Page 1 of 1
McNair traded to Ravens
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 8:58 pm
by Cicero
Dealt for a 4th Round pick in '07
If they were going to do this I dont see why they didnt take Leinart. If Volek sucks or gets hurt, the Titans will be picking in the Top 3 again next year.
Re: McNair traded to Ravens
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 9:27 pm
by ChargerMike
Cicero wrote:Dealt for a 4th Round pick in '07
If they were going to do this I dont see why they didnt take Leinart. If Volek sucks or gets hurt, the
Titans will be picking in the Top 3 again next year.
...the Titans will be picking in the top three regardless.. Leinart, Volek or McNair. The Titans...they're not good!
Re: McNair traded to Ravens
Posted: Wed Jun 07, 2006 9:36 pm
by Felix
mvscal wrote:Cicero wrote:If they were going to do this I dont see why they didnt take Leinart.
They did it because Bud Adams is a dumbfuck.
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 5:31 am
by WhatsMyName
I bet every veteran on the Titans now knows they are fucked should they ever sign a lucrative, long term contract. Nice play, dumbfucks.
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 6:42 pm
by BSmack
Kyle Boller wrote:
Re: McNair traded to Ravens
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:38 pm
by Dinsdale
Cicero wrote:I dont see why they didnt take Leinart.
Uhm...I'm guessing because their scouts liked Jesus better?
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:40 pm
by Cicero
Fire them Scouts then,
Re: McNair traded to Ravens
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:51 pm
by Dinsdale
mvscal wrote:
The coaches wanted Leinart. The owner wanted Young.
The man with the gold, makes the rules.
That;s OK -- Paul Allen nixed two deals for Darius Miles -- further evidence that owners always know best, regardless of the sport.
Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 5:10 am
by WhatsMyName
Owners know best when it comes to business. If selling jerseys is the most important thing, every team would try to copycat the Redskins. Notice the Skins have sucked every year except last year's fluke.
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 4:41 pm
by velocet
WhatsMyName wrote:last year's fluke.
Link?
velocet
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:02 am
by Dumbass
No way, pinks.
Dio said something stupid? Never.
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:43 am
by WhatsMyName
velocet wrote:WhatsMyName wrote:last year's fluke.
Link?
velocet
Sure.
Code: Select all
2005 NFL Washington Redskins 10-6-0 Gibbs Brunell Portis Moss 13 11 9 9 32
2004 NFL Washington Redskins 6-10-0 Gibbs Ramsey Portis Coles 31 30 5 3 32
2003 NFL Washington Redskins 5-11-0 Spurrier Ramsey Canidate Coles 22 23 24 23 32
2002 NFL Washington Redskins 7-9-0 Spurrier Ramsey Davis Gardner 25 19 21 4 32
2001 NFL Washington Redskins 8-8-0 Schottenheimer Banks Davis Gardner 28 28 13 8 31
2000 NFL Washington Redskins 8-8-0 Turner, Robiskie Johnson Davis Connell 24 11 8 4 31
1999 NFL Washington Redskins 10-6-0 Turner Johnson Davis Westbrook 2 2 24 29 31
1998 NFL Washington Redskins 6-10-0 Turner Green Allen Westbrook 17 12 28 22 30
1997 NFL Washington Redskins 8-7-1 Turner Frerotte Allen Shepherd 15 19 9 16 30
1996 NFL Washington Redskins 9-7-0 Turner Frerotte Allen Ellard 8 16 13 28 30
1995 NFL Washington Redskins 6-10-0 Turner Frerotte Allen Ellard 18 16 21 18 30
1994 NFL Washington Redskins 3-13-0 Turner Shuler Ervins Ellard 13 19 28 26 28
1993 NFL Washington Redskins 4-12-0 Petitbon Rypien Brooks Sanders 25 26 23 26 28
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 7:43 pm
by velocet
Your link proves nothing in terms of last year being a fluke. The success of last season was the result of good coaching and good play, period.
velocet
Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 4:18 pm
by WhatsMyName
So you asked me for a link to something that proves that good coaching and good play were NOT the reasons they won 10 games?
Gee, brilliant comeback. You're a fucking tard.
The Skins have been a model of Suck for the past 10+ years, all while outspending everyone.