T1B

[web]http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/di ... istory.php[/web]

[m2]Ya but statistically we won each game, the scorboard just didn't indicate it. Also, we beat each of those teams at a different time, in Berkeley[/m2]

Wow two Rose Bowl wins all before 1950.

Cal is the Michigan State of the Pac-10 except with decent academics.

big props to all Cal fans on your team eeking out that 0-0 tie against Washington & Jefferson........

those dudes could play......

feCals Rose Bowl wins are about as meaningful as 7 of Notre Dames and all of Princetons National Titles. Little that happened more than 50 years ago is relevant to the college football landscape now. Teams took trains for 4 days to play a game so nobody traveled much, National Champions were crowned before the Bowl games, the voters never even heard and certainly never saw other teams play.

I'm not sure what's more embarrassing:

Losing to Temple
Losing to Temple in the Garden State Bowl
The Garden State Bowl

Ouch. Losing to Temple in a Bowl Game has got to hurt more than not making it to one at all.

i can't take my eyes off that epic tilt with Washington and Jefferson in 1919. 0-0.

What, they didn't have penalty kick shootouts then??

In case anyone was wondering, the last 0-0 tie in D1(and may be the last ever, with OT now) was in the 1983 Civil War, a game that's been known since then as the "Toilet Bowl."

A horrrrrible Oregon State team, facing off against a horrrrrrible Oregon team, in a horrrrrrrible storm. I forget how many turnovers there were, but I believe it was well into double digits.

What a game.

Fuck all that. We wanna hear your sordid tale of drunken lust and random nihilism beneath the stands, mid deluge...

Dude...I was like 16.

Actually, I've never actually made it into the stadium for the Civil War. Been outside for a couple, but the "meet me in Corvallis, I've got tix for ya" have ever worked out.


No matter, I'm something of a drinker, so the tailgate works for me. That 2000 game where it was like 20 degrees at gametime was a little harsh, but being Mr Smoooove, I found some chicks in an RV...beaverfans, though...but they had booze.

Web Page Name

wow, they used to go to great bowl games


beating a very good s-purrier led gator team in the sugar bowl.



now its fighting it out for insight bowl bids

What does it matter $C faggots. Bowl games never have as much 'bode as God's Country...









- m2ool

my bad, thought this was a ND thread...................................

feCals Rose Bowl wins are about as meaningful as 7 of Notre Dames and all of Princetons National Titles

Ok then let's take a look at SC's NC's before 1950. Should we take them away? Asshole.

Believe the Heupel wrote:Shit, no. We're still trying to find someone who thought we were the best team in 1907 so we can claim another national title.

Sincerely,

USC AD

He's just hoping that their woman's volleyball coach is still recruiting her ass off, just in case Carroll decides to take that Arizona job.

Also, Meds, you forgot the line about you getting your ass kicked. You know, because it happened.

Kal is 43-54-11 in the "Big Game" vs Stanford.

BODE the left side of the Bay.

Killian wrote:Also, Meds, you forgot the line about you getting your ass kicked. You know, because it happened.

Why state the obvious? Stats = the truth.

Believe the Heupel wrote:

Laxplayer wrote:

feCals Rose Bowl wins are about as meaningful as 7 of Notre Dames and all of Princetons National Titles

Ok then let's take a look at SC's NC's before 1950. Should we take them away? Asshole.

Shit, no. We're still trying to find someone who thought we were the best team in 1907 so we can claim another national title.

Sincerely,

USC AD

Sorry, but Ralph's Roll Tide website clearly shows that a 3-3-2 Bama team was the best in the land in 1907 and thereby another Bama title.

sin,

Bama Fan.

Laxplayer wrote:

feCals Rose Bowl wins are about as meaningful as 7 of Notre Dames and all of Princetons National Titles

Ok then let's take a look at SC's NC's before 1950. Should we take them away? Asshole.

I would take away all National titles by EVERYONE prior to 1967.
In 1960 Minnesota won the National title and LOST their bowl game
In 1964, Alabama won a National Title and LOST their bowl game

(the Championship was awarded at the end of the regular season prior to 1967)

SoCalTrjn wrote:

Laxplayer wrote:

feCals Rose Bowl wins are about as meaningful as 7 of Notre Dames and all of Princetons National Titles

Ok then let's take a look at SC's NC's before 1950. Should we take them away? Asshole.

I would take away all National titles by EVERYONE prior to 1967.
In 1960 Minnesota won the National title and LOST their bowl game
In 1964, Alabama won a National Title and LOST their bowl game

(the Championship was awarded at the end of the regular season prior to 1967)

Can't just start at 1967. Alabama was awarded part of the NC (UPI or AP, can't remember which) in 1973 before the bowl game. ND beat them in the Sugar Bowl, but they still claim that title.

I say we only start counting 'em from '03 on...

-Jsc

:-)

Van wrote:I say we only start counting 'em from 1/4/04 on...

-Jsc

:-)

ftfy

FUCK tOSU is 1-1 vs KAL...mother of GOD...

I guess we will run it to 3-1 after we butcher rape them in 2012/2013

somehow with a 1-1 record m2OOELEVIN will find a way to claim BODE over tOSU and the Big 10...

buckeye_in_sc wrote:FUCK tOSU is 1-1 vs KAL...mother of GOD...

I guess we will run it to 3-1 after we butcher rape them in 2012/2013

somehow with a 1-1 record m2OOELEVIN will find a way to claim BODE over tOSU and the Big 10...

Only in the Rose Bowl...Overall, the Buckeyes are 5-1 vs CAL.