Page 1 of 1

how will the church react to this?

Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 9:53 pm
by peter dragon

Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:06 pm
by peter dragon

Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:27 pm
by Wolfman
maybe "the church" will
simply say--
what a load of horse crap !!

Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 11:50 pm
by Rich Fader
peter dragon wrote:how will the church react to this?
"Drugs are bad, mmkay?"

:twisted:

:lol:

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:56 pm
by Goober McTuber
Wolfman wrote:maybe "the church" will
simply say--
what a load of horse crap !!
And you were --
a teacher?
Good fucking God.

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:05 pm
by Wolfman
Meanwhile, more down-to-earth theories abound. One Indian government investigation conducted in 2001 lays blame for what some have called the "blood rains" on algae.

Other theories have implicated fungal spores, red dust swept up from the Arabian peninsula

I vote for algae (Rhodophyta) carried by winds--
next ???

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:09 pm
by GrizBearStare
Gay marriage is the big issue here.


sin,

29% and falling

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:11 pm
by Goober McTuber
Wolfman wrote:Meanwhile, more down-to-earth theories abound. One Indian government investigation conducted in 2001 lays blame for what some have called the "blood rains" on algae.

Other theories have implicated fungal spores, red dust swept up from the Arabian peninsula

I vote for algae (Rhodophyta) carried by winds--
next ???
So now we should--
vote on this?
As opposed to say--
scientifically testing--
different theories?

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:15 pm
by Bizzarofelice
Wolfman wrote: I vote for algae (Rhodophyta) carried by winds--
Did you not read the part where it said "this shit has no characteristics that would suggest algae"?

Of course you didn't. Biggest damned tard on the boards.

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:25 pm
by Wolfman
so all algae have to be alike ??
no chance for a species we never saw before ??
who's the "tard" ??

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:31 pm
by Bizzarofelice
Wolfman wrote:so all algae have to be alike ??
no chance for a species we never saw before ??
who's the "tard" ??
We've never encountered an organism wifout DNA.

Algae has DNA. If it has no discernable DNA, then it is likely a completely different animal, inbred chickenfucker.

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:43 pm
by Bizzarofelice
mvscal wrote:
Bizzarofelice wrote:Did you not read the part where it said "this shit has no characteristics that would suggest algae"?
No, but I did read the part that they still had a lot more testing to do before we get to space aliens.
mvscal,
remind me of the place in this thread where I said these things were aliens? If you are having some troubles, it might be because I never said that, douchebag. Before you open that hayseed mouth of yours, might want to pause and wonder "Will this be another instance of me making a damned fool of myself?"

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:48 pm
by Goober McTuber
mvscal wrote:
Bizzarofelice wrote:Did you not read the part where it said "this shit has no characteristics that would suggest algae"?
No, but I did read the part that they still had a lot more testing to do before we get to space aliens.

Yeah, you're a fucking idiot.
Can we count on your vote for “a fine mist of blood cells produced by a meteor striking a high-flying flock of bats”?

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:52 pm
by Bizzarofelice
mvscal wrote:Your implication is quite clear.
All in your perception.

You should also question pretty much everything else you take for granted.

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:06 pm
by Goober McTuber
mvscal wrote:The only thing I've taken for granted here is the fact that you are a complete idiot.
I believe he's suggesting that you should question that.

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:20 pm
by Bizzarofelice
mvscal wrote:The only thing I've taken for granted here is the fact that you are a complete idiot.
Gotta sdmire the tard's tenacity. Tough little bugger, that mvscal. There's no stopping him, even in the face of his own limitations.

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:27 pm
by Cicero
I dont see how people could be so naive to think that Aliens couldnt exist. The Universe is so complicated and immense that scientists dont even know how big it is. I dont know how people can be so arrogant to think that no life exists outside of the planet Earth.

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:30 pm
by Goober McTuber
Cicero wrote:I dont see how people could be so naive to think that Aliens couldnt exist.
Exhibit A:


Image

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:31 pm
by Bizzarofelice
mvscal wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:
mvscal wrote:The only thing I've taken for granted here is the fact that you are a complete idiot.
I believe he's suggesting that you should question that.
I will cheerfully do so when presented with evidence to the contrary.
viewtopic.php?t=17038
You just can't avoid getting taken to school, can you?







Well maybe you avoided it from 10th-to-12th grade.

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:46 pm
by Bizzarofelice
mvscal wrote:Sorry, not seeing any evidence of intelligence from you here, but go ahead and dazzle me with your alleged brilliance.
I never professed brilliance, either. In fact, it didn't take much effort from me. You stuck your foot up your own ass. I just sat back and said "you're doin' it again" at the appropriate moments.

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 5:40 pm
by Smackie Chan
Bizzarofelice wrote:You just can't avoid getting taken to school, can you?
Not after the driver strapped the beetle-headed, flap-ear'd knave into the short bus.

Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 10:29 am
by Allah Akbar
We here at al Qaeda are the ones who discovered this planet and we will be the ones to destroy it for everyone but Muslims as soon as the liberals help us succeed in destroying America.

Allah Akbar!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!