Ohio State-Florida: In Game
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 1:36 am
Damn...Ginn looks fresh. 7-0, Bucks...
Page 1 of 5
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 1:38 am
Ginn made it look way too easy.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 1:39 am
It's a PAC 10 officiating crew?
Oh shit. Look for Oregon to win on a disputed play.
Oh shit. Look for Oregon to win on a disputed play.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 1:44 am
Like the last time, when Oklahoma's coaching staff disputed whether or not they should play any defense or tackle anybody, and decided against it?Mikey wrote:Look for Oregon to win on a disputed play.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 1:44 am
Did anyone take the over?
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 1:49 am
So far both sides have made it look too easy.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 1:56 am
You can already see the difference between Michigan and Florida's defense...the Gators' secondary is much more athletic and talented. They can hang with the speed of the Buckeye receivers. I don't agree with Brenneman that Florida's front four is the best Ohio State has faced...I'd still give that nod to Branch, Woodley, Taylor and company.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:02 am
OK two drives for Florida and in both they look unchallenged. Something has gotta give or this could be a blowout.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:03 am
That wasn't a TD...what did the booth see that we didn't?
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:05 am
What can you expect from the conference with the worst officials of the BCS conferences?
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:05 am
Not if they keep giving them the short field and those penalties.Jsc810 wrote:Will OSU be able to keep up?
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:09 am
Short fields on both, but yeah. I see what you're seeing.Vito Corleone wrote:OK two drives for Florida and in both they look unchallenged. Something has gotta give or this could be a blowout.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:14 am
In.Shoalzie wrote:Did anyone take the over?
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:18 am
How many press clipping did Ohio St. read?
It should have been an easy game but if you come out and play like that you get this result.
It should have been an easy game but if you come out and play like that you get this result.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:21 am
Is that why they didn't call UF for a 15 yard penalty for the dude taking his helmet off after the kick return?Mikey wrote:It's a PAC 10 officiating crew?
Oh shit. Look for Oregon to win on a disputed play.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:23 am
Haven't seen anyone push the Buckeyes around like this in quite a while...
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:27 am
Pretty tacky roughing the passer call
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:29 am
That'd be a LOT funnier if you were RIGHT.Dinsdale wrote:Like the last time, when Oklahoma's coaching staff disputed whether or not they should play any defense or tackle anybody, and decided against it?Mikey wrote:Look for Oregon to win on a disputed play.
Considering that EVERYBODY involved has come out and said that this guy fucked OU, including the guy himself, are you really STILL trying to act like it DIDN'T happen, you ignorant dipshit?
the_ouskull
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:29 am
The over/under should have been set at 100
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:30 am
Defense anyone?
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:30 am
Very strong response by the Bucks...gonna be a lot of fun if we get four quarters of this.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:32 am
Somebody wake up the Buckeye's offense? Bout time for a Gator turnover.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:34 am
the_ouskull wrote:Considering that EVERYBODY involved has come out and said that this guy fucked OU, including the guy himself, are you really STILL trying to act like it DIDN'T happen, you ignorant dipshit?
Link?
And "the guy" has said repeatedly that he never saw the replays. Should they bend the replay rules just to cater to OU?
Never denied that OU wasn't the recipient of a bad break due to officiating(OK, never since about a day after the game). Are YOU denying that OU's defense didn't take the last two minutes of that game off, which was the REAL reason OU lost?
One play....all they had to do was make ONE PLAY...in HOW many opportunities? One freaking play...they didn't.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:35 am
Cross Traffic wrote:Defense anyone?
Jeebus...both teams are playing D like they're waiting for the officials to bail them out...Sooner-style.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:37 am
Here is a novel idea, tOSU needs to actually play defense and stop Florida.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:37 am
How many times is Florida going to get away with that crossing route?
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:41 am
Have you EVER seen a piece of bait you didn't immediately latch onto?Dinsdale wrote:the_ouskull wrote:Considering that EVERYBODY involved has come out and said that this guy fucked OU, including the guy himself, are you really STILL trying to act like it DIDN'T happen, you ignorant dipshit?
Link?
And "the guy" has said repeatedly that he never saw the replays. Should they bend the replay rules just to cater to OU?
Never denied that OU wasn't the recipient of a bad break due to officiating(OK, never since about a day after the game). Are YOU denying that OU's defense didn't take the last two minutes of that game off, which was the REAL reason OU lost?
One play....all they had to do was make ONE PLAY...in HOW many opportunities? One freaking play...they didn't.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:42 am
That might be the stop Ohio State needed
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:45 am
Ohio State is in for a long night... they just don't know it yet, or do the folks that picked Ohio State to win.MuchoBulls wrote:That might be the stop Ohio State needed
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:51 am
Mikey wrote: Have you EVER seen a piece of bait you didn't immediately latch onto?
Oh dear God...
please tell me you aren't trying to set up a "I was just trolling you" defense for the absolute beating you put on yourself in that other forum?
Please fucking tell me I didn't just read that?
Please?
When I suggested you "stop," I was actually being sincere, dipshit.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:51 am
For a so called "dual threat" QB, Troy Smith looks like a pussy tonight. Looks scared to run. Another Heisman Trophy flame out performance so far.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:52 am
420 wrote:Ohio State is in for a long night... they just don't know it yet, or do the folks that picked Ohio State to win.MuchoBulls wrote:That might be the stop Ohio State needed
if we didn't figure that out after the first quarter, we'll never figure it out
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:52 am
It's a 7 pt game, that might be a blow out by kal standards but to the rest of us it's still close.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:56 am
Vito Corleone wrote:It's a 7 pt game, that might be a blow out by kal standards but to the rest of us it's still close.
He's just setting us up for the "I told you so" thread after this game is over...I'm assuming he took the Gators in this game.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 3:03 am
Geezus, that Dodge truck commercial with the Rock'em Sock'em Robots sucks ass, is unbelievably stupid and it they have already shown it 100 times tonight
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 3:03 am
Tressel just Lloyded his team... 
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 3:03 am
Odd call to make at this point of the game....how about going outside with that run?
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 3:04 am
How about "punting?"Cross Traffic wrote:Odd call to make at this point of the game....how about going outside with that run?
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 3:07 am
The way Florida has moved the ball on Ohio State made going for it the right call. A bad read by the RB not to go outside.
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 3:07 am
Atomic Punk wrote:How about "punting?"Cross Traffic wrote:Odd call to make at this point of the game....how about going outside with that run?
It's very easy to second guess when they failed to get the first...