Haster to hold noon press conference
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 4:35 pm
CNN anticipates he will announce that he plans to continue his eternal battle against the skeksis.
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 4:38 pm
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 4:45 pm
Is he fasting for ramadan?
Wouldn't be a bad idea in his case
Wouldn't be a bad idea in his case
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 6:32 pm
Hastert wrote:I am to blame. The buck stops here. But the Democrats are behind all of this
Whiny bitch. Should be happy attention is drawn away from another person saying the administration lied us into war.
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 6:44 pm
Yeah, Peter Tork is sure helping the DemocRats image 
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 6:57 pm
Stay on topic, bitch. Hastert is paid with my tax money. Sheehan just mooches off misguided retards and their donated money.Cuda wrote:Yeah, Peter Tork is sure helping the DemocRats image
[img]http://images.ctv.ca/archives/CTVNews/i ... 050924.jpg
[/img]
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 6:59 pm
cuda doesn't care about tax monies. Biggie's nutsack hasn't mailed out W-2s for years
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 7:30 pm
Too late. He just publicly jerked off.Cuda wrote:Is he fasting for ramadan?
Wouldn't be a bad idea in his case
Link
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 9:03 pm
rack psu
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 10:38 pm
Who Knew Congressman Foley Was a Closeted Democrat?
by Ann Coulter
Posted Oct 04, 2006
At least liberals are finally exhibiting a moral compass about something. I am sure that they'd be equally outraged if Rep. Mark Foley were a Democrat.
The object lesson of Foley's inappropriate e-mails to male pages is that when a Republican congressman is caught in a sex scandal, he immediately resigns and crawls off into a hole in abject embarrassment. Democrats get snippy.
Foley didn't claim he was the victim of a "witch-hunt." He didn't whine that he was a put-upon "gay American." He didn't stay in Congress and haughtily rebuke his critics. He didn't run for re-election. He certainly didn't claim he was "saving the Constitution." (Although his recent discovery that he has a drinking problem has a certain Democratic ring to it.)
In 1983, Democratic congressman Gerry Studds was found to have sexually propositioned House pages and actually buggered a 17-year-old male page whom he took on a trip to Portugal. The 46-year-old Studds indignantly attacked those who criticized him for what he called a "mutually voluntary, private relationship between adults."
When the House censured Studds for his sex romp with a male page, Studds -- not one to be shy about presenting his backside to a large group of men -- defiantly turned his back on the House during the vote. He ran for re-election and was happily returned to office six more times by liberal Democratic voters in his Martha's Vineyard district. (They really liked his campaign slogan: "It's the outfit, stupid.")
Washington Post columnist Colman McCarthy referred to Studds' affair with a teenage page as "a brief consenting homosexual relationship" and denounced Studds' detractors for engaging in a "witch-hunt" against gays: "New England witch trials belong to the past, or so it is thought. This summer on Cape Cod, the reputation of Rep. Gerry Studds was burned at the stake by a large number of his constituents determined to torch the congressman for his private life."
Meanwhile, Foley is hiding in a hole someplace.
No one demanded to know why the Democratic speaker of the House, Thomas "Tip" O'Neill, took one full decade to figure out that Studds was propositioning male pages.
But now, the same Democrats who are incensed that Bush's National Security Agency was listening in on al Qaeda phone calls are incensed that Republicans were not reading a gay congressman's instant messages.
Let's run this past the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals: The suspect sent an inappropriately friendly e-mail to a teenager -- oh also, we think he's gay. Can we spy on his instant messages? On a scale of 1 to 10, what are the odds that any court in the nation would have said: YOU BET! Put a tail on that guy -- and a credit check, too!
When Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee found unprotected e-mails from the Democrats about their plan to oppose Miguel Estrada's judicial nomination because he was Hispanic, Democrats erupted in rage that their e-mails were being read. The Republican staffer responsible was forced to resign.
But Democrats are on their high horses because Republicans in the House did not immediately wiretap Foley's phones when they found out he was engaging in e-mail chitchat with a former page about what the kid wanted for his birthday.
The Democrats say the Republicans should have done all the things Democrats won't let us do to al Qaeda -- solely because Foley was rumored to be gay. Maybe we could get Democrats to support the NSA wiretapping program if we tell them the terrorists are gay.
On Fox News' "Hannity and Colmes" Monday night, Democrat Bob Beckel said a gay man should be kept away from male pages the same way Willie Sutton should have been kept away from banks. "If Willie Sutton is around some place where a bank is robbed," Beckel said, "then you're probably going to say, 'Willie, stay away from the robbery.'"
Hmmmm, let's search the memory bank. In July 2000, the New York Times "ethicist" Randy Cohen advised a reader that pulling her son out of the Cub Scouts because they exclude gay scoutmasters was "the ethical thing to do." The "ethicist" explained: "Just as one is honor bound to quit an organization that excludes African-Americans, so you should withdraw from scouting as long as it rejects homosexuals."
We need to get a rulebook from the Democrats:
-- Boy Scouts: As gay as you want to be.
-- Priests: No gays!
-- Democratic politicians: Proud gay Americans.
-- Republican politicians: Presumed guilty.
-- White House press corps: No gays, unless they hate Bush.
-- Active-duty U.S. military: As gay as possible.
-- Men who date Liza Minelli: Do I have to draw you a picture, Miss Thing?
This is the very definition of political opportunism. If Republicans had decided to spy on Foley for sending overly friendly e-mails to pages, Democrats would have been screaming about a Republican witch-hunt against gays. But if they don't, they're enabling a sexual predator.
Talk to us Monday. Either we'll be furious that Republicans violated the man's civil rights, or we'll be furious that they didn't.
by Ann Coulter
Posted Oct 04, 2006
At least liberals are finally exhibiting a moral compass about something. I am sure that they'd be equally outraged if Rep. Mark Foley were a Democrat.
The object lesson of Foley's inappropriate e-mails to male pages is that when a Republican congressman is caught in a sex scandal, he immediately resigns and crawls off into a hole in abject embarrassment. Democrats get snippy.
Foley didn't claim he was the victim of a "witch-hunt." He didn't whine that he was a put-upon "gay American." He didn't stay in Congress and haughtily rebuke his critics. He didn't run for re-election. He certainly didn't claim he was "saving the Constitution." (Although his recent discovery that he has a drinking problem has a certain Democratic ring to it.)
In 1983, Democratic congressman Gerry Studds was found to have sexually propositioned House pages and actually buggered a 17-year-old male page whom he took on a trip to Portugal. The 46-year-old Studds indignantly attacked those who criticized him for what he called a "mutually voluntary, private relationship between adults."
When the House censured Studds for his sex romp with a male page, Studds -- not one to be shy about presenting his backside to a large group of men -- defiantly turned his back on the House during the vote. He ran for re-election and was happily returned to office six more times by liberal Democratic voters in his Martha's Vineyard district. (They really liked his campaign slogan: "It's the outfit, stupid.")
Washington Post columnist Colman McCarthy referred to Studds' affair with a teenage page as "a brief consenting homosexual relationship" and denounced Studds' detractors for engaging in a "witch-hunt" against gays: "New England witch trials belong to the past, or so it is thought. This summer on Cape Cod, the reputation of Rep. Gerry Studds was burned at the stake by a large number of his constituents determined to torch the congressman for his private life."
Meanwhile, Foley is hiding in a hole someplace.
No one demanded to know why the Democratic speaker of the House, Thomas "Tip" O'Neill, took one full decade to figure out that Studds was propositioning male pages.
But now, the same Democrats who are incensed that Bush's National Security Agency was listening in on al Qaeda phone calls are incensed that Republicans were not reading a gay congressman's instant messages.
Let's run this past the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals: The suspect sent an inappropriately friendly e-mail to a teenager -- oh also, we think he's gay. Can we spy on his instant messages? On a scale of 1 to 10, what are the odds that any court in the nation would have said: YOU BET! Put a tail on that guy -- and a credit check, too!
When Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee found unprotected e-mails from the Democrats about their plan to oppose Miguel Estrada's judicial nomination because he was Hispanic, Democrats erupted in rage that their e-mails were being read. The Republican staffer responsible was forced to resign.
But Democrats are on their high horses because Republicans in the House did not immediately wiretap Foley's phones when they found out he was engaging in e-mail chitchat with a former page about what the kid wanted for his birthday.
The Democrats say the Republicans should have done all the things Democrats won't let us do to al Qaeda -- solely because Foley was rumored to be gay. Maybe we could get Democrats to support the NSA wiretapping program if we tell them the terrorists are gay.
On Fox News' "Hannity and Colmes" Monday night, Democrat Bob Beckel said a gay man should be kept away from male pages the same way Willie Sutton should have been kept away from banks. "If Willie Sutton is around some place where a bank is robbed," Beckel said, "then you're probably going to say, 'Willie, stay away from the robbery.'"
Hmmmm, let's search the memory bank. In July 2000, the New York Times "ethicist" Randy Cohen advised a reader that pulling her son out of the Cub Scouts because they exclude gay scoutmasters was "the ethical thing to do." The "ethicist" explained: "Just as one is honor bound to quit an organization that excludes African-Americans, so you should withdraw from scouting as long as it rejects homosexuals."
We need to get a rulebook from the Democrats:
-- Boy Scouts: As gay as you want to be.
-- Priests: No gays!
-- Democratic politicians: Proud gay Americans.
-- Republican politicians: Presumed guilty.
-- White House press corps: No gays, unless they hate Bush.
-- Active-duty U.S. military: As gay as possible.
-- Men who date Liza Minelli: Do I have to draw you a picture, Miss Thing?
This is the very definition of political opportunism. If Republicans had decided to spy on Foley for sending overly friendly e-mails to pages, Democrats would have been screaming about a Republican witch-hunt against gays. But if they don't, they're enabling a sexual predator.
Talk to us Monday. Either we'll be furious that Republicans violated the man's civil rights, or we'll be furious that they didn't.
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 11:25 pm
Democrats don't need to be "furious" about anything. All they need to do
is sit back and watch the knuckledraggers melt.
I'd love to see Ann Coulter and Dennis Fatstert in a kinky S&M pron vid.
is sit back and watch the knuckledraggers melt.
I'd love to see Ann Coulter and Dennis Fatstert in a kinky S&M pron vid.
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 11:34 pm
Ann and denny would make for a rather horrific vid, but, not sure it would make it into the pron genre.Mikey wrote:Democrats don't need to be "furious" about anything. All they need to do
is sit back and watch the knuckledraggers melt.
I'd love to see Ann Coulter and Dennis Fatstert in a kinky S&M pron vid.
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:00 am
All the same leftwing tools who claim to find AC totally repulsive would make any pron tapes of her bestsellers.
Whereas if a Michael Moore/Barbara Boxer (or a Hitlery-Rosie O'Donnell) vid came out, the only reaction from the right would be horror at the concept.
Sick twisted bunch, those Dems.
And of course Coulter is right about them being a bunch of hypocritical losers.
Whereas if a Michael Moore/Barbara Boxer (or a Hitlery-Rosie O'Donnell) vid came out, the only reaction from the right would be horror at the concept.
Sick twisted bunch, those Dems.
And of course Coulter is right about them being a bunch of hypocritical losers.
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:11 am
Rack.PSUFAN wrote:cuda doesn't care about tax monies. Biggie's nutsack hasn't mailed out W-2s for years
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 1:03 am
I'd make like Doug Flutie and drop kick the bitch out of my bed. You can have that skank.Diogenes wrote:All the same leftwing tools who claim to find AC totally repulsive would make any pron tapes of her bestsellers.
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 1:16 am
The 'skank' would mock your pathetic ass so badly you'd finally embrace your inate homosexuality. If you had the minimal balls to even talk to her.
Which is where the total meltowns whenever she is mentioned come from. Her intristic ability to point out what sackless pathetic bitches you are.
Which is where the total meltowns whenever she is mentioned come from. Her intristic ability to point out what sackless pathetic bitches you are.
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 1:35 am
Geezusfuckingkreist. Do you, like, have wonderful dreams about your Ann every night or something?
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 1:37 am
FTFY, DouchePSUFAN wrote:I haven't had an original take in years
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:13 am
I tend to laugh at her. She's got shakes like an alcoholic whenever she gets all wound up on TV. Maybe it's just because she hasn't been fucked in so long that she simply can't relax. It wouldn't surprise me if she has a bit of pent-up lesbian needs inside that skeleton of hers. Let me know when she discovers it and I'll start to take her seriously.Diogenes wrote:Which is where the total meltowns whenever she is mentioned come from.
Btw, hey Cuda ... it must be fall, seeing how you've stepped up your ankle-nibbling exponentially. Nice job, takeless territory-marking gerbil.
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:31 am
But I have to ask. Did he have have his hands on that kid's eleventh digit? Or not?
Talk to me.
Talk to me.
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:09 am
BwahImus wrote:But I have to ask. Did he have have his hands on that kid's eleventh digit? Or not?
Talk to me.
Don, you being in New Mexico and all, what's "eleventh digit" mean? Is that an inside joke? If not, you CAN'T say that! If so, go with the New Mexico angle, Don. Pure Gold!
Sincerely,
Hip New York radio producer
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 4:37 am
I don't know why but the Peter Tork thing cracks me up every time.Cuda wrote:Yeah, Peter Tork is sure helping the DemocRats image
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 7:30 am
Wrong. They already have Stick-Figure Sex videos & they aren't exactly flying off the shelf.Diogenes wrote:All the same leftwing tools who claim to find AC totally repulsive would make any pron tapes of her bestsellers.
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 1:26 pm
Nobody cares.Diogenes wrote:All the same leftwing tools who claim to find AC totally repulsive would make any pron tapes of her bestsellers.
Stick your face in the business end of a lawnmower.