Page 1 of 2

Voters to Lieberman: FUCK YOU

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 7:36 am
by LTS TRN 2
What? Are you in any way surprised that the malignant hairball that is the "neocon" agenda is being eructed on the carpet of the Democratic party?

Do you really think the vile monstrosity of Cheney (btw, where the fuck is that ludicrous war criminal these days?) and Rummy (to be replaced by Lieb the hebe?) and lost Condi is going to play for...what...another six months?

Guess what?

No, really...guess which way this catastrophe is collapsing. Think about it.

Picture houseboy Colin Powell trotting out the Rove-written Total Bullshit before the U.N.....

Keep going....now you're picturing fake reporter, real prostitute, James Gannon (not his real name, it's actually James Gurkert) plowing the Queen Bitch Rove (or is it the Chimp!!!) AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN during his 100+ OVERNIGHT visits at the White House.

Woah...wait a minute...what's this got to do with Lieberman getting the boot? How weird is this thing? How completely off the rails has America slipped?

Well, fact is, I really don't think you're in any way prepared to accept or deal with the full slimey hairball. But for now just appreciate Lieberman and his vile contingent REJECTED. And appreciate that this detoxifying is a natural healthy process--it's called rational sanity. :wink:

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:14 am
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Image

Maybe Joe "Two Passports" Lieberman can exercise his right of "aliyah" now.

So long, Joe. Don't let the door knob hit ya where the good Lord split ya.

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:24 pm
by smackaholic
joe will win going away as an independent in november.

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:40 pm
by Degenerate
smackaholic wrote:joe will win going away as an independent in november.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

No Democrat will campaign for him now, and the DC Republican establishment will never allow their money to flow to an independent in a competitive race. Period.

Lieberman will get his ass kicked. Again. He couldn't even hold his core constituencies like Southington and Bridgeport.

Give him credit, though. At least he's not cutting and running like Tom DeLay.

Re: Voters to Lieberman: FUCK YOU

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 1:25 pm
by Rich Fader
LTS TRN 2 and Martyred wrote: Die Fahne hoch, die Reihen fest geschlossen
S.A. marschiert mit ruhig festem Schritt
Kam'raden, die Rotfront und Reaktion erschossen
Marschier'n im Geist in unsern Reihen mit

Die Strasse frei den braunen Bataillonen
Die Strasse frei dem Sturmabteilungsmann
Es schau'n aufs Hakenkreuz voll Hoffnung schon Millionen
Der Tag für Freiheit und für Brot bricht an

Zum letzen Mal wird nun Appell geblasen
Zum Kampfe steh'n wir alle schon bereit
Bald flattern Hitler-Fahnen über allen Straßen
Die Knechtschaft dauert nur mehr kurze Zeit

Die Fahne hoch, die Reihen fest geschlossen
S.A. marschiert mit ruhig festem Schritt
Kam'raden, die Rotfront und Reaktion erschossen
Marschier'n im Geist in unsern Reihen mit
FTFY.

:twisted:

:lol:

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 1:35 pm
by BSmack
Degenerate wrote:
smackaholic wrote:joe will win going away as an independent in november.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

No Democrat will campaign for him now, and the DC Republican establishment will never allow their money to flow to an independent in a competitive race. Period.

Lieberman will get his ass kicked. Again. He couldn't even hold his core constituencies like Southington and Bridgeport.

Give him credit, though. At least he's not cutting and running like Tom DeLay.
Credit my ass. He's flopping around looking for a graceful way out. Look for him to withdraw "for the good of the party" as soon as he's properly hooked into a high 6 figure gig.

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 2:58 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
BSmack wrote:
Degenerate wrote:
smackaholic wrote:joe will win going away as an independent in november.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

No Democrat will campaign for him now, and the DC Republican establishment will never allow their money to flow to an independent in a competitive race. Period.

Lieberman will get his ass kicked. Again. He couldn't even hold his core constituencies like Southington and Bridgeport.

Give him credit, though. At least he's not cutting and running like Tom DeLay.
Credit my ass. He's flopping around looking for a graceful way out. Look for him to withdraw "for the good of the party" as soon as he's properly hooked into a high 6 figure gig.
Actually, my concern is that he'll stay in the race, and do just well enough to throw the election to the Republican candidate with about 35% of the vote.

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:14 pm
by smackaholic
Terry in Crapchester wrote:
BSmack wrote:
Degenerate wrote: :lol: :lol: :lol:

No Democrat will campaign for him now, and the DC Republican establishment will never allow their money to flow to an independent in a competitive race. Period.

Lieberman will get his ass kicked. Again. He couldn't even hold his core constituencies like Southington and Bridgeport.

Give him credit, though. At least he's not cutting and running like Tom DeLay.
Credit my ass. He's flopping around looking for a graceful way out. Look for him to withdraw "for the good of the party" as soon as he's properly hooked into a high 6 figure gig.
Actually, my concern is that he'll stay in the race, and do just well enough to throw the election to the Republican candidate with about 35% of the vote.
Rest easy Terry. No such thing as a republican senate candidate here.

Joe will hold onto a good chunk of the democratic vote and quite possibly every last republican in the state, yours truely included.

He will neat Ned like a rented mule in the general election.

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:19 pm
by BSmack
smackaholic wrote:Rest easy Terry. No such thing as a republican senate candidate here. Joe will hold onto a good chunk of the democratic vote and quite possibly every last republican in the state, yours truely included.

He will neat Ned like a rented mule in the general election.
Lieberman was running even with Lamont before the primary. Now you can expect him to fall 8-10 points behind Lamont as Dems rally to Lamont.

But you're right about the GOP candidate. He looks to be dead in the water.

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:15 pm
by Mikey
If Lieberman wins, he wins. At least he won't be able to call himself a Democrat any more, and he'll be able to fellate his Administration buddies in public without getting in trouble with the party.

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:40 pm
by BSmack
mvscal wrote:But it isn't a competitive race. Dr. Laura's husband has no chance, so why not throw some dollars Joementum's way?

Lieberman should trounce Lamont going away in the general election.
You GOP honks were saying the same thing about Lamont's chances in the primary. Just 4 months ago Lieberman was leading Lamont 65% to 19%. By November Lamont will have completely reversed those numbers.

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 5:04 pm
by BSmack
mvscal wrote:This is the first comment I've made on the race, so save your "you GOP honks" bullshit.

Lamont is a far left, nutroots douchebag who will be decisively thrashed in November.
Again, that's what all the pundits were saying before. But hey, feel free to ignore the reality of the anti war movement.

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 5:17 pm
by BSmack
mvscal wrote:There is no anti-war "movement".
Tell that to Joementum.
You nutroots clowns were saying the same shit when you were backing Dean in 04.
And the seeds of Dean's candidacy are just now bearing fruit. Just look at the "tale of the tape" so to speak.
"In one corner, you had a bunch of unpaid volunteers, Internet rabble-rousers, and an inexperienced politician whose highest post had been County Selectman.

"In the other, you had the three-time Senator, former vice-presidential candidate, visible party statesman, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Harry Reid, Barbara Boxer, the other popular CT senator Dodd, most of Organized Labor, the women's groups and the environmental groups, most of traditional Democratic party support, paid lobbyist support, paid armies of GOTV staff, the slick ad money, the top DLC consultants, and a 3 to 1 budget gap.

"I'm sorry. That's not David vs. Goliath. This isn't even the NBA champions versus a rec league team.That's more like an ant vs. my shoe."

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/8/9/92842/82959
And yet the underdog clearly came out on top. So you tell me where Lamont's support came from if it didn't come from the anti war movement.

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 5:48 pm
by BSmack
mvscal wrote:Tell it to Cynthia McKinney.
What about her? She lost and she's done for this race. Joementum could learn something from that.
Lamont won by 4 points in a redmeat, Democratic primary. When you factor in moderates and Republican cross overs, Lamont is dead in the water.
Of course you're not factoring in Democrats who will go to Lamont to avoid thowing the race to the GOP. And never mind those Democrats who will be turned off by THIS.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/theworldnewser ... phano.html

That's right, Karl Freaking Rove is throwing in with Lieberman. I'm sure that will help Lieberman's standing with Democrats. :meds:
If Liberman stays on the ballot, he will win handily. Your so called anti-war "movement" is nothing but a very small, very noisy minority with zero clout at the polls.

The "seeds of Dean's candidacy" don't vote. They just shoot their mouths off on the internet.
They did vote. Yesterday. In Connecticut. And they beat down Bush's puppet Senator with a fucking plunger.

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:07 pm
by BSmack
mvscal wrote:Lieberman is (or was) a Democrat. He is not Bush's puppet.
Say it with even more feeling and I still won't buy it.

Image

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:27 pm
by ChargerMike
Image



this picture says it all...oh, but go ahead and spin it boys...

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 6:36 pm
by BSmack
mvscal wrote:Image

Good fucking God, you're a dumbshit.
When Karl Rove offers to help Ted Kennedy you'll have a point.

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 7:16 pm
by BSmack
mvscal wrote:If it ever becomes expedient to do so, he will.
I'm sure Rove would skullfuck his own grandmother should it ever become politicaly expedient to do so.

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 7:21 pm
by BSmack
mvscal wrote:So would you. What's your point?
If I did what was politicaly expedient, I would have joined the GOP out here in Monroe County 20 years ago. So what's your point?

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 8:03 pm
by ChargerMike
...whatever... you still can't get past your Party being run by the Jessie Jacksons', Al Sharptons', of the world, in conjunction with the ilk of Move-On.org, and Right Wing Blog's.

Pathetic scenario when a recent V.P. nominee is run out of the Party because he's one of the few who "get it".

As long as this pattern continues, the GOP will continue to rule.

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 8:33 pm
by BSmack
ChargerMike wrote:...whatever... you still can't get past your Party being run by the Jessie Jacksons', Al Sharptons', of the world, in conjunction with the ilk of Move-On.org, and Right Wing Blog's.
Are you on drugs Mike? The DNC has been run for the past 20 years by the DLC. That is just starting to change. Albiet, just a bit. Watch now as the DLC crew tries to latch on the the Lamont train for a helping of gravy.
Pathetic scenario when a recent V.P. nominee is run out of the Party because he's one of the few who "get it".
The same thing happened to progressive Republicans back in 1980. Anybody remember Jacob Javits?
As long as this pattern continues, the GOP will continue to rule.
Wrong. It is a good thing for Democrats to define themselves in terms different from Bush Republicans. If Democrats are just going to be watered down Republicans, then you might as well just vote for Republicans and get the full dose.

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 9:16 pm
by ChargerMike
Are you on drugs Mike? The DNC has been run for the past 20 years by the DLC. That is just starting to change. Albiet, just a bit. Watch now as the DLC crew tries to latch on the the Lamont train for a helping of gravy.
Bri. you can't possibly believe as long as Hillary heads up the Leadership Council they are going to move anywhere near center! Why the hell do you think Leiberman lost? I'm sure America is chomping at the bit to adopt Hillarys' "American Dream Initiative"
The same thing happened to progressive Republicans back in 1980. Anybody remember Jacob Javits?


You expect me to remember something 35 years ago? :wink:


Wrong. It is a good thing for Democrats to define themselves in terms different from Bush Republicans. If Democrats are just going to be watered down Republicans, then you might as well just vote for Republicans and get the full dose.
different yes...but aligning with the anti-war movement, the Rev's, and radical special interest groups can only be good for the GOP..imho

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 10:47 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
ChargerMike wrote:Image



this picture says it all...oh, but go ahead and spin it boys...
I could be wrong about this, but Jesse in that pic looks like a wytch job. Something about the head looks a little different from the other heads.

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:03 pm
by The Seer
How does Mrs. Mvscal clean off the T1B tard blood he treads in after battle?

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:04 pm
by The Seer
Terry in Crapchester wrote:
ChargerMike wrote:Image



this picture says it all...oh, but go ahead and spin it boys...
I could be wrong about this, but Jesse in that pic looks like a wytch job. Something about the head looks a little different from the other heads.


Surely, you aren't suggesting that ChargerMike would be capable of anything minutely less than ethical....

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 11:15 pm
by ChargerMike
Terry in Crapchester wrote:
ChargerMike wrote:Image



this picture says it all...oh, but go ahead and spin it boys...
I could be wrong about this, but Jesse in that pic looks like a wytch job. Something about the head looks a little different from the other heads
...sorry...pic. # 3

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/08/ ... 3279.shtml

...and another with caption..


Image



A lot of big names lined up behind Ned Lamont. Above, at the Lamont victory party are, from left, the Rev. Al Sharpton, the Rev. Jesse Jackson and Lowell Weicker, who is a former governor and a former U.S. senator. (AP)

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 12:18 am
by BSmack
ChargerMike wrote:A lot of big names lined up behind Ned Lamont. Above, at the Lamont victory party are, from left, the Rev. Al Sharpton, the Rev. Jesse Jackson and Lowell Weicker, who is a former governor and a former U.S. senator. (AP)
Of course they are lined up behind him NOW. Kicking Joe Lieberman's teeth in will do that.

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 2:01 am
by Terry in Crapchester
ChargerMike wrote:A lot of big names lined up behind Ned Lamont. Above, at the Lamont victory party are, from left, the Rev. Al Sharpton, the Rev. Jesse Jackson and Lowell Weicker, who is a former governor and a former U.S. senator. (AP)
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but didn't Weicker used to be a Republican?

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 3:27 am
by Mister Bushice
used to be, he's independent now but he won't be anything for much longer, he's like 75 or so. clock is ticking. :)

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 3:14 pm
by Mikey
ChargerMike wrote:...whatever... you still can't get past your Party being run by the Jessie Jacksons', Al Sharptons', of the world, in conjunction with the ilk of Move-On.org, and Right Wing Blog's.

Pathetic scenario when a recent V.P. nominee is run out of the Party because he's one of the few who "get it".

As long as this pattern continues, the GOP will continue to rule.
Jackson and Sharpton standing behind Lamont at his victory rally means that they are running the Democratic party?

What's pathetic, CM, is that people of your ilk actually think this is true. What they're really doing is lamely trying to soak up some of his BODE. Those two have no more influence in the Democratic party than you do.

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 5:12 pm
by BSmack
mvscal wrote:
Mikey wrote:Those two have no more influence in the Democratic party than you do.
Of course they have no influence on the Democratic Party. They're nig..gers. They are nothing but diversity props and their role is to be seen and not heard. Wouldn't want them to get all uppity and think they actually have a seat at the table with white folks.
Diversity props my ass. There are plenty of black folk with real power in the Democratic Party. Jackson and Sharpton just happen to be skilled at the art of self promotion, ergo they receive a higher level of visibility than their accomplishments rate. Simply put, to paraphrase LBJ, the party is better served with them inside the tent pissing out than outside pissing in.

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 5:28 pm
by BSmack
mvscal wrote:
BSmack wrote:There are plenty of black folk with real power in the Democratic Party.
You can tell how much "power" they have by the prominent roles they receive in Democratic Administrations.
You mean like Vernon Jordan? Ron Brown? Mike Espy? Togo West?

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 5:53 pm
by LTS TRN 2
And don't forget Clinton's Secy of Defense, Colin Powell.

Lieberman's done. He'll probably pull out before Sept. No doubt he's waiting on the next big SCARE....oh, it's already here!

British Arabs looking to blow up planes!!!!!

Everyone circle in fear, shred the constitution a little more, and intinctively MOVE TO THE RIGHT!!

C'mon, what are you waiting for? You can see the Freedom Is Being Attacked!

Gotta love Hillary's look of weary disgust as she assured that she'll "support the person the people voted for in Conneticut." (WTF is his name again?)

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 5:59 pm
by BSmack
LTS TRN 2 wrote:And don't forget Clinton's Secy of Defense, Colin Powell.
That was fucking horrible.

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 6:32 pm
by ChargerMike
Mikey wrote:
ChargerMike wrote:...whatever... you still can't get past your Party being run by the Jessie Jacksons', Al Sharptons', of the world, in conjunction with the ilk of Move-On.org, and Right Wing Blog's.

Pathetic scenario when a recent V.P. nominee is run out of the Party because he's one of the few who "get it".

As long as this pattern continues, the GOP will continue to rule.
Jackson and Sharpton standing behind Lamont at his victory rally means that they are running the Democratic party?

What's pathetic, CM, is that people of your ilk actually think this is true. What they're really doing is lamely trying to soak up some of his BODE. Those two have no more influence in the Democratic party than you do.

...actually what's pathetic....no it's laughable, is that people of your ilk continue to think you're dialed in and the Righty's are a bunch of idiots! Meanwhile, you don't seem to realize the American people keep bitch slapping you every election. Hey, but keep those two Rev's in the picture for us will ya? PLEASE

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 6:40 pm
by Mikey
I don't have an ilk. That's a Republican thing.
You did know that, didn't you?

:wink:

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 6:43 pm
by BSmack
ChargerMike wrote:...actually what's pathetic....no it's laughable, is that people of your ilk continue to think you're dialed in and the Righty's are a bunch of idiots!
If the shoe fits...
Meanwhile, you don't seem to realize the American people keep bitch slapping you every election.
Every election?

Image
Hey, but keep those two Rev's in the picture for us will ya? PLEASE
Yea, far better for the GOP to run against Sharpton and Jackson than to run against those actualy nominated by the party.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 7:03 pm
by ChargerMike
Mikey wrote:I don't have an ilk. That's a Republican thing.
You did know that, didn't you?

:wink:

...I knew that :wink:

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 7:09 pm
by BSmack
mvscal wrote:
BSmack wrote:
mvscal wrote: You can tell how much "power" they have by the prominent roles they receive in Democratic Administrations.
You mean like Vernon Jordan? Ron Brown? Mike Espy? Togo West?
All tokens.

Let me know when you start appointing them to meaningful positions of authority.

You know something like oh...Secretary of State for instance.
Vernon Jordan didn't want to take the pay cut.

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 7:11 pm
by ChargerMike
....A once proud party...what the hell happened?


Weak and Wrong