T1B

[web]http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/w ... index.html[/web]

I wouldn't classify this as glass dique b/c it hasnt been posted here, but she has been doing that for about 2-3 months now. Amazing how far in life you can get and the hurdles you can jump over b/c of a pretty face and a knockout body. It looks more like an advice column but WTF does a 22 year-old girl know about life? Esp one who has had every guy be nice to her since she hit puberty.

SI......whatafuckingdisgrace*





*I want to be in her.

This is absolute bullshit. Who gives a flying fuck what some skank thinks about issues in sports. If she wants to talk about her and her friends bumping donuts...I'm all ears.

She's really not a skank, but go on.

I guess we have differing definitions of the word.

Slunt?

I am compelled to view Sterger's pics.
I am compelled to avoid her blog posts like the Black Death.

^^^


We agree on something.

Cicero wrote:She's really not a skank

Most in the coccaine and boobs crowd aren't skanks. Whores yes. Skanks no.

Not sure which is more sad...
SI devoting a mailbag to her, or
Some complete numbnut asking HER a fucking sports question. Hell, any question... except, "which hole" of course.

"Ace"

She's the type of chick that would make out with other chicks to get attention... Not because it's cool, but because more guys pay attention her when she does so.

To me, that = skank. Lesbians are boring enough. Fake lesbians are downright weak.

And if she knows so much about sports, college football in particular, let's see her start posting here in the fall. :D:D:D:D:D:D:D

...oh, and who was it saying she had a pretty face? Last I remember, at least three of her "we're not lesbians, but being ambiguous is hot, right?" friends were better looking than her.

Great body though. Wonder what the rack cost daddy?

the_ouskull

I want the two minutes of my life I spent reading that back. :brad:

Is it just me, or is she a few fries short of a Happy Meal, intellectually speaking?

I'd agree, Terry. Not real surprised.

She's one of those ladies that is better seen than heard...or read in this case. How does going to FSU games in a cowboy hat and a bikini make you a writer? Yeah, I look at her and say, I wonder what her thoughts are on the world around us.

Shoalzie wrote:She's one of those ladies that is better seen than heard...

Touche

Mods:

Anyone here that seyz they wouldn't blast DNA all over that abdomen should be banned.

p.s. Justsayin

Shes good lookin'. I refuse to read the article on the grounds that she might not be as good lookin' after I read it. There is something about intelligence that I find attractive.

the_ouskull wrote: Wonder what the rack cost daddy?

the_ouskull

i saw a link to a radio interview with her at Netbuffs.com where susequent posts revealed that number to be 12,000$. Jen, always philosophical, said "it was one of the best decisions she ever made". it was unclear what other competition there was in terms of "best decisions".

Facially, she looks much more attractive in the doctored-up model shots. ...not that she WOULDN'T, I'm just saying.

...and yes, I'd spackle her belly hole, no doubt. Or, as Jay Mohr might say, "I'd pull out and draw a map of Hawaii on her stomach."

the_ouskull

OK...another topic I feel qualified to comment on: Skanks.

Jimmy Medalions wrote: Anyone here that seyz they wouldn't blast DNA all over that abdomen should be banned.

While I agree with the fundamental principle, I disagree to an extent -- I'd probably be more inclined to draw a bead on the eyeball...just sayin'.