Page 1 of 1
Nebraska vs. usc
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:46 am
by bradhusker
well, this game has the potential to be a GREAT ONE.
from my vantage point, after seeing one-dimensional texas get waxed by mediocre ohio st.
the big 12 is ours for the taking, easily, nebraska is the most balanced team in the big 12.
zac taylor should be good for, at the very least, 350 yds and a trio of td's, and, our ground game should easily go for 175 to 250 yds, that being said, I see us sacking booty at least 6 times, with a couple of picks to boot,
my take,
nebraska 38 usc 31
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:49 am
by PSUFAN
You sound an awful lot like me a week ago
?
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:53 am
by bradhusker
please, dont even compare your QB to zac taylor, dont compare your athletes to ours, its like comparing, men vs. boys, JoPa is a relic, bill callahan is THE MAN.
you dont really believe that penn st. is in the same category as NEBRASKA FOOTBALL?
do ya?
Re: ?
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:55 am
by Jimmy Medalions
bradhusker wrote:bill callahan is THE MAN.
*snicker*
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:58 am
by SoCalTrjn
USC will control both lines of scrimage
The Trojans speed will force 2 or 3 turnovers
Carroll will make the adjustments at the half
The Trojans will again cover the spread
?
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:58 am
by bradhusker
what are you smirking at?
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:01 am
by Van
Bill Callahan is the CAPTAIN QUEEG.
?
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:05 am
by bradhusker
[quote="SoCalTrjn"]USC will control both lines of scrimage
The Trojans speed will force 2 or 3 turnovers
Carroll will make the adjustments at the half
The Trojans will again cover the spread[/quote
really? thats funny, see, your over-rated defense will not be able to see whats coming,
the nebraska offense is easily the most balanced in the nation, our west coast offense is perfectly balanced, your defense will be scratching their heads all night, just trying to keep up,
as for booty?
have you seen our rush ends? have ya seen the one who is 6'8 295, and runs a 4.6 forty?
cause booty will become well acquainted with him by games end, in fact, dont be surprised if booty is sent to the hospital,
by the way, your soft defense laid down like a pretty whore against vince young, ONLY THIS TIME, zac taylor will shred ya like paper, and lucky and co. will run it down your soft throats,
think im kiddin?
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:07 am
by Van
Btw, yeah, I'm pretty sure there that hosting those college football behemoths La Tech and Nicholls State for a couple of home field scrimmages really prepared Nebraska to roll into the Coliseum to take on the team with the nation's longest current regular season and home field winning streaks...
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:09 am
by Van
brad, may I go ahead and assume that there WILL be sig bets between us involved in this shindig?
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:12 am
by bradhusker
Van wrote:Btw, yeah, I'm pretty sure there that hosting those college football behemoths La Tech and Nicholls State for a couple of home field scrimmages really prepared Nebraska to roll into the Coliseum to take on the team with the nation's longest current regular season and home field winning streaks...
if nebraska had the luxury of playing in the pac ten, we'd have those winning streaks too,
time to face reality usc sissy,
the last time ya met up with a big 12 team, your pathetic piss poor defense gave up yards like a crackwhore gives up her pussy,
and, nebraska is so evenly balanced on offense, that your defense wont know whats coming,
get ready punk, THE BIG RED is coming to town.
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:18 am
by RadioFan
USC: 70
Neb: 10 (late)
This is going to be an absolute slaughter, errr, USC slurpfest from Brent. And if Nebraska is within 30, get ready for Cuntsburger's attempt at some sort of "prophetic" call ala, "Folks, despite being down here, I'm tempted to think Nebraska might be on to something." You know, just to keep us all glued to our TVs and shit.
I can hardly wait. ~ click ~
:brad:
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:27 am
by Jimmy Medalions
RadioFan wrote:USC: 70
Neb: 10 (late)
This is going to be an absolute slaughter, errr, USC slurpfest from Brent. And if Nebraska is within 30, get ready for Cuntsburger's attempt at some sort of "prophetic" call ala, "Folks, despite being down here, I'm tempted to think Nebraska might be on to something." You know, just to keep us all glued to our TVs and shit.
I can hardly wait. ~ click ~
:brad:
Oh fuck just RACK this guy.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99d1f/99d1ffcd436e8dfc800a9b8c92c0d1bf3f377acb" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:31 am
by Van
Brad, the last time we met up with a Big XII team:
-We met a Big XII team that was light years better than your current Nebraska team, on both sides of the ball
-We met a Big XII team that wasn't coached by Bill Callahan
-We met a Big XII team led by Vince Young, not Zach Taylor
-We played with a patchwork D which was seriously depleted by injuries
-We played at a neutral field site, not our own home field filled with our own fans, where we haven't lost since forever
-We still rang up over 500 yards and 38 points and we still managed to hold a 12 point lead with just six minutes left in the game; this, despite countless unusual and downright inexplicable blunders which kept us from finishing off what was shaping up to be a comfortable win.
Btw, no, it wouldn't matter which conference Nebraska played in because whether it was the Pac 10 or the Big XII Nebraska's been utter dogshit for awhile now. It's hard to build winning streaks when you give up 70 points to teams that aren't even any good.
So, sig bet or not?
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:38 am
by Van
RadioFan wrote:USC: 70
Neb: 10 (late)
This is going to be an absolute slaughter, errr, USC slurpfest from Brent. And if Nebraska is within 30, get ready for Cuntsburger's attempt at some sort of "prophetic" call ala, "Folks, despite being down here, I'm tempted to think Nebraska might be on to something." You know, just to keep us all glued to our TVs and shit.
I can hardly wait. ~ click ~
:brad:
After seeing the scores from ND, Louisville, LSU and Auburn this weekend I think it's safe to say that yeah, if Petey gets up on Nebraska he's not going to take his foot off the pedal until the total is something laughable.
I'll need to see it first though, since I'm still a LONG way from being sold on USC right now. With this many new people playing key roles for USC I could easily see them taking many a step backwards for every step or two they take forward.
?
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:39 am
by bradhusker
wow, you just gave me a bunch of excuses, depleted? blunders? zach taylor is no vince young? you are right, zach can pass the football with accuracy, and the remark about bill callahan? im not sure what the hell you are trying to say, BUT, after saturday, my guess is, you'l be making more excuses.
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:55 am
by RadioFan
Van wrote:I'll need to see it first though, since I'm still a LONG way from being sold on USC right now. With this many new people playing key roles for USC I could easily see them taking many a step backwards for every step or two they take forward.
Bro, if the line on this game is 40, I'm still taking USC. IN the pick 'em, at that line, already. At 50, it's a coin toss. Seriously.
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:58 am
by bradhusker
RadioFan wrote:Van wrote:I'll need to see it first though, since I'm still a LONG way from being sold on USC right now. With this many new people playing key roles for USC I could easily see them taking many a step backwards for every step or two they take forward.
Bro, if the line on this game is 40, I'm still taking USC. IN the pick 'em, at that line, already. At 50, it's a coin toss. Seriously.
if the line is 40, you will take usc? over nebraska? care to bet pink slips on that?
ur one stupid faggott fuck, thats for sure.
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:17 am
by Van
Brad, you still haven't even agreed to a simple sig bet yet so pipe down on the pussy talk.
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:27 am
by King Crimson
grab yer ankles "brad".
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 12:07 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
No ass-raping? No dry-fucking? No cornfed studs? No :twisted: ? This is a poor imitation of the original Brad. Just sayin'.
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:24 pm
by Shoalzie
Nebraska is turning the corner but they nearly aren't at USC's level yet...should be a two or three TD win for the Trojans, at least. The transition from Leinart to Booty looks to be as seemless as the Palmer to Leinart transition. Too much talent on the SC side...they'll take care of business in primetime next week.
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:56 pm
by Cross Traffic
Too bad Keith Jackson retired for good.
Tardburger every week for the ESPN on ABC games is brutal.
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:34 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
SC politely dryfucks and assrapes the Huskers 40-13.
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:37 pm
by socal
Unhook mama from the plow, brad. SuC will grudgefuck you like the heifers you frequent in the summer night.
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 4:02 pm
by War Wagon
Van wrote:Brad, you still haven't even agreed to a simple sig bet yet so pipe down on the pussy talk.
Why would you even bother with a sig bet with this horrid troll, Van?
If you win, this bandwagon chump runs off screaming into night. You'll never once see that sig you so painstakingly crafted posted under that nic.
If you lose (not likely), you get some garbage you have to tote around for a week or so. It's a no win scenario for you either way.
That said, I'd like to see the 'shuckers at least keep this one close.
That way, when Mizzou marches into Lincoln and crushes every last vestige of the corns hopes of winning the Big XII North this year, trolls like bradhusker will disappear like a fart in the proverbial midwestern whirlwind.
There's a new sherriff in town, and his name is Chase Daniel.
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 4:07 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Why would you even bother with a sig bet with this horrid troll, Van?
If you win, this bandwagon chump runs off screaming into night. You'll never once see that sig you so painstakingly crafted posted under that nic.
If you lose (not likely), you get some garbage you have to tote around for a week or so. It's a no win scenario for you either way.
Pretty much nailed it.
Van, brad is here for comedic relief, regardless of how inaccurate his parodying of the original brad is. You're not supposed to take anything he says with even a shred of seriousness.
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 4:18 pm
by Van
Well, yeah, if he's not even going to stick around and wear his sig then it's a worthless bet.
Is what they're saying true, Brad?
:-)
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:04 pm
by The Seer
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
Van, brad is here for comedic relief, regardless of how inaccurate his parodying of the original brad is.
Case closed.
?
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:26 pm
by bradhusker
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Why would you even bother with a sig bet with this horrid troll, Van?
If you win, this bandwagon chump runs off screaming into night. You'll never once see that sig you so painstakingly crafted posted under that nic.
If you lose (not likely), you get some garbage you have to tote around for a week or so. It's a no win scenario for you either way.
Pretty much nailed it.
Van, brad is here for comedic relief, regardless of how inaccurate his parodying of the original brad is. You're not supposed to take anything he says with even a shred of seriousness.
spoken just like a bona-fide michigan pussy, whatsamatter meeeechigan fag? you still hurtin' after losing to the BIG RED?
there is no "big house" there is no "big blue", there is only, "THE BIG RED", and, we beat your over-rated faggott pussy big ten loser program, and, guess what? we've gotten better,
meaning, that this season, nebraska will be too good to get a bowl game with a second tier program like yours,
van,
usc is also an over-rated program, and, you will learn the painful truth, come saturday,
as for the missouri fan who just took a shot at me? missouri? BUWAHAHAHAHAHA.
nuff said.
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:44 pm
by Van
Brad, for probably the only time in your posting life I will agree with you in this instance. Right now, yeah, USC is overrated. They shouldn't have their current #2 ranking, or even their former #3 ranking, not yet.
Last few seasons though, nope, they weren't overrated.
If it were up to me the current rankings would read:
1-OSU
2-Auburn
3-LSU
4-ND
USC would be somewhere around 10th and Texas would be right around the same spot too now.
W. Virginia and Louisville would still be behind Texas and USC.
FSU would be somewhere down in the high teens, low twenties.
Nebraska would be right around the same. No way to judge Nebraska yet, except off of what they showed last season, not when they still haven't played this season.
Re: ?
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:47 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
bradhusker wrote:spoken just like a bona-fide michigan pussy, whatsamatter meeeechigan fag? you still hurtin' after losing to the BIG RED?
there is no "big house" there is no "big blue", there is only, "THE BIG RED", and, we beat your over-rated faggott pussy big ten loser program, and, guess what? we've gotten better,
meaning, that this season, nebraska will be too good to get a bowl game with a second tier program like yours
I hate to rain on your trolling parade, but I'm no Michigan fan.
?
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:07 pm
by bradhusker
well how come your name says, goblue?
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:10 pm
by Van
It refers to "Blue Light Special", not the Wolverines.
Mgo's a pitious Sparty fan. He hates Michigan.
Re: ?
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:11 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
bradhusker wrote:well how come your name says, goblue?
Read more, post way, way less.
?
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:14 pm
by bradhusker
well then, you're probably mad when nebraska fucked your spartans 23-3, see, nebraska likes to fuck teams from the big ten, showing you big ten fairies that the big 12 is where the real studs reside,
and van, go over to the ohio st. texas thread, and tell me I am wrong about usc not being anywhere near 95 nebraska.