T1B

1. Bluetooth earsets...or more exactly, the tools that wear them everywhere. I understand how useful they can be, in driving situations, walking down the street..but come on, idiots. Where the hell do you think you live, anyway?



No one is impressed by your flashing earbud. No one imagines that you're so fucking important that you can't - not for a freaking minute - put the phone away. Just fucking answer your cell when you get a call, then put it the hell away.

2.


WTF?

Why are people still buying these things? A $60K vehicle that requires another $60K annually to fuel, and yet another $60K to insure?

The folks that do buy these things...what the hell is wrong with them? They drive as if their vehicle shipped with permission to drive like fucking maniacs in traffic...snapping in and out of lanes, doing 55 on residential streets, cutting people off...

I don't care how much money you have to pile up and set alight...if you own a HUMMER, you're officially a motherfucking idiot.

PSUFAN wrote:1. Bluetooth earsets.

The guy on the treadmill next to me at the gym last night was wearing one.

patsy stone wrote:

PSUFAN wrote:1. Bluetooth earsets.

The guy on the treadmill next to me at the gym last night was wearing one.

He was OK GOing you. He probably won.

People out here drive like idiots whether they have Hummers or not. I guess the Hummer drivers figure that if anybody's going to suffer for their idiocy, they'd rather it be the other driver.

PrimeX wrote:He was OK GOing you.

lol

It doesn't bother me if someone chooses to spend that kind of money on an ugly, fuel-guzzling truck if they can afford it. I do have a problem with the people who drive with an overblown sense of self-importance that makes them feel like they don't need to use signal lights, or stop for pedestrians. Being on the road for ten hours a day I've learned to be extra cautious around people in Hummers, Escalades, and BMWs because they seem to be the most likely to drive without any courtesy for their fellow motorists. And that's saying something considering how poorly people drive in this city.

The reason bluetooth earpieces are annoying goes beyond how they make the people who use them look like douchebags. Them and the Blackberry Zombies make nagivating office buildings almost as hazardous as it is on the streets.

But I'd still take these minor annoyances over having to dodge IEDs on the way to work, or the other crap people have to deal with in the less privileged areas of the world. Think about that when you're bitching about long weekend traffic.

And rack Primer for the OK GO reference.

My current employer shipped me a new Razor phone and a Bluetooth. I haven't taken the Bluetooth out of its box yet.

I'd be embarrassed to be seen in public wearing one of those things.

Truer words couldn't be said.

I'm not into the Bluetooth thing, but I sure hope people keep buying them. My former company that I worked for owns the Bluetooth technology and my 401k is loaded down with their stock.

Oh, and keep buying the DLP TVs and projectors!

Mikey wrote:My current employer shipped me a new Razor phone and a Bluetooth. I haven't taken the Bluetooth out of its box yet.

I'd be embarrassed to be seen in public wearing one of those things.

I'm in the same boat, mikey. Expecting the razr any day now from my employer. I told them not to pay for the Bluetooth as I wouldn't use it. However, I would really like a hands-free option, yet it appears there IS no other option. Is there soemthing else ear-bud-like that I'm not aware of?

Ken wrote:

Mikey wrote:My current employer shipped me a new Razor phone and a Bluetooth. I haven't taken the Bluetooth out of its box yet.

I'd be embarrassed to be seen in public wearing one of those things.

I'm in the same boat, mikey. Expecting the razr any day now from my employer. I told them not to pay for the Bluetooth as I wouldn't use it. However, I would really like a hands-free option, yet it appears there IS no other option. Is there soemthing else ear-bud-like that I'm not aware of?

Just duct tape the fucking cell phone to your head. You won’t look any stupider than you would with the Bluetooth.

I don't think "Bluetooths" have made it to South Texas yet, however, since Katrina we are awash in Blue Gums. That is until yesterday when FEMA cut the funds.

warren wrote:I don't think "Bluetooths" have made it to South Texas yet

Yeah, you have a hard time with just teeth, let alone a bluetooth.



I just saw a commercial for Dairy Queen. They have a hamburger they top with chili. Why? You top ground bef with...ground beef.

Ken wrote:Is there soemthing else ear-bud-like that I'm not aware of?

Pretty sure there is. I think my friend has such a thing.

I'll tell you what -- I've used his Razr a few times, and that is easlily the biggest POS phone I've ever used. And its owner (who's also owned a pile of phones) agrees. It was the cheapest one they had at the time...and it shows. Since he got it, I can barely hear him when we talk.

Unrack Razr phones.

I wish I never would have broken my old Sanyo phone...easily the best I've had. Ran that sucker over with the truck and it still worked for a long time, and always had crystal-clear reception.

I always had PUS figured for a bluetooth kind of guy

I've never had CTRL-Cuddles pegged for a reading comprehension guy. Small wonder-btw

pot-kettle, btw

People are still buying the Hummer, I believe, for these reasons.
1)Made in the USA(or more than half of it is)
2)It's military lineage makes buyers think they are more secure,
less prone to breakdowns.
3)It's now a proven vehicle..some buyers are aware that some companies are
still in their SUV-building infancy, and the bugs aren't gone yet...a should-be-a-red-flag
signal on most days.
4)Some buyers realize that while DaimChry, Honda, et al have attempted to
boost sales by cramming their vehicles with techie junk, undue attention
has been paid to the electronic wizardry, while quality issues such as fit and finish
have fallen off ,and naturally,so has resale value.

Honda is still at the top for resale value.

Dinsdale wrote:

Ken wrote:Is there soemthing else ear-bud-like that I'm not aware of?

Pretty sure there is. I think my friend has such a thing.

I'll tell you what -- I've used his Razr a few times, and that is easlily the biggest POS phone I've ever used. And its owner (who's also owned a pile of phones) agrees. It was the cheapest one they had at the time...and it shows. Since he got it, I can barely hear him when we talk.

Unrack Razr phones.

I wish I never would have broken my old Sanyo phone...easily the best I've had. Ran that sucker over with the truck and it still worked for a long time, and always had crystal-clear reception.

I've heard mixed reviews about the razr. The latest was a glowing one, this not from a youngin' looking for something flashy and sleek but from a professional sales manager. Easy to navigate and user friendly. On the flipside, I've heard the razr's reception ain't all that good... something I'm concerned about seeing as how at times I'm in relatively unpopulated areas. Speaking of which, to answer one of the original questions of the original poster, YES, cell phones themselves do make a difference regarding reception. Both with Verizon or Sprint or whomever, one phone may have inferior or superior reception to the other.

Uncle Fester wrote:Honda is still at the top for resale value.

I'll take this on faith, Fester. But the fact remains that customers get pissed when their nearly-new rig takes a crap..and whoa!!!! Lamborghini is now in the mix with their Q5 concept, sopposedly for a production run in '08.
WTF?? If I see the Lambo marque, I had damned well better see a 200 mph+ supercar and I had better hear a V-12 with twin turbos, four valves per cylinder and GodHell horsepower, not a vehicle designed to climb a tree.

biggest drawback to the razr phone is battery life. stand-by time isn't anyfucking where close to advertised. if you use it for more than a couple-three calls a day, you need to put it on the charger every night for a full recharge, otherwise, you'll run out of battery by the middle of the next day.

they include a free adapter so you can use a wired headset/earpiece instead of the bluetooth.

I'm surprised about RAZR's bad reviews. I've always loved Motorola phones. The one I have now has been accidentally dropped in water and dropped on the concrete many times, but it still works beautifully!

I think it's the V551?

silvurna wrote:

Uncle Fester wrote:Honda is still at the top for resale value.

I'll take this on faith, Fester. But the fact remains that customers get pissed when their nearly-new rig takes a crap..and whoa!!!! Lamborghini is now in the mix with their Q5 concept, sopposedly for a production run in '08.
WTF?? If I see the Lambo marque, I had damned well better see a 200 mph+ supercar and I had better hear a V-12 with twin turbos, four valves per cylinder and GodHell horsepower, not a vehicle designed to climb a tree.

Word.
Same mistake I think Porsche is making w/their Cayenne. Wonder how Mr. Santa Monica feels when he gets into his 911 only to glance over to the next aisle and see a some spoiled milf, Starbucks and Panera sandwich in hand, getting into her Cayenne after buckling her kids into their carseat in the rear.

Nothing like protecting your brand image.

PSUFAN wrote:1. Bluetooth earsets...or more exactly, the tools that wear them everywhere. I understand how useful they can be, in driving situations, walking down the street..but come on, idiots. Where the hell do you think you live, anyway?

Not trying to impress just I have radio and a mp3 player on my phone. So I have the gaux headset so i can listen to music. Sue me.

It's not that I'm cracking on all techie gadgets. I'm cracking on the fools that have to jam them into your face and let you know all about them. I don't see the need for wearing your Trekkie earbud as some kind of fashion statement.

Or, the waiter that served my wife and I recently...writing our orders down in his PDA phone, taking 5 times the amount of time it would have to just scratch it out in a pad of paper or memorize it.

Yes, you have a gadget, asshole. I'm very proud of you.

why the fukk does the bluetooth have that gax as hell blazing blue light? is it to make sure everyone around you knows you are a dork snorkler? can you turn that stupid fuggin' light off? if I ever have one, I'll just put a piece of tape over it.

I hate those too.

This is what i got and it is only in my ear when i got music going. If i am talking on a phone, i have the phone up to my ear with the headset out.

I have a blue tooth ear piece that came with the phone, but haven't used it for quite a while. I did use it while driving when I first got it because the hands free thing made it easier to drive and conversate. I could voice dial thru my GPS and never have to touch a thing, but the fucker never fit right and was not comfortable.

The concept is good, but they need to lose the ear bud and go with something invisible. That way when I'm walking around and looking like I'm talking to myself with no visible means of telephony people will give me a wide berth and leave me alone, which is what I want.

You need to add a .jpg to that there link. Still pretty gax lookin'. You need your radio and music that bad that you would wear one of those things around in public? And not even stereo?



If I'm listening to music the onliest ear attachment you'll see me wearing is this:

I actually got a ticket for wearing headphones. This balck motorcycle cop ticketed me in LA about 10 years ago, fucker. They let deaf people drive, you can talk on the phone while you drive, but wearing headphones is illegal? Bullshit.

Mister Bushice wrote:I actually got a ticket for wearing headphones. This balck motorcycle cop ticketed me in LA about 10 years ago, fucker. They let deaf people drive, you can talk on the phone while you drive, but wearing headphones is illegal? Bullshit.

Deaf people are used to not hearing and compensate automatically by being more aware of their visual surroundings.

I've no problems with headphones.......it's the fucking CELL PHONES I wish they ban while you're driving.

Loganfan wrote:

Mister Bushice wrote:I actually got a ticket for wearing headphones. This balck motorcycle cop ticketed me in LA about 10 years ago, fucker. They let deaf people drive, you can talk on the phone while you drive, but wearing headphones is illegal? Bullshit.

Deaf people are used to not hearing and compensate automatically by being more aware of their visual surroundings.

I've no problems with headphones.......it's the fucking CELL PHONES I wish they ban while you're driving.

Actually, cell phone usage while driving is illegal in these parts unless you have a hands-free device. But it seems to me that dialing a cell number, answering your phone or even talking on the phone is more distracting than holding the damn thing to your ear.

I've had a razr for 6 months and I like it better than any of the nokias I had before it.

I've heard a lot of complaints from folks on gax networks about drops and bad reception.

Mine works nails out here in the sticks, in Portland, and every other urban area I've taken it to (LA,SF,Seattle) I like that its not fukken this little thing the size of a Halloween snickers bar, and the controls are wayyy easier to use than the little elf-sized ones on some phones.

bad internal antennas and gax networks could attribute to it not being a hit 100% of the time I guess

mine's a beaut

Terry in Crapchester wrote:

Loganfan wrote:

Mister Bushice wrote:I actually got a ticket for wearing headphones. This balck motorcycle cop ticketed me in LA about 10 years ago, fucker. They let deaf people drive, you can talk on the phone while you drive, but wearing headphones is illegal? Bullshit.

Deaf people are used to not hearing and compensate automatically by being more aware of their visual surroundings.

I've no problems with headphones.......it's the fucking CELL PHONES I wish they ban while you're driving.

Actually, cell phone usage while driving is illegal in these parts unless you have a hands-free device. But it seems to me that dialing a cell number, answering your phone or even talking on the phone is more distracting than holding the damn thing to your ear.

That and the fact that 97% of the women on the road don't seem to be able to talk and drive and the same time.

mvscal wrote:

Loganfan wrote:Deaf people are used to not hearing and compensate automatically by being more aware of their visual surroundings.

WRONG

I think it's because deaf people drive angry that makes them better drivers.

timmay wrote:I've had a razr for 6 months and I like it better than any of the nokias I had before it.

I've heard a lot of complaints from folks on gax networks about drops and bad reception.

Mine works nails out here in the sticks, in Portland, and every other urban area I've taken it to (LA,SF,Seattle) I like that its not fukken this little thing the size of a Halloween snickers bar, and the controls are wayyy easier to use than the little elf-sized ones on some phones.

bad internal antennas and gax networks could attribute to it not being a hit 100% of the time I guess

mine's a beaut

I've had mine for a month and agree with you 100%. Features, functionality and perfomance are top notch IMO.

Cuda, battery life is fine. Was away for 3 days with no charger, talked on it and took a bunch of pictures and still had 75% power. If you are in a bad coverage area and your phone is constantly searching for a system, then that will drain any battery to death.

I was driving up I5 on Wednesday from Palomar Airport Road in Carlsbad to the Rt 76 exit in Oceanside at about 5:15. It's evening rush hour and fairly congested but once you get past Carlsbad Village drive the the speed is usually at least 75-80 in the two left (out of four) lanes at that hour. Except, of course, on Wednesday. I've gotten out of the Palomar Airport Rd - Canon Rd conggestion and up to speed when suddenly the two fast lanes are full of brake lights and the speed suddenly drops to about 45 - 50. WTF? I'm in the third lane, and the fourth seems to be going a little faster, so I change lanes. Past about a half dozen cars, there's a guy in driving a Lexus in the third lane with a cell phone to his fucking ear being passed by cars on both sides. Completely and utterly oblivious.

Now, I try not to use the celly while driving, and especially try not to dial a number while driving on the freeway. BUT, if I do have to talk, I'm at least aware of WTF is going on around me. These assholes who go off into another world while talking on their phones ought to be shot and used as crash test dummies.

mvscal wrote:[I've been in car being driven by an angry deaf dude who was arguing with his deaf wife. Scary fucking shit.

that's gotta be even funnier than it is scary.

deaf dude: FIK YIUW BATCH!!!!!!

dead dude's wife: NUUU, FAK YUUUU, BASTUW!!!!

mvscal wrote:

IndyFrisco wrote:

mvscal wrote: WRONG

I think it's because deaf people drive angry that makes them better drivers.

I've been in car being driven by an angry deaf dude who was arguing with his deaf wife. Scary fucking shit.

Sorry Logon Fan, deaf people are no different than anybody else which means that 90% of them have their heads up their asses 99% of the time.

No...you're wrong. Again.
They HAVE to be more aware.

Although they DAMN sure need to NOT sign while driving......