Martyred Education Thread no.1
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
Martyred Education Thread no.1
Everyone knows you're a strident anti-semite. You deny it, but it is obvious that you do so for the sake of expediency.
This is not necessarily a permanent condition. Your outlook can be reconsiderd if you'd give it a go. And to that end, some on-point study aids will prove useful.
This is just the first in a series.
We're here to help.
velocet
This is not necessarily a permanent condition. Your outlook can be reconsiderd if you'd give it a go. And to that end, some on-point study aids will prove useful.
This is just the first in a series.
We're here to help.
velocet
- Jay in Phoenix
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 3701
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 10:46 pm
- Shlomart Ben Yisrael
- Insha'Allah
- Posts: 19031
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: filling molotovs
- Shlomart Ben Yisrael
- Insha'Allah
- Posts: 19031
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: filling molotovs
- Mike the Lab Rat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 1948
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:17 pm
- Location: western NY
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Regarding Michael Medved, for someone who writes for a living, he seems to not have much knowledge regarding the use of “parapraphs”.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
I don't know. There's a few paragraph breaks, but they are widely scattered. Are you suggesting that some frodo-type individual deleted some of the paragraph breaks but not others?velocet wrote:Goobs- is that Medved's fault? Putting the page together is someone else's responsibility, no?
In any case, Michael Medved is an idiot. He has a wet sock for a brain. A thumbless grasp of the issues and a propensity to lachrymose wimpering when he doesn't get his way. At least, that's what KC Paul 3.0 told me.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
- Bizzarofelice
- I wanna be a bear
- Posts: 10216
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:48 pm
- indyfrisco
- Pro Bonfire
- Posts: 11683
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:15 pm
Wolfman wrote:although Luther is nails with
his art work--
don't forget that the Liar in Chief
committed his to a Grand Jury.
Lying on a message board isn't quite
the same.
just sayin'
Ok, can we turn the page on that one? That whole thing arose because dude got some. Understand this: I am no kind of Clintonista apologist. NOT a Lefty. But attacking a guy for having relations with a woman is flagrantly homosexual at best. In the old days-- you remember the old days, dontcha?-- we used to give the Commander in Chief a pass on such liasions. FDR, Kennedy, you know the story, or you should. What happened? Who commandeered our side such that we stoop to such faggotry just to score political points?
I think we, meaning conservatives, will be judged more harshly by posterity (if they have any degree of masculinity) than Cli-in.
-----------------------------
Mar-taaaay! What up dawg? C'mon now, not all of us are your sworn foes. You can level with us...
it was that hebe professor that flunked you unfairly, wasn't it?
Something like?
Well, the protestations of innocence are getting old. You chastise Americans for being sheeple in the service of Jews. You never miss an opportunity to point out how they manipulate us for their greater benefit.
You cannot deny having written this message. The very ideas you communicate are by definition anti Jewish (I'll leave aside the troublesome 'semite' from now on).
Read medved's article. Maybe goobs is right but even a broken clock is right twice a day and maybe for that writer, that article is one of those times.
Have your assignment ready by Monday.
velocet
- Terry in Crapchester
- 2012 March Madness Champ
- Posts: 8995
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
- Location: Back in the 'burbs
Clinton wasn't a lefty, either. Not even close. And some of his harshest criticism comes from the left as well. The righties hate the guy to their core, but a lot of lefties are extremely disappointed in Clinton.velocet wrote:Understand this: I am no kind of Clintonista apologist. NOT a Lefty.
Hmmm, your side and faggotry? A few suspects, submitted for your approval . . .What happened? Who commandeered our side such that we stoop to such faggotry just to score political points?
Rove
Gannon
But truth be told, I don't think it was the work of faggotry, more likely the work of limpdicks who were jealous that Clinton was getting some, whereas they couldn't get laid in a whorehouse with a fistful of Benjis.
On this, you and I are in complete agreement.I think we, meaning conservatives, will be judged more harshly by posterity (if they have any degree of masculinity) than Cli-in.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
Mikey wrote:B...b...b....b...b....b...b...b...b...b...b...but
he LIED about it!!!!!
...yeah, compounding the disaster: glass houses and all that. Like none of our side EVER spoke an untruth. Even under oath.
TiC,
- Cli-in wasn't a lefty?
-what criticism from the left was leveled his way?
For the record, I don't hate homos the way Marty hates Jews. NOT a fan, mind you, but I regard them with the same sort of dissin' attitude I have for Eagle, Cowboy and Giants fans, as these are as homos and vice versa.
velocet
- Mister Bushice
- Drinking all the beer Luther left behind
- Posts: 9490
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:39 pm
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 1948
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:44 pm
- Location: Riverside, CA
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21748
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
I have one simple question for the clinton apologists. Is sexual harassment OK? I'm not talking dinsdale type had too much to drink and pinched some chick in the ass type harassment. I am talking about the worstest kind there is. Using one's position of power to try to bang underlings.
I have seen more than one person get fired over this "consensual" type of thing.
now, back to our regularly scheduled program.
Marty, you are a denim clad, midget, lying sack of shit. Please die. Soon.
I have seen more than one person get fired over this "consensual" type of thing.
now, back to our regularly scheduled program.
Marty, you are a denim clad, midget, lying sack of shit. Please die. Soon.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Props to Martyred and his scientific analysis of Judaism - always a good read. As soon as he ditches Bukharin he'll be home free.
Karl Marx - On the Jewish question
Karl Marx - On the Jewish question
Let us not look for the secret of the Jew in his religion, but let us look for the secret of his religion in the real Jew.
What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest.
What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering.
What is his worldly God? Money.
Very well then! Emancipation from huckstering and money, consequently from practical, real Judaism, would be the self-emancipation of our time.
We recognize in Judaism, therefore, a general anti-social element of the present time, an element which through historical development – to which in this harmful respect the Jews have zealously contributed – has been brought to its present high level, at which it must necessarily begin to disintegrate.
I don't see it that way, 88. Ridiculing a nation that had just gone through a vicious twenty year war for lack of higher education seems childish and unworthy of a serious response.
Keep in mind, imperialism hit the middle east and Africa like sledge-hammer, with western backed dictators inflicting cruel miseries upon their populations for centuries. Higher education is in the public interest, ensures intelligence and encourages critical thought - this is not in the interest of foreign capital and not bound to flourish.
It's a lengthy topic.
Keep in mind, imperialism hit the middle east and Africa like sledge-hammer, with western backed dictators inflicting cruel miseries upon their populations for centuries. Higher education is in the public interest, ensures intelligence and encourages critical thought - this is not in the interest of foreign capital and not bound to flourish.
It's a lengthy topic.
- Jimmy Medalions
- Student Body Right
- Posts: 3236
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 4:04 pm
- Location: SoCal
- Terry in Crapchester
- 2012 March Madness Champ
- Posts: 8995
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
- Location: Back in the 'burbs
No, he wasn't. Deregulation, welfare reform and a balanced budget out front should have told you so.velocet wrote:TiC,
- Cli-in wasn't a lefty?
For that matter, Clinton, with the possible exception of Jimmy Carter, was easily the most conservative Democratic President of the 20th century relative to the time in which he served.
In general? Clinton could have been a counter-balance to the Reagan Republicans, but in that regard he failed miserably. His desire to be all things to all people, even to those who would not vote for him if their very lives depended on it, together with incredible hubris and an appetite for self-destruction (see Lewinsky, Monica) did in his chances in that regard.-what criticism from the left was leveled his way?
Specific policy criticism? See welfare reform.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
- The Whistle Is Screaming
- Left-handed monkey wrench
- Posts: 2882
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:24 pm
- Location: Eat Me Luther, Eat Me!
There aren't enough of theseDr_Phibes wrote:Props to Martyred and his scientific analysis of Judaism - always a good read. As soon as he ditches Bukharin he'll be home free.
Karl Marx - On the Jewish question
Let us not look for the secret of the Jew in his religion, but let us look for the secret of his religion in the real Jew.
What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest.
What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering.
What is his worldly God? Money.
Very well then! Emancipation from huckstering and money, consequently from practical, real Judaism, would be the self-emancipation of our time.
We recognize in Judaism, therefore, a general anti-social element of the present time, an element which through historical development – to which in this harmful respect the Jews have zealously contributed – has been brought to its present high level, at which it must necessarily begin to disintegrate.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a636/1a63642b228b5f224293c7a14a623c933f9ae81b" alt="Rolling Eyes :meds:"
Ingse Bodil wrote:rich jews aren't the same as real jews, though, right?
-
- Merciless, suave and collected
- Posts: 2004
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 4:00 am
- Location: Your Mom's Ass
The Whistle Is Screaming wrote:There aren't enough of theseDr_Phibes wrote:Props to Martyred and his scientific analysis of Judaism - always a good read. As soon as he ditches Bukharin he'll be home free.
Karl Marx - On the Jewish question
Let us not look for the secret of the Jew in his religion, but let us look for the secret of his religion in the real Jew.
What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest.
What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering.
What is his worldly God? Money.
Very well then! Emancipation from huckstering and money, consequently from practical, real Judaism, would be the self-emancipation of our time.
We recognize in Judaism, therefore, a general anti-social element of the present time, an element which through historical development – to which in this harmful respect the Jews have zealously contributed – has been brought to its present high level, at which it must necessarily begin to disintegrate.in the world for this tripe.
Weren't Marx's grandfather's rabbis?