T1B

Al Gore. Pure hunch.

Gore isn't running.

Stick to linking takeless news tidbits about British advances in Dentistry, faggot...

BSmack wrote:Gore isn't running.

Like I said, pure hunch.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Stick to linking takeless news tidbits about British advances in Dentistry, faggot...

How very 90s. Isn't it about time you produced a take, you bitter little cuntbubble?

Nishlord wrote:Like I said, pure hunch.

Besides "what Nish does to his body before being penetrated", does the word "hunch" have other British translations we Americans are unaware of?


I'm thinking something along the lines of... pure uninformed bullshit?

ucant has been a pissy little bitch lately.

Bizzarofelice wrote:ucant has been a pissy little bitch lately.

Doing his best Beantown impression.....


Last edited by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 on 02 Feb 2007 10:50 am; edited 136 times in total

Nishlord wrote:Al Gore. Pure hunch.

Why do you even care? You hate us, remember?


My pick: Mitt Romney

Bizzarofelice wrote:ucant has been a pissy little bitch lately.

Since when did calling a tard a tard become the epitome of bitchdom? And please... limit your humorless response to a terrifically unfunny and thoughtlessness provoking one-liner as per usual.

Nishlord wrote:

BSmack wrote:Gore isn't running.

Like I said, pure hunch.

Gore doesn't have the balls to get in a race he doesn't think is a sure thing. Even if he beats out Limbaugh for the Nobel Peace Prize you won't see him in the White House.

You can also scratch McCain and Gulliani from your list of contenders. My guess is Romney will do the best job of faking real social conservative values on the GOP side. The Democratic side is a pure crapshoot.

Neil Diamond in '08.

Cicero wrote:My pick: Mitt Romney

Right... I can picture it now...

Reporter: Why should the American public believe you can run a country when the Big Dig ran billions of dollars over-budget, was about 7 years late in its completion, and someone died traveling through the 90 connector tunnel... all under your watch? Mr Romney, can you explain to us why you're qualified to run the country when you failed miserably as Gov of MA?

Romney: Uhhhh..... :cry: Uhhhhh.... what was the question?

who cares.

hey Nish, that crazy bat finally finished her 7th book. any bets how many she'll sell the first day of release, in the UK alone?

did he go to tea?

wtf

The Democratic side is a pure crapshoot.

laugh for the day ?

Hillary Clinton.

Newt Gingrich

Sirfindafold wrote:Newt Gingrich

No way.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:

Cicero wrote:My pick: Mitt Romney

Right... I can picture it now...

Reporter: Why should the American public believe you can run a country when the Big Dig ran billions of dollars over-budget, was about 7 years late in its completion, and someone died traveling through the 90 connector tunnel... all under your watch? Mr Romney, can you explain to us why you're qualified to run the country when you failed miserably as Gov of MA?

Romney: Uhhhh..... :cry: Uhhhhh.... what was the question?

I would love to see a reporter ask that question. I'll put the over/under on it at about never.

Justa Heel wrote:

Sirfindafold wrote:Newt Gingrich

No way.

But you think Republicans and Democratic Men will let a woman be President? Please send some of what you have been smoking.....

mvscal wrote:

BSmack wrote: The Democratic side is a pure crapshoot.

Richardson is good darkhorse candidate. Shillary is too polarizing and Obama is a media fantasy with no real pull in or out of the party.

I've been pimping Richardson for years. The Mountain West is where the furure lies for the Democratic party. The day the Dems can join the states of the Mountain West with the blue states in the Northeast and the Pacific Coast is the day the Reagan Revolution will have breathed its last.

Gore

he will announce at the Oscars

BSmack wrote:I would love to see a reporter ask that question. I'll put the over/under on it at about never.

If not a reporter, then his "opponent". What's the difference? The question will be asked. No way Romney gets the Primary... he'll be ousted very early... nevermind being elected president. If you're going to vote GOP next year, it'll be McCain or Giuliani.



Romney?

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:McCain or Giuliani

Which is the only way in hell the GOP could ever get Hillary elected. Those clowns will get shredded to bits so quickly, they won't know what hit them.

Pure hunch of my own: Clinton v Giuliani. Rudy wins.

Prime Minister of the UK, 2007: Twat. Unfortunately true whether it's Brown or Cameron. Thank God Prince Tampon the Horse Shagger isn't eligible.

I think the American public would vote in a coke-snorting nog before they'd put up with Rudy, the shameless dweeb who's great at gleaning PR off a tragedy, but not so good at that domestic thing...or John The Eunich McCain, who keeps telling us all how tough he is, bat has sat a little too long on the pot without dropping a decent turd.


Hey, Machine Gun McCain...the next time you decide to take on a frivolous bullshit deal strictly for the sake of taxpayer-paid-sabre-rattling, maybe you could actually have those baseball players testify...your big fancy hearings were kind of worthless without testimony, but hey, at least they cost Johnny Q a bunch of money...to make you look all "tough" and shit...


Didn't fool anyone, McCain. Most saw it for what it was...a cheap publicity stunt by you...on our dime. If you're not going to do what you say, then STFU and put the checkbook away.


I see people voting in a nog or a woman before they make that goiter the "face of America."

Jsc810 wrote:

mvscal wrote:Obama is a media fantasy with no real pull in or out of the party.

Perhaps this isn't his year to win, but he might win one day. He was in New Orleans on Monday and I was impressed with him. Let's see what he does in the Senate for a term or two.

My prediction: Rudy.

Rudy is toast.

http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/ ... 8347c.html

Stick a fork in him. He's done.

Obama would do well to finish one full term in the Senate before running.

Rich Fader wrote:Pure hunch of my own: Clinton v Giuliani. Rudy wins.

Do you think Rudy would be able to tell the difference between being at a presidential debate and a Speed-Dating meeting? Rudy probably be trying to get all up in that, rather than sticking to the "issues."

I don't see that going so well for Rudy The Shameless...after all, Hillary is pretty adept at dealing with adulterous leches.

Jsc810 wrote:Thought I had the presidential election all figured out, but this has screwed up my thinking completely.

It got screwed by a three week old(somewhere in there) glass dick?

Jsc810 wrote:It is amazing that such a document could have been lost, it just stuns me. I've been involved with some campaigns (no presidential ones), and I just can't believe it was simply "left behind". That is the type of thing that is kept on your person or under lock.

I can hardly say I'm surprised. There are people in the NYS GOP who simply can't stand Rudy, especially after he bailed on his 2000 Senate campaign, paving the way for the specter of Hillary in 2008.

Oh, and as if that wasn't enough, check out this gem on YouTube.

[video width=425 height=350]http://www.youtube.com/v/4IrE6FMpai8[/video]

Yes, that's Rudy in drag fending off a slumpbusting Donald Trump.

Bill Richarson

From what I've seen of Hillary (and I purposefully haven't been paying too much attention to her), she strikes me as one who deals with issues after the fact. She tests the waters to see where to stand on issues - like she's trying to decide which stance would help her presidency campaign more, not that she actually has any convictions on such issues. Granted most politicans do that, but it seems so much more obvious with her.

Obama is interesting, but he just doesn't have the experience yet. I would like to see him get a few more years under his belt before attempting a presidential run, but I think a VP run is quite possible for him now.

Edwards might also have a decent shot.

I'm guessing that out of these four, if any two link up together, they will win the Democratic ticket.

BSmack wrote:Yes, that's Rudy in drag.

That alone will guarantee Rudy the Dem nomination.

Rudy in 2008.

end.

This thread kind of exemplifies the stupidity of the American voter..."Let's wait for Obama to be corrupted by Washington a for a few years, and let the special-interests get into his pockets before we give him a shot."

Does anybody really think the voters of this country will elect a Muslim??

Neely8 wrote:Does anybody really think the voters of this country will elect a Muslim??

And who would that be?

Neely8 wrote:Does anybody really think the voters of this country will elect a Muslim??

Sure why not.


Obama '08

Tom In VA wrote:

Neely8 wrote:Does anybody really think the voters of this country will elect a Muslim??

Sure why not.


Obama '08

Except he's not Muslim, cum-chugger.

Jsc810 wrote:

Dinsdale wrote:This thread kind of exemplifies the stupidity of the American voter..."Let's wait for Obama to be corrupted by Washington a for a few years, and let the special-interests get into his pockets before we give him a shot."

Just two years ago he was a State Senator. Harvard Law degree or not, I'd like for his education on the world and national level to continue before he becomes the Leader of the Free World.

True but there's some creedence to Dins' statement, a whole lot. Reminds me of the movie "The Untouchables" where Sean Connery says "If you're afraid of getting a rotten apple, don't get it from the barrel, get it off the tree. "

Justa Heel wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:

Neely8 wrote:Does anybody really think the voters of this country will elect a Muslim??

Sure why not.


Obama '08

Except he's not Muslim, cum-chugger.

Didn't say he was. Felcher boy.