T1B

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 12:04 am**

I can't remember when I've been so pumped for a game this early in the season. :D

Salude to you bros!

LET'S GET IT ON!

WAR nailbiters!

Unwar Cuntsberger. My local Westwood One station has the other OSU team on tonight. :x

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 12:34 am**

Nice job with the technical glitches -- second week in a row. You'd think the techs would have the whole "ESPN Football on ABC" thing worked out by now.

Nice opening drive by tOSU, only to fuck up the field goal. No offense from Texas so far, but their defense looks awesome.

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 12:49 am**

Wow, Mack just blew a challenge and a timeout.

Cuntsburger: "I am almost stunned by this."

What a freaking turnaround. Makes up for the missed FG by tOSU.

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 12:59 am**

Somebody please cover that #11. Damn. Texas almost draws first blood, fumbles, and then lets the Buckeyes screw their secondary. That offense is scary.

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:05 am**

Right now Texas is controling the LOS on offense but they are letting TS carve them up. they need to blitz and get a little heat on Smith if they are going to have a chance in this game.

I have faith in Chizik to make the changes to slow down the passing.

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:09 am**

That was a good 3 and out for Texas.

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:33 am**

Questionable call. It was a helmet hit. Watch the replay. Dude goes in head first.

7-7.

This is a game, bros.

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:33 am**

That PF was BS.

He went in with his head up.
How you going to hit somebody and not touch them at all w/your helmet?

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:34 am**

that was the worst fuckin call I have ever seen, I bet McCaunahey was sucking that refs cock 2 mins before game time. score should be 7-3 OSU right now.

Head first my ass, dudes 4 inches taller than McCoy he hit him with his chest. At no point did the pass rusher dip his head during that hit

5 calls vs OSU and none vs Texas

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:42 am**

Karma comes back to kick Texass in the nuts

score should be 14-3, canthey change refs at the half?

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:43 am**

Jsc810 wrote:Fuck. :x

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:44 am**

protecting the quarterback my ass, put a skirt on that little bitch and call him Susie, this isnt flag football, that hit was clean

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:44 am**

SoCalTrjn wrote:Karma comes back to kick Texass in the nuts

score should be 7-10

Fixed.

Btw, you truley ARE a tard, in any forum.

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:45 am**

Rack the way Tressell answered the question about the bullshit call going into half.

I don't get to see Troy Smith play all that much...kid throws a nice ball.

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:46 am**

Troy Smith is better than advertised. Regardless of Brown the UT secondary is getting worked. All I can hope for is some serious half time adjustments.

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:50 am**

NOt sure the DT being about 6'5 could do anything other than hit him in the head. He would pretty much have to spear him to not hit his head.

Texas is getting toasted in the secondary. Chizik is getting his ass kicked right now. The good news for Texas is that they own the LOS on offense and Texas has never lost a game where they out rushed the opponent. I think the defense makes some changes to slow down the tOSU offense and the Texas offense wins the time of possession.

I like Texas in the 2nd half

Texas 24
tOSU 20

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:16 am**

Danicing with the stars promo? Nice job pussifying yourself Emmitt.

There still is a game going on dumbasses!

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:44 am**

damn, I was off on my 31-17 prediction, gave Colt McCoy too much credit

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:06 am**

SoCalTrjn wrote:damn, I was off on my 31-17 prediction, gave Colt McCoy too much credit

You come across as a very bitter USC fan. Texas will be ok, Colt has a lot of potential, but he is a freshmen starting his 2nd game. He made one mistake in that game, other than that interception he was nails for Texas.

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:08 am**

Vito Corleone wrote:You come across as a very bitter USC fan.

And you come across as an insecure Texas fan. Being a winner comes at a price - get used to it.

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:14 am**

Examples?

I give it out and I take it. I'm not going to defend my team against idiots who make stupid statements.

Maybe I should have reminded him he has a history of giving too much credit to QBs since he picked USC to beat Texas last year.

Texas lost but Colt was not the reason we lost, he made one bad decision.

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:16 am**

Vito wrote:Maybe I should have reminded him he has a history of giving too much credit to QBs since he picked USC to beat Texas last year.

That quote makes absolutely no sense considering both Rose Bowl QBs had absolutely smokin' games and the game was finally decided by the play of a QB.

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:22 am**

Van wrote:
Vito wrote:Maybe I should have reminded him he has a history of giving too much credit to QBs since he picked USC to beat Texas last year.
That quote makes absolutely no sense considering both Rose Bowl QBs had absolutely smokin' games and the game was finally decided by the play of a QB.

Makes as much sense as saying that Colt was given too much credit for Texas not scoring 17 pts.

I don't know, maybe he didn't watch the game but Colt can't be responsible for all the dropped passes or fumbles at the goal line. Colt made one bad decision that resulted in a field goal for tOSU. He played tough, but he is a freshmen.

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:25 am**

hey vito?

texas is one-dimensional without vince young, and, that is why I said, nebraska will beat you guys in Lincoln, simply put, nebraska is the most balanced team in the big 12 this year,
we run big, and we pass even bigger,
see ya in Lincoln, ya fruit.

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:30 am**

QB is about the one place Texas had turnover from last season, the fact that he only had 1 interception doesnt mean that he had a great game, the leadership he didnt show, the putting the team on his back that he couldnt do are the things that I anticipated him to do better.
Yeah he only threw one ball directly in to the hands of a OSU defnder but there were a couple other balls that the Buckeye defender had a better chance of catching than the Horn receiver.
I had to remember that Texas' offense was built for a player whose ability and size we may not see at any college for decades and that when a mere mortal is asked to make that sandlot stuff work vs a quality opponent, he can not.
Good luck the rest of the season Horn fans, you may still make a BCS bowl, just not "THE" BCS bowl.

Just curious, does Texas have ANY quality OOC opponents on the horizon or are they still holding out for teams from Cal or Fla that will come to Austin without asking for a return to their own facility. I bet San Jose State and Florida Atlantic/International will trade a paycheck for a loss to UT

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:32 am**

Texas still has to play one last OOC game this season against...Sam Houston State.

I'm not kidding.

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:34 am**

dont they get 4 OOC games?
I think they have Rice too

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:38 am**

Haahaa!!

I stand corrected!

Rice is up next.

Rice.

....and N. Texas...and Sam Houston State!

And hey, let's not forget, they also have....Baylor!!

Then again, at least we can rest assured (I think...) that they won't get to see Colorado in any Big XII "championship" game again this season.

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:41 am**

I think Meltie McCaunaghey is having a sympathy circle jerk at his "ranch" for all the melTexas fans out there butthurt over tonights crash back to reality

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:42 am**

SoCalTrjn wrote:QB is about the one place Texas had turnover from last season, the fact that he only had 1 interception doesnt mean that he had a great game, the leadership he didnt show, the putting the team on his back that he couldnt do are the things that I anticipated him to do better.
Yeah he only threw one ball directly in to the hands of a OSU defnder but there were a couple other balls that the Buckeye defender had a better chance of catching than the Horn receiver.
I had to remember that Texas' offense was built for a player whose ability and size we may not see at any college for decades and that when a mere mortal is asked to make that sandlot stuff work vs a quality opponent, he can not.
Good luck the rest of the season Horn fans, you may still make a BCS bowl, just not "THE" BCS bowl.

Just curious, does Texas have ANY quality OOC opponents on the horizon or are they still holding out for teams from Cal or Fla that will come to Austin without asking for a return to their own facility. I bet San Jose State and Florida Atlantic/International will trade a paycheck for a loss to UT

If you thought a true freshmen was going to put the team on their back and win this game then you really know nothing about football. Comparing a true freshmen to a 4th year junior is like dumbass Lakerfan comparing rookie Kobe Bryant to veteran Michael Jordan.

Our offense was built to take pressure off the QB, as he and Jevan matures our sandlot offense will again look like the Juggernaut that averaged 50 pts per game and broke the all time scoring record set by Nebraska 30 years ago.

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:54 am**

Vito Corleone wrote: dumbass Lakerfan

that's redundant

Im sure McSnead will look to have rebounded in Texas' remaining OOC whoppers but without V.Young, that offense is just a gimmick. Did that purple headed, fatass, jack-o-lantern toothed ghetto buzzard have any more freak offspring?

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:05 am**

Van wrote:in any Big XII "championship" game

Ease up, PAC 10 void of a championship game for now Fan. That Big XII game may come back to bite your boys a few tenths of a point in the ass, given the "beauty" of the BCS and all. Just sayin'

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:14 am**

Vito, you're equally uncomfortable enjoying success as you are falling from success.

Understandably, while other programs in your conference have been consistently credible over the years, Texas has been consistently underachieving. No excuse, given all of those bling-bling recruiting titles.

The MNC Texas rightfully won a year ago would mean so much more to dumbfucks like you if you had the dignity to appreciate it.

Humility is something Vito has struggled with. tOSU has just shown him the light.

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:16 am**

RF, not a chance, not this year.

As I explained in another thread just now, USC is one of only three teams left (along with OSU and ND) who control their own BCS title game destiny.

There's nothing anybody can do. If OSU, USC or ND win out, they're in and everybody else is out.

I'm not predicting that'll happen (I think USC will lose one or even two games this season), but USC does already control their own destiny. They win, they're in, no if's, and's or but's.

Nobody in the Big XII, ACC, Big East, SEC or any other conference can say that.

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:21 am**

Van wrote:Haahaa!!

I stand corrected!

Rice is up next.

Rice.

....and N. Texas...and Sam Houston State!

And hey, let's not forget, they also have....Baylor!!

Then again, at least we can rest assured (I think...) that they won't get to see Colorado in any Big XII "championship" game again this season.

Ha Ha! A fan of a PAC 10 team making fun of Texas schedule. I might be missing something but we just played the #1 team in the country. We didn't waste our time playing Arkansas, or Kal, or WSU or Udub or Arizona, or fresno state. Do I need to go on. Your whole conference is nothing but cream puffs.

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:43 am**

Van wrote:RF, not a chance, not this year.

Explain it, if all of three teams you mentioned lose, mensa.

And given that USC and ND will play later this season and that an SEC or ACC team could go undefeated, answer me this:

Conference championship games ARE or ARE NOT a step closer to playoffs?

A simple ARE or ARE NOT will do. You hate the BCS right? Why diss a conference championship game?

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:48 am**

Van wrote:RF, not a chance, not this year.

As I explained in another thread just now, USC is one of only three teams left (along with OSU and ND) who control their own BCS title game destiny.

There's nothing anybody can do. If OSU, USC or ND win out, they're in and everybody else is out.

I'm not predicting that'll happen (I think USC will lose one or even two games this season), but USC does already control their own destiny. They win, they're in, no if's, and's or but's.

Nobody in the Big XII, ACC, Big East, SEC or any other conference can say that.

actually, you are WRONG.
if nebraska wins out, meaning we run the table, beating usc and texas both, and then win the big 12 title game, I guarentee you, we will be ranked 1 or 2, provided we are 12-0, beating usc in usc, then texas, and running the table, will easily put us in line for a title game,
thus, should we win out, we control our own destiny.

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:53 am**

Vito, your conference is the Big XII. You have NO room to talk. Straight up.

Difference is, while you play OSU and three 'puffs we play ND every fucking year and we NEVER schedule any 'puffs.

ND, Nebraska and an away opener at Arkansas absolutely beats the snot out of OSU and three Special Olympians...

Also, you only get credit for scheduling OSU when you beat them. Hell, anybody can play OSU, the trick is to actually beat them.

In fact, come to think of it, perhaps you might've been a little better prepared for them this time had you not scheduled a controlled scrimmage as your opening game?

Face it, Vito. You can't justify your schedule. You're not even in the SEC and they can't justify their schedules either and they at least actually play in a tough conference.

In a conference loaded with Baylor, Colorado, Missouri, Kansas and a bunch of other teams on the decline you have zero business attempting to defend a schedule loaded with N. Texas, Rice and Sam Houston State. Zero.

You should never schedule those teams and you should never get to play these unbalanced home-away schedules and the NCAA needs to put a stop to this naked greed and cowardice once and for all, all across the board.

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:07 am**

RadioFan wrote:
Van wrote:RF, not a chance, not this year.
Explain it, if all of three teams you mentioned lose, mensa.

Controlling your own destiny means that regardlesss of what anybody else does you're in if you win, dipshit. It means you don't have to worry about anybody else, just yourself. Only OSU, ND and USC are locks to get in if they run the table. They alone control their own destiny.

And given that USC and ND will play later this season and that an SEC or ACC team could go undefeated, answer me this:

Conference championship games ARE or ARE NOT a step closer to playoffs?

They are NOT a step closer to playoffs. They're nothing but a cynical money grab. The regular season works just fine as a "playoff" for those conferences who don't foist end of season farces like Texas-Colorado upon us.

A simple ARE or ARE NOT will do. You hate the BCS right? Why diss a conference championship game?

Because it's a farce. It serves no purpose. Texas had no business risking its title shot last year in a game where even if they'd lost they still would've been ranked at least ten spots higher than the team that beat them. They had nothing to gain there and everything to lose and Colorado wasn't going to be anybody's "champion" of anything just because they beat a bored out of their minds Texas team who was obviously looking past them after having already skullfucked them earlier in the season.

Oh, and then there's the K-State-OU conference title game of '03. Wasn't that a thing of beauty, and rife with import? Actually, no, it wasn't. OU got cuntpummeled and still they were immediately awarded with a date in the BCS title game...

Conference championship games are completely worthless. Earn it all year long and no extra money grab game is necessary.

The only extra money grab we need is Plus One.

Posted: **Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:13 am**

bradhusker wrote:
Van wrote:RF, not a chance, not this year.

As I explained in another thread just now, USC is one of only three teams left (along with OSU and ND) who control their own BCS title game destiny.

There's nothing anybody can do. If OSU, USC or ND win out, they're in and everybody else is out.

I'm not predicting that'll happen (I think USC will lose one or even two games this season), but USC does already control their own destiny. They win, they're in, no if's, and's or but's.

Nobody in the Big XII, ACC, Big East, SEC or any other conference can say that.
actually, you are WRONG.
if nebraska wins out, meaning we run the table, beating usc and texas both, and then win the big 12 title game, I guarentee you, we will be ranked 1 or 2, provided we are 12-0, beating usc in usc, then texas, and running the table, will easily put us in line for a title game,
thus, should we win out, we control our own destiny.

Nope. You're not going to leapfrog ND and the Auburn/LSU winner. You're too far back and they're already right there knocking at the door.

If USC goes down it'll be ND or the SEC winner who benefits. Even if you run the table you'd still need TWO of the top three teams to lose. You don't have a sniff, not unless you end up as one of only two undefeateds or one of only two one loss teams.

Not that it matters. You're Nebraska, under Bill Callahan. You're merely in a race with m2 to see who gets there first.

T1B

tOST @ Texas ingame

tOST @ Texas ingame

?

?

Re: ?