T1B

:P

Bwahahaha

Yep, that's about right.

you'll both have to step up your game if you ever hope to get an invite to Buttsy's new board

:wink:

Tom Tomorrow is the best cartoonist on the Interwebs.

Rack Tom Tomorrow and the Trollfessor.

Tom Tomorrow is accountable to whom when he's wrong ?

Tom In VA wrote:Tom Tomorrow is accountable to whom when he's wrong ?

WTF does that have to do with anything?

Christ Tom, get some fucking booze in you again. You used to make sense.

Tom In VA wrote:Tom Tomorrow is accountable to whom when he's wrong ?

To the people that voted him into his cartoon office.

Jesus, Tom...try the Coast Guard...Immigration Service...Fruit inspector...
ANYTHING!!! Anything to dampen your "unfulfilled-duty blues".

BSmack wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:Tom Tomorrow is accountable to whom when he's wrong ?

WTF does that have to do with anything?

Christ Tom, get some fucking booze in you again. You used to make sense.

The entire cartoon is a piece of fiction about somebody being "wrong" and being held accountable to a penguin. The guy draws real well, and the cartoon is funny. Nevertheless the statement it is making, is incorrect.

Is the author held accountable for spreading incorrect information ? Seems the author holds others' accountable.

BSmack wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:Tom Tomorrow is accountable to whom when he's wrong ?

WTF does that have to do with anything?

Christ Tom, get some fucking booze in you again. You used to make sense.

ROFLMMFAO!

Martyred wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:Tom Tomorrow is accountable to whom when he's wrong ?

To the people that voted him into his cartoon office.

Jesus, Tom...try the Coast Guard...Immigration Service...Fruit inspector...
ANYTHING!!! Anything to dampen your "unfulfilled-duty blues".

I'm moving to Canada to keep an eye on you.

Tom In VA wrote:

BSmack wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:Tom Tomorrow is accountable to whom when he's wrong ?

WTF does that have to do with anything?

Christ Tom, get some fucking booze in you again. You used to make sense.

The entire cartoon is a piece of fiction about somebody being "wrong" and being held accountable to a penguin. The guy draws real well, and the cartoon is funny. Nevertheless the statement it is making, is incorrect.

Is the author held accountable for spreading incorrect information ? Seems the author holds others' accountable.

Trolling or retarded?

Tom In VA wrote:The entire cartoon is a piece of fiction about somebody being "wrong" and being held accountable to a penguin. The guy draws real well, and the cartoon is funny. Nevertheless the statement it is making, is incorrect.

Is the author held accountable for spreading incorrect information ? Seems the author holds others' accountable.

You're right Tom. It is true that penguins can't really talk. Do you feel better?

Can somebody link me to where it was said that it would be a cakewalk? How 'bout to the part where middleast democracy would flourish according to a certain time period?

I got just one fukkin' question for TT. Just how the fukk would he handle it? Continued arab appasement/looking the other way? That got us to 911.

Not saying that GDub has handled it all well. He hasn't. Dismantling the entire Iraqi military on day one was a huge fukking blunder. It has made everything else difficult. But, I would still take the current mess over there over us sitting on our hands waiting for the next tower to collapse.

Bizzarofelice wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:

BSmack wrote: WTF does that have to do with anything?

Christ Tom, get some fucking booze in you again. You used to make sense.

The entire cartoon is a piece of fiction about somebody being "wrong" and being held accountable to a penguin. The guy draws real well, and the cartoon is funny. Nevertheless the statement it is making, is incorrect.

Is the author held accountable for spreading incorrect information ? Seems the author holds others' accountable.

Trolling or retarded?

Neither, offering a solid take on a piece of material submitted to the board.

You should try it some time.

Tom In VA wrote:

Martyred wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:Tom Tomorrow is accountable to whom when he's wrong ?

To the people that voted him into his cartoon office.

Jesus, Tom...try the Coast Guard...Immigration Service...Fruit inspector...
ANYTHING!!! Anything to dampen your "unfulfilled-duty blues".

I'm moving to Canada to keep an eye on you.

I'll tell Phibes to put fresh sheets on the fold-out couch.

I hope you like boiled potatoes and Mao.

BSmack wrote: You're right Tom.

About time you recognized.

Tom In VA wrote:

BSmack wrote: You're right Tom.

About time.

Now that we've gotten past your penguin issues, what did you think of the content?

Pssst! I do remember when you were not a knee jerk neocon defender. Would it be possible for you to remember that as well?

Tom In VA wrote:Nevertheless the statement it is making, is incorrect.

Where? Where is it incorrect?

smackaholic wrote:Can somebody link me to where it was said that it would be a cakewalk? How 'bout to the part where middleast democracy would flourish according to a certain time period?

I got just one fukkin' question for TT. Just how the fukk would he handle it? Continued arab appasement/looking the other way? That got us to 911.

Not saying that GDub has handled it all well. He hasn't. Dismantling the entire Iraqi military on day one was a huge fukking blunder. It has made everything else difficult. But, I would still take the current mess over there over us sitting on our hands waiting for the next tower to collapse.

Et tu, smackaholic? Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.

BSmack wrote: ... your penguin issues...

'swhat I'm sayin'

BSmack wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:

BSmack wrote: You're right Tom.

About time.

Now that we've gotten past your penguin issues, what did you think of the content?

I think the content of the cartoon is up for debate. I think smackoholic said it best about the first "lie", i.e. Iraq being a cakewalk or the entire "War on Terror" being a cakewalk.

Tom In VA wrote:I think the content of the cartoon is up for debate.

Only if you've been sleeping the past 6 years.

I think smackoholic said it best about the first "lie", i.e. Iraq being a cakewalk or the entire "War on Terror" being a cakewalk.

No, actualy that was what Rummy said. Something about being "greeted with flowers in the streets" as I recall.

BSmack wrote: Only if you've been sleeping the past 6 years.

......

No, actualy that was what Rummy said. Something about being "greeted with flowers in the streets" as I recall.

Nice strikeout. You lose.

L8

Tom In VA wrote:

BSmack wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:Tom Tomorrow is accountable to whom when he's wrong ?

WTF does that have to do with anything?

Christ Tom, get some fucking booze in you again. You used to make sense.

The entire cartoon is a piece of fiction about somebody being "wrong" and being held accountable to a penguin. The guy draws real well, and the cartoon is funny. Nevertheless the statement it is making, is incorrect.

Is the author held accountable for spreading incorrect information ? Seems the author holds others' accountable.

Dude, its a CARTOON. How many cartoons do you know that are actually correct?

You need to get a life or a wowo. The sell wowo's here http://www.wowomg.com

Dog wrote: You need to get a life

Can't argue with that one.

Terry in Crapchester wrote:[

Et tu, smackaholic? Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.

Terry, the middleast being in desperate need of an unfukking had everything to do with 9/11. And it just so happened that saddam was the self professed head of that shithole. Knocking him the fukk out sent a message. It said "homey don't play that no more".

Dont really find that cartoon funny. If he wants, next week he can doodle up a little diddy about how he would have handled the situation. I bet that would be hilarious.

Tom In VA wrote:

BSmack wrote:

Tom In VA wrote: About time.

Now that we've gotten past your penguin issues, what did you think of the content?

I think the content of the cartoon is up for debate. I think smackoholic said it best about the first "lie", i.e. Iraq being a cakewalk or the entire "War on Terror" being a cakewalk.

Washington Post wrote:Ken Adelman, formerly an assistant to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, promised us "Cakewalk In Iraq."

http://www.newyorker.com/printables/tal ... _hertzberg

Tom In VA wrote:

BSmack wrote: Only if you've been sleeping the past 6 years.

No, actualy that was what Rummy said. Something about being "greeted with flowers in the streets" as I recall.

Nice strikeout. You lose.

L8

I see you've decided to stop defending your points. Probably the best strategy you could have come up with.

Bizzarofelice wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:

BSmack wrote: Now that we've gotten past your penguin issues, what did you think of the content?

I think the content of the cartoon is up for debate. I think smackoholic said it best about the first "lie", i.e. Iraq being a cakewalk or the entire "War on Terror" being a cakewalk.

Washington Post wrote:Ken Adelman, formerly an assistant to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, promised us "Cakewalk In Iraq."

http://www.newyorker.com/printables/tal ... _hertzberg

My God you're absolutely .

More than a year ago, Kenneth Adelman, a prominent national-security official in the Reagan Administration who now serves part time, with Richard Perle, on the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board, wrote a piece for the Washington Post. Its title was “Cakewalk in Iraq,” and its payoff went like this: “I believe demolishing Hussein’s military power and liberating Iraq would be a cakewalk.

WRONG

Guy writes an unofficial editorial piece.

And all things considered, the actual dethroning of Hussein was very successful.

BSmack wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:

BSmack wrote: Only if you've been sleeping the past 6 years.

No, actualy that was what Rummy said. Something about being "greeted with flowers in the streets" as I recall.

Nice strikeout. You lose.

L8

I see you've decided to stop defending your points. Probably the best strategy you could have come up with.

No, I was awake in 9/2000 when Clinton, Gore, Kerry and the gang felt Iraq substantial enough a threat to consider military action.

Lastly, being greeted with "flowers" is hardly calling for a cakewalk.

You sir, are a dishonest man.

What was wrong?

smackaholic wrote:

Terry in Crapchester wrote:[

Et tu, smackaholic? Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.

Terry, the middleast being in desperate need of an unfukking had everything to do with 9/11. And it just so happened that saddam was the self professed head of that shithole. Knocking him the fukk out sent a message. It said "homey don't play that no more".

Actually, the correct response to 9/11 would have been to get the guy responsible for it, i.e., Osama bin Forgotten. Our fools' errand in Iraq distracted from that.

I think Tom in VA's point is that it's easy to play the armchair cartoonist and take easy, cynical pot shots at complex problems.

You could say the same about SNL, the Daily Show, Rush Limbaugh, etc.

Tom In VA wrote:

BSmack wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:Tom Tomorrow is accountable to whom when he's wrong ?

WTF does that have to do with anything?

Christ Tom, get some fucking booze in you again. You used to make sense.

The entire cartoon is a piece of fiction about somebody being "wrong" and being held accountable to a penguin. The guy draws real well, and the cartoon is funny. Nevertheless the statement it is making, is incorrect.

Is the author held accountable for spreading incorrect information ? Seems the author holds others' accountable.

You're right.

I think we should all mill about in the street calling for Tom Tomorrows death, kill some people and burns some buildings down and stuff.

Tom In VA wrote: Lastly, being greeted with "flowers" is hardly calling for a cakewalk.

Why? Did the flowers have thorns? Were they "exploding flowers"?

Was the "insurgency" betting on bogging down occupying forces with hay fever?

Uncle Fester wrote:I think Tom in VA's point is that it's easy to play the armchair cartoonist and take easy, cynical pot shots at complex problems.

I agree that it is easy. The insane number of failures regarding this war make it incredibly easy.

Tom in VA's point is that it's easy to play the armchair cartoonist and take easy, cynical pot shots at complex problems.

Mind explaining this to Rumsfeld and Cheney, over some ice-cold Hamm's, if need be?