T1B

Juba's existence has not been proven by any military source. U.S. soldiers have been led to believe that each sniper attack was carried out by the same individual, which is what gave rise to the idea of "Juba". Every time one of these incidents occurs, a single cartridge case and a note have been found at the location where the sniper was believed to have been. The message says, in Arabic, "What has been taken in blood cannot be regained except by blood. Baghdad Sniper". These items were found after the sniper attack when buildings were searched by U.S. forces. It is not yet known whether "Juba" is a single sniper, or whether "Juba" represents a copycat phenomenon carried out by multiple individuals, or if "Juba" in fact exists at all.


"What has been taken in blood cannot be regained except by blood. Baghdad Sniper"

JUBA, The Terror of US Forces in Iraq

They have never seen Juba. They hear him, but by then it’s too late: a shot rings out and another US soldier slumps dead or wounded.

There is never a follow-up shot, never a chance for US forces to identify the origin, to make the hunter the hunted. He fires once and vanishes.


Is this him?


No. No American has ever seen "Juba".....and lived.

Download
Juba's Greatest Hits

Right click and save.

This must be terrifying to the troopers.

What you can't see can hurt you. It's the psychology of an effective guerrilla war.

There's been more than a few Hajis beheaded by a .50 caliber bullet from US sinper rifles.

I have seen some of the videos and its fucking impressive. Hajis head and torso dissappering in a red splash about 20 feet in the air.

That dude will get his.

War whacking and stcking as many of them Iraqi cocksuckers as they can.

Martyred wrote:This must be terrifying to the troopers.

What you can't see can hurt you. It's the psychology of an effective guerrilla war.

Effective?? Okay my friend. The second we decide to go all out on their ass, none of them will be around. They are doing everything they can and we have only scratched the surface.

we have only scratched the surface.

Rack....

Our guys have whacked so many of those fucks it is unbelivable. Too bad the body counts for Hajis don't make the nightly news, but maybe that is a good thing.

We could kill those cocksuckers all day and all night for a year and not make a dent.

These are people who are ready to blow themselves up to get rid of your stinking occupation.
You think they care about body counts?

As the occupation drags on, the resistance gets stronger, and you get weaker.
Americans are poor students of history.

These are people who are ready to blow themselves up to get rid of your stinking occupation.
You think they care about body counts?

As the occupation drags on, the resistance gets stronger, and you get weaker.
Americans are poor students of history.

They don't care and neither should the American public.

If the politicans would get the fuck out of it, tell the boots on the ground to solve the problem, they would all be home in 6 months, with a fucking huge pile of rotting Hajis corpses left behind.

I submit we have a fuck of a lot more bullets and bombs than they have those illierate goat fucking Hajis, and they will run out of cannon fodder before we run out of bullets.

American politicians are poor students of history, the common man understands it very well.

Derron wrote: I submit we have a fuck of a lot more bullets and bombs than they have those illierate goat fucking Hajis, and they will run out of cannon fodder before we run out of bullets.

You (like the rest of your overfed, ADD afflicted countrymen) have no fucking clue on how to
combat a popular resistance.

Welcome to Stalingrad. Who's that skeleton looking at you in the mirror?

Martyred wrote:
You (like the rest of your overfed, ADD afflicted countrymen) have no fucking clue on how to
combat a popular resistance.

Dude, you are Canadian. Glasse houses and all. You get the picture.

Martyred wrote:This must be terrifying to the troopers.

What you can't see can hurt you. It's the psychology of an effective guerrilla war.

Another argument for the "glass parking lot" war strategy....

mvscal wrote: The Germans were losing 2,400 soliders a day. We've lost that many in three years.

Just think of it like a business, when the costs outweigh the gain - you are wasting time. The losses the Soviet Army took in Afghanistan seem relatively small:

1979 - 86 men.
1980 - 1484 men.
1981 - 1298 men.
1982 - 1948 men.
1983 - 1446 men.
1984 - 2343 men.
1985 - 1868 men.
1986 - 1333 men.
1987 - 1215 men.
1988 - 759 men.
1989 - 53 men.

Soviet soldiers - 13,833 (amount of prisoners - 330).

Soviet IFVs and APCs - 1,314.

Soviet helicopters - 333.

Soviet jets - 118.

Soviet tanks - 147.

Two worst years for soviet tank forces:

1981 year - 28 tanks.

1988 year - 22 tanks.


Worst year for mech infantry:

1983 year - 186 IFVs and APCs.



Murtha was saying yesterday that the casualty rate per men deployed is three times higher than Viet Nam.

I unfortunately watched that whole video, and the *sniper* (if you want to call him that) had less than a 20% kill ratio.

Our guys are much better.

Too bad someone doesn't smoke your sand ni66er ass and make you live up to your name, Martyred.