Page 1 of 2
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:00 am
by Qbert
as a self-rescpecting BUCKEYEFan...like you?
why would you Post something like this?
are you Catfishing on the Olentangy River?
no No and NO.
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:15 am
by Diogenes
A)Wife's sister, or her brother's wife?
B)What does wifey think about the proposition?
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:19 am
by Diogenes
Go for it.
Of course, I'd be wondering what wifey and the blankshooter would be up to while you're being nice.
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:19 am
by Qbert
NO!
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:25 am
by Mikey
And...
What if it doesn't take the first time
or the second
or third
etc
etc
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:25 am
by Luther
Are you kidding me? Is there any other choice but to fucking say, "NO?"
Do you seriously want to have this burden on your ass until you die? Really? If you feel that guilty then pay for the SPANK ah er, SPERM bank fees for crissakes.
This is really a no-brainer.
Rip City
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:32 am
by Qbert
Alex
i'll take NO for $$$infinity$$$$$....
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:33 am
by Mister Bushice
No. You forgot they're women. It'll end badly. She might not be jealous now, but wait until you come home after attempt #1. There will be no right answers.
W: How was it, dear?
88: Good.
W: What do you mean good? You mean she's better than me?
88: no she's not better than you.
W: what do you mean, she's not good in bed?
88: I didn't say that.
W: Well then how was it.
88: It was fine. she's ok.
W: It was just fine? What do yo umean she was "ok"?
Next day:
W: He said you were just ok.
S: that's not what he said to me....
and what happens if your swimmers don't take the first time? how many times will the wife let you tup her sister before she starts getting worried?
I suggest you run back and forth across the freeway a few times first. If you survive that, you might be lucky enough to survive a sister fuck.
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:41 am
by Jimmy Medalions
Mikey wrote:And...
What if it doesn't take the first time
or the second
or third
etc
etc
Rack
Rack
Rack
etc.
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:43 am
by Jimmy Medalions
88 wrote:I'm about 99% sure that the answer is no, and I'm going to do some legal research tomorrow that might push it to 100%. But I thought it was an interesting issue. Never had anyone present that one to me before.
Don't waste the opportunity to make this a dramatic change in the GMJO landscape. This is good for at least a half dozen good tugs.
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:46 am
by Mister Bushice
If they keep the pressure on:
Jerk off
Freeze it
buy a turkey baster
wrap em up together
Give it to them and say "have at it"
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 6:12 am
by Money Shot
Mikey wrote:And...
What if it doesn't take the first time
or the second
or third
etc
etc
Then he's going to be busy for several nights planting seed.
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 6:19 am
by Qbert
turkey baster aside...YOU'LL know that it is YOURS....you're WIFE will know that its YOURS.
no matter HOW it gets put into your wife's Sister...your Wife KNOWS that its YOURS.
No.
btw...with all of this talk...get ready to be a Dad again with your Wife...
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 6:34 am
by Luther
88
Oh please, make a decision before U knows who comes in and Layes down the pain. Actually, most of us just want to know what you have decided to do. Baste or Blast out of there?
Rip City
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 6:48 am
by Y2K
Not a chance.
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:22 am
by Kansas City Kid
Just nail her in the ass and then she can produce a product of a buttfuck like KCPAUL. :paul:
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 12:01 pm
by the_ouskull
^^^^^ took my idea. Only, I have a bit more to add.
If you pull out, nail her in the ass and shoot there, she'll, of course (you hope) be mortified. Then you look at her, as straight-faced as you can, and say, "I got confused." They'll never ask again.
They'd be better off putting an ad in the paper.
the_ouskull
Re: Hypothetical Question
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 12:33 pm
by Joey Moss
88 wrote:
Oh, and they say thay are essentially tapped out financially.
Dude, do you really want YOUR child living in lesser conditions?
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 12:46 pm
by poptart
Post her pic here and then we can more adequately answer your query.
Re: Hypothetical Question
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 12:47 pm
by Goober McTuber
88 wrote:Let's say your wife has a sister who is happily married to a great dude
Diogenes wrote:A)Wife's sister, or her brother's wife?
I can see why you’re so bitter about public schools. They certainly let
you down.
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 1:24 pm
by atomicdad
Get a vasectomy with out telling the wife and in-laws.
Bop the wifes sister a few times, after nothing happens move on. Hey babe I tried.
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 1:43 pm
by Derron
Sounds like party time to me. Tell the wife that this is the PERFECT time to get that 3 way going that you have always wanted. Sisters is almost as good as twins.
And you can't tell me none of you perverted fucks has not tapped the wifes sister, or girlfriends sister, either before or after marriage.
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 2:12 pm
by Dinsdale
Mister Bushice wrote:No. You forgot they're women. It'll end badly.
RACK!
Rack this whole thread, actually.
I've never been married. I have no children, or none that I cut a monthly check for, anyway.
That said, if the dreadful day ever comes that I do get married, it's going to be because it's the woman I want to be exclusively involved with for the rest of my life, and would have no desire to be with other women, regardless how "noble" the cause may be.
Of course, I can't, at this point, ever see myself not lusting after every hot chick I meet, ergo...not married.
"We got no cash, but we want a baby." Yeah, there's some responsible winners, right there.
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 3:07 pm
by Cicero
I have to agree w/ Dins and most of the people here. I am still in my mid 20's and not married or have kids, but this cannot end well, 88. I think it is noble of you and your wife for even considering it, but that is not your family's problem. Plus, if they arent financially capable of raising a child, then they probably shouldnt be having one.
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 3:13 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Roo makes a good point...if they can't afford to create one, how do they intend on feeding it, clothing it, etc?
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 3:22 pm
by Fat Bones
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/487ec/487ec58778cec112ec565866f5753e0b0aa04ded" alt="Image"
Fuck her.
Fuck her brains out.
Suck her tits, squeeze her buns. You know she wants it.
:twisted:
Take pictures with the garden cam.
No, just kiddin'. Sounds like a good recipe for paying child support for your children and theirs.
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 3:23 pm
by indyfrisco
88,
I believe I remember saying once before that you think it is deplorable to plug a woman in the ass.
So, there’s your solution. I’m sure you’ve discussed this with your wife of many years. As long as the sis-in-law goes with it, this is the money way of doing this.
You will agree to impregnate her. However, you will start the session off by dryfucking her ass. You will need to be sure and give her a Mike Backer. This is part of the deal. If she wants the kid, she will agree to it. Once you are about ready to blow your load, you pull out and jam it in the honey hole, unleash the hounds and pull out when done.
So, in this scenario, the sis-in-law will not have enjoyed the episode as I’m sure the buttfucking will have been very uncomfortable and the fact she has a Mike Backer will surely not be pleasant. You, yourself, are not a fan of the Hershey Highway so you surely didn’t enjoy it along with the fact you got some gal’s scat on your fingers and member. The fact neither of you “enjoyed” the experience (except for the 3-5 seconds you had the “O” face which is nothing in the grand scheme of things) should make your wife happy in the long run as well as the brother-in-law.
You’ll probably have some hesitation on the part of the sis-in-law on the buttfucking. She’ll probably resist because she’ll say it hurts too much. At that point, just ask her what the fuck she thinks childbirth will be like and then this will all be over.
TIA
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 3:24 pm
by The Whistle Is Screaming
the_ouskull wrote:
If you pull out, nail her in the ass and shoot there, she'll, of course (you hope) be mortified. Then you look at her, as straight-faced as you can, and say, "I got confused." They'll never ask again.
RACK! That made me laugh.
88,
Bushice (of all people) nailed it, it will end badly and most likely with your wife screwing the blank shooting BIL as a form of "payback". Buy them a puppy and years supply of food.
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 3:24 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
88 wrote:Plus, I think it would be weird if my kid's called a half-brother or sister "cuz".
Since you brought that up, I actually know somebody in that situation, sort of.
My wife's grandmother, toward the end of her life, was in failing health, and had a few nurses attend to her at home. One started bringing her boyfriend (at the time) around, and he got to be friendly with my wife and her mother.
Turns out that dude had previously been married to the girlfriend's sister, and had two kids with her. Then he had another kid with the girlfriend.
Long story short, girlfriend turns out to be a flake and ultimately bails on him and the kid and winds up in Florida. He gets custody of the kid, and she winds up (for a time, anyway) in jail for failing to pay child support.
The kid is now 17, and is all kinds of fucked up. For my money, this is due in no small part to the family dynamics which have involved him. Granted, not all of these would be present in your situation, but based at least on this anecdotal situation, if I were you, my answer is no.
They can always adopt if they want kids.
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 3:38 pm
by PSUFAN
My sister-in-law has her own well-lit wing in the Spank Bank, rest well assured.
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:20 pm
by indyfrisco
[pun]I thought I made it clear as mud.[/pun]
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:20 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
88 wrote:This issue is resolved.
Her place or mine?
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:23 pm
by PSUFAN
^ he's on to something. Time for a pinch-hitter. Maybe an auction? Benefit? Charity? Something that'll twist mvscal's pantaloons?
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:27 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Benefit? Charity?
Oh, we'll both benefit greatly after I shoot loads of charity up in that.
Yep, I'm the logical choice. I live in a bordering state, and have no wife or children to alienate.
Let's make this happen, 88.
Re: Hypothetical Question
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:41 pm
by ADAM
88 wrote:Let's say that you're happily married, in your early 40's, got a couple of great kids and are doing OK financially. Let's also say that you were a pretty good (but not great by any definition) athlete, did very well in school and haven't had any serious medical problems to speak of during your lifetime. Let's say your wife has a sister who is happily married to a great dude, but he hasn't been able to get the sister-in-law preggers for three years despite repeated efforts and some medical intervention. And, let's say that the sister-in-law and brother-in-law found out, about three weeks ago, that the reason he hasn't been able to put a bun in the oven is because he's basically shooting blanks. Now, let's say that brother-in-law and sister-in-law, who are about 10 years younger than you and your wife, live about 500 miles away from you, but decide to pay you a visit, on short notice, just to say "Hey". And let's say that while saying "Hey" at a restaurant tonight, they bluntly ask if they can have some of your swimmers. What do you say?
Oh, and they say thay are essentially tapped out financially. So, unless you are going to drop your own dimes to have those swimmers put in a tube and mixed with an egg from the sister-in-law and then have that egg popped in the sister-in-law's oven, you're going to have to put those swimmers in the pool the old fashioned way.
And although this probably shouldn't factor into the decision, the sister-in-law was a first team all-state athlete in two sports, is now a fitness trainer, and basically is a POA.
TIA
As you all get the vivacious porn skank motiff out of your heads....
Banging your wifes sister for the act of "procreation " isn't a half bad honor...
The fact that she would allow you to do it speaks of.....Aww fuck it, bang her sister! Knock that girly up troop!
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:52 pm
by Y2K
Terry in Crapchester wrote:88 wrote:Plus, I think it would be weird if my kid's called a half-brother or sister "cuz".
Since you brought that up, I actually know somebody in that situation, sort of.
My wife's grandmother, toward the end of her life, was in failing health, and had a few nurses attend to her at home. One started bringing her boyfriend (at the time) around, and he got to be friendly with my wife and her mother.
Turns out that dude had previously been married to the girlfriend's sister, and had two kids with her. Then he had another kid with the girlfriend.
Long story short, girlfriend turns out to be a flake and ultimately bails on him and the kid and winds up in Florida. He gets custody of the kid, and she winds up (for a time, anyway) in jail for failing to pay child support.
The kid is now 17, and is all kinds of fucked up. For my money, this is due in no small part to the family dynamics which have involved him. Granted, not all of these would be present in your situation, but based at least on this anecdotal situation, if I were you, my answer is no.
They can always adopt if they want kids.
That story has Springer written all over it, they should try to get on the show and make a few dollars off their dysfunctional fucked up life. Obviously it can't hurt that situation in the slightest.
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 6:29 pm
by Sky
88 wrote: I think it is amazing that we appear to have finally found an issue that everyone agrees on.
I would agree, quite amazing. I expected the 20-somethings who aren't married and don't have kids to give a resounding yes while us married responders would have said NO NO NO NO NO.....
Still, what a situation. It has to boost that ego a little bit but I have to imagine things will be awkward for a little while.
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 6:37 pm
by indyfrisco
Sky wrote:I expected the 20-somethings who aren't married and don't have kids to give a resounding yes while us married responders would have said NO NO NO NO NO.....
I didn't say "NO NO NO NO" ...
but I was being facetious.
Or was I???
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 7:14 pm
by RadioFan
Luther wrote:This is really a no-brainer.
Jimmy Medalions wrote:Don't waste the opportunity to make this a dramatic change in the GMJO landscape. This is good for at least a half dozen good tugs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99d1f/99d1ffcd436e8dfc800a9b8c92c0d1bf3f377acb" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 7:24 pm
by Fat Bones
Then again, you COULD consider it your patriotic duty...does your wife have eight more sisters?
Dr. Strangelove, or
If You Won't Do It, I know Your Sister Will.