T1B

Explain why they are???

or

Why they aren't?


Not a chance in hell!!!

Why???


Michigan shoved a plunger up their ass... in their own house.

They needed the last 30 seconds of a game at home... to beat one of the worst teams in the PAC 10(UCLA).

$C beat them by 3 TD's while playing on Lemon 714's.

Can someone make a case why this joke of a team is a top 25 team???

I'd like to hear it!

They're 10-2 and they're D-1 and they don't play in the WAC or the Mountain West or whatever, that's why.

Top 25 ain't sayin' all that much anyway. No way 10-2 isn't Top 25. Regardless, ND is Top 15, easy.

Yes and fuck off.

<<<< p.s. Ellison says to fuck of also

Beat the service academies, UNC and Stanford and lose to the two highly ranked teams on your schedule by an average of 23 points and skate into the Rose Bowl.

Simply Pathetic.

Is Notre Dame a Top 25 team???

Yes. Anybody who would even ask that question obviously knows nothing about college football. Next.

Terry in Crapchester wrote:

Is Notre Dame a Top 25 team???

Yes. Anybody who would even ask that question obviously knows nothing about college football. Next.

RACK...the Irish have been getting a little too much press but the bottom line is that they went 10-2 and have losses against the #2 and #3 teams in the country. For most schools, that would be considered a very good season. Notre Dame is probably in the #8-13 range but I don't think at any point I'd consider them a top 5 team when they've lost two games by a total of 46 points. They didn't deserve to play for a national title after getting blasted by Michigan and they wouldn't have been any more deserving if they did win last night. But to say they aren't a top 25 team...you're a tool, an m2ool if you will.

Top-25 - yes. Top-10 - no.

Rack Fu wrote:Top-25 - yes. Top-10 - no.

You took the words right out of my mouth.

The question is though, looking at the teams directly above and below them heading into this weekend, where do you put them?

OSU
USC
MICH
FLA
LSU
WIS
ARK
WVU
LOU
TEX
ND?

I dunno. They may still be top 10 but barely. Top 15 for sure.

The better question is this:
Is M-2ool a top 1 or 2 idiot?

Laxplayer wrote:The better question is this:
Is M-2ool a top 1 or 2 idiot?

YES!

OK, good....now that someone agrees with me I can get on with my Sunday.

Laxplayer wrote:OK, good....now that someone agrees with me I can get on with my Sunday.

I'm glad I could help.

I'll get on with mine as well. Here we'll be starting with a celebratory champagne brunch for my (*gulp*) youngest daughter's 15th birthday. We are of course celebrating her birthday and the ND ass-kicking we witnessed last night.

I think I better start cooking now, and drinking!

Laxplayer wrote:The better question is this:
Is M-2ool a top 1 or 2 idiot?

After the run she's put together over the past three weeks, look for her lead to grow thanks to love from the human and computer polls.

Jimmy Medalions wrote:

Laxplayer wrote:The better question is this:
Is M-2ool a top 1 or 2 idiot?

After the run she's put together over the past three weeks, look for her lead to grow thanks to love from the human and computer polls.

Agreed. She will distance herself nicely from the #3 spot. It's quite a feat to hold the top 2 spots simultaneously.

Your youngest is 15.....Jesus Christ you are old.....

Laxplayer wrote:Your youngest is 15.....Jesus Christ you are old.....

Thanks Marcus.

Laxplayer wrote:Your youngest is 15.....Jesus Christ you are old.....

Not necessarily a fair indicator. My youngest is 1, but I'm still old.