T1B

Seems Cals coach is upset that the libs in Berkley dont find football too important and have put off updates to the stadium and facilities another 5 years or so. This has lead to rumors that Tedford is going to jump ship and the leading candidate for his services is the University of Nikerrroregon.
Bellotti would move to the schoos AD and Tedford would take over as head coach in Eugene

There's definitely been rumors floating about that Bellotti might take the AD position. I'm taking them with a grain of salt.

But in the "what if" scenario, I've been wondering who they might hit up. Tedford would be an obvious choice, should he be available...obvious.

I was kinda thinking Coker would be a good guy to call, but maybe out of Oregon's price range.

I'm guessing that June Jones is probably happy in his "other home" right now. He'd be a pretty decent choice, as well, and could bring Glanville along for the ride.

But Tedford would do quite nicely.

That said, I look for Bellotti to be coaching the Ducks next year.

This my friends, is why the PAC has always questioned the entry of USC into the PAC.

The ability to master... down syndrome doesn't qualify them as PAC school.

Let me help out our gifted friends from the south.

FACT:Allowallotti, wants to be AD, if he can be the football coach as well.

I wonder how SC fan feels about CAL being the PAC 10 Champion?

Losing to the University of California la (an actual school) and having CAL win the PAC 10, must be eating them up.

If'n I'm not mistaken, USC won the PAC outright, by virtue of their head-to-head win against Cal.

Same conference record, but SC won the head-to-head = BODE USC.


Oh wait...you were kidding...I get it now...

Cal....conference champ...

You funny guy, JSC.

Jsc810 wrote:Wait, that would be co-champ, right? Cal didn't win the conference outright, did it?

You just asked two questions... and you wanted one answer. Gotta love LSU.

We actually take academics into consideration...

SoCalTrjn wrote:Seems Cals coach is upset that the libs in Berkley

Cal is the PAC 10 Champ... by proxy.

Dinsdale wrote:If'n I'm not mistaken, USC won the PAC outright, by virtue of their head-to-head win against Cal.

Same conference record, but SC won the head-to-head = BODE USC.

Wrong.

420 wrote:

Dinsdale wrote:If'n I'm not mistaken, USC won the PAC outright, by virtue of their head-to-head win against Cal.

Same conference record, but SC won the head-to-head = BODE USC.

Wrong.

Care to explain...since you've been avoiding everyone that has called you on that silly statement you've been making all night.

Shoalzie wrote:

420 wrote:

Dinsdale wrote:If'n I'm not mistaken, USC won the PAC outright, by virtue of their head-to-head win against Cal.

Same conference record, but SC won the head-to-head = BODE USC.

Wrong.

Care to explain...since you've been avoiding everyone that has called you on that silly statement you've been making all night.

Sure. I just usually avoid responding to uneducated idiots. I'll make an exception for you.

Under Pac-10 rules, it technically does count as a co-championship. Doesn't mean we get the Rose Bowl or anything though.