T1B

Seems they're releasing video of the missle....errr....airliner striking the Pentagon.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/16/pentag ... index.html

Footage can be doctored or even manufactured. Consider the Moon Landings.


Bottom line, I don't see this "moving" too many people that don't think a plane hit the Pentagon. They're kooks anyway and they'll just find another way to rationalize their kookiness.

mvscal wrote:

What a pitifully stupid fuck.

glass dick

He could've been on that god damn plane and he wouldn't believe a plane hit it.

Sounds like it is just the video that the stills were taken from. If so... nothing to see here. Move along.

mvscal wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:Footage can be doctored or even manufactured. Consider the Moon Landings.


Bottom line, I don't see this "moving" too many people that don't think a plane hit the Pentagon. They're kooks anyway and they'll just find another way to rationalize their kookiness.

Of course. The mopes at Felchomatic Reacharound are already priming for the meltdown as we speak.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/di ... 02x2287696

Im sure the family members of the passengers on that plane would love that site.....

These last five years, how come the Pentagon attack is rarely if ever talked about?

'rarely if ever talked about?'

Where have YOU been?

Eaglebauer wrote:These last five years, how come the Pentagon attack is rarely if ever talked about?

I blame American Idol.

Moving Sale wrote:'rarely if ever talked about?'

Where have YOU been?

It's never talked about. Each one of the plane crashes on 9/11 was obviously a catastrophe of unprecedented proportions in its own right, but 9/11 has pretty much just been synonymous with the World Trade Towers and that's it.

The plane that crashed in PA that they just made the movie about sometimes got a mention.

The Pentagon thing is almost like swept under a rug.

Just my candid impression.

Tom In VA wrote:Footage can be doctored or even manufactured. Consider the Moon Landings.

And don't forget the flat earth society. They just don't get enough props.

Mister Bushice wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:Footage can be doctored or even manufactured. Consider the Moon Landings.

And don't forget the flat earth society. They just don't get enough props.

When Bigfoot ordered those 19 leprechauns to fly those UFO's into Loch Ness,
I just knew that things were never going to be the same.

mvscal wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:Footage can be doctored or even manufactured. Consider the Moon Landings.


Bottom line, I don't see this "moving" too many people that don't think a plane hit the Pentagon. They're kooks anyway and they'll just find another way to rationalize their kookiness.

Of course. The mopes at Felchomatic Reacharound are already priming for the meltdown as we speak.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/di ... 02x2287696

Those poor people.

Martyred wrote:

Mister Bushice wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:Footage can be doctored or even manufactured. Consider the Moon Landings.

And don't forget the flat earth society. They just don't get enough props.

When Bigfoot ordered those 19 leprechauns to fly those UFO's into Loch Ness,
I just knew that things were never going to be the same.

How's life in FallacyLand treating you guys?

IKYABWAT?

Brilliant.

Damn that was one big ass cruise missle, no fucking way that was launched by just any black helicopter. I'm thinking Stealth shit, Maybe from space. Goddamn Bush set us up the freak'n bomb while he chit chatted with little kids in Florida. It was all a plan so he could make sure he had no contact with anyone because he was on vacation and forgot his cellphone back at the oval office.

Bastards!

Now that I've seen it...

That was a pretty weak clip.

GMcT,
You are an idiot.

Eaglebauer wrote:These last five years, how come the Pentagon attack is rarely if ever talked about?

It's never talked about. Each one of the plane crashes on 9/11 was obviously a catastrophe of unprecedented proportions in its own right, but 9/11 has pretty much just been synonymous with the World Trade Towers and that's it.

The plane that crashed in PA that they just made the movie about sometimes got a mention.

The Pentagon thing is almost like swept under a rug.

Just my candid impression.

If you've got a point you want to attempt to make then go for it.

Go for it, or shut your hole.

You sound like a complete idiot.

Moving Sale:







Moving Sale’s cat:

Moving Sale wrote:IKYABWAT

Leave your mom out of this

There aren't too many people around more critical of the Bush Administration than I am, but I've never gone in for the 9/11 conspiracy theories. Too much evidence to the contrary. My beef with the Bush Administration and 9/11 is about them politicizing and exploiting the event, not causing it.

There are more than enough legitimate grounds available to criticize this Administration without making oneself look like a card-carrying member of the Tinfoil Hat Society.

Terry in Crapchester wrote:Too much evidence to the contrary.

Physical evidence that 77 hit the pentagon? Like what?

Nice to hear from you again you fucking Racist tard. Did you say something?

poptart wrote:

Eaglebauer wrote:These last five years, how come the Pentagon attack is rarely if ever talked about?

It's never talked about. Each one of the plane crashes on 9/11 was obviously a catastrophe of unprecedented proportions in its own right, but 9/11 has pretty much just been synonymous with the World Trade Towers and that's it.

The plane that crashed in PA that they just made the movie about sometimes got a mention.

The Pentagon thing is almost like swept under a rug.

Just my candid impression.

If you've got a point you want to attempt to make then go for it.

Go for it, or shut your hole.

You sound like a complete idiot.

Still melting?

My point was those are my impressions (perfectly legitimate ones at that).

I post them because I thought someone might come by and tell me, 'You know what, I noticed that, too, and that IS odd' or 'No you just must have missed it. The Pentagon thing gets the play it deserves.'

You're of course incapable of either.

But if my impressions somehow make your brainwashed tard brain uncomfortable in some way then why don't YOU figure out why instead of wasting our time by posting and making an ass of yourself for the umpteenth time.

As I suspected, you haven't the balls to even attempt to make your point.


Almost 3000 were killed at the towers, and 'just' 250 were killed at the Pentagon (including those who were in the plane).

The Pentagon was damaged but not destroyed, while the largest structures in downtown NY City were completely taken down.


Gee, 'tard, I wonder why one event has gotten the bulk of the attention ... ?

Your 'legitimate impressions' are those that a child might make.

Eaglebauer wrote: I post them because I thought someone might come by and tell me, 'You know what, I noticed that, too, and that IS odd' or 'No you just must have missed it. The Pentagon thing gets the play it deserves.'

No, you just must have missed it.

You must live in a cave, or be so obtuse that no amount of "play" that "Pentagon thing" received ever penetrated your dull senses.

These are just my candid impressions (perfectly legitimate ones at that).

Happy now?

Gee, there's a viewpoint I hadn't thought of--> the terrorist attack on our nation's capital, the HQ and very heart of our very nation's defense in fact, wasn't that big a deal.

Hey I think you might finally find your niche in S. Korea. First place you can open your mouth and people won't instantly understand what a dumbfuck you are.

War Wagon wrote:

Eaglebauer wrote: I post them because I thought someone might come by and tell me, 'You know what, I noticed that, too, and that IS odd' or 'No you just must have missed it. The Pentagon thing gets the play it deserves.'

No, you just must have missed it.

You must live in a cave, or be so obtuse that no amount of "play" that "Pentagon thing" received ever penetrated your dull senses.

These are just my candid impressions (perfectly legitimate ones at that).

Happy now?

Somehow your post doesn't seem very genuine.

Which one of us said that the pentagon attack wasn't a big deal ... ?

The towers coming down was a bigger deal.

Why is that concept puzzling to you ... ?

Nobody else struggles with it.

poptart wrote:Which one of us said that the pentagon attack wasn't a big deal ... ?

You did. That's your argument.

My argument was both events in their own right exceed such a magnitude that I am surprised the coverage of one can so dwarf the other.

Sorry if that's hard for you to grasp, poptard.

Maybe you can pray to Jesus to be smarter.

Eaglebauer wrote:

poptart wrote:Which one of us said that the pentagon attack wasn't a big deal ... ?

You did. That's your argument.

No, it's not.

I never made such a point.


If you are 'surprised the coverage of one can so dwarf the other' then you're just a very dim bulb.

poptart wrote:

Eaglebauer wrote:

poptart wrote:Which one of us said that the pentagon attack wasn't a big deal ... ?

You did. That's your argument.

No, it's not.

I never made such a point.


If you are 'surprised the coverage of one can so dwarf the other' then you're just a very dim bulb.

Dumbass--That is the only argument you have.

I never said the WTC deserved less coverage.

I think the Pentagon should have gotten more coverage.

The two aren't mutally exclusive.

For virtual retards such as yourself I suppose they are though considering you can't focus on more than one concept at the same time.

I hope you didn't forget to pack your retard safety helmet for S. Korea in case you fall and hurt that soft fuckin head of yours...

Eaglebauer wrote:Dumbass--That is the only argument you have

My 'argument' is that you are a clueless eunuch, and that was secured long ago.

At this point I am just lifting your maimed carcass up at the count of 9 to joy-beat you a little more.

Eggle dumbuck, go construct your strawman somewhere else, 'k?

Your arguement sucks ass.

My arguement is very genuine.

That you're a blithering dumbfuck for not being aware of the over whelming attention that the attack on the Pentagon was also afforded.

What color is the sky on the world in which you live?

poptart wrote:

Eaglebauer wrote:Dumbass--That is the only argument you have

My 'argument' is that you are a clueless eunuch, and that was secured long ago.

At this point I am just lifting your maimed carcass up at the count of 9 to joy-beat you a little more.

Run^^^^^

War Wagon wrote:Eggle dumbuck, go construct your strawman somewhere else, 'k?

Your arguement sucks ass.

My arguement is very genuine.

That you're a blithering dumbfuck for not being aware of the over whelming attention that the attack on the Pentagon was also afforded.

What color is the sky on the world in which you live?

And you saw this when? Between re-runs of Roseanne and Family Guy?

Sorry, but opinions from bumfuck rednecks from KC don't register high on my discussion-scale.

Eaglebauer wrote:

War Wagon wrote:Eggle dumbuck, go construct your strawman somewhere else, 'k?

Your arguement sucks ass.

My arguement is very genuine.

That you're a blithering dumbfuck for not being aware of the over whelming attention that the attack on the Pentagon was also afforded.

What color is the sky on the world in which you live?

And you saw this when? Between re-runs of Roseanne and Family Guy?

Sorry, but opinions from bumfuck rednecks from KC don't register high on my discussion-scale.

And neither does reality, but don't let that stop you, lil feller.

Eaglebauer wrote:Run^^^^^

Remember the day Regalblower beat up the bad guy's hands with his face .... ?