T1B

Dinsdale wrote:Linus and Lucy

As an aside, if you want to better understand everything that is wrong with music today, look no further than Built To Spill's cover of this.

BTS are heralded (by many on this board as well) as some great band, and pop music has become so removed from reality, they had the nerve to do something other than destroy these recordings. This band isn't even capable of feeling shame, otherwise they would surely be mortified that they tried to pass that shit off as music.

If the fuckers can't tune their instruments and play in time, they probably shouldn't be doing covers, much less covers that have been done many times, and every time prievious was better than theirs.

Absolutely hideous.

Dinsdale wrote:Built To Spill

Never heard of them, which sounds like a very good thing.

Oh, and its the yob that keeps me here for now. Happiest I've been career-wise. It's a tradeoff after having lived in Milwaukee, San Antonio, Lawrence and Albuquerque, all of which have upside and downside, though Lawrence has very little downside as far as living there, outside of the limited career opportunities. Or if you happen to be a Mizzou basketball fan.

Closest I've been to the U&L is San Fran. and Yosemite, on different occasions.

Built to Spill is $

I can assure you Doug Martsch and co. are playing their instruments precisely how they intend to. If their style doesn't suit your perception of what should be the "precedent" for all, well, you can kindly get fucked and not listen to the discs.

Oh, and this is coming from a guy who has...applauded Death Cab on these very boards, yet has the gall to denounce BTS? Classic.

dins is about as full of shit as it gets. the next time i trust dins' taste in music will be the fucking first. dude sucks enough dick on the smack board where i know he's in mvscal's words: irrelevant.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:I can assure you Doug Martsch and co. are playing their instruments precisely how they intend to.

I spoke of a particular cover. On this cover, there are band members playing out of time, on out of tune instruments.

If you are so fucking stupid that you believe that anyone, anywhere would do this intentionally, then huge freaking props to BTS, as they found their target audience -- the tone-deaf.

And Screw Michigan -- I'm still looking for that link...the one thing you posted that suddenly gave you the epiphany that you were in some position to judge who and what is relevant.

I'll hold my breath....since you had to fucking quote mvscal just to come up with that always-funky-fresh one punch knockout...the dreaded "you're irrelevant."

Good god, you fucking tard -- I think you may have just raised (or lowered) the bar on being a fucking retarded little fucking moron.

You actually had to tap into someone else's arsenal to come up with "you're irrelevant?"

Just when I think retards can't get any more fucking retarded, someone always proves me wrong.

Here's a dose of reality for you, asswipe -- I, and I alone will decide when it's time for me to make you famous on these boards. No amount of sniping little "if mvscal was here, he'd call you irrelevant" is going to expedite this process.

In fact, most people with a working brain choose to delay that day as long as possible. But I suppose when you're as takeless a little fuck as you are, grasping at straws is all you have, and all you'll EVER have.

Dude...I still can't believe YOU, a resident fucking retard, were considering stepping to ME, a veritable garthok of removing fucking birthdays, whether you care to acknowledge the fact or not....with "mvscal says you're irrelevant."

That is utterly fucking PRICELESS.

Holy fucking retards, Batman.

Hi. I have the Linus and Lucy cover, and I love it. That's all.

Also, I love their song "Strange"...

patsy stone wrote:Hi. I have the Linus and Lucy cover, and I love it. That's all.

Stu Hamm's cover?

Personally, the Vince Guaraldi trio works just fine for me.

But I suppose one of the motherfucking tards on American Idol -- if not the uber-motherfucking watching tards of that abortion -- could do a better version of the instramental of "Christmas time is here."


Yeah, we'll all be waiting for that.


I heard that they're now singing classic Queen songs on American Idol.

Are you fucking kidding me?

Amazing how so many people are into "music" these days. Good God, in the immortal words of Jim Morrison: "Save us. Jesus. save us."

RadioFan wrote:
I heard that they're now singing classic Queen songs on American Idol.

Are you fucking kidding me?

And Rod Stewart songs.

RadioFan wrote: I heard that they're now singing classic Queen songs on American Idol.

Who told you? Your boyfriend?

Dinsdale wrote:

Dinsdale wrote:Linus and Lucy

As an aside, if you want to better understand everything that is wrong with music today, look no further than Built To Spill's cover of this.

BTS are heralded (by many on this board as well) as some great band, and pop music has become so removed from reality, they had the nerve to do something other than destroy these recordings. This band isn't even capable of feeling shame, otherwise they would surely be mortified that they tried to pass that shit off as music.

If the fuckers can't tune their instruments and play in time, they probably shouldn't be doing covers, much less covers that have been done many times, and every time prievious was better than theirs.

Absolutely hideous.

I haven't heard the cover, so I can't comment on this beyond the fact that you're talking about a song that was recorded live and wasn't put on an official release. There must be far worse violators of your apparent code of what is good music, Dins. I mean, besides the Flaming Lips.

Dinsdale wrote:I spoke of a particular cover. On this cover, there are band members playing out of time, on out of tune instruments.

I haven't heard the cover. All I can tell you is I'm a big fan of "There's Nothing Wrong With Love" and "Keep It Like A Secret". Have you heard either of those? If you haven't, then creating a Built to Spill "argument" thread was a little redundant on your part. If you have, then give me your unbiased thoughts on the two records. Afterall, you created a debate thread devoted entirely to one band, so I would have to imagine you know quite a bit about the band other than just some cover song that you heard.

I think this is where Dins explains the you are a dipshit, that of course he's heard almost every song BtS has ever written, that he can't understand why he wastes his time with incoherrent twits who can't undertand the intent of his original post, and that you are unworthy of even discussing this band on his level.

Only longer.

P.S. Mgo, no love for Perfect From Now On? What gives?

Not a huge fan.

Where to begin...

I guess HERE is as good a place as any --

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:

Dinsdale wrote:I spoke of a particular cover. On this cover, there are band members playing out of time, on out of tune instruments.

I haven't heard the cover.

Yet you rushed in to defend it, even suggesting I was wrong in my assertions.

But now...you haven't even heard the song being discussed?

Please tell me I didn't just read that? Please?

What next, MaGoo -- going to tell me that "mvscal would call you a dipshit if he was here?"

Jeebus.

Afterall, you created a debate thread devoted entirely to one band, so I would have to imagine you know quite a bit about the band other than just some cover song that you heard.

You know what...I'll just let this slide. After all, you had no way of knowing that I did NO SUCH THING, and only mentioned that particular song, since covers of Linus and Lucy were being discussed in another thread. A forum mod apparently split this post into its own topic, probably with the intent of getting you and I to call each other "stupid" and "gay" and stuff.

So, since you had no way of knowing that I didn't in fact start this thread, it gives you a pass on the horribly inaccurate stupidity you based your response on, pretty much rendering your entire point moot.

So, since you had no way of knowing that I didn't in fact start this thread, it gives you a pass on the horribly inaccurate stupidity you based your response on, pretty much rendering your entire point moot.

Fine. But, have you really heard anything by these guys? I'm genuinely curious to know.

I have a few mp3s kicking around. The more instrumentally-driven stuff isn't so bad.

Certainly nothing I'd go out of my way to play, but when it comes up on a random shuffle, I don't automatically click the "next" button.

Is that what you were looking for?

And really -- would I start a thread with such a pedestrian title? You know me better than that. I'm sure if I started the thread, the title would include "tards," "indiefags," or something along those lines. When I post a topic, the "argument" part is implied, is it not?

They're just a fun band to listen to. They're not made up of Steve Vais and Eric Johnsons, but, more importantly, they don't intend to replicate what those guys are doing - regardless of whether they have the ability to or not.

And if they're soliciting me to buy their tickets, I'd at least appreciate it if they showed the same ability as Vai and Co. to tune their freaking instruments.

The general operating theories of Western Music tend to encourage entire ensembles to tune to the same pitch. And hitting notes on the actual appropriate downbeats is a nice bonus, too. It is kind of what seperates professionals from 6th grade band class.

Since I have seen them play an entire show, I can speak from experience and say: they played VERY well, tuned instruments and all.

But I realize when assessing a band, that piece of empirical information doesn't serve nearly as valuable when being compared to the one fucking cover song you heard at one point in time.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: the one fucking cover song you heard at one point in time.

Uhm, didn't I dispell this notion just a couple of posts ago?

So, you somehow thought bringing horrendous grammar to the table was going to change that? (Sorry, but "point in time" is a pet peeve of mine. Horrid. Obviously, it wasn't a point in a line, plane, or universe, so it was therefore a point "in time." Redundant. But anyhoo...)

OK, brass tacks (this wasn't going to end well for you, but I'll just make certain of that at this point in time) --

Have you heard the cover I mentioned?

Think this one over carefully.

Do you, or do you not believe that instruments were out of tune?


Two questions. We already know the answer to one of them, and can easily deduce the other.

And this is what you chose to respond to?

Have you been borrowing Screw Michigan's IQ, or what?

You're entire argument is based upon "Well, I haven't actually heard it, but since Dinsdale said it, it MUST be wrong."

Nice work, clown. Stay tuned for my "water is wet" thread...I'm sure you'll do well in it.

Dinsdale wrote:Uhm, didn't I dispell this notion just a couple of posts ago?

Are you really this fucking idiotic?

Your point of contention was based entirely on that one song, dipshit. At no other point did you reference any other song as the basis for your "poorly tuned instruments" argument. Try taking some lessons from yourself before you so hastily dispense them out to others.

So, you somehow thought bringing horrendous grammar to the table was going to change that? (Sorry, but "point in time" is a pet peeve of mine. Horrid. Obviously, it wasn't a point in a line, plane, or universe, so it was therefore a point "in time." Redundant. But anyhoo...)

Then...

You're entire argument

Thanks for the laugh, dopey.

rack this thread. everything that needs to be said has been said.

reality 1 - dins 0 (F)

bode.

"Dopey?"

Cutting edge stuff, there.

But, I'll concede the draw in the grammarsmack. I believe the "you're" came from me being about to call you a name (one much better than "dopey," to be certain).

But, I see you neglected to answer the two questions that were entirely germane to the argument at hand. And all the external fluff you care to throw around doesn't change that.

You're arguing a point that you readily admit to being unfamiliar with the subject of, based strictly upon the person who posted it. Instead of pumping your chest, maybe it's time for some inflection, from which maybe you can formulate a plan to avoid looking this fucking whiney and stupid in the future...just a thought.

Dinsdale wrote:And all the external fluff you care to throw around doesn't change that.

External fluff, you say? Does that resemble anything like this?

So, you somehow thought bringing horrendous grammar to the table was going to change that? (Sorry, but "point in time" is a pet peeve of mine. Horrid. Obviously, it wasn't a point in a line, plane, or universe, so it was therefore a point "in time." Redundant. But anyhoo...)

Does your hypocrisy end anywhere? Do I have to go beyond this thread to find it? This is fucking hilarious. I'm accused with the usage of "external fluff", yet you're the first to provide a chief example of it? UN-FREAKING-REAL.

You're arguing a point that you readily admit to being unfamiliar with the subject of, based strictly upon the person who posted it. Instead of pumping your chest, maybe it's time for some inflection, from which maybe you can formulate a plan to avoid looking this fucking whiney and stupid in the future...just a thought.

Let's just get this straight: Your attempt was to take what you heard from that song, and that song alone, and use it as some sort of undeniable description of the band. If that's not your intention, why break out with this bit of lavish outpouring?

And if they're soliciting me to buy their tickets, I'd at least appreciate it if they showed the same ability as Vai and Co. to tune their freaking instruments.

The general operating theories of Western Music tend to encourage entire ensembles to tune to the same pitch. And hitting notes on the actual appropriate downbeats is a nice bonus, too. It is kind of what seperates professionals from 6th grade band class.

Ahh, yes. We have a band that has been playing shows and making records for 15 years, and have done phenomenal for themselves (as far as indie acts go), DESPITE lacking the most critical ability a musician can possibly know: how to tune an instrument. Yes, we should all blatantly ignore 15 years worth of success, because, get this...DINSDALE CAN REFERENCE ONE SONG THAT DISPLAYS THEIR "INABILITY" TO TUNE THEIR FUCKING INSTRUMENTS! Are you suggesting people should accept your isolated and rather...venturesome admission OVER 15 years worth of touring and record making proficiency? I can only think of two kinds of mentally defective pushovers who would: those who can't pry themselves from your collapsing ballsack long enough to disagree with you and check out the rational side, and those who are legitimately as stupid as you have shown to be in this thread.

But yes, these guys DO know how to tune their instruments and they actually know how to play them too. Do you think people go see them to witness a grandiose spectacle of image-lauding and attention-whoring (which, by the way, is the only thing you've been able to execute in this thread)?

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Ahh, yes. We have a band that has been playing shows and making records for 15 years, and have done phenomenal for themselves (as far as indie acts go), DESPITE lacking the most critical ability a musician can possibly know: how to tune an instrument.

I remember reading an interview with Charlie Watts after the Stones released Steel Wheels. In said interview he made mention of the fact that during the sessions for Steel Wheels, he had gotten his drum kit tuned FOR THE FIRST TIME.

It is worth noting that Steel Wheels and every album following it have sucked more ass than a Staples Center toilet seat.

In a humorous way, I can sort of appreciate Dinsdale's attempt to convince someone that a (critically) reputable and notable act has found a way to go through life and maintain a career playing music WITHOUT possessing the knowledge or ability to tune their instruments. That's certainly not an intelligent stance for anyone to take, but at least the attempt to do so is fun for me to watch. Keep up the entertainment, good buddy.

dinsdale is a twat

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:blatantly ignore

You probably should have let the grammarsmack die.

Not exactly sure how you "blatantly ignore" something.

I guess right after you "proudly hang you head in shame."

So, I guess what you're saying (again), is that "No, I haven't heard the one song you referred to, so I can't really say whether there's instruments out of tune or not. I just wanted to argue with Dinsdale, since he pointed out a major gaffe by a band I like."


Word of advice, MaGoo -- you might want to stick to subjects where you actually have some fucking clue what you're talking about next time. You have even admitted as much in this very thread, so save the spinjob.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:I can sort of appreciate Dinsdale's attempt to convince someone that a (critically) reputable and notable act has found a way to go through life and maintain a career playing music WITHOUT possessing the knowledge or ability to tune their instruments.

I can sort of appreciate MGO trying to convince someone that this even vaguely resembles anything I said.

Link to where I said anything about the career of BTS, and or any abilities they may or may not possess to tune an instrument? If you got this out of anything I said, you're not very bright. I was referring to...

maybe if I use the capslock, it will sink in?

I WAS REFERRING TO ONE PARTICULAR SONG.

I'm not sure at which point you lost your grasp on this concept? Was it when I explained it to you for the third time? Is that when the idea that my statements were about ONE SONG?

You know...that one song you've never actually heard, but are willing to go to the mat to defend? That one?

But wheat they hey...if changing my words suits your idiotic stance better, then by all means...