T1B

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 12:07 am**

Unloading before ya get it in???????????? If USC loses to UCLA the rubbers go to the rose. Also, don't disregard the Gomers, they have this thing with god......................allegedly...........

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 2:20 am**

I'll be there. You going Jsc?

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 2:36 am**

Still a good deal of games left to be played before the BCS selection show.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 2:44 am**

so if Arkansas wins the SEC title game, LSU will get the nod over a Florida team that has the same record and won the head to head matchup?

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 3:06 am**

SoCalTrjn wrote:so if Arkansas wins the SEC title game, LSU will get the nod over a Florida team that has the same record and won the head to head matchup?

Sounds about right

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:09 am**

Jsc810 wrote:
TenTallBen wrote:I'll be there. You going Jsc?
No, but I'll be there in spirit. :D

Well I bought a plane ticket just in case. Worst that could happen is that I'd be out a hundred bucks to switch the fight to a planned trip to Arizona for the wife and I to spend a weekend at the spa.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:16 am**

Looking forward to it gents!!!

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:55 am**

WolverineSteve wrote:Looking forward to it gents!!!

I'll buy you a beer if this shit pans out. Been down the bars on Colorado plenty of times. Just let me know...

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:06 am**

I've been saying on other boards that LSU to the rose was likely for about three weeks now. I'm really hoping that it pans out for the Tigers. My mom said that she would send my dad and I there for xmas if they make it so i'm hoping she has to pay up.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 1:47 pm**

That's what I'm hearing. So long as USC wins on Saturday, LSU to the Rose against UofM and ND to the Sugar against the SEC winner.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 2:20 pm**

Jsc810 wrote:Methinks the story is true, and the CEO is saying that for cover. LSU will play in the Rose Bowl, and it matters not if it is USC or Michigan. :)

I disagree. If USC were to shit the bed and lose to UCLA and UF beats Arkansas, UF would play OSU and the Rose Bowl would take the "traditional" B10/Pac10 match up of USC v. UofM. LSU would then likely get the Sugar Bowl (again, tradition) and play ND. I think the Fiesta and Orange are pretty much set at this point.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 2:28 pm**

TenTallBen wrote:to a planned trip to Arizona for the wife and I to spend a weekend at the spa.

To the... spa??? Good gawd, Bennifer, please see your primary care physician ASAP and have him write you a script for two testicles.

Enjoy your facial and foot massage, faggot.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 2:38 pm**

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:
TenTallBen wrote:to a planned trip to Arizona for the wife and I to spend a weekend at the spa.
To the... spa??? Good gawd, Bennifer, please see your primary care physician ASAP and have him write you a script for two testicles.

Enjoy your facial and foot massage, faggot.

Thanks for joining the forum. Please remember that this is the CFB forum where CFB is discussed. And we're not really fond of trolls. So, have fun contributing to the CFB discussion.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 2:45 pm**

Killian wrote:And we're not really fond of trolls.

I am not a "troll", Killian. Check yourself.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 2:54 pm**

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Enjoy your facial and foot massage, faggot.

That's for the wifey, dipshit. I'll be on the golf course...

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 3:00 pm**

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:
Killian wrote:And we're not really fond of trolls.

I am not a "troll", Killian. Check yourself.

Great. Post more often in the CFB. I don't ever remember seeing a post of yours here, so again, welcome. We look forward to you discussing CFB.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 3:59 pm**

Killian wrote:We look forward to you discussing CFB.

As do I, my friend. Do you mind if my wife posts here too? She and Bennifer can mix in pad vs tampon discussions while the men post about football.

Anyways... I'd be pissed if I were Florida. When they beat Arkansas and still get left out of the BCS title game, that's gonna leave a sour taste in their mouth. Not to mention getting screwed out of the "runner-up" game against Michigan because the Rose wants the 3rd place finisher in the SEC. To top it off, they'll prolly get stuck playing a overrated Notre Dame team in the Sugar, who they will surely blow the fuck out, because that's what Notre Dame does in bowl games = get blown the fuck out. Notre Dame always seem to play teams much faster than them in January, and this will be no different.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:11 pm**

Killian wrote:That's what I'm hearing. So long as USC wins on Saturday, LSU to the Rose against UofM and ND to the Sugar against the SEC winner.

Killian wrote:
Jsc810 wrote:Methinks the story is true, and the CEO is saying that for cover. LSU will play in the Rose Bowl, and it matters not if it is USC or Michigan. :)
I disagree. If USC were to shit the bed and lose to UCLA and UF beats Arkansas, UF would play OSU and the Rose Bowl would take the "traditional" B10/Pac10 match up of USC v. UofM. LSU would then likely get the Sugar Bowl (again, tradition) and play ND. I think the Fiesta and Orange are pretty much set at this point.

Both of these make sense to me. The lone possible exception is that Michigan could wind up playing tOSU if USC loses to UCLA, even if Florida beats Arkansas.

But ND in the Rose against either Michigan or USC, and LSU in the Sugar against the Florida-Arkansas winner, never made much sense.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:38 pm**

And if Arkansas beats Florida in the SEC title game, LSU gets the Gator Bowl? Cotton Bowl?

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:41 pm**

SoCalTrjn wrote:And if Arkansas beats Florida in the SEC title game, LSU gets the Gator Bowl? Cotton Bowl?

In that case . . .

Arkansas to Sugar Bowl. LSU to Rose Bowl. Florida to Capital One Bowl. Auburn to Cotton Bowl.

This really isn't rocket science.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:19 pm**

Why would a BCS Bowl take the third place SEC team when they have the same record and lost to the second place SEC team?

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:36 pm**

Jsc810 wrote:Wouldn't it be nice.

You know what would be nice... you putting the poms-poms down for a second and rationalizing why LSU deserves to be in any Rose Bowl discussion. At all.

Perhaps in between you and TTBennifer painting each other's toenails and giving each other bukkake facials (at the... "spa")... you could offer that up.

TIA.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:54 pm**

Money.

The Rose Bowl will already have one dog (as far as fan travel goes) in the game in Michigan, maybe they don't want to risk having another fan base that won't travel. LSU travels anywhere.

Same reason ND will get in. Money.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:05 pm**

Jsc810 wrote:Being ranked #5 isn't enough for you?

Try again, assclown.

They are closer to being the number 5 team.... in their own conference... than a legitimate #5 ranking.

If Florida beats Ark, no way they shouldn't play Michigan in the Rose Bowl. They'd have a higher BCS ranking and they beat LSU 23-10 earlier in year. <---- Put down the fucking pom poms and I'd like a response to this last sentence.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:13 pm**

Bolding words and making them bigger always gets the point across. Great job!

So, you're a Florida fan?

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:33 pm**

Killian wrote:Bolding words and making them bigger always gets the point across. Great job!

Please remember that this is the CFB forum where CFB is discussed. So, have fun contributing to the CFB discussion.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:55 pm**

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:I can't read.

Did you miss the second part of my post, where I asked if you were a Florida fan?

Helpful tip: Knowing how the BCS selection process works, helps you understand why Florida wouldn't get the Rose Bowl bid.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:56 pm**

Jsc810 wrote:But what do I know?

Jack fucking shit.

http://www.bcsfootball.org/bcsfb/eligibility

3. If a bowl loses a host team to the NCG, then such bowl shall select a replacement team from among the automatic-qualifying teams and the at-large teams before any other selections are made. If two bowls lose host teams to the NCG, each bowl will get a replacement pick before any other selections are made. In such case, the bowl losing the No. 1 team gets the first replacement pick, and the bowl losing the No. 2 team gets the second replacement pick. If the Rose Bowl loses both the Big Ten and Pac-10 champions to the NCG, it will receive two replacement picks.

Assuming USC plays Ohio St for the title, the Rose Bowl is free to select any two teams they want.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 7:01 pm**

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote: Assuming USC plays Ohio St for the title, the Rose Bowl is free to select any two teams they want.

Uhm...no.

Sin,
Dins having this explained to him in this very forum within the last couple of days.

Although I'm Old Skool enough to know your nic denotes a UConn fan...do they even have football?

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 7:14 pm**

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:
Jsc810 wrote:But what do I know?
Jack fucking shit.

http://www.bcsfootball.org/bcsfb/eligibility

3. If a bowl loses a host team to the NCG, then such bowl shall select a replacement team from among the automatic-qualifying teams and the at-large teams before any other selections are made. If two bowls lose host teams to the NCG, each bowl will get a replacement pick before any other selections are made. In such case, the bowl losing the No. 1 team gets the first replacement pick, and the bowl losing the No. 2 team gets the second replacement pick. If the Rose Bowl loses both the Big Ten and Pac-10 champions to the NCG, it will receive two replacement picks.

Assuming USC plays Ohio St for the title, the Rose Bowl is free to select any two teams they want.

Um, no. Do you want to go back and post provisions A-C for the #3 criteria, or should I do it?

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 7:20 pm**

I guess it was Blindref.

And I kind of doubt he made it up --

BlindRef wrote:
2. Unless they qualify to play in the NCG, the champions of selected conferences are contractually committed to host selected games:

Atlantic Coast Conference-Orange Bowl
Big Ten Conference-Rose Bowl
Big 12 Conference-Fiesta Bowl
Pac-10 Conference-Rose Bowl
Southeastern Conference-Sugar Bowl

3. If a bowl loses a host team to the NCG, then such bowl shall select a replacement team from among the automatic-qualifying teams and the at-large teams before any other selections are made. If two bowls lose host teams to the NCG, each bowl will get a replacement pick before any other selections are made. In such case, the bowl losing the No. 1 team gets the first replacement pick, and the bowl losing the No. 2 team gets the second replacement pick. If the Rose Bowl loses both the Big Ten and Pac-10 champions to the NCG, it will receive two replacement picks.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 7:21 pm**

I was thinking more along the lines of this:

3. If a bowl loses a host team to the NCG, then such bowl shall select a replacement team from among the automatic-qualifying teams and the at-large teams before any other selections are made. If two bowls lose host teams to the NCG, each bowl will get a replacement pick before any other selections are made. In such case, the bowl losing the No. 1 team gets the first replacement pick, and the bowl losing the No. 2 team gets the second replacement pick. If the Rose Bowl loses both the Big Ten and Pac-10 champions to the NCG, it will receive two replacement picks.

A bowl choosing a replacement team may not select any of the following:

A. A team in the NCG;
B. The host team for another BCS Bowl;
C. When two bowls lose host teams, then the bowl losing the number one team may not select a replacement team from the same Conference as the number two team, unless the bowl losing the number two team consents.

Add that to your post (criteria #2) and we see why UF cannot go to the Rose Bowl unless they lose the SEC championship. In that case, they will be left out all together.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 7:23 pm**

Jsc810 wrote:You mean this part?

Uhm, no he doesn't.

Good thing you have Killian around to save you. What you posted doesn't reference provisions A-C. Guess I should have scrolled further.

Jsc810 wrote:Isn't it fun when someone KTOA?

Isn't it?

:giggle:

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 7:24 pm**

I've found it's usually a bad idea to question the entire CFB collective here when it comes to the finer points of CFB...just sayin'.

These folks ain't pretending.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 7:29 pm**

Dinsdale wrote:I've found it's usually a bad idea to question the entire CFB collective here when it comes to the finer points of CFB...just sayin'.

These folks ain't pretending.

JSC doesn't count. Dude is a bitch of the highest caliber and had all but given up... or did you miss this fetal position wimper:::

Then if the Rose Bowl can choose who they want, then all that matters is they want LSU, and LSU has already been invited.

I was about to win the argument even thought I was wrong. Too bad he had co-counsel Killian sitting at the table with him.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:14 pm**

Jsc810 wrote:Well, since I had already posted the answer and you didn't like it, I gave another answer.

I made you give another answer, faggot. You were ready to give up. This reminds me of the time my g/f walked in on me banging some other whore.

Saw it with her own two eyes.

Less than 24 hours later, I had her convinced otherwise. You proved to be an even dumber cunt than she was.

:giggle:

You're so stupid, I bet I can get to say this again:

Jsc810 wrote:Then if the Rose Bowl can choose who they want.

Even after it's been proven and verified otherwise.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:33 pm**

hecantakeitdoggieSTylerepeatedly wrote::giggle:

Just stay down dude. You've been schooled.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:40 pm**

I don't have a dog in this fight but please, newbie, stop giggling.

Laughing, cackling, chortling, chuckling, guffawing, snickering, and cachinnation are all perfectly acceptable.

Giggling is for pussies.

Posted: **Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:45 pm**

War Stoops wrote:cachinnation

Ooooooh....good word.