T1B

do you think the US will reinstate the draft?

would the world take notice, or would tensions increase?

should women be included?

wtf

I'm past the age of eligibility so why the hell not.

should have done it on 9/12/01

My Army has enough jackasses in it without bringing guys like you in.

I'll pass.

Considering that a good number of you clowns are probably still of draft age, I voted "stfu timmah". The idea that somebody might consider some of you even basically qualified to take up the defense of our country gives me hives. (I'm obviously excluding those of you who actually went in and served honorably and well--props, by the way--but you know who I mean.)

Voters might think twice before putting a retard in office if they or someone they care about would get drafted.

well until the 70's we always did

we'd have to undertake some serious construction to rebuild the army bases that have shrunk so much. keep the engineers busy for a couple months.

sorry mark, time for your army to get beefed up

Bizzarofelice wrote:Voters might think twice before putting a retard in office if they or someone they care about would get drafted.

you dont think a demo president would pull the trigger on the draft?

or that dubya wont get it rolling before he's out?

No problem with it getting beefed up. 15 years ago, we filled 18 divisions, all volunteers.

We only got ten now, with a couple of extra Brigades/Regiments thrown in for flavor.

We can beef it up without the draft.

Tinker to Evers to Chance wrote:No problem with it getting beefed up. 15 years ago, we filled 18 divisions, all volunteers.

We only got ten now, with a couple of extra Brigades/Regiments thrown in for flavor.

We can beef it up without the draft.

it's not just the beef

it's the presentation

how would the rest of world react to the US drafting a bunch of tards, slapping together a few more Carriers, and Subs, establishing larger bases in friendly countries near hot spots, etc.?

It depends. If we have to fight 3 wars at a time, we might have too. Sad thing is if we would use some of our weapons to their fullest capability, we woulnt need to risk many lives.

timmay wrote:

Bizzarofelice wrote:Voters might think twice before putting a retard in office if they or someone they care about would get drafted.

you dont think a demo president would pull the trigger on the draft?

or that dubya wont get it rolling before he's out?

I think tone of our politicians would change drastically. Right now the Dems are just trying to keep up with the ravenous GOP with their sabre-rattling. Spineless turd Kerry says he would fight just as Dubya does but with other small consditions as if that changes anything.

If the draft were re-instated, both parties would face voter furor over sending everyone off into a war over a toilet like Iraq or Iran or NKPR that is no threat to our nation.

Cicero wrote:It depends. If we have to fight 3 wars at a time, we might have too. Sad thing is if we would use some of our weapons to their fullest capability, we woulnt need to risk many lives.

3 wars at a time? Which 3 countries do you think are going to attack us?

OK, put the drafted tards in the Navy so I don't have to deal with them.

Oh, and Bizzaro, we've had draftees fighting the DPRK before.

Goober McTuber wrote:

Cicero wrote:It depends. If we have to fight 3 wars at a time, we might have too. Sad thing is if we would use some of our weapons to their fullest capability, we woulnt need to risk many lives.

3 wars at a time? Which 3 countries do you think are going to attack us?

Iraq, Afganistan, N Korea or Iran

Tinker to Evers to Chance wrote:OK, put the drafted tards in the Navy so I don't have to deal with them.

probably where half of em would go

Cicero wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

Cicero wrote:It depends. If we have to fight 3 wars at a time, we might have too. Sad thing is if we would use some of our weapons to their fullest capability, we woulnt need to risk many lives.

3 wars at a time? Which 3 countries do you think are going to attack us?

Iraq, Afganistan, N Korea or Iran

he said "attack us"

Cicero wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

Cicero wrote:It depends. If we have to fight 3 wars at a time, we might have too. Sad thing is if we would use some of our weapons to their fullest capability, we woulnt need to risk many lives.

3 wars at a time? Which 3 countries do you think are going to attack us?

Iraq, Afganistan, N Korea or Iran

None of them have attacked us so far.

Easy, Timmay, there's plenty of tard to go around.

Tinker to Evers to Chance wrote:Oh, and Bizzaro, we've had draftees fighting the DPRK before.

Thanks for the history lesson, Dr. Eugen Weber. What that has to do with sending American boys over there in the year 2006 NOBODY HAS A FUCKING CLUE.

Goddamned Cubsfan.

Bizzarofelice wrote:
Goddamned Cubsfan.

How come we never hear P.E.T.A. complain about N. Korea? I don't think N. Korea should get off so easy just because they eat them all. I heard on TV the other night that KJII has a cellar full of whiskey and scotch, and I"d be willing to go into the (his) basement again just to sample some of the stuff. I promise to report back my findings right here on this board.

Rip City

So, if North Korea attacks, you're just gonna hang us saps that are already over here out to dry, because no one has a fucking clue?

Tinker to Evers to Chance wrote:So, if North Korea attacks

You made baby Jesus laugh with your stupidity.

Cicero wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

Cicero wrote:It depends. If we have to fight 3 wars at a time, we might have too. Sad thing is if we would use some of our weapons to their fullest capability, we woulnt need to risk many lives.

3 wars at a time? Which 3 countries do you think are going to attack us?

Iraq, Afganistan, N Korea or Iran

I nominate you for cannon fodder duty.

Well, your the one that is asshurt over the idea that we might go to war with North Korea. Only way one gets started is if they kick it off.

A war on the peninsula will end up killing a couple of million South Korean civilians. They sure as fuck aren't going to start it, and we won't start without them.

You made baby Jesus laugh with your stupidity.

They laughed at me too.

--UBL (no relation to the U&L)

Rip City

There was one?

Tinker to Evers to Chance wrote:Well, your

'sup, Diogenes?

Grammar smack. Fuckin’ outstanding.

Diogenes wrote:The military loathes the idea, which is one reason you only hear the left talking about it

The left are not the only ones that listen to the military advice. Some on the right do but don't speak up for fear of making their President look even more stupiderer.

Diogenes wrote:What I was saying is...

No, you got caught in a fuck up and now you're backpeddling. Log back in with the troll and we'll continue.

Bizzarofelice wrote:backpeddling

Can we now declare a moratorium on spelling/grammar smack?

Dinsdale wrote:

Bizzarofelice wrote:backpeddling

Can we now declare a moratorium on spelling/grammar smack?

no.

btw tinkers.. is not a troll. he really is a cannon stuffer stationed in SK

timmay wrote:btw tinkers.. is not a troll. he really is a cannon stuffer stationed in SK

poor dumb bastard.

he is a cubs fan

Bizzarofelice wrote:

Dinsdale wrote:

Bizzarofelice wrote:backpeddling

Can we now declare a moratorium on spelling/grammar smack?

no.

Then could you edit that to read "backpedalling?"

I don't know. Dio might be selling time on his back. Ann Coulter with a strap-on seems a logical customer.