T1B

Oregon... you do know you were playing Arizona at home, right???

Nice meltdown at the end... and you've lost 4 of your last 6 games?

The NIT is looking pretty sweet right now.



UCLA... I didn't see the game, and losing one player when you have the talent you do, should not lead to a L when playing WV.

You do know you are/were the #2 team in the country???

You do know that Kal would be grateful to get invited to the NIT....right?

The Seer wrote:You do know that Kal would be grateful to get invited to the NIT....right?

We'd be lucky to beat our women's team. Hell, I'm just hoping we can score 35 against Wash State today in Pullman.

We're up to 28 with under 5:00 minutes to go... I've got my fingers crossed!

420 wrote:

UCLA... I didn't see the game, and losing one player when you have the talent you do, should not lead to a L when playing WV.

You do know you are/were the #2 team in the country???

you don't know much about basketball, do you?

King Crimson wrote:

420 wrote:

UCLA... I didn't see the game, and losing one player when you have the talent you do, should not lead to a L when playing WV.

You do know you are/were the #2 team in the country???

you don't know much about basketball, do you?

You kinda wander around the message board world making sissyroo look like a genius... dont you?


Sissyroo's little brother, Mongo

Lets take a look, shall we?

I wasn't going to embarrass you in this thread, because, quite frankly it would be rather tedious to run around correcting every ankle biting tard in the College Football Forum, now wouldn't?

But since you decided to pop your head in here and make a fool of yourself, I thought it'd be cool of me to help you along.

Mongo wrote:the only thing i have to say, and there is no chance in hell i'm reading all this thread.....

Too many big words... huh?

Mongo wrote:is that on scout USC had more 5 star players in this year's class than Cal has 4 star players. so, that this appears to be recruiting smack is kind of funny.

Hmmm... you say you read on "scout" that $C had more 5* players than Cal had 4* players, correct?

I'll help you out here mongoloid... mkay? Can I just call you "Mongo" from now on? Thanks.


$C has (10) 5 stars... (5) 4 stars... and (3) 3 stars.

Cal has (12) 4 stars... and (12) 3 stars.

See, reading and math ain't that hard.

Mongo wrote:though, the 420 troll is getting kind of old.

What you really meant to say was... 420 is a hell of a lot smarter than me!


Now be on your way, and "Sissyroo" some other threads.

420 wrote:
$C has (10) 5 stars... (5) 4 stars... and (3) 3 stars.

Cal has (12) 4 stars... and (12) 3 stars.

See, reading and math ain't that hard.

.

yer right. the final numbers reflect USC 10 5* and Cal 12 4*. war Cal.

my bad. the pyrrhic victory is yours.

but, my point remains: you don't know much about WVU over the last 2-3 years, do you?

King Crimson wrote: pyrrhic

Probably a good word for "hangman"...