Page 1 of 1

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:30 pm
by Cicero
Fine by me.

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:31 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
Jsc810 wrote:Of course non-lawyers' comments are welcome also.

You're a shit poster.
.
.
.
.
.

JTR brings more to this board than you do. End of story.

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:33 pm
by BSmack
Cicero wrote:Fine by me.
Yea, why don't we just suspend habeas corpus while we're at it and appoint Chimpy McDouchbag El Presidente for Life?

Ya fucking moron.

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:37 pm
by Tom In VA
BSmack wrote:
Cicero wrote:Fine by me.
Yea, why don't we just suspend habeas corpus
Worked for me.

Sincerely
Abe Lincoln

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:42 pm
by Rich Fader
Having lived all my life under the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circus errrrrr Circuit Court of Appeals...I see Al's point.

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:51 pm
by Cicero
BSmack wrote:
Cicero wrote:Fine by me.
Yea, why don't we just suspend habeas corpus while we're at it and appoint Chimpy McDouchbag El Presidente for Life?

Ya fucking moron.

My opinion was asked. I gave it. I can see you don't agree. Shocking.

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:56 pm
by KatMode
We don't need no stinkin' checks and balances.
Gonzales says judges generally should defer to the will of the president and Congress when deciding national security cases.
How do you 'defer to the will of Congress' if you didn't allow Congress an input on the subject in the first place? Fucking Gonzales. :x

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:17 pm
by KatMode
mvscal wrote:
KatMode wrote:We don't need no stinkin' checks and balances.
Checks and balances is exactly what he is talking about, dumbfuck.
How do you 'defer to the will of Congress' if you didn't allow Congress an input on the subject in the first place? Fucking Gonzales. :x
Get a clue, you fucking dipshit. Jesus Christ.
Oh yeah, that's right. The BA is checking on the BA to make sure the BA's actions are within the BA guidelines. That's checks and blanaces alright. :meds:

What Congressional legislation approved the wiretapping program to step outside the FISA oversight?

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:22 pm
by Moving Sale
mvscal wrote:
Jsc810 wrote:There's a separation of powers issue in there somewhere.
A very clear one to me. Gonzales is absolutely correct.
Did you use the same brain to decide that that you used to decide that Black's are genetically predisposed to violence you racist fuck?

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:24 pm
by BSmack
Tom In VA wrote:
BSmack wrote:
Cicero wrote:Fine by me.
Yea, why don't we just suspend habeas corpus
Worked for me.

Sincerely
Abe Lincoln
The next time half the country is in a state of armed insurrection you'll have a valid point.

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:31 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
Moving Sale wrote:Did you use the same brain to decide that that you used to decide that Black's are genetically predisposed to violence you racist fuck?

English, motherfucker. Do you speak it?

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:33 pm
by Tom In VA
BSmack wrote: The next time half the country is in a state of armed insurrection you'll have a valid point.
There might be more elements that would be destructive to Lincoln's "more perfect union" today, than in 1861. You've got multiple factions out there being monitored. White Supremecists, Black Supremecists, Islamic Radicals, even animal rights people, willing to or at least willing to discuss and plan operations that could be detrimental to .... "the union".


I'm not saying I agree or disagree. I'm stating facts.


Suspending certain rights also worked for FDR, in WWII.


It isn't without precedent, so let's stop acting like it is and pretending the BushCo's are causing all of this. They're reacting like any other leader of this nation would in time of crisis.

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:33 pm
by ChargerMike
BSmack wrote:
Tom In VA wrote:
BSmack wrote: Yea, why don't we just suspend habeas corpus
Worked for me.

Sincerely
Abe Lincoln
The next time half the country is in a state of armed insurrection you'll have a valid point.

...are we not now in a state of insurrection? sans the arms!


sin, The Democrats

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:41 pm
by Moving Sale
Tom In VA wrote: It isn't without precedent, so let's stop acting like it is and pretending the BushCo's are causing all of this. They're reacting like any other leader of this nation would in time of crisis.
How's the sky you little chicken?

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:46 pm
by Tom In VA
Moving Sale wrote:
Tom In VA wrote: It isn't without precedent, so let's stop acting like it is and pretending the BushCo's are causing all of this. They're reacting like any other leader of this nation would in time of crisis.
How's the sky you little chicken?

The point I'm making is that there have been times in this country's history where leadership has decided to do things, things that on the surface went against liberty, but were overall .... seemingly good for the country and preserved it.

That's it. I'm not saying I agree or disagree.


The sky in my world is slightly overcast and they're calling for a bit of snow this evening. How's your drawers ? Shitstained as usual I'm sure.

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:49 pm
by KatMode
mvscal wrote:
KatMode wrote:What Congressional legislation approved the wiretapping program to step outside the FISA oversight?
Shut the fuck up, idiot.

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html ... -000-.html
What you linked up what not what I asked, dipshit. What you provided was the authorization of the President to allow wiretapping for foreign intelligence without a warrant. However, the FISA Court still has oversight over the wiretapping, whether it's done before or after the surveillance, as § 1803 & 1808 explains. So again, when did Congress approve the wiretapping program to step outside the FISA oversight?

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:53 pm
by Bizzarofelice
mvscal wrote:
KatMode wrote:We don't need no stinkin' checks and balances.
Checks and balances is exactly what he is talking about.
Yup. Absolutely everything is checked by the White House. Its a matter of terra.

Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2007 11:42 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
BSmack wrote:
Cicero wrote:Fine by me.
Yea, why don't we just suspend habeas corpus while we're at it and appoint Chimpy McDouchbag El Presidente for Life?
That's fine by us, too.

Sin,

Image

Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 12:31 am
by RadioFan
RACK Terry.

Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 12:33 am
by Dinsdale
I had previously thought it impossible to fuck up the humor in a "Sin, SissyCrown[/img]" reset...

But I didn't take Terry's presence here into account.

Crownero25 is more likely to get a date with a woman than Terry is to drop anything even remotely funny.

Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 3:25 am
by XXXL
Far fetched idea, can't see it holding water. An off the wall opinion in my opinion.......

Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 3:37 am
by RadioFan
Damn Dins, wake up with the wrong skank this morning?

Terry's post was humorous from the standpoint that Sissy would do exactly that -- vote for suspension of the rule of law if this president says he should. I'm not too sure about the other half of the Wonder Twins, but I'm fairly certain there wouldn't be any strenuous objections to being bent over and fucked.

By the government, I mean. The obvious is a given, of course.
mvscal wrote:It is the administration's position that the President has the inherent authority to conduct foreign intelligence intercepts without reference to FISA courts. Nor is the claim without precedent.
Yeah, because we all know that power would never, ever be abused.

:meds:

The administration did an about face on this one because they knew it likely would be struck down by the SC as a violation of the 1978 eavesdropping statute, imo. There's a reason for the FISA court. Doing an end run simply "because they can" is horseshit.

Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 2:19 pm
by BSmack
Jsc810 wrote:
XXXL wrote:Far fetched idea, can't see it holding water. An off the wall opinion in my opinion.......
Yeah, except it is held by the Attorney General of the United States of America. The weight of that office is huge.
Especially when Ed Meese occupied it.

Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 2:23 pm
by Tom In VA
That came close to an all out guffaw.

Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 3:56 pm
by The Whistle Is Screaming
RadioFan wrote:Damn Dins, wake up with the wrong skank this morning?
Why do you hate America RF?

There is no such thing as the wrong skank. There may be good skanks (those who experience my pleasure proficiencies) and bad skanks (those unfortunate ones who have yet to experience the Dinsmachine or dumb enough to say “No” (not many of them btw)).

I can further categorize skanks by what they do in bed (or the kitchen table, stairs, back of the Subaru, bar stool, bathroom in bar, etc), but you wouldn’t really get the whole greatness of the sexual experience that is the U&R. [Dinzclone]One time at my friends bar down by the Ocean (that big body of water that helps provide us with the greatest weather on the planet, salmon the size of cougars and a drowning place for Cali transplants) this skank picked me up (literally picked up off the bathroom floor where I had passed out from a combination of things that would kill most of you) and hoisted me in the stall (turns out it was the Ladies Room, just my luck) and fucked the shit right outta me. I came and shat at the same time, good thing I was sitting on the crapper when she rode my tower of terror or this story might have been a little embarrassing. Anyway, she would be categorized as a Good Bad (in a good way) skank. Get it yet?

So yea, I’m all that and a bag of the best fucking potato chips you’ve ever had (courtesy of the U&L).

Carry on showing your complete and utter ignorance of the topic at hand.

Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 3:59 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
The Whistle Is Screaming wrote:
RadioFan wrote:Damn Dins, wake up with the wrong skank this morning?
Why do you hate America RF?

There is no such thing as the wrong skank. There may be good skanks (those who experience my pleasure proficiencies) and bad skanks (those unfortunate ones who have yet to experience the Dinsmachine or dumb enough to say “No” (not many of them btw)).

I can further categorize skanks by what they do in bed (or the kitchen table, stairs, back of the Subaru, bar stool, bathroom in bar, etc), but you wouldn’t really get the whole greatness of the sexual experience that is the U&R. [Dinzclone]One time at my friends bar down by the Ocean (that big body of water that helps provide us with the greatest weather on the planet, salmon the size of cougars and a drowning place for Cali transplants) this skank picked me up (literally picked up off the bathroom floor where I had passed out from a combination of things that would kill most of you) and hoisted me in the stall (turns out it was the Ladies Room, just my luck) and fucked the shit right outta me. I came and shat at the same time, good thing I was sitting on the crapper when she rode my tower of terror or this story might have been a little embarrassing. Anyway, she would be categorized as a Good Bad (in a good way) skank. Get it yet?

So yea, I’m all that and a bag of the best fucking potato chips you’ve ever had (courtesy of the U&L).

Carry on showing your complete and utter ignorance of the topic at hand.
:lol: Rack.

Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 4:47 pm
by 420
Nice one TWIS!

Funny shit!

Actually, being raised and living in the only place the U&L wishes they could be.

Things like that really do happen out here.

By the way... I'm making this post from Hotel in Fresno.

Driving on ice for 2110 miles can take a while... when you're pulling 10,000 lbs.

Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 6:09 pm
by Dinsdale
Outstanding.

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 4:06 am
by XXXL
The Whistle Is Screaming wrote:
RadioFan wrote:Damn Dins, wake up with the wrong skank this morning?
Why do you hate America RF?

There is no such thing as the wrong skank. There may be good skanks (those who experience my pleasure proficiencies) and bad skanks (those unfortunate ones who have yet to experience the Dinsmachine or dumb enough to say “No” (not many of them btw)).

I can further categorize skanks by what they do in bed (or the kitchen table, stairs, back of the Subaru, bar stool, bathroom in bar, etc), but you wouldn’t really get the whole greatness of the sexual experience that is the U&R. [Dinzclone]One time at my friends bar down by the Ocean (that big body of water that helps provide us with the greatest weather on the planet, salmon the size of cougars and a drowning place for Cali transplants) this skank picked me up (literally picked up off the bathroom floor where I had passed out from a combination of things that would kill most of you) and hoisted me in the stall (turns out it was the Ladies Room, just my luck) and fucked the shit right outta me. I came and shat at the same time, good thing I was sitting on the crapper when she rode my tower of terror or this story might have been a little embarrassing. Anyway, she would be categorized as a Good Bad (in a good way) skank. Get it yet?

So yea, I’m all that and a bag of the best fucking potato chips you’ve ever had (courtesy of the U&L).

Carry on showing your complete and utter ignorance of the topic at hand.


A+

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 4:20 am
by Y2K
Rack TWIS ...

and Rack Tom just because.

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 4:20 am
by XXXL
Jsc810 wrote:
XXXL wrote:Far fetched idea, can't see it holding water. An off the wall opinion in my opinion.......
Yeah, except it is held by the Attorney General of the United States of America. The weight of that office is huge.

Word.......

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 4:27 am
by Mikey
RACK TF outta TWIS

Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2007 1:45 am
by RadioFan
Indeed.

Beautiful, bro.