T1B

The whole idea being that you get your infantile insult cravings in the cul de smack, and bring something a little less 1999 SCII here.

If you can't read and comprehend the very basic rules of this forum and follow along, just don't whine and cry when your crap gets removed.

and coming up with six different ways to call B smack stupid that a 9th grader could manage to do is not witty. It's boring and has been done on these boards 10 million times before.

got it now? Hope so.

ps.

You do realize it's a little pathetic that you keep copies of two week old smack posts that get removed for violating forum rules, don't you? But hey, you showed me. way to go, champ!

and in case you are totally unfamilar with the location and content of said rules, here they is:

top of the board should have told you wrote:. No thread hijacking. Offending posts will be removed. Threads that naturally move from one topic to another will not be touched, for example if a thread starts out about bushs Stem cell beliefs and ends up discussing Bushs Economic policies, it'll stay. Unless it is obviously an intended hijack, like diverting from "Bushs religious beliefs" to "Civil war sexual practices of junior ranking officers" in mid stream for no reason. Those type of posts will be split but will most likely remain in the forum.

2. No call out threads or non topic personal insult posts. Those will be moved to main street or removed, depending. To define it a little more, it is acceptable to say "It's because Bush lied about his reason for going to war, you idiot", but if you're just posting "Fuck Off you Pussy" Or "Bushice is a homo that I hate", that will most likely get the thread / post removed to either Trots or Main street.

3.Bickering should be kept at a minimum. It is in everyones best interest to maintain some thread integrity by not devolving into a circular pissing match with someone else, so don't do it. If it gets out of hand, it will be split or removed, but most likely a gentle reminder will be given first, unless you're a clueless repeat offender.

learn it. know it. live it.

Mister Bushice wrote:The whole idea being that you get your infantile insult cravings in the cul de smack, and bring something a little less 1999 SCII here.

Wrong. The whole idea being is that you have your ignorant and naïve head planted squarely up your ass if you refuse to acknowledge that politics and “smack” have been synonymous with one another pre-dating the very founding of our Republic.

If you can't read and comprehend the very basic rules of this forum and follow along, just don't whine and cry when your crap gets removed.

I read and comprehend just fine. Who the fuck do you think you are? King George III? And we freely voted on the “very basic rules of this forum” when? Just don’t whine and cry when your crappy rules are challenged in open forum and your fallacies are removed by “smack”.

and coming up with six different ways to call B smack stupid that a 9th grader could manage to do is not witty. It's boring and has been done on these boards 10 million times before.

What part of

Truman wrote:…I would be the LAST person on this Board to suggest that BSmack is stupid.. Stubborn? Hell yes. B sets the standard for Missouri mules. But believe it or not, Bushie, I have a helluva lot of respect for BSmack. Sumbitch could successfully argue Canadian geese to fly north to the Arctic Circle for the winter.

…do you not understand?

BTW, I don’t see BSmack – or anyone else for that matter – openly complaining of boredom or challenging my “wit”… ‘cept you. But I can see where struggling through two Freshman terms would make anyone bitter…

Tell you what, Sparky: You document six instances where I called BSmack “stupid” and I vow never to “darken” your Forum again.

Short of that (and you WILL lose):

You resign in favor of a more benevolent and “tolerant” moderator.

”Got it now? Hope so.”

You do realize it's a little pathetic that you keep copies of two week old smack posts that get removed for violating forum rules, don't you? But hey, you showed me. way to go, champ!

Why, I don’t have to do a damn thing, Bushrant! You “show” yourself just fine!

But you digress.

Quick observation of your heavy-handed, ham-fisted bungling of past threads would tend one to believe it to be good policy to keep copies of one’s posts in this forum.

BTW, It’s even MORE pathetic to OUTRIGHT delete posts without comment that challenge your rules , criticize your authority, or are openly suspicious of your agenda in this forum.

and in case you are totally unfamilar with the location and content of said rules, here they is:

Stone tablets too heavy for you, Bushlight? Pussy. Moses carried ten….

top of the board should have told you wrote:. No thread hijacking. Offending posts will be removed. Threads that naturally move from one topic to another will not be touched, for example if a thread starts out about bushs Stem cell beliefs and ends up discussing Bushs Economic policies, it'll stay. Unless it is obviously an intended hijack, like diverting from "Bushs religious beliefs" to "Civil war sexual practices of junior ranking officers" in mid stream for no reason. Those type of posts will be split but will most likely remain in the forum.

2. No call out threads or non topic personal insult posts. Those will be moved to main street or removed, depending. To define it a little more, it is acceptable to say "It's because Bush lied about his reason for going to war, you idiot", but if you're just posting "Fuck Off you Pussy" Or "Bushice is a homo that I hate", that will most likely get the thread / post removed to either Trots or Main street.

3.Bickering should be kept at a minimum. It is in everyones best interest to maintain some thread integrity by not devolving into a circular pissing match with someone else, so don't do it. If it gets out of hand, it will be split or removed, but most likely a gentle reminder will be given first, unless you're a clueless repeat offender.

Slacker. What about #4?!

4. Intolerant opinion is defined as any that differs from those of the Moderator. Any opinion proffered that disagrees with the views, agenda, mood, or menstrual cycle of said Moderator is subject to edit, split, removal, or outright deletion.

learn it. know it. live it.

I forget : Would that bit of philosophy come before or after Phoebe Cates caught you masturbating in the bathroom?!

Truman wrote:

Mister Bushice wrote:The whole idea being that you get your infantile insult cravings in the cul de smack, and bring something a little less 1999 SCII here.

Wrong. The whole idea being is that you have your ignorant and naïve head planted squarely up your ass if you refuse to acknowledge that politics and “smack” have been synonymous with one another pre-dating the very founding of our Republic.

Calling someone names a 6th grader uses on a daily basis is not smack, unless you're in the 6th grade that is, but we're not anymore.

If you can't read and comprehend the very basic rules of this forum and follow along, just don't whine and cry when your crap gets removed.

I read and comprehend just fine. Who the fuck do you think you are? King George III? And we freely voted on the “very basic rules of this forum” when? Just don’t whine and cry when your crappy rules are challenged in open forum and your fallacies are removed by “smack”.

When? It was before you arrived, last year. We had a long discussion thread about it, and took a vote. OC Mike was modding here at the time before he ran off with his Emu. The results of all of that are what you see posted above, but fail to follow.

King? No. Just a Mod.
George? No. Mister Bushice
III? No. First.

BTW, there's no whining here, and you can challenge all you like, it doesn't change a damn thing. The first time you remove anything with smack will be the first time for both the removal thing, and the smack.

and coming up with six different ways to call B smack stupid that a 9th grader could manage to do is not witty. It's boring and has been done on these boards 10 million times before.

What part of

Truman wrote:…I would be the LAST person on this Board to suggest that BSmack is stupid.. Stubborn? Hell yes. B sets the standard for Missouri mules. But believe it or not, Bushie, I have a helluva lot of respect for BSmack. Sumbitch could successfully argue Canadian geese to fly north to the Arctic Circle for the winter.

…do you not understand?

Oh gee maybe it was..

1. I’m sure that there are some mosques and mental institutions in San Francisco that would love to take in like-minded folks just like you….

and:

2. Once you’ve mastered reading, B,

Ya think?

BTW, I don’t see BSmack – or anyone else for that matter – openly complaining of boredom or challenging my “wit”…

Easy answer. You are not witty.

‘cept you. But I can see where struggling through two Freshman terms would make anyone bitter…

See, now you think this is witty? It's not. Just more
"you are stupid" innuendoes. Not humorous, not original, not clever, and not needed here. There are reindeer over in the CDS that would love this shit, though.

Tell you what, Sparky: You document six instances where I called BSmack “stupid” and I vow never to “darken” your Forum again.

Short of that (and you WILL lose):

First off I said "six different ways to call B smack stupid" not six "instances" where you used the word stupid. Don't misquote me.

But for the record, there are the two above, and these four, on a quick search:

3. Intelligent discourse would clearly mark you as an over-achiever, B. But despite your struggles, rest easy:

4. As for “what the fuck” we should expect…

Why, intelligent discourse, B!

But once again, you leave us sorely disappointed….

5. Are you being deliberately ignorant?

6. Ever tire of waking up wrong, Brian?

But don't feel like you have to leave, just stop the childish stuff.

You resign in favor of a more benevolent and “tolerant” moderator.

Feel free to PM PSU, and make any request you like. I'm sure he will do whatever you say.

Quick observation of your heavy-handed, ham-fisted bungling of past threads would tend one to believe it to be good policy to keep copies of one’s posts in this forum.

Oh come now. You kept that post of yours and reread it lovingly every night, marveling in your turn of phrase, and clever invective, didn't you?

BTW, It’s even MORE pathetic to OUTRIGHT delete posts without comment that challenge your rules , criticize your authority, or are openly suspicious of your agenda in this forum.

The rule as posted are very clear and very simple. I don't need to explain anything, actually the only two people who have questioned them are you and whitey, which speaks volumes.

You posted that thread as a direct attack on me ( see rule #2), there was nothing political about it, it was just a whiny personal attack I removed without reading.

Let's try pounding this into your skull one more time. They are not just my rules, but they are the rules of this forum. If you don't like them, stop bitching and leave. If you wanna criticize me, take it to cul de smack. See how well it goes over.

Odd how you're the only one bitching about this now though, isn't it? How many times do I need to explain it until you are able to comprehend?

And you infer that Bsmack stupid. How stupid do you have to be to NOT get the basic rules of posting here?

Stone tablets too heavy for you, Bushlight? Pussy. Moses carried ten….

Pretty much done here. Again. You don't like the rules, just leave. If you break the rules, shit will be removed and don't bitch, I won't be listening. If you continue this incessantly dull diatribe, it won't stay up. I've wasted enough time on it.

And try not to shit on any other topic threads with this stuff.

PS

If you weren't jerking off to Phoebe Cates in that movie, you're a eunuch, or gay.

Truman's one of the more entertaining reads around.
He's intelligent, witty, and brings excellent points of discussion.
Yes, he brings a little smack mixed in.

That's a problem .... ?

You will never m0derate out smack insults without showing yourself to be a hypocrite.
That being so, unless someone comes in to the forum and shits all over it, just let it ride.

You're fucking around with one of the GOOD guys, Bushice.
It makes no sense.



My .02





Off me ... ?

poptart wrote:Truman's one of the more entertaining reads around.
He's intelligent, witty, and brings excellent points of discussion.
Yes, he brings a little smack mixed in. That's a problem .... ?

I have no problem with that. however, there is absolutely no need to post some variation of "you're a fucking idiot" without making any point whatsoever in the thread.

You will never moderate out smack insults without showing yourself to be a hypocrite.
That being so, unless someone comes in to the forum and shits all over it, just let it ride.

Not trying to moderate out that at all. Look around the forum. Did it ever occur to you that perhaps I AM using good sense as a mod in removing the "maybe if you stopped sucking black cocks long enough" type of shit posts that you never see polluting up a decent discussion thread? That's all I'm saying. Ask how many posts I actually remove from here.

You're fucking around with one of the GOOD guys, Bushice.
It makes no sense.

You mean the guy referring to me as a nazi who himself won't just "let it ride"? oh.

My .02

Off me ... ?

Not today. Gas chamber is broken.

mvscal wrote: Don't lie.

Yes, I recall your opinion on that discussion quite clearly. Something on the lines of "you're a fucking idiot" I took that as a "no".

Doesn't this post then violate rule number 2 ?