Chargers - Chiefs

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 5:29 pm

So far it looks like the Bolts are melting.
2 TO's in the first quarter is not a good thing.

Still early though.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 5:45 pm

Rivers is playing like he's scared. They need to run Michael Turner a few more times to soften things up a little.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 5:57 pm

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
Mikey wrote:Rivers is playing like he's scared. They need to run Michael Turner a few more times to soften things up a little.
Natrone Means couldn't help them right now.

Whatever, moron.

I'm thinking you maybe ought to try some of that shit that makes your penis numb or you're going to blow your wad before halftime.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:58 pm

That pass was a TD. He never hit the ground before crossing the line.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:03 pm

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:14-0 Chiefs

It's gonna be a LOOOOOOONG day for ya, BoltFan....might as well spread your legs, lay back and enjoy your plungering. ;)

So, you wiped your dick off on your own curtains yet and ready for the second half?

( :wink: )

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 8:14 pm

God and GOD I hate the "prevent" defense.

Game set and fucking match.

I guess I gotta RACK the Chiefs for holding on and pulling it out.

Again, some poor coaching decisions by the Bolts, and sloppy play in the first qtr really screwed them.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 8:24 pm

YES!!!

Great game.

KC almost choked it away.

I'm out of breath right now and hoarse as hell from yelling my ass off in my living room all damn day.

whew

WhatsMyName · Post by **WhatsMyName** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 8:55 pm

Great game Chiefs. Denver will sweep you but nice win today.

Kansas City Kid · Post by **Kansas City Kid** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 10:33 pm

Too bad you picked the Chargers to win, Fatty.

Mississippi Neck · Post by **Mississippi Neck** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 11:21 pm

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
WhatsMyName wrote:Great game Chiefs. Denver will sweep you but nice win today.
In your dreams, fuckhole- the Bolts are BETTER than the Donks, and we got over so what exactly makes you think THAT?

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
mvscal wrote:
atomicdad wrote:Actually I see this as a tough game as it always is.
I agree with that. I expect the Chefs to come out fired up. Objectively though, the Bolts are a better team across the board, so they should squeak out an ugly win.
Couldn't agree more.

Sorry to disappoint this week, BoltFans...I just don't have it in me.

Whatever way the wind blows, eh?

trev · Post by **trev** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 11:23 pm

War Wagon wrote:YES!!!

Great game.

KC almost choked it away.

I'm out of breath right now and hoarse as hell from yelling my ass off in my living room all damn day.

whew

That sure was a battle. Not much to say. Congrats.

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 11:57 pm

Rivers turnovers on the road led to a big deficit and the Charger Oline & D sucked. The Chiefs outplayed the Chargers most of the game, props Chief fan on a very good win.

No excuses here.

WhatsMyName · Post by **WhatsMyName** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 1:01 am

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
WhatsMyName wrote:Great game Chiefs. Denver will sweep you but nice win today.
In your dreams, fuckhole- the Bolts are BETTER than the Donks, and we got over so what exactly makes you think THAT?

The Bolts allowed more TDs today against the shithole Chiefs than the Broncos have allowed ALL YEAR.

And you're still a fat fucking piece of shit and your fellow Chief fans are FUCKING IDIOTS for thinking you had ANY CHANCE against Pittsburgh last week. Dumbfucks.

KC Scott · Post by **KC Scott** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 1:56 am

Not sure if I'll be able to figure the Chiefs out this season. They haven't run the ball all year and then against one of the best front 7 in the league, LJ breaks loose.

The defense which looked horrible in Pitt against the run last week shuts LT down - but lets Rivers burn them for 266 and 2 TDs?

Is it just the Marty curse?

Who the fuck knows?

But then again, who saw Houston hammering J-Ville, or Pittsburgh giving up 4TDs to Ron Mexico?

Weird shit, man.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:00 am

KC Scott wrote:Not sure if I'll be able to figure the Chiefs out this season.

Here's a clue.

You don't pick against the Chiefs at home.

Unreal that you didn't see this coming, Scott.

KC Scott · Post by **KC Scott** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:27 am

War Wagon wrote: You don't pick against the Chiefs at home.

Like week one vs. Cincy?

Unreal that you didn't see this coming, Scott.

Didn't say that - go look at my call - Thought it would be close and it was.

I don't know what Chiefs team we are looking at - we couldn't even run on the Cardinals, yet we bowl over SD?

I've shelved the myopia - Just really trying to determine if this is a competitve team or not

WhatsMyName · Post by **WhatsMyName** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:30 am

Wasn't Whitey one of the dumbfucks who picked the Chiefs to beat Pittsburgh?

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:35 am

Oh ye of little faith, they're competitive.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:44 am

WhatsMyName wrote:Wasn't Whitey one of the dumbfucks who picked...

So who did you pick?

Oh, that's right... you don't participate in any of the picks games here.

Why is that?

Don't bother answering, shit troll.

I already know the answer.

It's because you are a PUSSY.

WhatsMyName · Post by **WhatsMyName** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:56 am

Yup, it takes a ton of balls to participate in a free pick 'em game. You are such a hapless homer.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 4:50 am

War Wagon wrote:Oh ye of little faith, they're competitive.

They're mediocre.

.... or 'competetive'.

6 of one, half-dozen of the other.

atomicdad · Post by **atomicdad** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 5:11 pm

Gotta give props to the Chiefs on the win. I only saw part of the 2nd quarter sitting in the airport in OK City. From what little I saw it looked as if Jared Allen was schooling McNeil beating him around the corner on almost every play.

Raydah James · Post by **Raydah James** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 5:20 pm

mvscal wrote:
KC Scott wrote:The defense which looked horrible in Pitt against the run last week shuts LT down -
138 yards of offense and 2 TDs? Good job "shutting down" LT.

Idiot

What did you expect? Scrote has proven time and again that he knows dick about football......and well, just about anything else.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 5:26 pm

Raydah James wrote:
mvscal wrote:
KC Scott wrote:The defense which looked horrible in Pitt against the run last week shuts LT down -
138 yards of offense and 2 TDs? Good job "shutting down" LT.

Idiot

What did you expect? Scrote has proven time and again that he knows dick about football......and well, just about anything else.

Careful or Whitey will be hard on your ass extolling Scott's encyclopaedic football knowledge and analytical prowess.

atomicdad · Post by **atomicdad** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 5:32 pm

Baaaaa,

"Bolt Fan shivers and Rivers quivers"

Which Shakespere came up with that steaming pile of horseshit.

Nixhex · Post by **Nixhex** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:20 pm

The much maligned KC offensive line pretty much dominated the line of scrimmage and the so called best front 7 in the NFL. LJ had his way with the vaunted Charger defense. A backup QB in Damon Huard posted a 108.5 Qb rating while racking up 250+ yards and 2 td's. The Charger's overrated #1 defense got pimp slapped yesterday. Not to mention a juiced up Shawn "Roids Out" Merriman had a less than stellar game.

Nixhex · Post by **Nixhex** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:49 pm

mvscal wrote:And after being spotted 14 points off of turnovers early, you promptly squandered a 20-3 lead and were forced to make a 53 yard field goal to win the game.

If you think you "dominated" anything in that game, you are a fucking idiot.

The Chiefs offense dominated the Charger defense. If you don't believe that than you are a fucking idiot.

Raydah James · Post by **Raydah James** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:58 pm

Nixhex wrote:
mvscal wrote:And after being spotted 14 points off of turnovers early, you promptly squandered a 20-3 lead and were forced to make a 53 yard field goal to win the game.

If you think you "dominated" anything in that game, you are a fucking idiot.
The Chiefs offense dominated the Charger defense. If you don't believe that than you are a fucking idiot.

RACK!

Sincerely,

Pissing away a 17 fucking point lead and needing a 53 yard field goal as time expired to win.

Once again Sister Slammer, MO fan amazes us with thier flagrant stupidity-I mean, whats next....you going to piss yourself over the *impending* stock market crash that never was and dump a ton of shares?

Oh wait................

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 7:05 pm

They "dominated" the first quarter (only because of TO's) and the final minute, due to the Bolts' brilliant "prevent" defense.

I guess some people can't be satisfied with just a win, but have to show what ignoramuses they are by making ridiculous statements about "dominance". I guess margins of 3 points and 6 total yards points to domininance in Nix's myopic point of view.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 7:10 pm

Raydah James wrote: Pissing away a 17 fucking point lead and needing a 53 yard field goal as time expired to win.
Once again Sister Slammer, MO fan amazes us with thier flagrant stupidity

doesn't amaze me anymore.......

I've come to expect it.......

Nixhex · Post by **Nixhex** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 7:12 pm

mvscal wrote:As I said...idiot.

Not that imbecility is any great surprise coming from Toothless City, Mo.

Tell me how the Chiefs offense didn't dominate the Charger defense. Or you can just act like a fucking 2 year old and call me names.

355 total yards
LJ goes for 132 yards for a 4.7 avg with 2 td's
Huard throws for 232 yards, 2 td's and a 108.9 rating
An average of 6 yards per play
3 for 3 in the red zone
They take the ball on the 18 yard line with 33 seconds left and march down the field to get in field goal position

Nixhex · Post by **Nixhex** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 7:16 pm

Raydah James wrote:
Nixhex wrote:
mvscal wrote:And after being spotted 14 points off of turnovers early, you promptly squandered a 20-3 lead and were forced to make a 53 yard field goal to win the game.

If you think you "dominated" anything in that game, you are a fucking idiot.
The Chiefs offense dominated the Charger defense. If you don't believe that than you are a fucking idiot.
RACK!

Sincerely,

Pissing away a 17 fucking point lead and needing a 53 yard field goal as time expired to win.

Once again Sister Slammer, MO fan amazes us with thier flagrant stupidity-I mean, whats next....you going to piss yourself over the *impending* stock market crash that never was and dump a ton of shares?

Oh wait................

WTF does that have to do with the Chiefs OFFENSE kicking the ass of the Charger DEFENSE? The Chiefs defense didn't play well in the second half. The offense dominated the Charger defense. They couldn't stop them when it counted.

Nixhex · Post by **Nixhex** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 7:23 pm

Mikey wrote:They "dominated" the first quarter (only because of TO's) and the final minute, due to the Bolts' brilliant "prevent" defense.

I guess some people can't be satisfied with just a win, but have to show what ignoramuses they are by making ridiculous statements about "dominance". I guess margins of 3 points and 6 total yards points to domininance in Nix's myopic point of view.

Did any of you read my post? I was speaking in terms of the Chiefs offense against the Charger defense. Nothing more, nothing less. The stats fucking prove it. My statement had nothing to do with the score, or the Chiefs defense blowing the lead. I realize the Chiefs barely won the game. I realize the Chiefs defense blew the lead. I said nothing about the Chiefs dominating anything other than the Charger defense. You could say the same for the Charger offense. Aside from the turnovers they kicked the Chiefs ass.

The Chargers had the number one defense coming into the game. Charger fan was pounding their chest like the Chiefs offense had no chance. The Chiefs came in and kicked the Charger defense in their overrated face. End of story.

Nixhex · Post by **Nixhex** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 7:39 pm

mvscal wrote:
Nixhex wrote:Charger fan was pounding their chest like the Chiefs offense had no chance.
More lying bullshit.

Their offense didn't "dominate" shit. Their offense was gifted with a short field off of turnovers in the first quarter. Those two early scoring drives totaled a "whopping" 43 yards combined.

The Chargers defense came into the game giving up 241 yards per game. The Chiefs had 355. The Chiefs also only ran 59 plays to the Chargers 71 and still out gained them. Use all the excuses you want. The offense of both teams dominated the defenses. 704 total yards between the two teams is pretty good evidence.

Nixhex · Post by **Nixhex** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 7:58 pm

mvscal wrote:Points on the board are the only measure of dominance.

I don't give a fuck if you can move it between the 20s. It doesn't mean shit.

30 points is pretty good. Should have been 34. Oh and 3 for 3 in the redzone. Looks like they moved it once inside the 20's as well.

Speaking of Gifts. The refs gave the Chargers a gift on 3rd down when they called Ty Law for pass interference on an uncatchable pass. That gave the Chargers first and goal on the 1.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 8:59 pm

For a guy who admittedly can't even see his own dick you seem to know a lot about running fast.

BTW, Law got away with an obvious interference on an earlier sideline play.

Raydah James · Post by **Raydah James** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 11:09 pm

If all else fails, blame the refs.

Excellent play, KC dumbshits.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 11:42 pm

Raydah James wrote:If all else fails, blame the refs.

KC has no need to blame the refs. They won the game.

Besides, blaming the refs is 'duh fans job.

KC Scott · Post by **KC Scott** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:28 am

mvscal wrote:Points on the board are the only measure of dominance.

KC 30
SD 27

KYOA?

================================

Good to see Coke Head James still swinging from your Sack.

RJ, if you ask MVS real nice, he might let you come over and wash his car.

RadioFan · Post by **RadioFan** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:34 am

mvscal wrote:And after being spotted 14 points off of turnovers ...

"Being spotted?"

Let me guess, Marty was telling Rivers and the OL, "Hey, let them think they're in it by 'spotting' them three turnovers, then we'll come back, OK?"

KC's defense had everything to do with those turnovers. And it should have been 17 (actually 9, according to your logic, in this thread). Granted, SD settled down, and had a few plays that worked out for them. (LT's screen-pass touchdown looked easier than a Sissyroo pileon). Then again, the 'Bolts were favored by 5.

You called it though, fucker. It was a sqeaker, just not the outcome you predicted. I just wonder how KC's offense would be performing if Green was at the helm. The defense is improved, even Bolt and Raider Fan has to admit that.