T1B

Posted: **Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:43 pm**

Miami Archdiocese apologizes to Foley

How come we never heard about this BEFORE Foley was caught sending and receiving sexually explicit instant messages to and from teens who had served as congressional pages??

How come Foley did not try to get help???

So, is it now less wrong for a Congressman to be sexually involved with a teenager because the Congressman was diddled on as a child??

Posted: **Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:52 pm**

"John Favalora, archbishop of Miami, is withdrawing Father Mercieca's dick from his ass," the archdiocese said.

Posted: **Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:53 pm**

If only the Catholic Church would use this guy's pic in their marketing strategy. No wonder they're losing members ... and priests. Simply shocking.

Posted: **Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:57 pm**

A defense of child molester priests by Cuda in 5...4...3...2...1...

Posted: **Fri Oct 20, 2006 11:07 pm**

mvscal wrote:Nobody cares.

Face it, you'd be felching that faggot, if this scandal never came out and he was the difference in the GOP retaining the House.

Posted: **Fri Oct 20, 2006 11:17 pm**

You don't care if the House goes to the Dems?

Posted: **Fri Oct 20, 2006 11:25 pm**

Don't bother mvscal with shit about some Congressman from Florida.

He's busy blaming the Union Tribune reporter for ruining "Duke" Cunningham's career.

Posted: **Fri Oct 20, 2006 11:34 pm**

Not what I asked. What I asked was a hypothetical.

Damn, the least you could do would be to call me a dumbfuck or something, especially because if Foley was a Democrat, you'd be over this like stink on shit.

Since when is the balance of the House "irrelevant?"

Ah, I get it ... the old "I don't care" routine. Sure ... like I don't "care" about funnin in here.

Posted: **Fri Oct 20, 2006 11:36 pm**

A priest touched my nipples 40 years ago, so now I have the hots for young boys and I drink alot.

Boo, hoo.

Sincerely,

Foley.

Posted: **Fri Oct 20, 2006 11:38 pm**

bray2 wrote:A priest touched my nipples 40 years ago, so now I have the hots for young boys and I drink alot.

Boo, hoo.

Sincerely,

Foley.

So where's you're loyalty, soldier?

Chop Chop

Posted: **Sat Oct 21, 2006 12:00 am**

RadioFan wrote:Since when is the balance of the House "irrelevant?"

Ah, I get it ... the old "I don't care" routine. Sure ... like I don't "care" about funnin in here.

He knows it's a lost cause, so right now he's busy trying to convince himself that he doesn't care.

Posted: **Sat Oct 21, 2006 12:01 am**

bray2 wrote:A priest touched my nipples 40 years ago, so now I have the hots for young boys and I drink alot.

Boo, hoo.

Sincerely,

Foley.

It rubs the lotion on it's skin!!

Posted: **Sat Oct 21, 2006 12:08 am**

Mikey wrote:Don't bother mvscal with shit about some Congressman from Florida.

He's busy blaming the Union Tribune reporter for ruining "Duke" Cunningham's career.

Posted: **Sat Oct 21, 2006 2:01 am**

It's hardly the most penitent of apologies, is it?

On Thursday, Mercieca told CNN that he fondled the lawmaker as a teen, but he said it wasn't abuse because Foley "seemed to like it."

"Once maybe I touched him or so, but didn't, it wasn't -- because it's not something you call, I mean, rape or penetration or anything like that you know. We were just fondling," Father Anthony Mercieca, 69, said in a phone interview with CNN affiliate WPTV from his home on the Maltese island of Gozo in the Mediterranean.

"He seemed to like it, you know? So it was sort of more like a spontaneous thing," Mercieca told WPTV, a West Palm Beach, Florida, station.

"Let's say it was 40 years ago, almost 40 years ago, so why bring this up at this late stage?" Mercieca asked. "Anyway, he will overcome it, with a psychiatrist you know. Mark is a very intelligent man."

Yeah Mark, chill out a bit, dude. There's no need to put a downer on the vibe just because your career's fucked.

Posted: **Sat Oct 21, 2006 7:46 am**

RadioFan wrote:You don't care if the House goes to the Dems?

It will be interesting to see how much more the Dems will be able to fuck things up. I am sure these dumbfucks will be more concerned with impeaching Bush then actually rectifying a few of his numerous pisspoor policies.

Posted: **Sat Oct 21, 2006 7:47 am**

It'll be a lot easier to rectify when he's either confined to Crawford Texas, or in jail getting rectumfied..

Posted: **Sat Oct 21, 2006 1:38 pm**

Actually, I don't think he's really done a good job of shifting the blame...but I am amazed at the scurrying around that he's caused.

Posted: **Sat Oct 21, 2006 3:04 pm**

PSUFAN wrote:Actually, I don't think he's really done a good job of shifting the blame...but I am amazed at the scurrying around that he's caused.

^^Agreed, and the media-driven scurrying will continue until Election Day....then, it will be as mv stated, nobody cares.

Posted: **Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:41 pm**

stuckinia wrote:
RadioFan wrote:You don't care if the House goes to the Dems?
It will be interesting to see how much more the Dems will be able to fuck things up. I am sure these dumbfucks will be more concerned with impeaching Bush then actually rectifying a few of his numerous pisspoor policies.

Lord help us if we have to return to the peace and prosperity of the 1990s. What a living hell that was.

Posted: **Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:41 pm**

mvscal wrote:
RadioFan wrote:
mvscal wrote:Nobody cares.
Face it, you'd be felching that faggot, if this scandal never came out and he was the difference in the GOP retaining the House.
If the scandal never came out, then I never would have heard of him.

Are you suggesting that you’ll only felch faggots that you’re on a first name basis with?

Posted: **Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:56 pm**

There was neither. The "prosperity" was built on corporate fantasies and the "peace" was nothing more than Bubba sweeping shit under the rug for the next administration.

So how do you characterize the Bush Utopia that we have now? How about your assessment of the guy who stood in front of the nation and pledged that he would not use the U.S. Military for "nation building" and yet we're doing exactly that?

Posted: **Mon Oct 23, 2006 4:39 pm**

9/11 changed our foreign policy paradigm. If you don't understand why, you are a fucking idiot.

Yeah, no shite. I understand the why, just not the "how."

We invade Iraq, give Paul Bremer two weeks to figure out what to do afterward, and now we're using our army to babysit the murderous dirtpatch that is Iraq? Our soldiers die or are maimed, the insurgents bleed us dry financially for perpituity...

That's the new paradigm??

Posted: **Mon Oct 23, 2006 8:32 pm**

In any event, wringing your hands on the sidelines isn't a valid alternative and the status quo was flatly unacceptable.

I dunno, since we found jack squat in terms of threats, the status quo isn't looking so bad.

Posted: **Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:12 pm**

mvscal wrote:
Uncle Fester wrote:
In any event, wringing your hands on the sidelines isn't a valid alternative and the status quo was flatly unacceptable.
I dunno, since we found jack squat in terms of threats, the status quo isn't looking so bad.
We've been fighting the graduates of his terrorist training camps for the last three years now. I'd say the threat was dire.

A conclusion shared by both Duelfer and Kay.

Just when you thought babs had inched ALL the way out on his thin drooping limb.

Drop for fucking twenty, bitch! And try to wake up:

Your confused and grumpy state of denial oddly parallels that of the (unelected) cabal currently circling the drain at 1600 Pennsyvania Ave.

Every single one of your "ditto-head" interpretations of U.S. foreign policy, let alone military blunders, has proven absurdly stupid and backwards. Starting with the bald seething racisim of your stunted headspace and....well, it really doesn't GO anywhere else. That's all you are, just an indefatigable stream of bitter little snips, smears, and most of all, evasions.

Now do twenty more! In fact do twenty-four, one for each year of Skilling's sentence.

Posted: **Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:52 pm**

mvscal wrote: I'd say the threat was dire.

Of course you would.

Now, go put on your dress and hide under the bed.

Seriously, is there any external threat that you wont shit your pants over?

Posted: **Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:10 pm**

mvscal wrote:What the fuck does that have to do with anything? Or are we just not suppposed to react to external threats and sit there like an inert lump and take it?

I see. By shitting your pants, you're showing Osama and the world who's boss.

Man, I thought you Americans were made of tougher stuff than that.
Your entire nation hides behing mommy's apron evry time some bearded sheik gives you the "stink eye".

Posted: **Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:51 am**

I'd say that you and other "ditto-heads" that supported the invasion of Iraq on the feeble pretense of some Imminent Threat from "terrorists" are certainly living in caves of gnashing, desperate fear. And those like yourself who supported the Patriot Act and similar rash underminings of America's constitution and basic civil rights are living in caves of cowardice. That's right, Caves Of Cowardice!

I'll bet you're scared to the point of soiling yourself over the prospect of Obama becoming president. After all, he's intelligent, thoughtful, respected and...oh yeah, a "plate-lipped monkey."

One thing you won't do, however, like the Chimp 'n Cheney, is admit you were dead wrong, that immeasurably more harm has been incurred by America because of this heinous act of aggression than any "threat" supposedly posed by Saddam.

Posted: **Tue Oct 24, 2006 1:27 am**

The mvscal/Fester exchanges were way more entertaining than any of the LTS TARD 2 posts in case anybody is keeping score

Posted: **Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:43 am**

Aw, you're just a prick..a killjoy pencil-dick wet blanket who says...what? Oh that's right, you've got no opinions, let alone, etc...

Look, the real subtext here is Skilling and his weird, leveled state of amored denial. He'll presently be negotiating deals on cigarettes and tendering offers of..uh, spread sheets and other tight mergers.

Anyone seen "The Smartest Guys In The Room"? A succinct documentary in which Skilling emerges front and center as the most twisted Cult Leader since Jim Jones--no bullshit. If you think this guy is simply a weasalling manipulative thief, forget it. Enron was WAAAAAAAY beyond mere malfeasance. And far more criminal than mere "overvaluing" stock prices.

And, as amusing as babs is in his pathetic snearing (pawing) snit posts, he's really got nothing to say about anything. Haven't you noticed? This phony who pretends to have some historical perspective and geo-political insight, is just a snotty little brat who just says "dipshit" and "fuck off" when an actual take is expected. He's a punching bag. C'mon, without someone to kick him in the gut and lead him around the room by the ear squalling, he'd just sit there in the corner(psssst..notice how he's oblivious to sports?).

Anyways, with the death of Lay, the rolling of Fastow, and the quick canning of Skilling, we the people are (very deliberately) being denied the real harrowing truth of the utter criminality of Enron, the heart of the Texas Cabal.

Wakey Wake

(try to wake up, you "innocent puppets")

T1B

Rep. Mark Foley has done a good job shifting the blame...

Rep. Mark Foley has done a good job shifting the blame...