Page 1 of 1

Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 2:02 am
by TenTallBen
We'll see if Jsc posts in this thread. That being said, I've met some upstanding, quality members of government here in Louisiana, but I could probably count them on one hand.

Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 2:03 am
by Y2K
watch out for our well being
:lol:
we Trust these folks
:lol:

Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 2:26 am
by Wolfman
sadly--
there is so much money and chances
for graft (honest and dishonest---
ever read George Washington Plunkett ?)
that even someone with good intentions can
get caught up in it all--- regardless of party
affiliation.
The most important reason that if we really wanted
to clean up politics (if it is even possible) would
be to have term limits !!
If it works at the state level--why not in our
nation's capital ??

Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 12:31 pm
by BSmack
Wolfman wrote:sadly--
there is so much money and chances
for graft (honest and dishonest---
ever read George Washington Plunkett ?)
that even someone with good intentions can
get caught up in it all--- regardless of party
affiliation.
The most important reason that if we really wanted
to clean up politics (if it is even possible) would
be to have term limits !!
If it works at the state level--why not in our
nation's capital ??
If it works at the state level?

They have term limits here in Monroe County and things are just as fucked up as ever. The only difference is that now each legislator spends the last 4 years of his or her 12 year legislative career angling for another public sector job so that they can qualify for a pension. Term limits are a fucking joke.

Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 12:41 pm
by Wolfman
everything is an f-ing "joke" to you Bri--
it'as too bad you have grown to be a cynical bitterman--
the founding Fathers never intended federal
political office to a be full time job--
and we'd all be better off if the 17th Ammendment
was repealed !!

Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 1:11 pm
by BSmack
Wolfman wrote:everything is an f-ing "joke" to you Bri--
it'as too bad you have grown to be a cynical bitterman--
the founding Fathers never intended federal
political office to a be full time job--
and we'd all be better off if the 17th Ammendment
was repealed !!
The founding fathers also never intended for slavery to be abolished or for women to vote. So what's yer fuckin point?

Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 2:12 pm
by Cicero
BSmack wrote:
Wolfman wrote:everything is an f-ing "joke" to you Bri--
it'as too bad you have grown to be a cynical bitterman--
the founding Fathers never intended federal
political office to a be full time job--
and we'd all be better off if the 17th Ammendment
was repealed !!
The founding fathers also never intended for slavery to be abolished or for women to vote. So what's yer fuckin point?

They were visionary's.

Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 2:22 pm
by The Seer
I see no reason for him not to get re-elected...


Sincerely,

Ray Nagin

Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 2:25 pm
by BSmack
Cicero wrote:
BSmack wrote:The founding fathers also never intended for slavery to be abolished or for women to vote. So what's yer fuckin point?
They were visionary's.
You would want to party like it's 1799. But try to remember that the 18th century equivalent to an FSU degree was a career as a blacksmith.

Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 3:12 pm
by Y2K
Term Limits here in Cali do keep all the Special Intrerest people busy. They have to stay in touch with who gets bought and for how long and at the same time groom and shape another set of lapdogs for future uses.

Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 3:15 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
Bri, I get your overall point, but . . .
BSmack wrote:The founding fathers also never intended for slavery to be abolished . . .
A history major should know better than to post this. Slavery already had been abolished, IIRC, in most of the northern states by the time the Constitution was ratified.

Not to mention that there was serious discussion about abolishing slavery at the time, but that was sacrificed in the interest of obtaining unanimous ratification of the Constitution. Further, the founding fathers included a specific amendment process, and I'd be willing to bet that a few of them were prescient enough to realize that there was at least a possibility that slavery would one day be abolished through that process.

Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 2:20 am
by Turdmaker
Well, in a nutshell, yes.....

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,196517,00.html

Talk about a worthless POS.

Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 2:29 am
by TenTallBen
Where the fuck is risa? Lotta dumb darkies up in here that she needs to be defendin!