Horray !! Darwinism finally works.....
Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 12:30 am
mvscal wrote:Not always.... :(
mvscal wrote:
FTFY.Dinsdale wrote:mvscal wrote:
At least I flew fighters for the Guard. Davy Crockett there was a... ...journalist.
Sin,
W
Oh c'mon mvscal, seriously. For a guy who just pulled a "What unit were you in" card on a poster to sit here and say that about Al Gore, is disingenous. I think the dude is a total dork, but he was there, at a time when just being in country was risky.mvscal wrote:Get real. He was a Senator's son. He did a six month guided tour of Vietnam. The gravest danger he ever faced was his own ineptitude.Dinsdale wrote:mvscal wrote:
Mishandling a weapon in Vietnam? He should be ashamed of himself.
Sin,
W
mvscaveat wrote:Whoopdee fuckin' doo. Doing what, where and when?Tom In VA wrote:but he was there,
Calling out hypocrisy wrote:What about Bush, or other Republican politicans who served?
Not that your "expertise" isn't tainted by politics or anything.mvscaveat wrote:What about them? They served. What did you do?
and you know all of this how?mvscal wrote:Whoopdee fuckin' doo. Doing what, where and when?Tom In VA wrote:but he was there,
He was just a silver spooned moron shuffled through a chaperoned and abbreviated tour who barely managed not to shoot himself in the head while slinging his rifle. It was touch and go for a second there, though.
so based on your assumption that he wasn't "exposed to any meaningful danger" makes him a bad guy or what? I'm trying to understand why you (a former soldier) opts to trash a guy who was actually in Vietnam.....mvscal wrote:This is not classified information. He spent five months in Vietnam covering the 20th Engineers in Bien Hoa. This was not a combat assignment and Army brass being what it is, there is no chance in hell that Little Lord Fauntleroy was exposed to any meaningful danger.Felix wrote:and you know all of this how?
It is what it is.
I don't blame Bush for any of this. But getting back to the topic at hand in this thread, the fact that Bush is still around is proof positive that Darwin doesn't always work.Derron wrote:Nice hijack fuck sticks.....
Blame Bush for the Rusky blowing his brains out all over his family...
Here's antoher one you can blame on Bush...crist almighty
Suspect dies in apparent fall off Madras cliff
07:06 AM PDT on Thursday, June 1, 2006
Associated Press
MADRAS, Ore. -- A man fleeing a traffic stop early Wednesday plunged to his death from a 30-foot cliff, authorities said.
(kgw.com graphic)
Charles Yallup, 27, of White Swan, Wash., was driving a pickup on U.S. Highway 97 west of Madras when a sheriff's deputy tried to stop him because the truck had one functioning headlight, according to the Jefferson County Sheriff's Office.
Yallup avoided the stop by driving through two fences and onto roads where the patrol car could not follow, the sheriff's office said.
The deputy soon spotted the pickup and found two people inside. Undersheriff Jim Adkins said they told deputies that Yallup got out of the pickup and fled on foot.
Relatives living in Warm Springs organized a search for Yallup and found him dead, roughly two hours after the attempted traffic stop. He apparently fell over a cliff in the dark.
An autopsy has been scheduled, Adkins said.
Actually, it has more to do with his party affiliation than anything else. Were he a Republican, he'd be a bona fide war hero in mvscal's eyes.Felix wrote:so based on your assumption that he wasn't "exposed to any meaningful danger" makes him a bad guy or what? I'm trying to understand why you (a former soldier) opts to trash a guy who was actually in Vietnam.....mvscal wrote:This is not classified information. He spent five months in Vietnam covering the 20th Engineers in Bien Hoa. This was not a combat assignment and Army brass being what it is, there is no chance in hell that Little Lord Fauntleroy was exposed to any meaningful danger.Felix wrote:and you know all of this how?
It is what it is.
we all get the fact that you hate him, but sullying his name simply because he didn't serve in a capacity that you thought appropriate is pretty childish.......
We have a winner.Terry in Crapchester wrote:Actually, it has more to do with his party affiliation than anything else. Were he a Republican, he'd be a bona fide war hero in mvscal's eyes.
As soon as I saw this --Derron wrote:Here's antoher one you can blame on Bush...crist almighty
I didn't need to read the rest. But, my suspicions were confirmed --Suspect dies in apparent fall off Madras cliff
Relatives living in Warm Springs
An autopsy has been scheduled, Adkins said.
During the Vietnam War, the United States military operated a major combat air base in Bien Hoa. Nonetheless, a significant portion of the city's residents sympathized with or were members of the Viet Cong, and mortar attacks on U.S. and ARVN targets were frequently staged from residential districts in Bien Hoa.mvscal wrote:This is not classified information. He spent five months in Vietnam covering the 20th Engineers in Bien Hoa. This was not a combat assignment and Army brass being what it is, there is no chance in hell that Little Lord Fauntleroy was exposed to any meaningful danger.Felix wrote:and you know all of this how?
It is what it is.
so your major complaint is that he wasn't there at the right time.....and he wasn't doing a job that you consider to be worthwhile......mvscal wrote:I was saying that we was rear echelon pogue. The closest he ever got to combat was interviewing combat troops. He didn't get to Bien Hoa until well after Tet.BSmack wrote:You were saying dipshit?
You might want to look some of this shit up before plungering yourself.mvscal wrote:I was saying that we was rear echelon pogue. The closest he ever got to combat was interviewing combat troops. He didn't get to Bien Hoa until well after Tet.BSmack wrote:You were saying dipshit?
You have something to contradict any of that? I didn't think so. Go fuck yourself, dumbshit.
http://www.snopes.com/military/goreviet.htmThe evidence indicates that if there was an official effort to guarantee Gore's safety, it was uneven at best. His clippings from the Castle Courier, the newspaper of the U.S. Army Engineering Command, and other publications suggest that he pulled his weight, which in his case meant choppering around to report features about the good works of the 20th Engineers, who were tasked with paving roads, building bridges, and clearing jungle to support combat operations. William Smith, another reporter attached to the 20th, recalls the morning in early 1971 when a sergeant asked him to go to Khe Sanh, fifteens miles south of the Demilitarized Zone, to cover the engineers' role in reopening an abandoned airstrip. When Smith said he was scheduled to leave for R&R in Hawaii, the sergeant called for volunteers. Gore stepped up and spent a cold night in a foxhole. "Al did what everybody else did," said Mike O'Hara, the photographer who shot the Khe Sanh assignment.
So now a man carrying arms in service of his country is a dumbfuck?mvscal wrote:I have no complaints. Merely observing the simple fact that he is a dumbfuck.
Case closed.
Pretty sad attempt at constructing a strawman. Maybe you should move on down the road with your homies in the brick house.mvscal wrote:...choppering around to report features about the good works of the 20th Engineers, who were tasked with paving roads, building bridges, and clearing jungle to support combat operations.
Pretty "highspeed" shit there.
Why are you trying to reinvent this assclown as Audie Murphy? It's a lost cause. He was a Gomer. Deal with it.
nobody is.....mvscal wrote: Why are you trying to reinvent this assclown as Audie Murphy?
Derron wrote:Hmmmm .223 at that range would take half his dome off.
Can you show me where the bolt is on that rifle?mvscal wrote:That is correct. In fact, it is abundantly clear from the photo that he really shouldn't have been "carrying arms" in any capacity...for his own safety and that of everyone downrange from that sad sack.BSmack wrote:So now a man carrying arms in service of his country is a dumbfuck?
That's what I thought. Thanks for playing.mvscal wrote:It's not in the picture.
what do Al Gore and General Creighton Williams Abrams, Jr have in common?mvscal wrote:His "stint" in Vietnam was a joke. That's not trashing it. It's the simple fact of the matter.
No really, we got it the first time.mvscal wrote:It's not in the picture.
[Nonsensical sequitor]Felix wrote:what do Al Gore and General Creighton Williams Abrams, Jr have in common?mvscal wrote:His "stint" in Vietnam was a joke. That's not trashing it. It's the simple fact of the matter.
mvscal wrote:there is no fucking way in hell you can spin it that it's "OK" for the muzzle of your weapon to be pointed straight in your face.
Well, for one, you are looking at a two dimensional photograph and assuming that the muzzle is pointed at Gore's head. How you can tell this is a matter best kept between you and your dealer, as you cannot even see the bolt on this weapon, much less the angle of the stock resting on the ground to tell you what angle the muzzle is leaning towards.mvscal wrote:I see that you really seem to think you're on to something here. Go ahead and break it down for us, beanbag.BSmack wrote:No really, we got it the first time.mvscal wrote:It's not in the picture.
BSmack wrote: Well, for one, you are looking at a two dimensional photograph and assuming that the muzzle is pointed at Gore's head. How you can tell this is a matter best kept between you and your dealer, as you cannot even see the bolt on this weapon, much less the angle of the stock resting on the ground to tell you what angle the muzzle is leaning towards.
Maybe you could take a second look at the picture and tell me where the strap is in relation to the muzzle. Oh, and while you're at it, take a look at the hands. Mull it over for a while and get back.Dinsdale wrote:BSmack wrote: Well, for one, you are looking at a two dimensional photograph and assuming that the muzzle is pointed at Gore's head. How you can tell this is a matter best kept between you and your dealer, as you cannot even see the bolt on this weapon, much less the angle of the stock resting on the ground to tell you what angle the muzzle is leaning towards.
Or, you can stick with the "plunger" angle...doesn't really matter to me. I was just trying to help you out.
It's rare a poster puts on such a stellar display of stupidity, though. Enjoy the impending pile-on.
OK. I mulled it over.BSmack wrote:Maybe you could take a second look at the picture and tell me where the strap is in relation to the muzzle. Oh, and while you're at it, take a look at the hands. Mull it over for a while and get back.
BSmack wrote:How you can tell this is a matter best kept between you and your dealer
I wonder where the magazine is for this weapon?mvscal wrote:B.b.b.b.but you can't see the bolt!!! That means something....I think.
--BDumbfuck
What the fuck ??as you cannot even see the bolt on this weapon, much less the angle of the stock resting on the ground to tell you what angle the muzzle is leaning towards.
I think he means if he can't see the bolt, its not loaded. The M-16 has a ton of safety features, but overcoming operator stupidity and error is not one of them .B.b.b.b.but you can't see the bolt!!! That means something....I think.
Looks like its in the fucking gun you stupid fuck......I wonder where the magazine is for this weapon?
So much for your claim to be able to do cocaine "safely". It is obviously affecting your vision. Notice the gaping hole also known as the magazine port?Derron wrote:Looks like its in the fucking gun you stupid fuck......I wonder where the magazine is for this weapon?