data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b5dc/0b5dcc2d51cf62826326cc825f18168f1dff0c4d" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30068/30068ba12f29cf9e488347c6c2f45c77958d4bde" alt="Image"
Translation: "We have to have some system for dishing out favours to party insiders, corporate buddies, and special interest groups."Mr. Baird said the aim is to avoid having junior staff caught up in the ban.
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
Translation: "We have to have some system for dishing out favours to party insiders, corporate buddies, and special interest groups."Mr. Baird said the aim is to avoid having junior staff caught up in the ban.
I'm guessin that cartoons is all you die hard libby clownfools got left.Liberal Cartoon Machine:![]()
RACK!tough love wrote:I'm guessin that cartoons is all you die hard libby clownfools got left.Liberal Cartoon Machine:![]()
You need to take a page outta the 40% and growing fearful libby voters book who now realize that Prime Minister Steven Harper is without doubt the Real Deal, and get the hell offa that corrupt sinking ship while you still retain a half of a mm of self respect.
Otis wrote: RACK Harper.
Why wait?Otis Wrote:
We'll see how accountable PM Hypocrite is come May 3rd after people have had a chance to listen to their tax dollars being fleeced from them by Hypocrite's broken promises.
Just to be clear, you speak of the liberal media; and it's a good thing that New Canada's Prime Minister is mostly concentrating on what is best for the all of the country and not what the scumbag libby media would prefer, otherwise his popularity would most certainly not be as favorable as it is in the non-partisan poll's.Otis Wrote:
The media's just getting warmed up.. and Hypocrite's numbers are about to be cooled down.
Um no tl, I was referring to ALL of the country's media.tough love wrote:Just to be clear, you speak of the liberal media; and it's a good thing that New Canada's Prime Minister is mostly concentrating on what is best for the all of the country and not what the scumbag libby media would prefer, otherwise his popularity would most certainly not be as favorable as it is in the non-partisan poll's.Otis Wrote:
The media's just getting warmed up.. and Hypocrite's numbers are about to be cooled down.
I think it's just great that your media continues to insult the public's intelligence, as if they were still under the libby spell of fear.
The real story is that our guys are giving up their lives to give Afghanistan a chance at freedom and democracy. The hope is that the country can become something other than one in which the world's sickest of predators train to commit mass murder. Canadians are fighting the good fight. But the Harpoons in Ottawa are spearing the real story. Four heroes falling in Afghanistan has morphed into a sad tale of flags and caskets. Flags won't get lowered in Ottawa and caskets won't be seen in Trenton. The left-wing media isn't making this one up. And the more the Harpoons try to lay it off on the media, the more Bush they look.
Harper's whiz kids surely must have computers. It doesn't take a minute to find out who put an end to having TV cameras at Dover Air Force base when the U.S. coffins were coming from Gulf War I. Dick Cheney was Bush the Elder's secretary of defence. Today Bush continues to talk about his personal relationship with Jesus. But many Americans have come to believe that George's Jesus is fat, bald and evil and goes by the name of Dick.
If the Harpoons want to ape the George and Dick White House, they will get smeared with the kind of language that you see at the top of the column. For years now, the Bush-Cheney strategy has been to blame the media while at the same time feeding selected stories to certain members of the media.
The strategy now has Bush's approval numbers starting to resemble Richard Nixon's. When Neil Young's Let's Impeach the President is released it won't be just the burned-out dope-smokin' lefties who nod with approval.
This week it isn't a Liberal defence minister who is telling the media to stay off the property in Trenton when the caskets come home from Afghanistan. In justifying the move, the honourable member for Subterfuge says the ban was being put in place to protect the families.
Hey, minister. Please jam a teething ring back into the mouth of the backroom infant who offered you that.
You have not a lick of evidence that military families have been offended by this or by the lowering of the flag at the people's house, the House of Commons. If you want to keep boiling your reputation in oil by putting all this off on the media, good luck with that.
It's probably not easy being Stephen Harper.
Ever since he first went to Ottawa to do backroom work in the '80s, he fell in love with the idea that Liberal governments were without moral legitimacy. The Liberals only formed government because the national media framed the issues, and in doing so, real Canadian leaders were getting framed. The Liberal Goodfellas took Mulroney out to the desert and beat him with a shovel and then did the same to Preston Manning. Facts rarely fracture the fantasies of a young man who is a chartered member of the paranoid right.
The problem is that even paranoids have enemies. If Harper continues play it Bush, his government will be buried in a casket of his own making.
But wait, Adler's not part of your "left wing media", he's one of your own Tina...tough love wrote:I consider all of the media to be self_serving scumbags, so what's your point?
As did several others in the media tl.. and the voters got to hear all about Hypocrite's disgusting move for his political gain..Adler is a red lining motor mouth of a gas bag, and I have told him so in print on more then one occasion, so once again your dart misses the mark.
btw..UpChuck picked up on the PigMartin bit, and ran it on his drone of a mourning radio show...Sorry, move along, no autographs today.
Now that's rich... a guy who used to post under the nic "The Poet Harriet" trying to run homosmack..tough love wrote:You are in serious need of a new drug, Otis, may I suggest you give Harper's frog a lick, who knows my brother from same sex lovers, you just may never go heathen commie again.
Now how did that leak happen to get out eh?$1B transit windfall for Ontario
Cash from Ottawa will come in next week's budget to help with subway expansion -- as well as housing and campus buildings
Apr. 26, 2006. 05:17 AM
ROBERT BENZIE AND LES WHITTINGTON
STAFF REPORTERS
The Ontario government is expecting a $1 billion windfall from Ottawa that will help extend the Spadina subway line and improve transportation throughout Greater Toronto.
Federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty delivered the good news in a confidential four-page letter on March 24 to provincial Finance Minister Dwight Duncan.
Flaherty wrote that as part of the new Conservative government's "collaborative management of the federation," the provinces and territories would receive additional funding of $3.3 billion from the massive federal surplus run up last year.
The Harper government, which had planned to reveal the new funding when its first budget is delivered to Parliament next Tuesday, will set up five independent trust funds to distribute the money.
The trusts would make money available to the provinces for bricks and mortar spending for post-secondary education (up to $1 billion), affordable housing (up to $800 million), public transit (up to $900 million), northern housing (up to $300 million) and off-reserve aboriginal housing (up to $300 million).
Details of what provincial projects will qualify for funding are not yet available.
The trusts are a device to reserve some of the surplus from one year for spending in the next.
Otherwise, any money left over on March 31, the end of the federal fiscal year, would automatically be used to reduce the federal debt.
Duncan told the Toronto Star that his officials estimate that, based on Ontario's population and eligibility, the province would receive about $1.08 billion of the total new federal funding commitment.
He said it is great news for Ontario and will make it easier to pay for much-needed public transit improvements.
Word of the new cash from Ottawa comes on the heels of Duncan's March 23 provincial budget that included $1.2 billion for infrastructure, including $670 million toward the $2 billion extension of the Spadina line from Downsview station through York University and north of Steeles Ave. into Vaughan.
The long-awaited scheme would be the Toronto Transit Commission's first subway line in the 905 area.
"We fully anticipate that it should be fully new money," said Duncan, who added that Flaherty's missive was the kind of letter finance ministers dream of receiving.
"This is money that Ontarians have paid into Ottawa. It essentially represents money that they (federal authorities) have decided through their own legislative processes and financial processes to give back to the provinces. This is our portion."
"It's certainly encouraging, but we do need clarification," said the provincial treasurer, who has written to Flaherty seeking details.
In the March 23 budget, Duncan devoted a total of $838 million for transit in the GTA.
Aside from the subway, money will be spent to develop the Mississauga Transitway, which is a dedicated bus-only line along Highway 403 and Eglinton Ave., and Brampton's Acceleride bus program, among other non-TTC projects.
In exchange for Ottawa's largesse, Flaherty wants to ensure that the federal government is given lots of credit by the provinces and territories, which are trying to address Canada's fiscal imbalance in which some of them struggle with budget deficits while Ottawa records surpluses.
"In the spirit of the new, more collaborative relationships between our governments, we look forward to working with you to ensure all partners receive appropriate recognition, such as, for example, the display of Government of Canada wordmark on all assets and services connected with this funding," Flaherty wrote.
"A formal announcement of this commitment will be made by the federal government later this spring," he concluded.
In the House of Commons, Liberal finance critic John McCallum accused the Conservatives of "flip-flopping" on budget matters by utilizing Bill C-48 to earmark the additional money for the provinces.
When they were in opposition, Prime Minister Stephen Harper and the Conservatives fiercely opposed that Liberal legislation, which allows the government to spend surplus cash from one fiscal year in the following fiscal year.
Prior to C-48, any money left over in Ottawa's coffers when a fiscal year ended on March 31 had to be used to pay down the $499 billion national debt.
The bill, which was part of a deal between the Liberals and the NDP, was intended to provide extra federal funding for universities, public transit, affordable housing, foreign aid and aboriginal people.
At the time, Harper called C-48 irresponsible fiscal policy and the Conservatives tried, but failed, to bring down the Martin government over the legislation in May 2005.
In response to McCallum, Flaherty confirmed that the budget on Tuesday will "be dealing with surplus issues" and will provide money to deal with the priorities covered by Bill C-48.
"I am sure the member will look forward to May 2 when we will be able to provide the information that he is seeking concerning many of those issues," Flaherty added.
Outside the Commons, he refused to provide details.
Because of the unexpectedly strong performance of the economy over the past 12 months, the federal surplus for the 2005-06 fiscal year that ended March 31 is forecast to reach $9 billion or higher.
This has provided Flaherty with unexpected manoeuvring room as he designs his first budget.
But he had to decide what to do with the extra money before March 31 and thus turned to the mechanism in C-48.
I'm not the one who is a slave to others, Otis.Desperation Wrote:
But wait, Adler's not part of your "left wing media", he's one of your own Tina...
Nice ladepkcab Tina.. Rolling Eyes
Adler proved my point for me. The fact that you can't see it just reaffirms it, dumbfuck.
Thu, April 27, 2006
The deal that wouldn't die
By GREG WESTON
If Paul Martin were still in power today, he and Jack Layton would be celebrating the first anniversary of their marriage of convenience, consummated in a Toronto hotel room on the eve of last year's live-or-die Liberal budget.
Taxpayers are not likely to forget the price of the New Democrats vowing that night to stand by the minority Grits in the ensuing government-toppling budget votes -- a staggering $4.5 billion in federal spending this year and next on a vague NDP wish list of social causes.
Needless to say, this unseemly bit of hotel-room hanky-panky between Martin and Layton -- officially known as Bill C-48 --did not sit at all well with the then opposition Conservatives.
Stephen Harper properly denounced the deal as "complete irresponsible fiscal policy," and accused the Liberals of trying to "ruin the nation's finances with the biggest vote-buying spree in Canadian history."
In fact, Harper and his party were apparently so outraged at Bill C-48 that they voted against it in the dramatic Commons showdown last May that brought the Martin government to within one vote of defeat.
One year after politics and a desperation deal made strange bedfellows of Martin and Layton, now it is PM Stephen Harper who is using exactly the same $4.5-billion bribe to jump into the sack with Jack on the eve of the first Conservative budget.
A recent exchange of letters between federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty and his provincial counterparts indicates next week's Conservative budget will reveal plans to forge ahead with the NDP-inspired spending spree that Harper so aptly called "irresponsible fiscal policy."
There is so much wrong with this fiscal folly, one can barely imagine what Layton must have promised the PM in return.
Fact is, Harper didn't have to do it. Despite the failure of the Conservatives to defeat Bill C-48 while in opposition, a glitch in the bill means there was no obligation on the new Tory government to spend a dime of the promised loot.
Here's the deal: According to a leaked letter, dated March 24, from federal Finance Minister Flaherty to his provincial brethren, the Conservative government will spend $3.6 billion of the promised $4.5 billion this year, and the rest next year.
Roughly speaking, there will be $320 million more for foreign aid, and the provinces will get $1 billion for post-secondary education infrastructure; $900 million for public transit equipment; and $1.4 billion for affordable housing, including assistance to off-reserve aboriginals.
In short, it is the same old NDP wish list from last year.
Here's the catch: Like the Martin-Layton deal, the money will only flow if there is a year-end federal surplus after all the government's bills have been paid, and $2 billion has gone toward reducing the national debt.
The problem is that by federal statute, the government can't spend surplus money on anything except the debt after the fiscal year-end at March 31. But the federal beancounters won't know how much cash is left in the till until they close the government's books sometime in August. By the time the government knows how much surplus money it has for the NDP goodie list, it will be too late to spend it.
So the new Harper government of integrity and accountability came up with a better idea.
Last month the government secretly set up five separate trust funds that are essentially "owed" up to $3.6 billion of taxpayers' money from the March 31 surplus, if it is available.
But there's another issue here. The Conservatives could have devoted that massive amount of spending to anything else they wanted. For instance, that $4.5 billion would pay for all of the Liberals' promised income tax cuts that Harper has promised to roll back in order to fund his GST reduction.
Or it would buy equipment for the military, or build hospitals and schools. Or help clean up the environment.
Whatever the potential uses for $4.5 billion of our money, stuffing it in secret trust accounts to keep Jack Layton happy is still exactly what Harper said it was last year -- completely irresponsible.
One thing is certain: The auditor general is going to have a field day with this one.
And those Tina are Hypocrite's allies in the media slamming him for the Bush move he's pulling...Thu, April 27, 2006
Harper dropped ball
By PETER WORTHINGTON
A gesture of sensitivity ... stupid and thoughtless ... or an error in judgment?
Which is it?
Whatever it is, the decision to ban media from witnessing or documenting the arrival "home" of four soldiers killed in Afghanistan -- and the caskets of future soldiers killed -- seems, at first blush, to be astonishingly foolish.
One wonders at the thinking behind it.
Is it because the Americans ban media coverage for the homecoming of their dead from Iraq? Is it a brainchild of DND public affairs? Is Prime Minister Stephen Harper uneasy that coverage of coffins will weaken the resolve of Canadians for the "war" in Afghanistan?
Whatever the reason, it should be reevaluated.
Personally, I think it's reasonable when the caskets arrive at Trenton that grieving families be protected from reporters -- TV, radio and print. But cameras and TV should record the arrival. Canadians also grieve in their way for our dead -- and are entitled to see their homecoming.
Defence Minister Gordon O'Connor thinks journalists embedded with our troops in Kandahar witnessing the departure of the flag-draped coffins is sufficient.
He's wrong. Their arrival "home" is also a vital part of the story.
That doesn't mean a journalistic scrum among relatives at Trenton. But it does mean TV and photographic coverage. Words and interviews can come later when emotions are more settled.
In fact, the Canadian media have been exceedingly sensitive and respectful towards families of soldiers killed. Even the CBC, which normally doesn't approve of soldiers or the military. (Why has the CBC never run a documentary on the work our soldiers do in the field?)
While many families don't want reporters prying into their grief, others realize that Canadians want to share this moment and share the pain. The dead are our countrymen, serving our interests, and these days Canadians appreciate their soldiers as they haven't since the days of World War II.
Harper and O'Connor should understand that.
In general, the families of Afghan casualties behave with extraordinary dignity, courage and pride. The media too, invariably, is respectful and admiring of the poise shown by families, and share the sorrow each family endures. The media have not been paparazzi scrambling to intrude.
Each family is different. Some seek to mourn alone, away from outsiders, reluctant to speak their private thoughts. Others want the world to know their grief, and feel their pride in the decision of their dead loved one who died serving his country.
A greater concern than barring the media from witnessing and recording the arrival of the dead at Trenton is why Prime Minister Harper chose not to be there to meet the plane and express to the families his and Canada's gratitude for the sacrifice of these men in the full bloom of life.
A shoddy oversight.
Richard Leger, father of Marc Leger, one of four killed (and eight wounded) when the Americans mistakenly bombed them in Kandahar, told the CBC how important it was to the family that Prime Minister Jean Chretien was there when Marc came home.
Can't Harper see that?
News reports say he had chatted with one of the dead Canadians when he visited Afghanistan. Yet he couldn't be there when the body of this soldier came home.
Yes, it would have been painful, but it was the right thing to do and Harper didn't do it. For shame. It would have meant a lot to the families who were there.
It's not as if Canadians haven't been through such trauma before. We are not a weak people and historically have never cringed from pain, emotional or physical.
By shrouding events in secrecy, it's as if there is shame attached. But the only shame is to prevent Canadians from witnessing the return of their honourable dead.
Do you mean pocket books like this?Otis Wrote:
We'll see what the polls say once Hypocrite's bs starts sinking into the pocket books of Canadians...
WASHINGTON -- U.S. officials hailed a new era in relations with Canada on Thursday after reaching a softwood framework deal endorsed by a powerful American lumber group but rejected by the country's home builders.
He did, you are simply reacting to blindly to behold a true blessing.Otis Wrote:
God ******* help this country..
RACK the real deal.In a few months, Harper did what the gLiberals couldn't do in 13 years. BODE Harper!
Clearly; New Canada needs a new imfo czar.Information czar blasts Tory reform
:roll:tough love wrote:Clearly; New Canada needs a new imfo czar.Information czar blasts Tory reform
Canadian Press
Published: Friday, April 28, 2006
OTTAWA - Prime Minister Stephen Harper has done a complete about-face, introducing plans that would increase government secrecy after campaigning on openness, says Canada's information czar.
The proposed Accountability Act, now being debated in the House of Commons, will actually make government less accountable when it comes to making information available to Canadians, Information Commissioner John Reid said Friday.
In a special report to Parliament, Reid said no government has ever put forward "a more retrograde and dangerous'' set of proposals to change the Access to Information Act since the legislation first came into effect in 1983.
The Accountability Act, and other reforms being proposed, will "increase the government's ability to cover up wrongdoing, shield itself from embarrassment and control the flow of information to Canadians,'' says the scathing report.
Earlier this month, the Harper government released proposals to reform the Access to Information Act by including more government entities under its umbrella, and by turning over to a Commons committee another set of suggested reforms.
But the Accountability Act, which would add another 19 entities to be covered by Access to Information, also creates 10 new loopholes that would allow civil servants to deny requests for information, says the report.
The proposed legislation, for example, would prevent draft audits or audit working papers from being released for 15 years. Currently, there is no such wholesale exemption.
And the proposed reforms to be examined by a Commons committee also fail to deal with fundamental problems, Reid said, such as requiring civil servants routinely to create records, and giving the information commissioner more investigative powers.
Reid noted that while in opposition, Harper railed against the Liberals for failing to reform a system that encouraged civil servants to withhold information and allowed abuses such as the sponsorship scandal to flourish undetected. Harper also promised during the winter election campaign to toughen the Access to Information Act.
But the Tories are now guilty of the same abusive behaviour as they try to make government less transparent, he said.
"The new government has done exactly the things for which its predecessor had been ridiculed,'' says the report.
John Baird, president of the Treasury Board which is responsible for the Access to Information Act, called Reid's language "excessive.''
He acknowledged that the commissioner and the government disagree on some changes, but said the government is willing to work with Reid to refine the amendments.
"We're keen to work with him on those areas where I think there can be some agreement,'' Baird said.
"He's submitted some draft amendments -- we're just currently looking at that. ... I have a lot of regard for the commissioner.''
Baird suggested that 85 per cent of Reid's concerns are minor.
An NDP spokesman said government needs to strike a balance between Reid's pro-access position and privacy. But MP Pat Martin also said he takes the commissioner's concerns seriously.
"This is a pretty serious condemnation by the one leading authority on access to information,'' Martin said.
"It was the culture of secrecy that allowed corruption to flourish in Ottawa during the Liberal years. John Reid has actually now said we may be in a worse situation.''
For a $5 application fee, Canadian residents can request government information, but the system has been widely criticized for delays and excessive exemptions. More than 20,000 requests are filed each year.
Replacing a noncompatible Auditor General would entirely depend upon the poll results. :twisted:Otis Wrote:
When the auditor general starts slamming your tards for hiding money, skimming off the top.. poor ethics..
Are you going to say they have to be replaced as well?
In politics, the only reality of consequence is the end result after the ballots have been counted.Otis Wrote:
Keep on living in that bubble tl...
Tick tock...
Meanwhile in the real world... people aren't falling for Hypocrite's bullshit.
Rapidly Diminishing Opposition Support at the door said you were a Jive Turkey :wink:The provisions would weaken the commisioners power
A blip on the radar screen..tough love wrote:In politics, the only reality of consequence is the end result after the ballots have been counted.Otis Wrote:
Keep on living in that bubble tl...
Tick tock...
Meanwhile in the real world... people aren't falling for Hypocrite's bullshit.
Libby Loser keeps Screeching, You Just Wait...You Just Wait
Well, we waited and New Canada is now living large in Harper World.
Quit kidding yourself moron...tough love wrote:And:
That big self-serving crap being taken by the AG is for the same reason John Reid made his big self-serving stink over nothing.
Rapidly Diminishing Opposition Support at the door said you were a Jive Turkey :wink:The provisions would weaken the commisioners power
Let's have a little look see at the big opposition three, shall we.Otis Wrote:
as to who would actually vote for him next time around haven't gone up at all.
More like challenged.Otis Wrote:
Nice dodge on not taking the challenge to listen to one of your own Winnipegers tl..
So you're a pussy who is not up for the challenge?tough love wrote:More like challenged.Otis Wrote:
Nice dodge on not taking the challenge to listen to one of your own Winnipegers tl..
I'll leave the 'being a slave to the rantings of nay sayers' part to you, my crim(e)son washed fiend.
No Tina, what bothers me is that Harpocrite's fascism is blinding suckers like you into believing in it.As for The Harper doing's, he's looking more and more like the great statesman with each passing day, which is what is really bothering you, isn't it?
RIDE 'EM HARPER :)
Something like that.So you're a pussy who is not up for the challenged?
BIG SMILE BIG SMILENo Tina, what bothers me is that Harpocrite's fascism is blinding suckers like you into believing in it.
I pity you.