Page 1 of 1

GRAMMY'S IN-SHOW THREAD. CALL IT!

Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 12:35 am
by Buried_Nick
:mrgreen: :lol: :mrgreen:

Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 1:14 am
by Buried_Nick
Looking forward to seeing Green Day and U2 rip it up.

& John Mayer to win a couple. He's outstanding.

You?

Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 2:24 am
by KUTTER
Its all about white people tonight. Looks like we won't be getting a whole lot of thanking God first and foremost tonight.

Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 2:34 am
by mothster
not in

Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 3:00 am
by scritti
who gives a fuck about a grammy? the world is over now because Miss bayou trash Britney won...

expect pestilence soon...

Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 6:43 am
by Funkywhiteboy
scritti wrote:who gives a fuck about a grammy? the world is over now because Miss bayou trash Britney won...

expect pestilence soon...
And locusts! Plagues of locusts! :lol: :twisted:

Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 10:18 am
by Shoalzie
I love Ray Charles but apparently dying is a huge thing with Grammy voters...it worked for Johnny Cash. :lol:

Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 9:03 pm
by mothster
GRAMMY RATINGS PLUNGE: VIEWERSHIP DOWN 25% FROM YEAR AGO... MORE... LOWEST IN 8 YEARS... ABC 'DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES' EASILY TOPS MUSIC FEST...

Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 9:09 pm
by chargerfan
mothster wrote:GRAMMY RATINGS PLUNGE: VIEWERSHIP DOWN 25% FROM YEAR AGO... MORE... LOWEST IN 8 YEARS... ABC 'DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES' EASILY TOPS MUSIC FEST...
That's because alot of people myself included are really turned off by todays so called stars. They do nothing but run around like a bunch of idiots in their ghetto sleds and all their bling or whatever the fuck they're calling it these days and act like they can do whatever they want. Oh you're right about 1 thing if you want to win alot of grammys i guess dying would be a good start to acomplish that goal. He probably would'nt have won jack if he were still alive.

Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 2:44 am
by scritti
chargerfan wrote:
mothster wrote:GRAMMY RATINGS PLUNGE: VIEWERSHIP DOWN 25% FROM YEAR AGO... MORE... LOWEST IN 8 YEARS... ABC 'DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES' EASILY TOPS MUSIC FEST...
That's because alot of people myself included are really turned off by todays so called stars. They do nothing but run around like a bunch of idiots in their ghetto sleds and all their bling or whatever the fuck they're calling it these days and act like they can do whatever they want. Oh you're right about 1 thing if you want to win alot of grammys i guess dying would be a good start to acomplish that goal. He probably would'nt have won jack if he were still alive.
um rack that...and besides,who would you rather watch? a bald melissa etheridge and queen latifah or Eva and Teri from desperate housewives?

Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 3:47 am
by Guest
didn't watch the show

i did hear that J-Lo sounded like ASS

is anybody surprised? :lol:

Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 3:54 am
by Shepard Smith
Samurai G wrote:i did hear that J-Lo sounded like ASS

is anybody surprised? :lol:
She's got enough of it to go 'round! :wink:

Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 3:56 am
by Guest
Shepard Smith wrote:
Samurai G wrote:i did hear that J-Lo sounded like ASS

is anybody surprised? :lol:
She's got enough of it to go 'round! :wink:
true

:lol:

i didn't even realize i typed that

Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 6:23 am
by chargerfan
scritti wrote:
chargerfan wrote:
mothster wrote:GRAMMY RATINGS PLUNGE: VIEWERSHIP DOWN 25% FROM YEAR AGO... MORE... LOWEST IN 8 YEARS... ABC 'DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES' EASILY TOPS MUSIC FEST...
That's because alot of people myself included are really turned off by todays so called stars. They do nothing but run around like a bunch of idiots in their ghetto sleds and all their bling or whatever the fuck they're calling it these days and act like they can do whatever they want. Oh you're right about 1 thing if you want to win alot of grammys i guess dying would be a good start to acomplish that goal. He probably would'nt have won jack if he were still alive.
um rack that...and besides,who would you rather watch? a bald melissa etheridge and queen latifah or Eva and Teri from desperate housewives?
Um desperate housewives hands down.

Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 6:27 am
by Mister Bushice
scritti wrote:
chargerfan wrote:
mothster wrote:GRAMMY RATINGS PLUNGE: VIEWERSHIP DOWN 25% FROM YEAR AGO... MORE... LOWEST IN 8 YEARS... ABC 'DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES' EASILY TOPS MUSIC FEST...
That's because alot of people myself included are really turned off by todays so called stars. They do nothing but run around like a bunch of idiots in their ghetto sleds and all their bling or whatever the fuck they're calling it these days and act like they can do whatever they want. Oh you're right about 1 thing if you want to win alot of grammys i guess dying would be a good start to acomplish that goal. He probably would'nt have won jack if he were still alive.
um rack that...and besides,who would you rather watch? a bald melissa etheridge and queen latifah or Eva and Teri from desperate housewives?
Meaningless empty shit com that shows NO T& A just a cock tease with a bunch of heavily painted hags (ever seen hatchers rock-in-socks from 20 years ago? :shock: )

Etheridge at least has real talent.

But I think that the last few years of bling bling bullshit and talentless hacks acting like they actually matter probably has a lot to do with loss of viewership.

What I saw this year on the grammies talent wise was better than recent shows.

Except the has beens tsunami relief crew version of across the universe. Ghastly.

Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 3:17 pm
by scritti
Mister Bushice wrote:
scritti wrote:
chargerfan wrote: That's because alot of people myself included are really turned off by todays so called stars. They do nothing but run around like a bunch of idiots in their ghetto sleds and all their bling or whatever the fuck they're calling it these days and act like they can do whatever they want. Oh you're right about 1 thing if you want to win alot of grammys i guess dying would be a good start to acomplish that goal. He probably would'nt have won jack if he were still alive.
um rack that...and besides,who would you rather watch? a bald melissa etheridge and queen latifah or Eva and Teri from desperate housewives?
Meaningless empty shit com that shows NO T& A just a cock tease with a bunch of heavily painted hags (ever seen hatchers rock-in-socks from 20 years ago? :shock: )

Etheridge at least has real talent.

But I think that the last few years of bling bling bullshit and talentless hacks acting like they actually matter probably has a lot to do with loss of viewership.

What I saw this year on the grammies talent wise was better than recent shows.

Except the has beens tsunami relief crew version of across the universe. Ghastly.
don't get me started on that tsunami charity song...if you need to hear a remake of "Across The Universe",get either the versions done by Rufus Wainwright or Fionna Apple.