at a titty bar may be just dancers.

Dancers making "house calls" = hookers.

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 4:13 pm**

They probably just didnt pay her.

Rule of Thumb: Allows pay the strippers b/c if not, you will probably get indicted.

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 4:20 pm**

WolverineSteve wrote:Dancers making "house calls" = hookers.

Or over 90% of them are, according to a recent local study.

Let's see -- Katie Faber was lying about her rape, but this chick/hooker is obviously telling the truth...in Annie's world, anyway?

Anybody noticing a pattern here?[/StupidQuestionOfTheDay]

Yup Annie -- you're still the vile fucking pig that I remember.

Just fucking vile, you piece of shit.

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 5:17 pm**

Even if she was raped I say it's her fault for putting herself in the position.

Call it an "occupational hazzard" if you will. She chose her career knowing full well that this was a potential outcome. Kinda like those crazy bastards on the crab boats in the Bering sea.

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 5:19 pm**

Like th prosecutor is even going to go into a coutroom and try to prove a prostitute was raped. Good luck with that.

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:17 pm**

Terry is right about the town-gown relations. Not all that great.

The Cutters started it!

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:24 pm**

Dinsdale wrote:Like th prosecutor is even going to go into a coutroom and try to prove a prostitute was raped. Good luck with that.

why not?

or is the same mindset that allows serial killers to roam free as long as the victims are 'women of ill repute'?

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:29 pm**

It's called "common fucking sense," you vile racist.

The woman goes to parties and has sex with those in attendence for a living.

Why would the DA waste taxpayer's money on an unwinnable case?

But yes, I realize that different standards should be applied based upon her race, and the race of the allged attackers...because that is how you roll.

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 7:00 pm**

I think the issue is that she is a whore. The fact that she's a black whore seems to change your (Risa's) view. Dirty whores of all ethnicities run into problems with "clients". If the whore didn't want to be gang fucked she shouldn't have ought to have been where she was. If she'd stayed in school through Junior High she may have learned how to weigh risk/reward. She got herself into it and is looking for a huge payday. Fuck her.

If you don't want to whore for a living stay in school, say no to drugs, use contraception and become a decent citizen. Crack whores with illigitimate babies from multiple dads giving meat washes at stag parties get noooo sympathy from me.

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:10 pm**

Risa wrote:
WolverineSteve wrote:Is it possible to rape a hooker? I mean business was conducted here. Offer + acceptance= contract.

she's an exotic dancer. that does not mean hooker, automatically.
i hope you all die. Bastard assholes.

How many strippers have you ordered in your lifetime? I have NEVER EVER seen one come to a party when she wasnt accompanied by a 400 lb man who could kill you with just 1 arm. That doesnt mean that she was for sure a hooker, but, well yeah, it does.

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:18 pm**

SoCalTrjn wrote:How many strippers have you ordered in your lifetime? I have NEVER EVER seen one come to a party when she wasnt accompanied by a 400 lb man who could kill you with just 1 arm. That doesnt mean that she was for sure a hooker, but, well yeah, it does.

A very logical thought. Prepare to have Annie completely ignore it.

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:49 pm**

SoCalTrjn wrote: How many strippers have you ordered in your lifetime? I have NEVER EVER seen one come to a party when she wasnt accompanied by a 400 lb man who could kill you with just 1 arm. That doesnt mean that she was for sure a hooker, but, well yeah, it does.

Exactly. Every bachelor party, hotel party, etc. where strippers were ordered came with a lot of muscle. And if the muscle thinks he can't handle shit when he gets there, strippers go home.

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 9:35 pm**

Risa wrote: the kids who stood around and watched the Central Park Jogger get raped got worse. they didn't do it, but they were charged as if they did.

Actually, I think it turned out no one in the group did it. Some lone assailaint convessed years later and the group of kids that were originally convicted were cleared.

If we are thinking of the same case.

Posted: **Wed Apr 05, 2006 10:14 pm**

Rrrrrack those Duke rapists.

Posted: **Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:44 am**

It turns out what happened was the bitch in question had a fantasy about taking on the entire team. She changed her story later when she found out it was a lacrosse team.

No link yet...

Posted: **Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:17 am**

Duke's season cancelled and coach out.

All over a piece of crack whore ass. Damn shame.

Posted: **Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:32 am**

it was their Lacrosse team, no major loss, if it was the basketball team nobody would have ever heard about it cause she would have been paid off or chopped in to pieces and scattered in the feed troughs at some hog farm

T1B

Duke Uproar