Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 2:32 am
That was beautiful, man! I'm calling a production meeting.
Sin,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1af7a/1af7a8f89df47e5e29f6e614fd7de679f0c08468" alt="Image"
Sin,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1af7a/1af7a8f89df47e5e29f6e614fd7de679f0c08468" alt="Image"
Heresy!88 wrote: Now I obviously wasn't there and cannot know for sure whether any of that story is true or not.
It takes a man to forgive one's persecutors while being killed by them.mvscal wrote:Wolfman wrote:I guess if Time magazine had a "Man of All Time" it should be Jesus,
For what? Being a pussy and getting tacked to a cross?
I'll take ressurected from history by some dude selling shit as a marketing tool for the commercialism aspect of Christmas for $100.Jack wrote:88,
and what are your thoughts on Saint Nicholas, Bishop of Myra, who had a reputation for secret gift-giving, but is now commonly identified with Santa Claus?
88 wrote: I'm fairly sure there was a dude named Jesus H. Christ. I think he got punked by the Romans and some pissed off Jews, and died a barbaric death on a cross. I'm also fairly sure he wasn't the son of God, and that he didn't rise from the dead or do anything remarkable during his life other than come up with a major scam that allowed his posse to con dudes out of their coin and obtain political power.
No, that's called being fucking delirious after 8 hours on a fucking cross. I'm sure he said a whole lot of other shit that day as well. Most of which wasn't deemed worthy of recording.Inge Bodil wrote:It takes a man to forgive one's persecutors while being killed by them.mvscal wrote:Wolfman wrote:I guess if Time magazine had a "Man of All Time" it should be Jesus,
For what? Being a pussy and getting tacked to a cross?
'forgive them father, for they know not what they do.'
that's powerful. that's inspiring.
Not the only error in his version, but I'll echo the sentiments as well.rozy wrote:88 wrote: I'm fairly sure there was a dude named Jesus H. Christ. I think he got punked by the Romans and some pissed off Jews, and died a barbaric death on a cross. I'm also fairly sure he wasn't the son of God, and that he didn't rise from the dead or do anything remarkable during his life other than come up with a major scam that allowed his posse to con dudes out of their coin and obtain political power.
Just to get boiled in oil, crucified upside down, etc. etc.? Thanks, bro! I LOVE the early morning chuckles.
Second.Merry Christmas, anyhoo.
If you lived in Northern Europe in winter, you'd totally understand why.In northern Europe, they celebrated the winter solstice as "Yule". All of these holidays were cause for epoch hell raising and partying
I believe the celebration originated when one of them Northern Euros said to another, "It's so freakin' cold out here, yule be one sorry mofo if you don't drink some of this!"Nishlord wrote:If you lived in Northern Europe in winter, you'd totally understand why.In northern Europe, they celebrated the winter solstice as "Yule". All of these holidays were cause for epoch hell raising and partying
Doncha just wish Scanner was around to provide his insight on the workings of the early Church?Terry in Crapchester wrote:Not the only error in his version, but I'll echo the sentiments as well.rozy wrote:88 wrote: I'm fairly sure there was a dude named Jesus H. Christ. I think he got punked by the Romans and some pissed off Jews, and died a barbaric death on a cross. I'm also fairly sure he wasn't the son of God, and that he didn't rise from the dead or do anything remarkable during his life other than come up with a major scam that allowed his posse to con dudes out of their coin and obtain political power.
Just to get boiled in oil, crucified upside down, etc. etc.? Thanks, bro! I LOVE the early morning chuckles.
Did they have thermometers back in the day?PSUFAN wrote:At the time that Northern Europe converted to Christianity, the climate of that region was significantly warmer.
Easter and Christmas were devised as replacements for the solstice celebrations. Conversion is going to take a lot more successfully if you present it as a repackaging.
It makes an awful lot of sense celebrating the cycles of the moon and sun - something that had a direct effect on humanity each and every year. When the weather was favorable, people got rich - when it sucked and they couldn't grow things, they died.
Towards the end of the Viking era, the region got a lot colder.
Well said 88. If only the world had a man like you 2000+ years ago, we could have avoided all this mess. What mess you might ask ?88 wrote:I know what you mean. What says LOVE more than letting your own child and his followers get boiled in oil, crucified upside down, etc. etc.? I wonder if Andrea Yates had used some railroad spikes and a telephone pole to kill her kids, and then immediately let it be known that God told her to do it because God wanted to show all of us how much he LOVES us, we'd be saying prayers for Saint Andrea right now?rozy wrote:88 wrote: I'm fairly sure there was a dude named Jesus H. Christ. I think he got punked by the Romans and some pissed off Jews, and died a barbaric death on a cross. I'm also fairly sure he wasn't the son of God, and that he didn't rise from the dead or do anything remarkable during his life other than come up with a major scam that allowed his posse to con dudes out of their coin and obtain political power.
Just to get boiled in oil, crucified upside down, etc. etc.? Thanks, bro! I LOVE the early morning chuckles.
Merry Christmas, anyhoo.
Early morning chuckles rock.
So these two holidays were made up?!?PSUFAN wrote:Easter and Christmas were devised as replacements for the solstice celebrations.
I think that came after Jesus.come up with a major scam that allowed his posse to con dudes out of their coin and obtain political power.
PSUFAN wrote:
Life is nasty, brutish, and short - and we are lucky sons of bitches.
So I could Google the high and low temps for Oslo in 912?PSUFAN wrote:Certainly, the climactic record for the period is well documented:
http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/lia ... g_mwp.html
That might be true Wolfman, but you have to understand Right Wing Christian American started the killing. It wasn't until Right Wing Christian Americans came around that death, famine, pestilence, and Jim Rome came around. Prior to that, everyone was naked and writhing around in ecstasy, nary a care in the world.Wolfman wrote:millions of people who were killed by Christians ???
no matter if true or not-- it pales when compared to the numbers
killed by "secularism" (Communism alone in the past century).
And Christians are still being persecuted in Africa and elsewhere !
I do believe that Jesus would be quite perplexed and maybe
even angry at what some of his followers have done in His name.
Funny thing about persecution - it doesn't belong to a religion or creed or nationality or belief system.And Christians are still being persecuted in Africa and elsewhere !
"Perplexed"...yep, I'd say so. That is, if he believed one whit of what has been attributed to him, anyway.I do believe that Jesus would be quite perplexed and maybe
even angry at what some of his followers have done in His name.
I am genuinely intrigued. I'd like to read more.PSUFAN wrote:"Perplexed"...yep, I'd say so. That is, if he believed one whit of what has been attributed to him, anyway.I do believe that Jesus would be quite perplexed and maybe
even angry at what some of his followers have done in His name.
No sir. What intrigued me about your post was the following ....PSUFAN wrote:You'd like to read depictions of Christians behaving in ways that would "perplex" Jesus?
Have you a taste for the lash?
I see. I was thinking in a different direction.PSUFAN wrote:Let me help you make your way through it - of COURSE Jesus would have been perplexed and even angry at some of the things done in his name. Otherwise, what he said - or what was attributed him - would needs be meaningless to him.
Does it make a little more sense to you now?
He did? Oh, FOUL! RALLY THE SOLDIERS OF INDEMNITY!Smackie Chan wrote:So these two holidays were made up?!?PSUFAN wrote:Easter and Christmas were devised as replacements for the solstice celebrations.
Why does Bush even acknowledge them?