T1B

So, do they alternate weeks that they get to wear the rings or what?

Hey, m2, it's a Pac-10 thread. Come and slob its knob.

the_ouskull

Cal won the co-championship in '75 too.










That was the most recent one, for Cal.























They didn't get to go to the Rose Bowl that year either. Sucks to be Cal.

Believe the Heupel wrote: Long time in coming.

that's not what the mead wenches say.

Believe the Heupel wrote:Congratulations on your Pac-10 co-championship, Cal. Long time in coming.

Thanks, Frozen!

I'll let the kids know when they get done studying at around 4:00am this morning.

By the way... OU had a great year, and their fans should be proud.

Believe the Heupel wrote:We definitely are.

Kiper's saying Lynch may be the first back taken in the draft. Personally, I think he's smoking crack, but hey, who knows.

Marshawn and AD, apples and oranges.

I think AD is hampered due to his injury's.

I think we have our hands full with aTm. They lost to you by one, and corn by one. Then beat Texas who beat both of you.

They have 3 loses by a combined point total of 6 points. They could be playing the best football in the Big 12, late in the season.

A&M's non conference schedule was a joke--the Citadel, Army, Louisiana-Lafayette, Louisiana Tech.

they had OU and NU at Kyle and lost both games.

I'll let the kids know when they get done studying at around 4:00am this morning.

Were they studying the definition of redundancy?

Sorry... I'm an ex-journalism guy and current english teacher. One of my (many) pet peeves is seeing am / pm and "in the _____" in the same sentence.

the_ouskull

Just wondering, will they print shirts that say "Co-Champion"? Do they give out half of a ring?

Cal may be "co-champs" but they're still 2nd best in the conference. Rose Bowl out front will tell you.

Since they lost head-to-head Cal should not be recognized as champs. Just sayin.

If the conference names them co-champs, who are we to argue it?

Hell, it's their championship to do with as they please.

WolverineSteve wrote:Since they lost head-to-head Cal should not be recognized as champs.

Nobody will.

H-2-H is the tie breaker isn't it?

If teams tie and didn't play h-2-h the team that went last is out.

edit...this is also used when there are more than 2 teams tied.

They get a trophy and everything, same as USC.

[img]http://i.a.cnn.net/si/2006/writers/pete_mcentegart/01/04/rose.commentary/p1.song.girls.getty.jpg[/img] wrote:Nuh uh.