T1B

Cause the media is trying to destroy the GOP and turn the country into a bunch of pussies.

What makes one a huge incident, and the other one day's news?

The Marines failed to package them properly.

88 wrote:If the press is getting worked up over Iraqi civilians that purportedly died at the hands of US Marines, shouldn't they be equally upset when a few produce boxes show up full of severed heads?

I know I'd be upset if I found a severed head in my box of tomatoes.

But the reason why the press is covering these stories differently is simple. Nobody knows who killed the headless people and everybody knows who killed those people in Haditha. Murder cases get a whole lot more newsworthy when there is a suspect.

there were several incidents of
"no prisoners" in our military operations
in most all of our wars-
--the lefties have an agenda
that's all !!

Wolfman wrote: --the lefties have an agenda
that's all !!

Yeah, that whole "don't kill civilians" is some pretty limp-wristed stuff.

"We're here to 'liberate' you....oh, and by the way...BLAMBLAMBLAM!!!!!!"


I'd kinda be looking for my taxes back at that point.

Dinsdale wrote:

Wolfman wrote: --the lefties have an agenda
that's all !!

Yeah, that whole "don't kill civilians" is some pretty limp-wristed stuff.

"We're here to 'liberate' you....oh, and by the way...BLAMBLAMBLAM!!!!!!"


I'd kinda be looking for my taxes back at that point.

How about a trial before convicting them.

mvscal wrote:

BSmack wrote:everybody knows who killed those people in Haditha.

Link?

Do you live in a fucking CAVE?

mvscal wrote:

BSmack wrote:

mvscal wrote: Link?

Do you live in a fucking CAVE?

That isn't a link.

Good to see you noticed dipshit. Turn on a fucking TV set.

BSmack wrote:

mvscal wrote:

BSmack wrote: Do you live in a fucking CAVE?

That isn't a link.

Good to see you noticed dipshit. Turn on a fucking TV set.

Oh T.V. has replaced due process. Good to know.

Tom In VA wrote:

BSmack wrote:

mvscal wrote: That isn't a link.

Good to see you noticed dipshit. Turn on a fucking TV set.

Oh T.V. has replaced due process. Good to know.

Yes it has. You happy now?

the lefties worry more about
thev due process of a money grubbing
congressman from Louisiana than our
troops under fire in harm's way !

*no link needed either*

Wolfman wrote:the lefties worry more about
thev due process of a money grubbing
congressman from Louisiana than our
troops under fire in harm's way !

*no link needed either*

Seriously James, are you retarded?

BSmack wrote:

Wolfman wrote:the lefties worry more about
thev due process of a money grubbing
congressman from Louisiana than our
troops under fire in harm's way !

*no link needed either*

Seriously James, are you retarded?

seriously, are you suggesting they're guilty already?

titlover wrote:

BSmack wrote:Seriously James, are you retarded?

seriously, are you suggesting they're guilty already?

Gee, you think?

Dammit, fucking idjits, when I said I wanted a box of melons, I meant Cantalopes.

mvscal wrote:Really hard hitting stuff you're bring here, BDumbfuck. A request for evidence yields:

Do you need evidence of the moon landings as well?

First of all...yes, both incidents appear to be deplorable.

If marines indeed murdered civs in cold blood, then it's worse because we don't want our marines to do that kind of thing.

Now:

the lefties worry more about

Can this noise. Your baloney about "lefties" is just as bad as what Carol Condit drops on us. If you honestly think any American cares more about abetting a corrupt politician than they do about our troops in harm's way, then you've gobbled up a vast load of horseshit with a vigor that belies your age and apparent infirmity.

Seriously...whose radio show has so twisted you that you imagine "lefties" don't care about the lives of our troops? You've been fucking had.

atomicdad wrote:Dammit, fucking idjits, when I said I wanted a box of melons, I meant Cantalopes.

Iraqis don't grow cantaloupes.
You'll probably need to speak to an Armenian.

BSmack wrote:

mvscal wrote:Really hard hitting stuff you're bring here, BDumbfuck. A request for evidence yields:

Do you need evidence of the moon landings as well?

Let's not let the investigation gather evidence and then if need be have a trial. A bunch of couch potato "armchair quarterbacks" with their heads up their asses have it all figured out.

And the insurgents don't stand to gain anything from pumping a few civilians with bullets and then making the claims American did it.

Mikey wrote:Iraqis don't grow cantaloupes.

Well Fuck me running, I guess that is where I went wrong.

Tom In VA wrote:

BSmack wrote:

mvscal wrote:Really hard hitting stuff you're bring here, BDumbfuck. A request for evidence yields:

Do you need evidence of the moon landings as well?

Let's not let the investigation gather evidence and then if need be have a trial. A bunch of couch potato "armchair quarterbacks" with their heads up their asses have it all figured out.

And the insurgents don't stand to gain anything from pumping a few civilians with bullets and then making the claims American did it.

Tom,

Take off the blindfold. The only thing in question is the mental state of the Marines in question. That is what will likely save them from life sentences.

mvscal wrote:

BSmack wrote:

mvscal wrote:Really hard hitting stuff you're bring here, BDumbfuck. A request for evidence yields:

Do you need evidence of the moon landings as well?

I'm not asking for evidence of the moon landing, you pathetic braindead fuck.

I'm asking for actual evidence that Marines are responsible for killing those people. Rumor, innuendo and Islamist propaganda is not "evidence".

So the Marines pay damages for people they DIDN'T kill?

After Haditha leaders complained, the Marines paid compensation put variously by townspeople at $1,500 or $2,500 for each of the 15 men, women and children killed in the first two houses.

Show me that the Corps did not pay those damages and you have a case. Otherwise, STFU.

BSmack wrote:

titlover wrote:

BSmack wrote:Seriously James, are you retarded?

seriously, are you suggesting they're guilty already?

Gee, you think?

why should we be giving Saddam a trial then? we all know what the fuck happened.

mvscal wrote:Is that it? That's supposed to be your "evidence" of deliberate murder?

Whether it was "deliberate" or not, it happened and it happened at the hands of US Marines. But feel free to explain how a platoon of Marines going house to house and killing women and children with small arms fire and grenades could be construed as somehow being "accidental".

mvscal wrote:

BSmack wrote:Whether it was "deliberate" or not, it happened and it happened at the hands of US Marines.

Did it? Or did it happen at the hands of the diaperheads who were using these people as sandbags? Or were they just caught in the crossfire?

But feel free to explain how a platoon of Marines going house to house and killing women and children with small arms fire and grenades could be construed as somehow being "accidental".

Says who?

Keep spinning. The other 70% of this country already knows the truth.

BSmack wrote:

mvscal wrote:

BSmack wrote:Whether it was "deliberate" or not, it happened and it happened at the hands of US Marines.

Did it? Or did it happen at the hands of the diaperheads who were using these people as sandbags? Or were they just caught in the crossfire?

But feel free to explain how a platoon of Marines going house to house and killing women and children with small arms fire and grenades could be construed as somehow being "accidental".

Says who?

Keep spinning. The other 70% of this country already knows the truth.

How are the presidential approval rating numbers relevent to this case? That is what you are referring to with your 70% BS right? Or is there a poll that says 70% of people believe they are guilty?

Those camel jockeys think they can 1 up me huh. They don't know who they're fucking messing with.

Sin

Cicero wrote:Cause the media is trying to destroy the GOP and turn the country into a bunch of pussies.

'Scuse me, but would that be the "Drive-by Media" as so routinely dismissed by Rusp Limpdick? Because we all know how tough the NY Times was on the run-up to the invasion of Iraq. Sure, all those Judy Miller pieces put right on the front page. Sure, the "media" is "against" the GOP.

(Do you anything WHATSOEVER about the real Cicero? It sure doesn't appear so)

BSmack wrote:

titlover wrote:

BSmack wrote:Seriously James, are you retarded?

seriously, are you suggesting they're guilty already?

Gee, you think?

He's hoping so. A real shitbag.

mvscal wrote:I'm just asking for facts and you don't have any to report.

You mean other than 20 something dead Iraqi civilians with American pullets and shrapnel in their bodies? You mean besides multiple eyewitness accounts that corroborate the information found on the victims' death certificates regarding their manner of death? You mean besides the Marines attempting to buy off the families of the victims with blood money?

BSmack wrote: You mean other than 20 something dead Iraqi civilians with American pullets and shrapnel in their bodies? You mean besides multiple eyewitness accounts that corroborate the information found on the victims' death certificates regarding their manner of death? You mean besides the Marines attempting to buy off the families of the victims with blood money?

Then after these Marines are granted their due process, they should get what they deserve.


Key words being "due process."

And if they're guilty, fry them. If not, then aplogize. Seems pretty simple.

Dinsdale wrote:Then after these Marines are granted their due process, they should get what they deserve. Key words being "due process." And if they're guilty, fry them. If not, then aplogize. Seems pretty simple.

They deserve a trial and a chance to refute the rather substantial pile of evidence already assembled. And if they do, I'll be the first to say I was wrong. But I wouldn't bet on it.

Sure, it's their fault. After all, if they knew a Terrorist was in their vicinity, their proper and obvious course of action was to alert Occupation Forces at once, right?

Seems clear once you read Mein Kampf for the eighteenth time.

mvscal wrote:

BSmack wrote:You mean other than 20 something dead Iraqi civilians with American pullets and shrapnel in their bodies?

Link?

I already gave you one. Try reading more.

Well, if terrorists and their enablers say so, it simply must be true.

You mean like the Naval Criminal Investigative Service?

Seriously. This is not a myth. When members of Congress state for the record that they expect charges of murder and dereliction of duty to be filed as a result of this investigation, that is a pretty fucking good sign that the Naval Criminal Investigative Service is agreeing with the eyewitness accounts. Maybe you want to take it up with them. Perhaps you could call them names. I'm sure that would help your cause.

Oh, by the way, maybe you can explain why they are using occupied dwellings as firing positions? That makes them responsible for those deaths.

There were no firing positions in those homes. Period. Try making some more shit up. I'm sure it will help you.

BUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!



Has there ever been a fucking bsmack thread that didnt end up with him getting his puckered apple jack lanced wide open by mvscal multiple times?

Raydah James wrote:BUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!



Has there ever been a fucking bsmack thread that didnt end up with him getting his puckered apple jack lanced wide open by mvscal multiple times?

mvscal = cat
bsmack = ball of yarn

lts trn = flea on a camel

Raydah James wrote:Has there ever been a fucking bsmack thread that didnt end up with him getting his puckered apple jack lanced wide open by mvscal multiple times?

Go ahead and take a break, mvscal...I'll field this one:



No.

mvscal wrote:Rumor, innuendo and Islamist propaganda is not "evidence".

A Racist fucko asking that someone be extended Due Process? I Laughed!

Moving Sale wrote:

mvscal wrote:Rumor, innuendo and Islamist propaganda is not "evidence".

A Racist fucko asking that someone be extended Due Process? I Laughed!

BSmack can you explain that 70% number you quoted earlier?