Page 1 of 1

We've lost Pluto

Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 2:27 pm
by Mikey
No, not the dog.

Image

I thought I read last week that there were now 11 planets instead of 9.
Now I find out there are only 8?

I wish the astronomers would make up their damn minds so I can get back to work.
Astronomers say Pluto is not a planet

Leading astronomers declared Thursday that Pluto is no longer a planet under historic new guidelines that downsize the solar system from nine planets to eight.

After a tumultuous week of clashing over the essence of the cosmos, the International Astronomical Union stripped Pluto of the planetary status it has held since its discovery in 1930. The new definition of what is — and isn't — a planet fills a centuries-old black hole for scientists who have labored since Copernicus without one.

Although astronomers applauded after the vote, Jocelyn Bell Burnell — a specialist in neutron stars from Northern Ireland who oversaw the proceedings — urged those who might be "quite disappointed" to look on the bright side.

"It could be argued that we are creating an umbrella called 'planet' under which the dwarf planets exist," she said, drawing laughter by waving a stuffed Pluto of Walt Disney fame beneath a real umbrella.

The decision by the prestigious international group spells out the basic tests that celestial objects will have to meet before they can be considered for admission to the elite cosmic club.

For now, membership will be restricted to the eight "classical" planets in the solar system: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune.

Much-maligned Pluto doesn't make the grade under the new rules for a planet: "a celestial body that is in orbit around the sun, has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a ... nearly round shape, and has cleared the neighborhood around its orbit."

Pluto is automatically disqualified because its oblong orbit overlaps with Neptune's.

Instead, it will be reclassified in a new category of "dwarf planets," similar to what long have been termed "minor planets." The definition also lays out a third class of lesser objects that orbit the sun — "small solar system bodies," a term that will apply to numerous asteroids, comets and other natural satellites.

It was unclear how Pluto's demotion might affect the mission of NASA's New Horizons spacecraft, which earlier this year began a 9 1/2-year journey to the oddball object to unearth more of its secrets.

The decision at a conference of 2,500 astronomers from 75 countries was a dramatic shift from just a week ago, when the group's leaders floated a proposal that would have reaffirmed Pluto's planetary status and made planets of its largest moon and two other objects.

That plan proved highly unpopular, splitting astronomers into factions and triggering days of sometimes combative debate that led to Pluto's undoing.

Now, two of the objects that at one point were cruising toward possible full-fledged planethood will join Pluto as dwarfs: the asteroid Ceres, which was a planet in the 1800s before it got demoted, and 2003 UB313, an icy object slightly larger than Pluto whose discoverer, Michael Brown of the California Institute of Technology, has nicknamed "Xena."

Charon, the largest of Pluto's three moons, is no longer under consideration for any special designation.

Brown was pleased by the decision. He had argued that Pluto and similar bodies didn't deserve planet status, saying that would "take the magic out of the solar system."

"UB313 is the largest dwarf planet. That's kind of cool," he said

Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 2:30 pm
by Dinsdale
Hasn't the number of planets changed like three times in the last two weeks?

Good luck selling that...hell, at least 2/3 of the republican party still believes the earth is flat...let's do this in baby steps.

Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 2:34 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
dwarf planets
In.

-Zyc

Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 2:36 pm
by poptart
What's the latest on Uranus ... ?

Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 2:40 pm
by Mikey
poptart wrote:What's the latest on Uranus ... ?
Too many Klingons

(rimshot)

Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 3:24 pm
by The Seer
Image

Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:02 pm
by The phantorino
Can't someone blame this on terrorists?
Isn' it unpatriotic to forget this lump of rock?
If Pluto isn't a planet, does that mean that Mel isn't a star?
If the ACLU gets involved and a Judge suggests that Pluto is returned to planethood, will Numbscal melt again?



The fun never ends here.

Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:01 pm
by Bobby42
Meanwhile..

As the TV and radio signals reach the former 9th planet:
No one would have believed that this world was being watched keenly and closely by intelligences greater than man's and yet as mortal as his own; that as men busied themselves about their various concerns they were scrutinised and studied, perhaps almost as narrowly as a man with a microscope might scrutinise the transient creatures that swarm and multiply in a drop of water. With infinite complacency men went to and fro over this globe about their little affairs, serene in their assurance of their empire over the earth. Yet, across the gulf of space, on Pluto, minds that are to our minds as ours are to those of the beasts that perish, intellects vast and cool and unsympathetic, regarded this earth with envious eyes, and slowly and surely drew their plans against us.

Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 1:39 am
by Mike the Lab Rat
Astronomers really have waaaaaaaaaay too much time on their hands.

Apparently this kind of stuff can result in fistfights. OK, maybe with astronomers, it's more of a hair-pulling slapfight, but you get the idea.

Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 12:23 pm
by Nishlord
But wait!

Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 2:17 pm
by Dinsdale
Image


There's an Irie reset in here somewhere...

Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 2:20 pm
by atomicdad
MtLR wrote:Astronomers really have waaaaaaaaaay too much time on their hands.
That is exactly what I told wifey last night when we were watchng the news last night.

Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 2:49 pm
by MuchoBulls
Mike the Lab Rat wrote:Astronomers really have waaaaaaaaaay too much time on their hands.
RACK!

Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 3:38 pm
by Uncle Fester
I'm not down with planetary correctness.

Pluto will always be the 9th planet.

If any Bob Saget-loving Poindexter says otherwise it will be my duty to fight them.

Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:01 pm
by ADAM
The EARTH is not FLAT?


What kind of blasphemy is this?

Dins is a commie!!!!! COMMMIE COMMIE COMMMIE!!!!

Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:14 pm
by Mike the Lab Rat
Until the Coppernican fundies allow for the Aristotleian ekwal time in classrooms, it's just another argument for school choyce

:wink:

Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:46 pm
by PSUFAN
get over it, astropussies.

Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 6:07 pm
by Mr T
Uncle Fester wrote:I'm not down with planetary correctness.

Pluto will always be the 9th planet.

If any Bob Saget-loving Poindexter says otherwise it will be my duty to fight them.
:lol:

Here is hoping that someone gets killed over this stupid thing and the astronomers get over.

I cant believe yall cant see they are trolling us.

Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 6:18 pm
by Th
I am buying up the copyrights to all the textbooks that will have to be rewritten.

Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 6:25 pm
by Uncle Fester
The astronomers have bode and are in our domes.

Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 6:28 pm
by Mikey
The astronomers are just trying to pull themselves up by their bootstraps.

Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 8:39 pm
by Mike the Lab Rat
The Bushies report on Pluto is full of fallacies. Fucking tards.

Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 12:31 am
by Dinsdale
Regardless whether it's a planet or not, Kal will win the National Championship.

Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 8:42 am
by Y2K
Pluto was fucked over by the Geeks!

We demand justice as Pluto didn't have a few thousand years to shuttle enough ice particles to mount a proper defense!

at least give us some instant replay so we can decide.

Fucking Four Eyed faggot Star Gazers..
Fuck Pluto hayta's

Pluto is the real deal!

i say IN!